|8 hours 28 min ago||True, but you missed the joke||
The joke is that people forgot about Dre.
Ace should have spelled "explosive" properly: Xxplosive...then I think more would have picked-up the reference, or at least looked it up. I'll admit that I missed it.
|14 hours 34 min ago||AWESOME||
Thank you; we need more thinking like this in the world.
|1 day 5 hours ago||Bolden||
I believe he could start over Morgan at WLB. This is one of the reasons I did not like the pick of Morgan by Brian in Draftageddon.
|1 day 5 hours ago||This is incorrect||
DG racked-up 461 yards of total offense against Ohio last year, good for #4 on that list and knocking his ND performance off the top ten.
|1 day 9 hours ago||Good news/ Bad news||
The good news is there is an obvious correlation between experience and wins. The bad news is that we haven't won 9 games or more when we are over 50% 1st/2nd year players since 2000.
I'm not sure this bodes well for our season, other than to say it's likely we'll get to 8 wins this year.
That said, great work, thanks.
|1 day 13 hours ago||Yes, mostly||
Nussmeier wants a RB who can find the crease in the zone blocking, usually in one of two holes, or use the cut-back lane, then take off. That's what a one-cut back is. One-cut backs tend to be more powerful with good acceleration but perhaps not the shiftiness of a scat-back.
Other RBs are open field runners who look to follow a man blocking play and then beat a defender with power, speed, or agility. Outside runners or shifty types like Denard Robinson would not be described as "one-cut" backs, since they make their living by running into space or creating it with multiple cuts. One-cut backs make a quick decision and then stick with it, and don't look like they are improvising.
For one-cut back examples, see any Mike Shanahan offense. For a non-one-cut example, see Barry Sanders.
|2 days 11 hours ago||Nuss'||
It helps that the he'll have one of the best QB tutors in the game. This offense might start a little slowly, but I expect it to be pretty damn good by season's end.
|5 days 5 hours ago||Then where does the money||
Then where does the money come from?
It is a fact that most athletic departments are barely getting by or losing money. Where will the extra cash come from? You said it best yourself: if the dollars aren't there, schools will leave the game...that will apply to ALL sports, not just football.
They'll either have to raise ticket prices further or cut sports. Money doesn't just appear because someone has decided it's the fair thing to do.
|5 days 9 hours ago||Well written||
This is well written, Ace, and you make lots of good points.
The trouble is--whether we like it or not--the money just isn't there to pay the players directly.
If direct payments to athletes from universities starts to happen, you WILL see Olympic and non-revenue sports (pretty much everything that's not football or men's and women's basketball) start to get an even shorter end of the stick. If those all sports fall apart, are those in favor of direct payments ready to take some of the blame for that?
Yes, football brings in gobs of cash at some schools, but most of those schools use that money to fund the rest of the athletic department, which hemorrhages money. Furthermore, those schools are spending about $750K per player, per year on their football programs. No small amount.
Paying players isn't a problem because the kids shouldn't have money, it's a problem because they're already highly-compensated and the money isn't there.
Letting players use their likeness to make money in advertising and in other ways, I am completely in favor of. In fact, if the NCAA were smart, they would turn this into an opportunity, requiring that every athlete that wants to make $$$ off his/her likeness take a course on how to do so effectively and make sure you don't get fleeced. They could put enforceable rules in place that helped direct the kids to properly managing the business of marketing themselves. This would be invaluable real world education that could help players understand business before they graduate or go pro.
As for the NCAA, they should not be profiting from players' images either, or really profiting from anything. They should be a non-profit dedicated to the well-being of student athletes, and they are not that right now. They have turned into a money-grubbing profit machine that does little to help progress the caues of the student-athlete, and they should be blamed for that.
The system needs fixing, but having universities pay the players is not the solution. And if that happens, and you were one of the people calling for direct payments to players, watch the demise of the other sports in the follwing decade, and be man enough to take some of the blame for causing that.
|5 days 9 hours ago||2011 highlights||
Yeah, 2012 sort of sucked, but these were 2011 highlights.
|5 days 10 hours ago||Marz||
I did not see that game, but it must have been a bad day. Zettel is pretty good, too.
But Marz is a good player, and will be drafted (barring injury), and should be even better as a second-year starter. Could easily be drafted in the first half of the draft.
|5 days 11 hours ago||Why does 2011 feel like it||
Why does 2011 feel like it was so, sooooooo very long ago? What a glorious season that was.
|5 days 11 hours ago||Hot and Cold||
I've liked a lot of your picks...I've also disliked a lot of your picks. Here are a few more I liked:
Those were all good picks where you got good value. Funchess and Scherff were also good picks, but properly valued.
You have a real chance at winning the totally useless prize of my approval. I don't see how Brian can salvage an O-Line that fits with his team...
PS - Great gif
|5 days 12 hours ago||Good vids||
Those three are all good, though I would rank them in reverse order. And the only reason the '09 gets a vote at all is because of the originality...even the highlights from '08 seem empty.
Yes, would love more hype videos from the MGoCommunity...no, not willing to pay.
|5 days 12 hours ago||Next time...||
I'll save my long-winded analysis for the conclusion, but let me just say that Ace's pick of Tony Jones was the best of this session, and that may have an impact on the final rankings.
I'll gladly do a re-analysis at the end of the regular season to see how right/wrong I was (and you guys were).
This, BTW, might have been the funniest iteration of Draftageddon, complete with an iconic comic book moment. Do kids even read those anymore?
The final analysis, Seth will be happy to know, will be based on who has the best TEAM and is most likely to succeed...I'll measure that by having an imaginary round robin fo your imaginary teams and declaring probable winners of each game, and finally a grand champion. Honestly, I'm not sure who is going win it (in my mind)....
|6 days 9 hours ago||Quick, look!||
It's a joke! And it just went right over your head!
|1 week 1 day ago||Great stuff||
One of the things I love most about Seth is that when the data doesn't support his hypothesis, he's willing to admit it. Most people just change the data or make-up stats to prove their point.
This is a great piece, and I really enjoyed seeing the data, which I must admit I thought would be different as well.
Now the coach in me wonders if, upon seeing that extra DB, more teams audible to inside runs or plays away from the nickel, effectively giving more tackles to the LBs because the offense is attacking the space where there is no DB. Even so, you'd think having the extra player on the field more would have more of an impact.
I do think JMFR was used as a nickel quite a bit, but not last year, and while the CBs did pick-up a few more tackles, they mostly took them from the safeties. I don't know, man, but it was cool to see the data and think about it. Makes me want to go back and watch games.
|1 week 2 days ago||Stats and remaining picks||
We both know stats can lie, and while Sudfeld is a fine passer, he's not the best in the conference. I don't see the guy as having the "it" factor, but he was the best option for you after Brian pulled his parlor trick.
I don't think I'm underrating Jones. He's a fine player and can be a good Hemingway-type, but he and Smith both have limited skillsets. They are two guys who would be great #2 options, but neither are are the consistent threat posed by a Funchess, Corey Brown, Stefon Diggs, or even Deon Long. They are good but not great. Again, you have two good WRs there, but they're still the worst group, IMO. Whose WRs do you think are worse than yours?
Mark is a very good player when he's healthy, and I'd certainly rank his value above the comparables you mentioned, but those other guys came off the board 6, 11, and 14 rounds later. It was just early for him. FWIW, Mark is the ONLY player on the Northwestern roster that scares me.
You hit the nail on the head yourself: You need a slot ninja, TE, and preferably a running QB. If you find these pieces, there's no reason you can't improve your standing as the #4 offense. That said, I only see high quality available at one of those three positions.
What's interesting is that I thought DG was an early pick by BiSB. If you had gotten DG and BiSB had ended-up with Hackenberg, this is a completely different picture, and a lot closer all the way around.
I am not going to make a final call until the fat lady sings. I think you're longest shot to win the useless prize of my opinion, but there is still time, and you've been drafting very well.
|1 week 2 days ago||Not just the QB||
Where would you rank your receivers and backfield vs. the other guys? And in a spread-n-shread, don't you need a running QB who can at least threaten to run to be an elite offense?
|1 week 2 days ago||Different method||
We're getting into some more obscure players now (although I think there are still a few gems to be had) and teams are rounding into form. At this point, the team starts to be more important than the individual talent that's been assembled, and I decided I would rank the offense and defense of each group, and then see where we stand overall.
If you just look at raw numbers, BiSB's #1 and #3 rankings put him on top. Ace and Brian are tied for second, and Seth is just one point behind them. It's worth noting, however, that Brian did just get the best kicker in the conference and he already has one of the best returners in the conference. So here's how I think it plays out:
But it's close, with no one sucking on both sides of the ball, and some critical picks left to be made.
|1 week 5 days ago||Good question||
Beamer, Richt, Shaw...Harbaugh would be a great choice to coach at U-M if he wants to be here when he's done with the NFL.
Surprised no one has picked Jimbo Fisher. Not my cup of tea, but a helluva coach. Or even Gus Malzahn.
|1 week 5 days ago||Hope you prove me wrong||
Your draft has been pretty amazing, and I hope, when it's all done, you can prove me wrong. Brian's team looks less attractive every round, and, while he's got more than plenty of sizzle on his squad, I'm just not sure the steak is there. Any good defensive coordinator will tell you that you MUST be strong up the "spine" of your defense (DTs, MLB, Ss) and Brian is just okay in that department.
Your team has some logic and fluidity to it, but even though Sudfeld's stats are good, I don't know if he's a winner. If he has a great season, then your team is likely bumped-up a few notches and could very well be the best. He lost a lot of production from last year, and lost his Robin (or Batman, depending on how you look at it), which is unfortunate because you didn't know it when you made the picks. If you had both of those QBs, you'd be in better shape. Sudfeld can't run at all, and while Mark is a very good back for your system when healthy, he's another question mark. Your O-Line certainly fits your system, but still needs more help in the backfield to be effective, and you lack playmakers at WR, too.
I'll reserve my final judgment for the final round. While your weaker skill positions look like an impossible obstacle now, you have made up more ground than I thought possible and gone from a team that looked like it couldn't compete to, as I said, the best roster outside of the offensive skill positions.
I'm excited to see how this thing plays out.
|1 week 6 days ago||FALSE||
"Urbz" went 8-5 (4-4 in the SEC) without Tebow. He pretty much sucked, actually.
|1 week 6 days ago||Brian (and the other dudes)||
I still think Brian's the leader, but Grant is a CB, and that HSP label is just to try to follow the rules. I call shenanigans.
That said, Grant was picked WAY too late, and was an absolute steal, even if a slight luxury with two very good CBs already on his roster. IMO, Ace really needed Grant if he was going to mount a comeback in this thing. Rose is a meh pick, and Brian's LBs in general are actually pretty meh. Having only one safety, and that safety not very good, along with a weaker LB corps, I'd have to say Brian's defense is very beatable. And while he still rules the skill positions on offense, his O-line still needs two more players, and there isn't much left. Now that the teams are filling out, I think Brian is vulnerable.
