Peppers at 10, which seems low.
|1 week 3 days ago||Why?||
I like Ace's team, but his QB, while clearly the 2nd-best option (because Michigan doesn't know who will start) is still just above-average. He's got a great RB and a great WR, only one OL so far, and a pretty good TE.
His defense is only very good or great players...but tell me this, can Jaylen Myrick shut down Godwin or Cobbs? Peppers will busy dealing with Barrett and Clement, and Seth's interior OL can hold up against any DL in the league or even the country.
Put it this way: Barrett is a legitimate Heisman contender. Clement was a legitimate Heisman contender last year, and if he can stay healthy could be this year. Godwin and Cobbs are impossible to cover consistently. With Seth's OL and skill players so far, I don't see who can stop him. In today's college football, there is no stopping an offense like that. Seth's group would easily be the best in the country. Ace's is good, but I'm not sure it's even better than Michigan's defense.
Seth's defense is also excellent. He's only got four guys, but King matches up with Chesson, and Bailey can only block Glasgow or Replogle.
While I hate to admit it, JT Barrett was, by far, the most valuable player in this draft. There just aren't any other QBs in the league that are top-tier players. While I love Peppers and Lewis as much as anyone, there are other great LBs and CBs in the B1G. There aren't any other great QBs.
FWIW, I really like Ace's team and believe it's the second-best group...but if you're going by postseason awards, I think Brian is ahead of him.
|1 week 3 days ago||My rankings||
Just one man's opinion, but here's how I see it so far:
Overall, there have been fewer reaches this year than last, and the PFF grades are awesome. As one who loves this segment, thanks to our writers for the content and dialogue.
|1 week 3 days ago||I'm not sure how he can||
I'm not sure how he can achieve that at this point. It's a bad year for talent on offense in the conference in general, and Brian still needs a QB, a WR, and a RB. If I'm him, I'm looking hard at De'Veon Smith or Devine Redding and waiting as long as I can to take Armstrong or Wes Lunt. O'Korn is a big risk as he may not win the job.
But his other WR is going to be bad. It's a down year for WRs in the conference in general, and the best five and Reilly have already been taken.
What may be worse, he's only got one OL.
Yes, Brian's defense is by far the best, but his offense is awful.
|2 weeks 2 hours ago||Brass is a great game.||
Brass is a great game. Imperial 2030 is probably my all time favorite. Agricola, Puerto Rico, Power Grid are excellent second tier games. Twilight Struggle is the best two player game.
|2 weeks 1 day ago||Mostly Yes||
10. YES. Intentional fast break fouls are dumb and should be eliminated. The "advantage" method is a great idea.
9. Different idea: After any player has been fouled 6 times, subsequent fouls allow the team to pick the FT shooter. I like this rule because it still punishes bad FT shooting to a point, but doesn't allow the game to get hijacked with intentional fouls. It would also open up huge strategy changes which I believe would benefit the league.
8. Three second rule is outdated and should be gone.
7. Charges should be about who initiates contact. Guys that are drawing fouls with up fakes or lowering shoulders should not be rewarded. If you are running into a defender, you are the one committing a foul.
6. Too many is the problem. It's not the timing of TOs, it's that there are too many. Three each half. That's it. Make them precious like they are in football.
5. YES. Not sure about the length of the guarantees, but I love this. Teams tell kids how long to stay in school and the kids get paid and know their destiny. Contracts could be contingent on the kid remaining academically eligible.
4/3. I like the "Loser Playoff" concept. Everyone gets extra games. One-game series. Seeding based on regular season record. Starts to feel like March Madness and there is actually something on the line.
|3 weeks 2 days ago||Best. Commitment. Ever. If||
Best. Commitment. Ever.
If he plays half as well as he commits, he's going to be another first-round draft pick OT. That was amazing.
|4 weeks 4 days ago||Had to lure Lancil to make||
Had to lure Lancil to make sure he was also killed by the fire. Otherwise he would have been on his way to the Red Keep. Also wanted a horrible death for him, knowing his beloved Septon was about to die.
|4 weeks 4 days ago||Because Bran had not been||
Because Bran had not been marked by the Night King yet. Now that he is marked, the Night King will be able to follow him.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||Yes. The west is best.||
Yes. The west is best.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||Michigan spots:Pictured Rocks||
|7 weeks 1 day ago||Angel's Landing at Zion||
Angel's Landing at Zion National Park.