Ace, Levern Jacobs is a good value, but also risky for the reasons you enumerated. If you had taken Grant there, you may have put yourself back in contention, because your defense is otherwise pretty good. I'm not sure there's much left in the CB department...Lindsay is fine, but nothing special.
BiSB...the Davis pick was well-snarked, but was actually good value, IMO. Epping is a steal where you got him, and Elfein is a well-researched pick that rounds out the best O-Line so far. Of course, Ace and Brian have yet to complete their lines, but you have a solid group that can most definitely open holes for Langford and Coleman.
Seth, other than offensive skill positions, you have the best roster. Unfortunately, your offesnsive skill positions are the worst. 20 years ago, you may have a shot at winning this thing, and it's truly admirable how you've built a roster in the late rounds--you have gotten the best value of anyone of the last six or seven--but I don't see how Sudfeld, Mark, Jones, and Smith are going to score enough points. You do have a good O-Line, and maybe if you'd gotten Coleman or another complimentary back it would have helped, but there aren't any game-breaking WRs left; there are a couple of pretty damn good TEs.
Overall, here's my rankings, but I'm not even that sure about them anymore:
I though Brian's lead was unassailable, but the second half of his draft has been uninspiring. BiSB and Ace could sneak back in, and Seth has a damn good team, but lacks the offensive talent to threaten. FWIW, if Seth had gotten Hackenberg/Cook and Jesse James (who is somehow still on the board), he would be in the conversation.
|1 week 6 days ago||NYC Pizza||
Racanelli's? I used to live in STL, and the pizza there generally isn't great. Imo's is worse than Little Ceasar's, IMO. Fortel's is okay, and I think Dewey's is overrated. Pi is pretty good though.
|2 weeks 6 days ago||Also||
For posting a highlight reel with that music on it, Ace should be permanently banned from the site. And from everything else.
|2 weeks 6 days ago||It's down to two...||
I've been ranking after each round, and it's gotten to the point where I think two guys have no way back:
And two guys are battling the trophy:
Fact is, Brian's offense is going to be hard to pass. Campbell and Heuerman were excellent values where they were taken, and Brian had the lead coming in. Dontre Wilson and Earnest Thomas...I don't really like either pick. Wilson could be good, but there are certainly no guarantees...I'd rather have Corey Smith if I'm taking a Buckeye playmaker. Maybe I'm just uneducated when it comes to Illinois, but I don't think ETIII is anything special at all. I see a couple safeties on the board that look more attractive
BiSB stays in the game with some good value picks himself: LTP may not be the most athletically gifted, but he does his job and produces. He would start for Michigan. And, as had been pointed out, Tevin Coleman is a steal at this point.
Seth...you did what you had to, but it's too late. I look forward to seeing your picks in the next rounds because you were on a roll before you decided to try to fix the QB problem en masse.
BiSB, your offense still isn't that scary, but your defense remains the best. Brian, your offense not only has playmakers, it also has great protectors. Your defense is solid, but not great, IMO.
|3 weeks 12 hours ago||Elite 11 = Joke||
This whole circus is a joke. It's cool that Malzone is there, and I'd certainly rather have someone there than not, and I'd certainly rather have someone get ranked highly while there.
But it's pretty meaningless.
One thing we know for sure about Doug Nussmeier: He is a QB guru. While his OC chops will be tested at U-M, I have ZERO doubt that he can evaluate, coach, and build QBs. If we offered Malzone, Nuss' saw something. Same with Messiah.
FWIW, I agree with Magnus--I REALLy like Kearns and was hoping we'd offer/get him.
|3 weeks 12 hours ago||Good stuff, and hopeful||
If we can be the #2 rushing defense in the conference, we'll have a shot at winning the conference. That would be shut-down run defense, and I'm confident our pass defense will be at least in 2012 form, which would put us near the the best in the B1G. Add marginal improvement to the offense, and you have a B1G contender.
|3 weeks 2 days ago||Ranking the schedule||
I'm going to do the whole schedule, just to put things in perspective:
The ND game is basically worthless, as everyone has pointed out, since we've dominated the series (despite our very bad teams) and they chickened out. Sure, I'll be foaming at the mouth during the game, but in the big picture, I don't much care.
Penn State has some momentum with the new hire and their unexpected success; we need to beat them.
The rest of the conference is more important than any non-conference game. App. State would be higher if they had a realistic chance of winning. Other than ND, only Utah should even put up a fight.
Win THE GAME. Beat Sparty. Then take care of the rest of the conference. I'm much more concerned about getting to Indianapolis than I am about the Fig Things.
|3 weeks 2 days ago||Will miss the USMNT content||
I wouldn't mind USMNT updates every summer; there is some sort of tournament thingy each summer, and we're in the MLS season.
BTW - I do believe this was some of the best USMNT coverage on the 'net. Well done, sir.
|4 weeks 8 hours ago||Bradley||
But with Altidore out, and Dempsey moved-up, who else plays where MB did? You can argue JK messed-up by not having an alternative to Altidore (though no such player that is a good option actually exists), but once Jozy was gone, Bradley played where he was needed.
And JK's placement of MB did not make MB turn the ball over or play bad passes. That's on MB.
|4 weeks 10 hours ago||Reason||
You got negged for sharing crappy content that wants nothing other than clicks.
Hoke is not on the hot seat, unless you define the hot seat as needing to appear competent to keep your job (which every coach has to do). This article is click-baiting, and I doubt Hoke gets fired unless the season is a train wreck.
The "Hot Seat" term should be reserved for coaches who have high goals set and don't achieve them. Hoke could go 9-4 or even 8-5 and keep his job if the team demonstrates improvement. That's hardly a "hot seat," IMO. If DB said, "We need to win our division this year or the coach is out," that would certainly qualify.
And yes, I negged your comment as well, because you were a jerk.
|4 weeks 11 hours ago||Agreed||
I'm so not mad about the USMNT and so excited about the future that I actually got mad this morning when Eric Wynalda* ranted on the Dan Patrick show about how stupid and foolish the US was in the WC this year. I almost punched my car radio.
This post, including and especially the good-bye thank yous, sums-up my feelings perfectly. I would only add that the future looks so bright--there is gobs of young talent that might allow us to play more like Belgium, Germany, Portugal, and Ghana in the future. For now, I'm just damn proud of a group that played like Americans, because TIM HOWARD.
*Wynalda is one of the best examples for why ex-players can make for lousy evaluators: he is emotional and irrational, and refuses to look at reality or basic soccer tactics when making his absurd comments. I mean, the dude even made Dan Patrick sound like a soccer expert.
|4 weeks 13 hours ago||FACT||
And there is no gray area.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||+1||
I am in favor of this if it has worked in training.
Johnson NEEDS to be involved on offense for us to be successful; if Cameron can link well outside, I like this idea, and would even consider using a Johnson/Yedlin wing combo.
We need to be aggressive in this match. There is no prize for second place anymore.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||Agreed||
I was there too, and will never forget the game. Chris Perry was amazing. He was clearly playing with an injury, and had to come off the field at one point. The OSU players started jawing at him and he stopped, turned around, and told them he'd be back.
He came back and ran them to death, rushing 31 times for 154 yards and two TDs. He also caught 5 passes for 55 yards. OSU averaged 2.2 yards/carry that day, but Jenkins and Santonio Holmes kept them in the game until Perry put the nail in the coffin half-way through the fourth quarter.
It was an amazing game, and we need more like it.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||John Beilein is the best. The absolute best.||
What a great coach. If DB's assessment of Hoke is that he is in the same vein, I hope both are coaches at U-M forever. Yes, forever. The U-M medical school can surely figure out a way to do that.
That said, Beilein has proven he has the character and can get the results...Hoke has work to do.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||HAHAHAHA||
Really? Your argument is that because we're economically successful and have a large population we should be a dominant soccer country?
Wow. That is so ridiculously silly, I don't even know where to begin...I guess using your logic? (can we even call it that?) that India, China, and Japan should be dominating world soccer right now too.
|4 weeks 6 days ago||Disagree||
This is most definitely Muppet-worthy. It's the first time every we've advanced out of the Group Stage in two consecutive tournaments, and this time we did it in either the toughest or second-toughest group.
This is the equivalent of the Sweet 16 in March Madness.
|4 weeks 6 days ago||Yes, Brazil||
Yes, behind Brazil. And yes, because of home field advantage. France has looked good, but weren't tested much in a pretty soft group.
Argentina is right up there, and then France and the Netherlands. Belgium should be in that group as well, but haven't shown it yet.
|4 weeks 6 days ago||Line-Up Changes||
I did not agree with either starting 11 change, but Klinsmann sure was right about Gonazlez. I think I was right about Davis. I was also hoping Yedlin would come on sooner.
What will be interesting will be to see what happens with the line-up and formation if Jozy is back on Tuesday (and I pray he is).
Acutally, we played a pretty good game today, and the referee was no help at all. But I believe Germany is 2nd-best team in this tournament, and we were more than respectable.
|5 weeks 10 hours ago||Marsch, Cameron, and Tomorrow||
There is no way Cameron should be pulled from the line-up. In fact, I wouldn't pull Zusi either. I thought the team played extremely well against Portugal--and that's no easy task.
As for Marsch's breakdown, I think he hit the important points that led to the goal:
The problem with playing centerback is that most goals can be blamed on you. Cameron, positionally, should have been there to meet the cross, and physically, he could have been there. That he had not identified Varela falls not just on the shoulders of Fabian Johnson (as Marsch points out) but also on him. And given the choice between marking Varela and the guys at the top of the box, Varela was the clear choice.
But damn, if the US midfield didn't make it hard for him. Jones was basically positioned as a centerback when the break started, and he should have stayed there. Bradley AND Gonzalez got sucked to Ronaldo--which is understandable, but also stupid. Besler was providing cover, and to have three guys pulled out of position is inexcusable. You have to understand that even though it's Ronaldo, if you properly positioned, you can still help.
At least one of Bradley or Gonzalez or Jones needs to be at the top of the 18 so that Cameron doesn't have to choose which of the three to mark.
All that said, the blaming of Cameron is ridiculous, but the idea that he should be substituted is even more absurd. He is the best defender on our team and is one of the top defenders in the best league in the world (La Liga fans may argue, but they're wrong--the EPL is tougher top to bottom, even if La Liga is stronger at the top). There is no replacement for him.
The second goal was a breakdown by nearly the entire team, and Cameron deserves only a small share of the blame.
But when you play centerback, you're usually the guy that looks like problem.
|5 weeks 10 hours ago||GRIII and Clips||
As a Clippers fan and former season ticket holder, I'd love to see GRIII as the pick. Adding an athletic wing with shooting range would help the team a lot. My only question about GRIII is his defense...he certainly has all the tools to be a great defender, but never has been. If he can add that to his game, there's no reason he couldn't start for a team that got very little production from the SF position when it counted.
Of course, Mitch McGary wouldn't be a bad pick either, especially if DeAndre Jordan gets shipped off in an effort to score LeBron.
|5 weeks 2 days ago||yes, but||
I agree with the Gonzalez criticism, if he is indeed supposed to be the deep CB. Given his positioning, I think that's highly unlikely. I think he's supposed to be in front of the other two, taking away anything in "the hole."
That said, whether Gonzalez was supposed to be there or not, Cameron could have and should have gotten to that ball.
Don't misunderstand me: other than the poor clearance and that play, Cameron had another great game. But he missed his mark on the decisive goal, and the criticism is deserved.
|5 weeks 2 days ago||Then you weren't watching||
Funchess ran away from lots of guys--including CBs--last season. I don't know what you were watching.
|5 weeks 2 days ago||Nope||
An internet post means absolutely nothing.
A hand-timed 40 is a reasonably accurate--though certainly not precise--measure of a player's speed.
At his size, even if that time is a full tenth of a second off, that is amazing speed. Why can't we all just be happy that we have Minitron on our team?
|6 weeks 1 day ago||The game, the flag, the snake||
It was truly an American tale. The lightning-quick surprise strike 34 seconds into the match showed the best of our team: Clint Dempsey taking advantage of a half-chance by beating two defenders and hitting a perfect shot.
Perhaps the worst moment of the match came at about the 20 minute mark. Ghana had taken control of the game, and a well-played outlet pass to Jozy appeared to give us a good chance at a counter-attack. Jozy had the speed and position to get to the ball first, but then, inexplicably, he fell to the grass, clutching his hammy. The significance of this loss can hardly be overstated.
We proceeded to show our worst. For nearly 80 minutes, we looked nervous, unskilled, and exhuasted. Top player Michael Bradley played so poorly with the ball that I joked in the second half with a friend of mine that he might not complete a pass before the game ended (he did, but just one or two). We could not possess the ball, and every time we had control of it we managed to find a way to give it back to Ghana in short order. Bad passes, sloppy dribbling, poor movement off the ball--we looked like a team without confidence.
The inevitable struck in the 82nd minute when a US player--Fabian Johnson--finally lost his mark in the box and allowed an easy shot. Tim Howard's superhero powers weren't even enough from that range.
But a team without confidence does not rally. A team without belief does not win games when their best player has what was likely his worst game in an American uniform. A team without a heart does not have a 21-yr-old substitute nod home a brilliant header from a corner kick taken by another substitute.
The American flag is iconic, and its symbols are powerful: the stars for the states, the stripes for the original thirteen colonies. But the snake is the appropriate symbol, and it's one that I wish the USMNT would embrace as the French sport their cock (rooster), the Czechs, English, and Dutch using lions, and the Australians the kangaroo and the ostrich.
The US Soccer symbol (below) is decidedly lame, and should be replaced, IMO, with the "Don't Tread on Me" motto and snake.
The game we just played proved it's an appropriate symbol: the pit viper waiting for its moment to strike, even as more powerful predators trample the earth around it.
|6 weeks 2 days ago||THIS||
There is only so much motivation a coach can provide. Championship teams have players that hold each other accountable; what this means specifically is that practices are intensified enough that they help players become play-makers in pressure situations.
The best teams--in every sport--have practices that are harder than their games. Coaching is a big, big part of that, but the players must take it on themselves to create that atmosphere and commit to sacrificing personal comfort, time, and desires in order to maximize every minute you're on the field.
My all-time favorite coaching quote: "Practice doesn't make perfect. Practice makes habit. When you practice well, you get better at playing well. When you practice poorly, you get better at playing poorly."
|6 weeks 4 days ago||GrEat pOst.||
|6 weeks 6 days ago||Three main competitors...||
Not exactly sure whom you are referring to, but MSU has significantly more experience.
Lindsay only had four starts at 'Bama, so those OSU numbers might be right.
I'm guessing Penn State is our third comparison? God willing, the crappy O-Line bug hits them this year and costs them dearly. They have good RBs and TEs, so if the OL can make holes and give Hackenberg time, they could be pretty good.
|6 weeks 6 days ago||Who's winning?||
Too often I get focused on the best players on a roster, and ignore the worst/weak links. This post I'm boing to try to point out the players that I believe were taken too early or weren't a good value. Who has the most weak links?
Other than Mark, none of the picks have been wildly foolish, but I'd have to say I think BiSB has the most steady draft at this point. Here's how I'd rank the teams:
|6 weeks 6 days ago||Humility + Confidence||
Jabrill continues to demonstrate an unwavering faith in his abilities combined with an understanding that he has much to learn and do before he can take his place among the greats. If he is truly running a 4.32 at his size, he will be on the field this fall. That said, if he is committed to learning the defensive schemes and he can actually do it, he will be a big contributor.
Everything points to Jabrill being a special player who makes an early impact. I can't wait to see it happen.
|7 weeks 13 hours ago||The Pattern||
Welcome to the family! He obviously fits the mold of a high character, high performance player. This class is shaping up nicely.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Thanks!||
Great info and write-up. Sounds like an amazing day.
|7 weeks 5 days ago||HAHAHAHA||
Everyone should watch this video immediately.
|7 weeks 5 days ago||Cook > Hackenberg?||
While Brian's selection is the more obvious one, there is a serious question in my mind about which QB is better. In Cook's last four games, he averaged at least 7.2 YPA and threw 8 TDs vs 3 INTs. His rating in those four games averages out to 154.19, a top-20 rating nationally. He finished ahead of Hackenberg in ratings anyway, but he finished strong and his improvement was evident.
This pick basically damns Seth to spoiler, because without a QB (and there are none left) he cannot claim the crown.
Brian has maintained his lead while eliminating an opponent...but the Hackenberg pick didn't help him as much it will hurt Seth. This is a solid three-horse race to the finish...
|7 weeks 5 days ago||Love it||
Most entertaining draftageddon post in awhile...Previously, I had the teams ranked like this:
And yes, it is coincidental that it mirrors the draft order. Seth had two very, very good picks for the first time in awhile, but to me, he's still behind the pack. BiSB appears to be assembling a version of Michigan State with great defense and a solid, but unspectacular offense. If he can boost his O-Line and keep his defense strong, he'll be hard to beat. Ace had two good picks, though I'm not that crazy about Lowdermilk. Brian's Hackenberg selection was brilliant draft strategy, but he needs to add another playmaker on offense and I'm pretty sure he'll need a LB on his team.
Here's my new rankings, and it's much closer now, especially among the top three (sorry, Seth):
BiSB is on the cusp of pulling ahead for now, since Hackenberg only marginally improves Brian's team if Braxton is healthy. Ace--if you don't get Cook, you are pretty much screwed. Seth has had a nice day here, but he still needs help from the other guys to move up. Since I love his analytical posts, I'm pulling for him, but there is much to do.
|7 weeks 6 days ago||Well said||
Welcome to the family, Ty. We are excited and grateful you've chosen Michigan.
|8 weeks 1 day ago||Maryl||
Maryland will give us more trouble than Rutgers.
|8 weeks 6 days ago||Brian, BiSB winning||
At the end of round eight, it's pretty clear that Brian and BiSB are the B1G East and Seth and Ace are the B1G West. There is plenty of time for this to turn around, but:
I'm not sure Seth can get back in this thing, but Ace could still get my vote. For now, it's close between Brian and BiSB, with Brian in the lead.
|9 weeks 12 hours ago||Not like Akron||
More like our 2011 win over SDSU: we got the job done, but not much more, and we really didn't learn anything. I don't have alarm bells going off in my head like I did after Akron. It was meh, not, "Holy crap we looked pathetic against weak competition."
I'm neither happy nor sad, just mildly frustrated we didn't show better. We'll see what happens against Turkey.
|9 weeks 13 hours ago||Great write-up||
Brian, you have a good eye for soccer and understand it better than most.
Jones has taken a lot of criticism for his turnovers this morning, but I agree that's mostly bollocks. No one hit accurate long passes in those conditions, and CDM's job is to attempt those passes regardless of conditions. You cannot stretch a defense otherwise.
I actually thought Bradley had a poor outing; his one-touch passing left a lot to be desired and his spacing was off. He needs to stay in the middle of the field if the 4-4-2 diamond is going to work.
Altidore was very ho-hum. Wondo looked aggressive in the box, and basically useless outside of it. Zusi was robbed a bit of his game by the conditions, and Bedoya was hot-and-cold.
I honestly thought Johnson was one of the most dangerous players in the starting eleven as well. Beasley was fine. Besler and Cameron did their jobs.
Brad Davis provided a spark off the bench, and his perfect service helped create both goals. The corner kick goal was a beautifully-crafted play that worked exactly as it was drawn-up. People who know soccer will recognize the tricks used to get Johannsson open; it wasn't bad marking, it was great execution. Very difficult to defend that play, right down to the goalkeeper being (legally) impeded.
Overall, I very much agree that left mid looks like the biggest question mark. I also agree that this game didn't tell us much. The next two matches will offer more substance, and hopefully better conditions. I sure did miss Dempsey.
|9 weeks 2 days ago||Great post||
I love the write-up, Brian. WC is one of the best--if not the best--sporting events in the world. I hate that we're so often told we can't be fans of football and soccer. I love both.
As for the roster choices, I trust Klinsmann. While Donovan has a proven track record of production at the MNT level, he's also fallen off recently and has never had the killer instinct that Klinsmann is trying to instill in his team. I have followed Donovan's career since it started, and he has always had a reputation for being soft and not training at a world class level. When he was in the Bundesliga, he said he was shocked to see the top level players going all out in practice and risking their careers and their millions just to make a tackle during training.
Don't get me wrong--Donovan is the most productive player in USMNT history, and is deserving of his accolades. I don't hate him or wish him ill. But creating a culture of success is Klinsmann's first and most important job as coach. The problem is that you cannot create that culture without actually experiencing success. Can the US make a World Cup run without its best scoring playmaker of all time? We'll see. But Klinsmann needs to continue to build not just for this summer, but for the future of US soccer. If he doesn't believe Landon has a role to play in that, I trust him.
You can't argue with results. While Donovan's numbers speak for themselves, he has slowed down and if the rumors of a lack of fitness are true, you don't want him out there. Klinsmann's results as a coach are just as successful as Landon's as a player. That is why I trust him.
For those wondering, "Why not just take Donovan as the 23rd guy?" I think the answer is not so simple. Donovan's career success and strong friendships with team leaders make him a defacto captain, even without the armband. Players will look to and look up to him, regardless of how he is playing now. Klinsmann may not want an out-of-shape player with a reputation for being soft as a team leader. He may not want the distraction of having the media and fans calling for Donovan to start of sub at the first sign of trouble. And he may just genuinely believe that Donovan is not one of the best 23.
This is a lose-lose for Klinsmann. Put Donovan on the roster, and you're expected to play him and he becomes a defacto captain. Leave him off, and everyone will clamor for him and bitch if the team doesn't do well. The only Klinsmann wins here is if the US gets out of the toughest group in the tournament and demonstrates they can win without the best player in the history of the team.
A tough decision, but I admire Klinsmann for sticking to his beliefs and making a hard choice...now he has to prove it was the right choice.
|10 weeks 1 day ago||Reader vote||
While I freely admit that fans are idiots (including me, sometimes) I think it would be fun to have a reader vote on who "won" the draft before and after the actual season. The "after" could be during the bowl lull. Easy content for you and fun for the readers = win-win.
|10 weeks 1 day ago||There is no debate||
Now that Smith is out of the league, the only people I know who defend Smith as better than Sanders are Cowboy slappy-types. Barry probably would have had more yards and broken Smith's record had he kept playing, but that's irrelevant. Sanders was the best runner at least since Gayle Sayers, if not Jim Brown.
All you have to do is watch...Barry was a far more talented player than Smith. Production is a function of system, scheme, and surrounding players. But Barry is definitively more talented than Smith, and anyone questioning that is either blind or Jerry Jones.
|10 weeks 2 days ago||Good, but not that good||
I think Maryland has the chance to be a good, but not great team. 9-3 is probably their ceiling. Their defense was fairly consistent, but never great and their offense was like a kid learning how to drive stick: sometimes popping off the line, sometimes stalling, always jerky.
They are safely ahead of Indiana and Rutgers, but not a threat to Ohio or MSU's reign at the top.
I'd have to lie to say that Michigan is convincingly better, but this is not a game that makes me worry, largely becuase it is at home.
Let's put it this way: if we're losing to Maryland at home, Hoke is probably in pretty hot water, because we're probably looking at 7-6 or 8-5 again.
|10 weeks 6 days ago||This needs more upvotes.||
This needs more upvotes.
|10 weeks 6 days ago||Yup||
Her definition of "more fun than the dogs" is clearly different than the hamsters', who were just trying to get the hell out of that pool.
|11 weeks 10 hours ago||Fair enough||
I'm certainly not suggesting that DG is clearly the more talented player. Miller may very well be more talented. But circumstances have been tilted in Miller's favor, and not in a small way. DG has demonstrated passing ability that Miller will never have. Let's be honest, if Miller were a good passer, his NFL draft grade would have him out of college this year.
Again, Miller is a great player. I'm not arguing against that. But DG, talent-wise, has demonstrated a skillset as a passer that Miller will never have. This season will be Gardner's final chance to prove that talent, but last year he put up the second-highest passing total for a U-M QB in history, behind an offensive line that often closely resembled pylons. He also set the record for passing yardage in a game, not just for U-M, but for the B1G. He is really, really talented.
My point is that this one is close--very close--and I think it's too close to call.
|11 weeks 12 hours ago||Chipotle mayo + Kate Upton||
Lunchtime, indeed. Hopefully, lunch3times.
|11 weeks 12 hours ago||Does Michigan want?||
If I were a top tier RB, I wouldn't be going to ND. Isaac could do very well in a Theo Riddick role, but if he wants to be a runner, I would think the Nuss' system would be a far better fit.
I think a really, really big question is, does Michigan want Isaac? It is interesting to note that he did NOT have a 'Bama offer.
|11 weeks 12 hours ago||I have some nits to pick||
First, let me start by conceding that Ohio has quite a bit more talent than does Michigan on the current rosters. Recruiting rankings and records both prove this out.
But I do have a few quibbles with your list:
Other than that, I think you're on point, and I definitely agree that OSU has a more talented roster overall.
EDIT - The argument that most fans think Braxton is better is meaningless. Fans are mostly idiots with little knowledge of anything they don't see on ESPN. Before NFL draft talk, my bet is that 95% of college football fans would have said their QB was more talented than Blake Bortles. DG has been handicapped by system and his O-Line...Braxton has been gifted with the best possible coach for his talents and great blocking. This is not a no-brainer.
|11 weeks 13 hours ago||Soccer players having been||
Soccer players having been saying this about football for years. ZING!
|11 weeks 1 day ago||LeBron vs. Derrick Henry||
LeBron was just about the surest thing to go pro in a big way in the last 25 years. Derrick Henry is a sophomore in a sport that sees a lot more kids go down due to injury and could find himself out of the game in the next couple of years. And even if he does get drafted, Henry isn't going to see LeBron money for his first contract, or maybe ever. It's also highly unlikely he'll get sponsored like LeBron did.
Businesses, like the dealership that financed LeBron, understand the risk/reward...no way would an honest business put together a similar deal for Derrick Henry, or most college football players.
|11 weeks 1 day ago||Rational Buckeye fan?||
Where did this guy come from? He needs to clone himself and start training other Buckeyes to do better than this:
|11 weeks 2 days ago||YES!||
Congratulations to Alex! We are fortunate to have you as part of the family.
|12 weeks 2 days ago||Realistic expectations||
Even IF we have an elite defense, 9-3 would be a good year. 10-2 feels like the ceiling right now. That said, I will reserve judgment until after the ND game. Unless we lose the Horror II, in which case I will say that we will not be winning 9 games, and that Hoke is getting canned.
|13 weeks 1 day ago||Youth and reality||
I'm tired of the youth excuse, and I'm even more tired of losing. Save the 2011 season, it's been pretty lousy to be a Michigan fan since about 2006. RR gave us hope and entertainment, but didn't deliver. Hoke inspired us with an amazing first season, but has fizzled since.
I'm tired of excuses and I'm sick of losing. But the reality is--as this AMAZING post demonstrates (thank you, Seth)--we're still really young and not likely to be very good on the O-line.
Without actually doing the heavy lifting of checking, I would guess that most programs follow a very similar progression trend with their O-Lines--even the ones with great coaches and consistent success. I know for a fact from my own research that Borges' success largely followed the experience of his O-Line.
What remains to be seen is if Nuss' and the staff can get this thing turned around from a team where "liability" players aren't able to block anything to "liability" players who can at least find their assignment on most every play.
With the '14 defense, the offense should not have to do much heavy lifting, but we won't win if we go backwards with anywhere near the frequency we did in '13.
|13 weeks 1 day ago||Wow||
I don't like the "youth" excuses, but damn, the 2010 and 2011 classes have left us with 17 scholarship fourth and fifth year players. That's not enough.
But the 2012 class should be ready to contribute in a big way. If they're not, we're in trouble.
|13 weeks 2 days ago||Jeebus||
Are we really melting down over this? Here's one of Fremeau's predictions from last year:
I like Fremeau, but I'm not going to pretend we should fire Hoke and we have no chance just because his computer says so. Let the football do the talking.
|13 weeks 6 days ago||Sweet, sweet BiSB||
What a great column. Perfect in both its comedy and its utility (or lack thereof) and definitely more of what we need around here. Thank you for making me laugh. The Hoosier hashtag nearly killed me.
As for future columns during the doldrums, how about starting a series that reviews one of our '14 opponents each week and compares their statistical futility of last season to ours, and compares their strengths to UConn and Akron. By keeping it funny, you avoid the emo aspect while still setting expectations to reasonable.
Just my two cents.
|14 weeks 6 hours ago||Meh||
The NFL is hard. Get over it.
If the Lions are ever going to be a good franchise, they need to make it happen regardless of whom they are playing.
The Lions have the 16th toughest schedule, the 28th hardest home slate. Their road schedule is tough--9th--but come on. This schedule is no excuse.
|14 weeks 6 hours ago||Disagree||
While I think your logic is sound, I have a different opinion. I do believe that college football is primarily an educational activity. And I believe every coach in the country would agree with that. I do not think the amount of money generated changes the primary focus of the activity.
I understand and appreciate your point of view, and Brian's, I just disagree. I believe college football is educational, and that it is not employment.
That said, I don't think players should be restricted from selling their likeness or using their notoriety to be compensated while they are in school. That part is bogus.
There are lots of problems that require fixing, and CAPA actually did a good job bringing some to the forefront:
It's a bad system that needs fixing, but I think having universities pay players is a bad idea.
|14 weeks 7 hours ago||THIS||
Herein lies the problem, and why I ultimately believe that college athletes should NOT be paid by their universities: Most schools--even in the FBS--are not actually making a profit directly from their football program. Revenue and profit are very different things, and, while every FBS school is brining in millions of dollars of football revenue, these programs are also extremely expensive to run.
Letting kids get paid for likeness? I have no problem with that. Let them endorse, market, and start to learn about the business side of sports. That would be an education. Help them learn about money in a more controlled environment than they'll have once they are in the NFL.
|14 weeks 7 hours ago||Great off-season post||
Love the data. Another stat-like substance that would interest me would be tackles that prevented a third/fourth down conversion vs. tackles on early downs.
|14 weeks 1 day ago||YES||
I actually laughed out loud. Well played, sir.
|14 weeks 1 day ago||Not good, but||
This sucks, because we didn't get a recruit we really wanted that probably would have helped us immediately.
But Ohio had a starting spot to offer as well, is coming off of a much better season, and is a program in much better shape than ours, currently.
Linsay is strictly interested in football right now, and it's hard to argue we have a better program than Ohio. I don't think this is "alarming" in terms of recruiting, just representative of what happens when you go 15-11 over two years.
Hoke and staff has demonstrated they can recruit; now they must prove they can win.
|15 weeks 13 hours ago||This will happen||
I guarantee we'll see plenty of extended handoffs with Nuss. He's always used it and he has the personnel to use it again. In the spring practice videos, there were several of these plays. Not sure why we didn't see it in the spring game.
|15 weeks 13 hours ago||Dawson was pulling||
It was the center, not Dawson, that blew that play.
|15 weeks 2 days ago||Like it||
I have to assume that's Norfleet standing in front of our O-Line on the front. I appreciate the quote on the back, even if it is a bit awkward.
|15 weeks 2 days ago||that's just, like, your opinion, man||
While I think GRIII would benefit from another year in college, I'm not sure that's the case. This year didn't help his draft status, and if he's ready to go, wants to go, and it's the best thing for him and his family, he should go.
I wish him the best, and, even if you agree with me that another year at U-M might benefit him, I'd feel a whole lot better if you'd admit you don't know all the circumstances and that you wish him the best, too.
|15 weeks 2 days ago||Wait, what?||
It IS a family matter. You don't think getting expelled from school is a family matter? You don't think a review board finding enough evidence to expel you for a crime you claim you didn't commit is a family matter? You don't think this affects his whole family?
It's certainly not the whole truth, but it's not untrue. I don't like the wording, either, but I understand trying to shut down the line of questioning.
I also don't like the "violation of team rules" comment. I would have preferred, "He is dealing with a personal issue and will not be with the team." But people would have called that a lie too.
Perhaps, "no comment" is the best answer in terms of honesty, but it ignites a media frenzy to find out what's going on with Gibbons and creates needless distractions for the innocent memebers of the team.
This was a NO WIN situation for Hoke, and picking nits about his word choice is ridiculous. If he lied to investigators, then I hope he's fired. But an innocuous comment at a press conference? Come on. Hoke uses more egregious half-truths about depth chart, line-up, player development, scheme, and staff at almost every press conference.
|15 weeks 2 days ago||National story?||
For those of you who believe this will be a national story, please note that page one of ESPN does have a Michigan headline currently:
There is a lot more to know before this becomes legitimate, national news. Here's a question, why the fuck was CSG even investigating the veracity of Hoke's statement?
|15 weeks 2 days ago||Couldn't say this||
Unfortunately for Hoke, Gibbons wasn't suspended by the football team. He was expelled. This is yet another half-truth to say he's "suspended." Furthermore, since we don't know the circumstances surrounding Bullough--which may have been admitted or legally proven misconduct--you're comparing apples to oranges.
Finally, on legal grounds, Dantonio wasn't dealing with FERPA, whereas Hoke was.
|15 weeks 2 days ago||Yes||
Your right as a victim or a victim's family is for justice, not for public humiliation or for the football coach to ignite a nationl media firestorm by explaining the situation to the press.
Furthermore, the assault has not been tried, and Gibbons has not been convicted. The universtiy has stated that there is enough evidence to believe that it's more likely than not that sexual misconduct occurred.
In NO way does that entitle ANYONE to a public announcement of those findings by the football coach.
|15 weeks 6 days ago||Inevitable||
Anytime you have a situation where someone is willing to pay for something and someone is willing to offer that good or service for money, there will inevitably be a market created. The law cannot stop this. That certainly doesn't mean it's a good thing--prostitution, drugs, and gambling have all caused some major problems--but it's a reality.
The rise in both the money and the popularity of college football made this inevitable. It isn't just that the NCAA and colleges are bringing in cash, it's that fans are so attached to their teams that they're willing to pay to make them better.
It's clear that the system is broken and needs some serious fixing. It's clear that in places like the SEC there are frequent and flagrant violations of the rules. And it also seems clear that, for now, the NCAA isn't too interested in a fix.
This issue needs to be addressed. It certainly doesn't make sense that schools like Michigan should be punished for playing by the rules, or even for playing by the rules more than the other guys do. Fix the system.
As for amateurism, I fully support it. If these kids really want to get paid instead of "playing school," then there should be a minor league. If we're going to pay players, let's bring it out in the open and make it transparent. The problem with paying players now isn't that it's wrong for poor kids and their families to get money, it's that it's wrong for it to have such a big impact on the competitive landscape of sports.
I may be old fashioned (or just old), but I firmly believe in the character and life values sports teach. And I believe there is value in playing sports for that reason, instead of to get paid. But I'm not naive enough to believe that some kids do it for the money, or even judge those kids "wrong" for doing it. I just want it be as fair and transparent as possible, because fairness and transparency are values worth teaching--whether players are getting paid or not.
|15 weeks 6 days ago||double post||
|15 weeks 6 days ago||I wish Horford the best||
All the best to you, JH.
Of course, this is how I feel:
|16 weeks 10 hours ago||Tough to do||
Eliminating pulling, trapping, countering, etc. sounds good, but it's very tough to do.
For one thing, your running game now consists of just a few plays and is predictable. This means you need to be able to execute those few plays nearly flawlessly. This seems unlikely for this group.
For another, you are taking deception out of passing game in a big way. All of those blocking techniques set-up LBs for play action passes in a way that zone runs simply don't.
Stanford, Wisconsin, and even Alabama use pulling. I would like to see Michigan go to the "square shoulders" method of pulling, and I'd like to keep the playbook limited, but pulling should not be eliminated.
|16 weeks 14 hours ago||THIS||
This is the key. If the OL is really as bad as it looks right now, 9 wins is probably spot on. But how we get those wins is very important. We need to show improvement and look like we're on our way to being a B1G contender, even if we don't get there this year.
We need to beat MSU and/or Ohio, and if we do that and get eight other wins while looking like an improved team, I'll be happy.
|16 weeks 14 hours ago||Hitch = Hot||
For Nuss, you'll see him use the five yard hitch as a hot route A LOT. He loves to have this plugged-in for a WR that is alone on one half of the field. It was very successful for Alabama, and it's an easy read-and-throw for the QB. With an athlete like Funchess, it has the potential to be a huge play for us this year.
As for "How Borges is this?" I think the answer is "medium." Houma is sent on a route instead of blocking, creating mismatches for the cover three on that side of the field. But we have two OL blocking no one, and that feels an awful lot like 2013.
|16 weeks 1 day ago||Picking Nits||
Great stuff, Brian.
I have a few differences of opinion. You have all three starting LBs in the top group; while I tend to agree--it is our deepest and strongest position group (although WR and CB is pretty dang good, too)--I think the starters may be a bit more fungible with Bolden, Gedon, and RJS right on the heels of the three you've named. Bolden was a "fourth starter" last year, and his athleticism is something Morgan will never have.
Willie Henry is immensely talented and almost as inconsistent. While Lloyd almost always played talent, I think Hoke really will put a guy on the field who is more consistent--even if he's not as good. If Henry doesn't take himself seriously, he's in danger of losing that job.
I love Dennis Norfleet. He's entertaining, tiny, and seems to have potential. But that's the problem--it's only potential. He has never demonstrated proof of his talent, and I don't think his spot as the slot is at all assured. I think he'll play more, but the emergence of Canteen coupled with the return of Darboh may mean there are four WRs ahead of him.
At CB, the wealth of options makes the waters murkier. That said, I don't think Lewis is a nickel at all. IF, and that's a big IF, Countess and Taylor beat him out as outside starters, I think he'll play on the outside nickel situations, with Countess tucking into the slot...perhaps that's what you meant. But hype and the spring practice/game thingy sure make it look like he deserves to start, with one of his elders coming off the bench in the nickel.
Dude. Chad Lindsay isn't even on the roster, and is visiting other schools. I'd replace him with either Kalis or Miller, and move that slot to the bottom of the list. I love the wishful thinking, and Lindsay would be a HUGE get, but it's far from a done deal.
Hurst is obviously only a tenous starter given his spot on the list, but the omission of Godin is glaring. That spot is wide open, and it could be Wormley, Hurst, or Godin, IMO. Henry may very well find himself back at the DT.
I believe Heitzman/AJ Williams is a toss-up.
I believe De'Veon Smith will start on first down against App. State. He has gotten stronger and quicker, and the new system is perfect for him. His ability to break tackles and move the pile will, I believe, make him the nominal starter. I do think Hayes is the #2 RB right now, even on first and second down, and I even think that Green will have to battle Drake Johnson for #3. All that said, I think Hoke is right: these are good problems to have, as any of these guys will be an upgrade over what we had last year. I expect RB to be a strength for this team, and it has good depth.
Clark doesn't look any better than Hill; in fact, I like Hill better. But experience often wins out at safety, so he may be the nominal starter. I'd expect rotation there, perhaps even a frustrating amount of rotation.
I think Houma is ahead of Kerridge.
That's my 2 cents.
|17 weeks 9 hours ago||Good sleuthing! That's their||
Good sleuthing! That's their one time since '97.
|17 weeks 11 hours ago||Obvious||
But they haven't been to Pasadena much, which was the joke.
|17 weeks 11 hours ago||Or Ohio?||
While they've obviously had more success than we have lately, OSU has only been to one Rose Bowl since 1997; we've been to four.
The great thing about buckeyes is they aren't even good at insults.
|17 weeks 11 hours ago||Just rivalry stuff||
I'm glad he said it for two reasons:
I do think it's a bit classless, but that's part of what makes this rivalry so great: OSU fans are often the opposite of our well-groomed faithful.
|17 weeks 12 hours ago||What I'm looking for||
In no particular order:
|17 weeks 3 days ago||Great picture||
Good to see Jake visited.
|18 weeks 2 days ago||Welcome to the family||
Looks like another great addition to the '15 class.
Welcome to the family Mr. Taylor. GO BLUE!
|20 weeks 4 days ago||FALSE||
That is absolutely Magnum P.I.
|20 weeks 5 days ago||Not that simple||
While I agree that Hoke could have stepped-in and said something, it's not like Borges had a history of failure while working with Brady. Sure, 2012 was disappointing, but Denard got injured and, if we're being honest, the offense looked pretty damn good (other than 2nd half Ohio) for the rest of the season with DG at the helm.
Brady gave Borges a season to fully implement his scheme, and it failed. I don't think giving an OC one year to try to have his way is being too patient. Don't get me wrong--I'm glad Borges is gone and Nuss' is in--but I'm not sure Hoke could have foreseen how bad things would be last season. No one else did.
|20 weeks 6 days ago||THIS||
Borges is a smart guy that understands constraints and football theory. But it appears he is not as adept at being able to coach his players to execute his multiple schemes, especially when the players are younger.
His concepts have always been sound, and when his teams have been smart/skilled enough to execute, he's had great success. But when his teams can't master his sorcery, they fall flat on their faces.
|21 weeks 8 hours ago||Billboard #1 "Top Hit"||
Walk Like an Egyptian.
Great song. Great year.
|21 weeks 1 day ago||Yes, please||
Compiling a list of recruits and targets with their scores would be AWESOME. Worthy of a sticky, IMO.
BTW, great work. Your content keeps me hooked to the football site, even during this long lull.
|21 weeks 5 days ago||Confidence?||
Nice work as always, Seth.
Not sure where you got confidence from my Hail Mary piece; I'm sure I said I was nervous more than once.
Excited? Yes. Confident? Hell no. It's 50-50 whether these changes work, IMO.
|21 weeks 6 days ago||Thank you||
It's people like Jon that make Michigan special and keep Michigan special. I wish him the best.
|22 weeks 1 hour ago||Apology accepted||
IMO, the 4-3 Under and 4-3 Over are very, very different. The 4-3 Under is actually pretty similar to a 3-4: your SAM and your WDE are your most interchangeable positions, and either of those guys needs to be prepared to eat a TE or OT. You use a NT much like a 3-4, and your 3-tech and SDE (5-tech) are pretty similar positions. The biggest difference is that you will see two-gapping much less in an Under than in a standard 3-4, but 3-4 defenses (even in the NFL) are one-gapping a lot more now.
The 4-3 Over essentially replaces your SAM with a 9-tech (your SDE will line-up near the TE, usually outside, sometimes covering, and rarely inside) and leaves your new SAM uncovered. This is creating a new position in the defense: a uncovered LB that must be able to make plays in space. The NT must be able to consistently two-gap and the 3-tech must either get consistent penetration or two-gap. There is a lot more responsibility for the 3-tech in this defense, and I think they'll leave Henry there instead of moving him to nose. This defense further emphasizes the MLB, who must now be able to stop runs in the A, B, and C gaps. The WLB must also be able to take on more blocks in this defense and needs to be ready for B and C gap runs.
So, other than the LB positions being drastically different, adding a new position to the D-Line (which suits Taco and Beyer MUCH better than the Under SDE), and strategically changing the way you blitz, contain, and control gaps, it's pretty much the same.
|22 weeks 5 hours ago||Not just record||
It's not just the record. Hoke could go 8-5 and keep his job, depending on how that 8-5 looks and who we beat. If we beat MSU and Ohio but lose some unlucky close games to Notre Dame, Penn State, Northwestern, and Rutgers, then lose a close bowl game, I think he stays. More likely, we go 9-3 and fall to Notre Dame, MSU, and Ohio. He probably still keeps his job, assuming he was competitive in those games and in the bowl game.
Losing to all three rivals plus another loss puts him in ultra-hot water, and five losses all but guarantees he's out. But if the recruits keep coming in and the losses are close, 9-3 would probably be the benchmark.
Style will be as important as the record in 2014. If the teams looks good and is obviously progressing, Hoke keeps his job. If they look like they did last year--even if they win eight games--I think he's gone.
But I think ten wins--no matter who they are against--and he definitely keeps his job.
|22 weeks 7 hours ago||Not perfect, but...||
Try this: http://tableizer.journalistopia.com/
It's not as pretty as using the MGoBlog tools, but it seems to work to just cut and paste into the plain text editor.
|22 weeks 7 hours ago||Thanks||
I appreciate the gratitude. I'm nervous, but I'm excited-nervous, like I used to be before big games when I played/coached, not scared-nervous, like I used to be before tests I didn't study for. It's the feeling of confidence in a good plan and the expectation of success coupled with the understanding that you never know what the day will bring or if your plan will work.
Now we just have to execute. (In memory of Al Borges)
|22 weeks 7 hours ago||Thanks||
I appreciate the feedback. I hope it all works.
|22 weeks 9 hours ago||You||
|22 weeks 9 hours ago||LTT||
He had lots of bad weight and had been injured; 290 signals that he's probably dropped most of what he needed to lose, now he needs to add 10-20 lbs of the good stuff.
He was always going to take more time to develop.
|22 weeks 1 day ago||I have no problem with this||
I have no problem with this salary whatsoever. Now he needs to earn it.
|22 weeks 1 day ago||List of highest paid||
Once that list is updated, we won't have #4 and #6 on the list anymore. That said, we are still paying top dollar for our assistants, and I hope they earn their checks.
|22 weeks 1 day ago||Desperate times||
Brady Hoke knows another 7-6 season likely dooms his tenure as the football coach at Michigan. Furthermore, another 7-6 season means we've had just one double-digit-win in the past eight seasons. That is verging on a program that is awfully tough to call "elite."
Here are my feelings on the changes, and why I think they were good changes. First, the Ryan move:
Then the coaching changes:
Desperate times call for desperate measures. While I don't see any of these moves as "desperate," they are certainly pretty significant moves that probably would not have been made had we finished 11-2 or 10-3. But we didn't, and change was in order. I'm optimistic about the changes, and if they don't work Brady Hoke will be the last guy left to point the finger at.
|22 weeks 2 days ago||Good idea||
I like this concept. Would love to see the data aggregated for current offerees and prospective offerees. And I agree that the numbering system is less offensive/sophmoric than the smileys.
I will miss you Eduardo; may you rest in peace.
|23 weeks 1 day ago||AGREE||
I'm not saying we had a good year or that we were close to greatness. I'm saying that a respectable improvement could get us double-digit wins.
|23 weeks 1 day ago||11 pts. from 11 wins||
As bad as the season was, and as bad as these stats are, let's not forget how close we were to 11 wins. If Nuss' can improve these stats in a meaningful--even if it's not spectacular--way, then we could easily finish the season with 10 or 11 wins.
I don't think we'll be in the top 20 next year, but I think top 75 is realistic.
|23 weeks 2 days ago||Not the only program||
The football program is doing great; so is men's basketball. But the rest of the athletic department and the university as a whole BADLY need the cash.
Organizations like Michigan should be looking for creative ways to get big gifts. I used to raise money for a non-profit, and a goofy title is well worth $10 million.
|23 weeks 2 days ago||Good idea||
I think this is a good idea. Who cares if the title is different? This is a good way for Michigan to bring in a donation and help be certain they can afford top-level coaches for years to come. I have no problem with this at all.
Think about it this way: would you rather the goofy title, or higher ticket prices?
|23 weeks 6 days ago||Wish him the best||
Jake Butt had a great freshman year and was poised to have a huge sophomore campaign. This is a big loss.
I wish Jake a speedy and healthy recovery, and look forward to his return. He's going to be a great player for Michigan.
|24 weeks 7 hours ago||Great stuff||
This is a great analysis with some good ideas; it's hard to install a new offense in a short period of time, but I think the Rip Hamilton double screens are a great solution, and would serve Stauskas well in the long run: he's a pure SG in the NBA that won't be able to create his own shot against most defenders he'll face in the league.
|24 weeks 1 day ago||Was at DCD with Webber||
If you think Webber paid for Country Day, you're crazy. Shane Battier probably did, but I seriously doubt Webber's family paid for him to attend Country Day.
And it's very true that these kids don't have time for a job. I don't support "pay-to-play," but I do support a small stipend so that these college kids have a little cash and aren't as tempted to do shady things with boosters.
|24 weeks 1 day ago||Vision + Speed = Yes, Please||
I like his film a lot. Even though he's still pretty slender, he runs with power and doesn't shy away from contact. But I think his vision and speed are the most impressive aspects of his game. He takes the hole and hits top gear quickly.
I hope RJII gets up to AA for a visit.
|24 weeks 2 days ago||THIS||
It's not what you know, it's who you know, and from that perspective, U-M opens a lot more doors than MSU.
|24 weeks 5 days ago||No||
No, that's not the difference. And the federal government has not changed the justice system, just the disciplinary system at universities, which are not part of the justice system.
I do think the university has the authority (and responsibility) to judge its student body on these matters, and FWIW, and I agree with the decision to expel Gibbons, however terribly it was handled.
But it's not just "technically" different. The difference between "rape" and "sexual misconduct" is like the difference between murder and manslaughter: they are very different crimes. Look it up.
And calling someone a rapist instead of saying they are guilty of sexual misconduct is a lot like using a racial slur instead of calling someone a jerk. There's a big difference.
Language matters. Nuance matters. My opinion is that Gibbons made a mistake, a big mistake, and that justice was delayed. I'll say that publicly. But I'm not going to say he raped someone unless it's proven that he did or I know he did.
|24 weeks 5 days ago||You are completely wrong||
You could not be more wrong on this one. I am passionate about this issue because I don't think it's fair to a young man--any young man--to call him a rapist without proving he raped someone or knowing he raped someone.
The only thing that's proven here is that you're acting in an ignorant and bigoted manner, and that's why I won't waste my time responding to the rest of your post. Your mind is made-up that you know what happened and that you know what everyone else is thinking, so why bother.
|24 weeks 5 days ago||DISAGREE||
So everyone that is accused of rape is guilty if they actually had sex?
|24 weeks 5 days ago||Rape and due process||
Rape was not the proven charge. In fact, the charges of rape were dropped. So calling him a "rapist" doesn't further the discussion or make people think about it, it just villifies a young man.
I'm not sure if you went to college, but these drunken sexual encounters can be more complicated than they seem. Sometimes people don't say what they're thinking, don't do what they mean to, and don't remember what happened. It's not always as black-and-white as a big football player throwing a girl down and taking advantage of her.
You have no idea what happened, and discussing things when you don't know what happened means you are behaving ignorantly. So don't jump on the guy that says you shouldn't label a kid a rapist because he refuses to speak ignorantly on an issue. Of course, you're not just ignorant, you're bigoted, since you are assuming someone is saying something just because this is the football team, when you have no idea what their motivation is.
For me, it's about not calling a kid a rapist when I don't know the facts. I'm not calling him innocent or saying I don't think he should have been expelled, but I'm not going to call him a rapist unless he's been proven to have raped someone or I know he raped someone.
|25 weeks 1 day ago||QB Story||
The press's favorite story is a QB controversy. While there will be and should be "competition" at the QB position, the only way DG gets unseated is if Shane, Speight, or Bellomy is on pace to be one of the best ever to play QB for Michigan. Gardner just had one of the best statistical seasons in U-M QB history, and he did it with no running game and almost no blocking.
In fact, Hoke mentioning Bellomy is, to me, a clear signal that this is just coachspeak--there is NO WAY that Bellomy surpasses DG, or even Shane, IMHO.
|25 weeks 1 day ago||FALSE||
Gibbons sucked when the incident occurred.
And why should they keep a kid from playing when no charges were filed? Unless Gibbons admitted guilt, why should he be punished?
If I accused you of murder, should you be penalize, kept from working, and locked-up until an institutional council decided your fate over three years later?
Dude. Get a grip.
|25 weeks 1 day ago||"Rapist"||
I get that people are pissed that a girl may have been sexually assaulted. I'm pissed too. But throwing around wild accusations and calling a kid who has not been convicted of a crime a "rapist" is ignorant, malicious, and stupid.
Quite frankly, the further I get away from the emotion of the case, the more I feel the end result was the right one, even if it was delayed.
You're talking about "sheltering" a kid who was the worst kicker in program history when the incident occurred. That makes no sense.
And before you go spouting off concepts like "moral authority," you ought to think twice about labeling a kid a "rapist" and accusing a university of "sheltering" a (when the incidenct occurred) terrible kicker.
Posts like your are why this is process is confidential, and why the athletic department should NOT know until the final decision is handed down.
|25 weeks 2 days ago||Thanks, and I agree||
I agree with this. I was also a college athlete, but I went to a DIII school and had an academic scholarship that covered tuition but not room and board. I had to work my way through college, maintain a 3.5 GPA (scholarship requirement) with a double-major (my choice), and train for and participate in my sport.
I further chose to be active in student government and other extra-curriculars. It left less time for a social life, but that was my choice, and I loved my experience.
I wasn't meaning that DI athletes are victims--they're not--but I don't think the average person realizes how much time these players devote to their sport, especially during the season when it's got to be more like 60 hours per week.
One of my main quibbles with current system is that, because of their athletic commitment, they don't have time for a job; this needs to be accounted for and some rules for reasonable stipends or even compensation for jersey sales/licensing (capped a LOW number) makes sense to me. What makes even more sense is taking care of these kids instead of treating them like commodities, and that's where I sympathize with CAPA.
|25 weeks 2 days ago||Respectfully disagree||
First of all, Division I college athletes are easily spending 40-60 hours/week on their sports. In addition to that, they have school.
I don't know where you played sports, but the time it takes to excel and physical and mental commitment are pretty severe. This isn't just time they could otherwise be spending partying...how often do parties happen at 6am while the football team is doing their morning conditioning?
That said, they are getting an education and potential training for their field, and they should take responsibility for that, just as other students do.
|25 weeks 2 days ago||A few things||
|25 weeks 6 days ago||That uniform is so bad, I||
That uniform is so bad, I almost didn't watch the film. But I'm glad I did.
Quick release, good vision, and decent athleticism are on display, and an uncanny ability to throw on the run. He can really drop the intermediate-deep stuff right where he wants to.
I would not be unhappy to see an offer go to this prospect.
|25 weeks 6 days ago||"Amateurism" isn't my argument||
This is precisely my point. These kids are getting the best job training possible--isn't that what everyone goes to college for? To be more prepared for their careers? Should we pay everyone who goes to college?
READ THE STUDY. Football programs are not making the "windfall" profits people believe they are, and the schools that do make solid profits (which are few) use that money to subsidize the money-sucking sports which are basically everything that isn't football and men's basketball.
If you're going to pay these kids because their sport brings in revenue, shouldn't you have to charge the kids whose sports are subsidized? How else will you balance the budget?
I get that players don't have the opportunity to work while they play, and I'm even more sympathetic to some of the issues the Northwestern players have brought-up re: medical care. But the money isn't there to pay these kids--unless you're charging the ones whose sports are a drain on athletic departments.
My argument is that football players are being fairly compensated in the training they get for their craft, and it's awfully hard to dispute that, since the college programs are producing the only source of NFL talent.
If you want to argue that the NFL should remove its restrictions on how long players have to go to college, I'd agree. But don't blame the NCAA for that. If the NFL wanted high school kids they could change their rules, or they could develop a minor league.
The fact is that college football programs are extraordinarily expensive to operate, and those costs go to training the young men to be good football players. There is a TON of value in that, and by looking at actual figures you can see just how much is spent per player.
|25 weeks 6 days ago||Read the study||
Really? I offer an academic study from a reputable think tank with ZERO incentive to make footballs programs look good, and you come back with garbage piece from HuffPo?
They are ONLY counting the $21,000 in tuition as "player costs" in that article. They're not counting equipment, facilities, and yes, coaches and staff who help develop the players. That is beyond ridiculous, and smacks of article that is only trying to advance a political agenda.
Saban is known as one of the best coaches in the country and consistently coaches players into multi-million dollar contracts. Isn't there some value in that for the players?
What about all the equipment, training, and resources they're given to hone their craft? What about the travel and boarding expenses for the players?
If you want to advance an agenda, go ahead. If you want an honest conversation about the facts, then spend some time learn them.
|26 weeks 5 hours ago||Know the facts||
The point is, athletics are NOT a huge financial boon to universties. Even the huge programs, like Michigan, don't make much of a profit.
Michigan spends about $800K per player, per season on their football program. These kids are already getting compensated, just not in cash. They are getting the best training available for their craft, they are getting equipment, they are getting trainers, they are getting coaches, they are getting medical treatment, they are getting a state-of-the-art place to train and play, etc.
There are huge problems with college football, and the Northwestern players are addressing some of them. But you cannot argue that $800K/player is not sufficient compensation.
As I have said before, I'm all for a limited stipend, since these kids can't work. But paying them or calling them employees? Definitely a bad idea. If someone wants to do that, start a minor league and call a spade a spade. Don't try to mix college athletics with professional athletics.
The fact is that even with the mega-bucks football produces, only a precious few programs (around 30) are making a profit. These programs cost huge amounts to run, and that is the compensation these players are already getting.
|26 weeks 10 hours ago||Not sure||
Hoke can say that. There would obviously be a follow-up question, and it would obviously lead to a media investigation of why Gibbons was booted from the team. It's not like the reporters would just say, "Cool, Bro."
This could be violating Gibbon's privacy rights, if not in letter, then certainly in spirit.
I really don't have a problem with the family issues thing. If Hoke lied about the injury to cover-up the investigation, that's a different story.
|26 weeks 12 hours ago||Love Kearns' tape||
He makes good decisions, is mobile, can throw on the run, and has scary-good touch and accuracy. His arm could be a little stronger and he could be a few inches taller, but he may still be growing and he's definitely getting stronger.
I hope we offer and he accepts on the spot. It would be great to have a California connection for the 2015 class.
|26 weeks 13 hours ago||I'm not sure I've ever been||
I'm not sure I've ever been more ashamed of our fanbase.
We know nothing, except that a small group determined that Gibbons was guilty of "Sexual Misconduct" (VERY different from rape) and that he was expelled.
There are a lot missing pieces to this puzzle still, and to see a young man's name trashed by lynch mob that doesn't know all the facts is abhorrent.
Gibbons was not charged with rape, and rape could not be proven (according to the DA). The victim was charged with (and convicted of) filing a false report. I'm not saying I know what happened or that Gibbons is innocent, I'm saying I'm going to wait to hear more before I say something that I can't take back, like "Gibbons is a rapist" or "Hoke is a liar."
I implore everyone, not as fans of Michigan football, but as fair-minded people, to be patient and withhold judgment until more is known. What is happnening on this board right now is completely unfair: many are assaulting a young man's reputation (and future) on the basis of a brief report in the Michigan Daily, and going a step further to question the character of our coach. I get that this is the internet and you can say whatever you want, but these are peoples' lives we're tearing down.
Finally, I will say that I believe rape/sexual assualt is an awful, terrible crime that far too often goes unpunished. My ex-wife was raped. An ex-girlfriend of mine was raped. Personally, I know of far too many stories of rape/sexual assault and it makes me sick. But just because it happens doesn't mean that's what happened here. This is a complicated issue, and I, for one, think it's best to reserve judgment on a case that is over four years old and that the police and DA seemed to find in favor of Gibbons. IF he did it, then he deserves expulsion and more. But we really don't know. I had friends get expelled for things they didn't do, but they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Just my two cents.
|26 weeks 1 day ago||Much to know||
Before we jump to criticize anyone for lying, we should get the facts. Was Gibbons practicing? Was it a lie? What did Hoke know?
Assumptions can do bad things.
And, quite frankly, before we judge Gibbons a rapist, we should wait for the facts of that case as well. That he has not been found guilty in a court of law certainly says something.
I am NOT saying any of these people should be excused for reprehensible behavior; I am saying that knee-jerk reactions to news stories are inadvisable.
I'll be the first to jump on Hoke, Brandon, and the university if this is all true.
|26 weeks 1 day ago||Alabama "scholarship"||
Getting a scholarship at the University of Alabama is really only a guaranteed try-out. If they think they can bring in someone else that's better than you, you're gone. Cutting eight kids is ridiculous, and if the NCAA was actually interested in anything resembling protecting student-athletes, they'd put a stop to this. Instead, we have Kain Colter starting a union for college football players. JEEBUS.
The worst part is, when 'Bama dumps these kids, they still have some control over them. That's right--you have to be released by your school, and the school therefore has some leverage in deciding where the player can go and the player may have to sit for a year--even he's cut.
Nick Saban is the devil.
|27 weeks 1 day ago||3-star||
While recruiting rankings do show some correlation with success, getting hung-up on stars is a mistake. If you find a player that fits your system and you believe can excel, you offer him. 'Nuss clearly thinks this young man fits what we want to do, and I trust that.
Wilton Speight is a 3-star that was recruited by Michigan and Alabama, among others. Kyle Kearns is a 3-star that I believe will be a star. MSU just went 13-1 and won the Rose Bowl with a roster full of 3-stars.
Stars do mean something, but they certainly don't mean everything.
Looking at his film, there's a jet sweep in there that is reminiscent of Mike Hart, another 3-star that turned out pretty well.
Offers from Penn State and Georgia indicate that there are some really good coaches that believe Frasier is better than his rankings suggest.
|27 weeks 2 days ago||EXACTLY||
Well said, sir.
|27 weeks 2 days ago||Hoke disagrees||
In the presser on the day he signed, Hoke specifically mentioned Shallman as a guy that could run the inside zone.
Also, I'm sure I disagree that Green and Smith are unproven. Do you mean they're unproven because they haven't had a big season in college football yet? By now, the coaches know the talent those guys have, and if they're not taking a back, they certainly trust them. And don't forget Hayes and Drake Johnson.
As for Houman, Kerridege, and Norfleet--I basically agree. I think 'Fleet is going to be our slot next year, and Houma and Kerridge are unlikely to carry the ball much, if at all. Rawls isn't gone yet, but he was buried on the depth chart anyway.
|27 weeks 2 days ago||Don't "bank" on it||
I would be surprised to see the staff bank a scholarship for next year with such a small class this year. I think we'll see a signing day surprise taking an additional spot, and either McDowell or one of the RBs taking a spot.
|27 weeks 3 days ago||Welcome!||
Kyle, I wish the best at the University of Michigan and beyond.
Welcome to the family, and GO BLUE!
|27 weeks 4 days ago||Inside Zone||
Even if the IZ does become our base running play, it's not going to look like basketball on grass anymore than 'Bama's offense did.
Make no mistake about it: Hoke, Funk, and Nuss want big, powerful players (power = speed x strength) that can move the LOS. For this reason, I think Miller is done as a starter. The biggest, baddest, meanest guys are likely to start, especially on the inside.
Glasgow, I believe, will stay at center unless Blake Bars or Patrick Kugler can make the strength gains necessary to dominate the LOS.
While I'm a huge Kugler fan, I just don't see it happening. His body needs to develop quite a bit. This is a good thing--you really don't want RS Freshmen starting on your O-Line.
|27 weeks 5 days ago||Single-high safety||
This seems to be Mattison's preference. While we played a lot of cover two in 2013, he has brought a safety into the box many times, and seems to like to do it with both safeties. It seems clear to me that he likes to use a safety in his run fits, and that leaves a single-high safety.
That said, he needs to have corners that can stop the deep ball for that to work. Sadly, the jury is still out on Countess and Taylor in this regard, but Lewis and Stribling look like guys who will be able to shutdown the deep routes one-on-one sooner than later, since they were both just inches away from those plays all year.
Single-high safety opens-up huge pressure options for a defense and allows you to disguise and use more exotic blitzes...it's a tough defense to read in the box. But you better be able to get to the passer and have competenet LBs/SSs to carry the seam, because 4-verts is awfully popular in the college game right now.
|27 weeks 5 days ago||Yes||
You are an overly optimistic homer, but I love it.
+1 for you, sir.
|27 weeks 6 days ago||Huh?||
I think we've recruited plenty of safeties, and plenty of DBs in general. Lots of HS corners wind-up being safeties, and we currently have 14 retruning DBs/CBs and four safeties. And we've recrutied four safeties in the last two classes:
The 2014 class is light on DBs, with just two, but it's only got 16 members total. But that gives us a total of 15 scholarship players (out of 85) that play in the defensive backfield. That is right about where we should be.
|27 weeks 6 days ago||Iowa||
The Hawkeyes run mostly outside zone, but yes, if we can run inside zone at their level of zone blocking proficiency, we should have an offense good enough to win 10 games.
|28 weeks 6 hours ago||Also||
Nearly every good IZ run requires the RB to do the following:
Watch zone running highlights. The RB almost always slows down just before the LOS and picks his hole, then explodes through it.
|28 weeks 6 hours ago||Good stuff||
I like that you not only talk about the strengths of IZ, but also the challenges in running it effectively:
Also, I love the ND clip. ND has 8.5 in the box and a good play called to stop IZ. The keys are the combo block that take out the WLB, and the athelticism of Lacy, which gets him by the SS (who took a bad angle and really should have made the play).
I'm not sure our 2013 OL could have run this play all that effectively, given the above requirements, but the thought of Green and Smith barrelling at top speed into the secondary makes my mouth water.
I also think it's worth mentioning that this scheme is basically perfect for Drake Johnson, IMO, and if he fully recovers, he could factor-in to Nuss' '14 plans. Drake is a strong, fast, one-cut runner who powers through arm tackles and was coming into form before his injury. Watch this tape, and you'll see a guy who is well-suited for the IZ:
|28 weeks 11 hours ago||Great job||
Brian should fear for his job.
Seriously, though, it was McCarron's uncharacteristic INTs that cost this offense more points. He threw into triple-coverage on the first one, and threw VERY late to his safety valve on the last one. He didn't make mistakes like that all season.
FWIW, I think Green could definitely be Henry-Lite.
Actually, my biggest criticism of Nuss in this game was that he didn't run enough. The run game was working well when he used it and he seemed to get a little lizard brain tendency to pass.
But that's nit-picking. The 'Bama offense racked-up 516 yards at about 8 yds/play, and scored 31 points while turning the ball over five times. That's an efficient offense that just had a bad day from its QB.
|28 weeks 13 hours ago||Good, not great||
I'm not sure it's as strong as any HS ball in Michigan. One of the quickest ways to determine level of competition is the size of the D-Line; in those highlights, there are very few DTs at 240 lbs. or higher.
That said, I see why the coaches like Mack, especially with Nuss on board. He appears to be a good one-cut runner with good speed and enough shiftiness to get to and through the hole even in traffic.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||That could be||
But Lockett is great, and certainly deserves to be in the conversation for best WR in the country, especially when you consider the system and the talent around him.
K-State averaged 224.7 passing yds/gm, 75th in the country. Lockett averaged 105.2 yds/gm, more than twice as many as the next guy on the team.
You are probably right in that there are a few guys I'd pick before Lockett, but he's definitely top ten, and we're talking about a difference in degree of greatness at that point. There certainly isn't anyone that is head-and-shoulders better than Lockett.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||No, thank you||
No need to bring race into this conversation. Crazies call for the back-up, freshman QB at nearly every program, regardless of race.
Debate the issues, not the idiots. If someone is calling for Shane because of race, better to ignore than engage.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||Heiko||
I'm sad for Heiko, who would've gotten to see his avatar in full effect this season. Nuss loves the WR screens, especially early in games.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||Doug Nussmeier didn't just||
Doug Nussmeier didn't just sell ice to an eskimo, he sold him flip-flops and a Speedo.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||HALOL||
Haha...oh, how I wish this were true.
Media types are pretending there's a QB controversy because it's the best way to sell stories. Fans who were foaming at the mouth over Shane want to believe all the hype was true and that if it wasn't for Al Borges he would have started and won the Heisman in 2013.
Sadly, there are enough people out there who believe this nonsense that the rabble will continue.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||(No subject)||
|28 weeks 1 day ago||Borges was his buddy||
The issue here is that Borges was/is friends with DH's coach, and they had become buddies. When you have a personal connection with someone and they get fired, it's hard to look at things objectively.
I think Harris will come around after a visit with Nuss and Fred.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||Grades||
I would add that, at Michigan, they have to do an academic evaluation as well. Sometimes they're waiting to see how a kid does with his grades, and that may have been the case with MF.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||Nuss||
If our new OC can't sway Rosen, I really, really hope he lands Kearns.
ESPN, Rivals, Scout...they can all suck it. Kearns is one helluva QB, 3 stars or not. There's a reason Michigan and Alabama are both recruiting him.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||He might||
But we have the right to judge, and to be skeptical based on the Ford family's history of hiring mediocre heach coaches.
Caldwell was 2-14 his last season in Indy, and 26-63 as a head coach at Wake Forest. His Ravens were 29th in total offense this year.
I was excited about Mariucci. I was excited about Schwartz. Heck, I was even excited about Marinelli.
As a lifelong Lions fan, I've earned the right to be skeptical. I hope I'm wrong, but this looks like and uninspiring hire.
|28 weeks 1 day ago||HALOL||
Hahaha....I love you BiSB...wait did I just say that out loud?
This is getting weird. Time to go.
|28 weeks 2 days ago||Doug Nussmeier coached the||
Doug Nussmeier coached the SEALS who killed bin Laden. His coaching was so good, bin Laden was dead before the SEALS arrived.
|28 weeks 2 days ago||Who hired Nuss?||
Just as RR was at fault for his defense, so Hoke is responsible for his offense. If Nuss turns the ship around, Hoke deserves credit.
|28 weeks 2 days ago||Doug Nussmeier||
Before he got coaching from Doug Nussmeier, Chuck Norris was "Walker, Texas Panzy."
|28 weeks 3 days ago||I'm so glad||
It's so nice that we can still have "FIRE BORGES!" arguments here. I don't know what the board would be like without them.
I feel Borges had a tough situation, but didn't do enough to make the best of it. The guy deserved to get fired, because, at the end of the day, you can't argue with results. He didn't get it done.
And it's especially nice when we can weave in a bit of "FIRE RR!" into the conversation.
AB is gone, and by all accounts, it appears his replacement is an upgrade. The same could be said of RR. Can't we agree to just let it go and move on?
|28 weeks 5 days ago||Some ties||
Are just too fat for the full. If you the tie the half right, it can look just as good.
Actually, I almost wonder if he had a four in hand...which is unacceptable.
|28 weeks 5 days ago||O-Line and team experience notes||
As you watch this tape, keep in mind that the LT is a Sr and the C is a junior, but the LG is a RSFr, and the RG and RT are true sophomores.
The QB is a RS sophomore in his first year as a starter.
Also remember it's the third year in the system.
|28 weeks 5 days ago||Washington Tape||
What you'll see is a very multiple offense, with lots of WR screens, zone, and some pulling guards. He uses pick routes, jet action, and empties the backfield. RBs are much more utilized the passing game than with Borges. He spreads the receptions around to everyone.
|28 weeks 5 days ago||'Bama and the H-Back||
Depending on what you call an "H-Back," 'Bama uses a lot of it. I'm referring to a TE-type that lines up behind the the O-Line and often goes in motion or downblocks. We can argue over the name, but the second TE (sometimes called the "F" or "H") operates differently than the in-line guy. I think we'll see a lot of that.
|28 weeks 5 days ago||Mostly outside zone||
Mostly outside zone
|28 weeks 5 days ago||Great stuff||
I agree with SC, and would add a few things that Nuss does very differently from Borges:
But there are some similarities that Brian might find maddening:
|28 weeks 5 days ago||90% sour grapes, 10% honest||
You can watch the whole game in less than an hour on youtube.
Alabama moved the ball just fine, thank you, averaging 7.94 yards/play and I think they only punted twice. What happened? AJ McCarron threw an INT into triple coverage, which he NEVER does (tough to blame that on Nuss), Yeldon got accidentally stripped by his own player in the red zone, and McCarron got stripped for a scoop-and-score and threw an INT that wasn't terrible, but still out of character.
There is a legitimate argument that 'Bama abandoned the run too soon (Yeldon averaged 4.24 YPC and Henry averaged 12.5 [!!!] YPC), but they moved the ball pretty easily when they weren't giving it away to Oklahoma. The problem was the 7 sacks they surrendered, and perhaps a little better run/pass mix would have allowed them to maintain productive drives without giving the green to Oklahoma to pin their ears back and try to kill McCarron.
But guys, 'Bama put up 516 yards of offense while getting sacked seven times, and did it against a defense that was #20 in the country and had allowed just 5.38 yards/play in the Big 12...that is insane. The 'Bama defense lost this game, and the Saban worshippers are afraid to admit it.
|28 weeks 5 days ago||THIS||
Watching Alabama against Oklahoma and Auburn, you see a lot of drives where 'Bama is consistently getting 11-13 yards on 1st down, or 6-9 yards on 2nd and 5.
They move the chains like crazy and pop a couple of big plays every game, but they're not Baylor.
|28 weeks 6 days ago||Three highlights||
In no particular order:
Yeah, I know I did it wrong, but bringing-up the guy's mistakes and getting myself angry seems pretty lame right now. Borges deserves our gratitude for his work, and I'm much more focused on my joy for the new hire.
|28 weeks 6 days ago||Wish I could give your 1st paragraph ALL the upvotes||
When Brandon penned his letter of support for Hoke and specifically mentioned Mattison but left Borges out, I was suspicious. He even made this ominous remark:
It turns out he meant business. Whether or not Funk should also be gone is an open question, but Borges earned his firing and Michigan handled the situation perfectly: lock-up the best in the business at your brand of football before you can the current guy.
All that said, I want to thank Al Borges for his service, and wish him the best.
|28 weeks 6 days ago||Kearns would be my choice of||
Kearns would be my choice of the realistic options right now; it's great to hear that he and Coach Nuss already have an established relationship.
|28 weeks 6 days ago||Competition? Yes. Change? No.||
The only people who believe there is a QB controversy at Michigan are media types who want to create a story and fans who haven't been paying attention.
Devin Gardner is a damn good QB, and Shane Morris is a QB with damn good potential.
Lost in the wreckage of the 2013 season is righteous praise for Gardner, who produced the second-highest passing yardage total in the history of the program behind an interior offensive line that was about as effective as pylons with string tied between them.
Unless Shane Morris makes a galactic leap in year two and/or Gardner regresses, it is DG's job, and DG's team.
|28 weeks 6 days ago||Sam Webb||
Webb said it perfectly: The Ideal Candidate
Brandon and Hoke clearly had the replacement locked-up before they fired Borges; this was handled perfectly, and they both deserve credit.
I feel like a kid that just got the perfect Christmas present that wasn't even on his list becuase he didn't believe he could get it.
|28 weeks 6 days ago||Don't get it||
Nussmeier's offense averaged 7.73 yards in the Iron Bowl and 7.94 yards in the Sugar Bowl. Oh, and they averaged 29.5 points in those games.
I'm really not sure how those losses are his fault, but this certainly proves that fanbases LOVE to blame the OC when things go wrong.
|29 weeks 7 hours ago||Seth = Spot on||
I'd love to see the whole post, too, Seth.
This isn't as simple as the "pay-for-play" argument because of the system that's been constructed. Bacon's idea is the best solution I've heard, and I don't love it.
But the idea that all these colleges are raking in huge windfalls "on the backs of players" is just not true:
That is from a study done by the Delta Cost Project published in January of 2013, and the study concludes that aside from a handful of universities, even the football programs are not big money-makers.
FBS football schools are spending $91,936 per athlete on athletics, and $13,628 per student on academics. In fact, if you look at Michigan's 2008 football spending, they averaged $799,028 per player. Yes, they brought in about $13.5 million in profit, but isn't about $800K per person enough to be spending on your student-athletes? And isn't it good that sports like women's gymnastics have some of that $13.5 million so they can have top-class coaches and facilities too?
I am all for limited stipends for athletes--these kids don't have time to get jobs because of their sport, and a VERY limited stipend to cover some living expenses makes sense to me. I'm talking about $500-1,000/month. But to pretend these kids aren't already having hundreds of thousands of dollars devoted to them is just silly, and I don't believe we should create a system where just a few schools have the dough to pay players from profits, thus creating an even bigger "haves vs. have nots" scenario.
If you want kids to really get paid, then we should make them professionals, and not pretend they're "playing school." Kids can then choose between getting paid to play or getting the education (sports included) from college.