|12 weeks 23 hours ago||Pulp Fiction is one of the||
Pulp Fiction is one of the best movies of all time. Django Unchained was solid. Inglorious Bastards is underrated. Basically, you are very, very wrong.
|12 weeks 23 hours ago||This is the correct answer.||
This is the correct answer. Worst. Movie. Ever. So bad. And not even bad you can mock. It is simply impossible to be entertained in any way by this film.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Very tough play. The MLB||
Very tough play. The MLB reads the play correctly and heads to the correct hole. If he sticks to the backside gap, then the guard that blocked him is free to pop the safety coming down to help, and this might be a big gain up the middle. This was not a terrible play by the MLB at all, and I'm not sure gap discipline would have saved the defense.
|15 weeks 1 day ago||STOP||
Still too soon.
|15 weeks 3 days ago||This is not COUNTABLE||
This is not COUNTABLE copyright infringement.
|15 weeks 3 days ago||NCAA = IRS||
It is fitting that the NCAA is making such a stupid, self-defeating rule right around tax day. So many posters have discussed ways to fix the NCAA, but at this point, it's hopelessly corrupt and complex, and needs to be discarded...just like our 77,000 page tax code.
As with the IRS, the control is not in favor of the constituents, but rather those with the pockets deep enough to push through any ludicurous changes that will benefit them. This is why GE and Apple pay no tax but small business owners (who employ the vast majority of workers) are paying upwards of 50% in some cases. It's why the wealthiest individuals have some of the lowest effective tax rates and middle class gets crushed. And it's why Nick Saban and Hugh Freeze get their way when their only reason is "I really don't want to work that hard."
What I mean by this whole analogy is that I'm afraid the NCAA--like the IRS--is past the point of no return and needs to be scrapped now rather than reformed. Recruiting rules, student-athlete compensation, satellite camps...the NCAA has almost no rules in favor of the group it purports to protect and does a laughable job of enforcing the few that just might do some good. There is too much corruption and too much complexity--the purpose and focus of the organization have been completely lost and replaced with the self-interest of a few mega-star coaches.
|17 weeks 3 hours ago||D-Line||
Not to mention the talent on the DL: Hurst, Wormley, Mone, Charton, and Godin. That is an insanely strong group that only has to get past one starting OL (Cole)...we are not deep at OL this year.
Based on these lists, I'll take Blue, who looks stronger in the trenches.
|21 weeks 3 days ago||Stribling Starting||
Jeremy Clark is a very good player, and he proved that last year. If Stribling has overtaken him, that means we have three excellent CBs. I think this might be our best secondary in a long, long time.
The 2016 defense should be even better than the 2015 version. Scary.
Unfortunately, the offense will need some time to come along. Fortunately, our first five games are at home and the first three are very winnable, then Penn State, then Wisconsin. Not exactly murder's row. We finally hit the road, but game six is at Rutgers, then the bye, then we're back home for Illinois.
MSU on 10/29 is the first real test, followed by a brutal November with Iowa and OSU on the road sandwiched with Maryland and Indiana at home.
Definitely could be an undefeated season.
|23 weeks 3 days ago||Well done||
You finished the SEC trifecta!
But let's make sure we don't give kids a free, awesome vacation in Florida. That's not fair to the kids.
|23 weeks 3 days ago||This is a message board.||
This is a message board. Take your logic elsewhere!
Seriously thought, this is spot on. While there will always be homers, there are lots of people trying to take advantage of homer bets, too. Vegas knows this.
|24 weeks 3 days ago||Talent Gap||
Great data, thanks for doing the legwork.
We are still pretty far behind the nation's elite on a four-year rolling scale. We would be ranked #11 nationally, and 'Bama, OSU, LSU, Notre Dame, and FSU all have at least 10 more 4/5* prospects than we do. To put that into perspective, that means they have almost one whole unit (offense/defense) more of top prospects.
That said, a few teams are conspicuously absent from the top of this list: Michigan State, Oregon, Baylor, and even Clemson are all ranked lower than we are. Those teams use player development and scheme to keep with college's elite programs.
2016 feels like our best chance for the next few years, but if Harbuagh is on the same level as Dantonio, Kelly/Helfrich, Briles, and Swinney (and I believe he is) there is reason to believe that Michigan is set-up for consistent and long-term success. 2017 presents some obvious roster challenges, but it is also a home/home year for MSU/OSU. Unfortunately, we open with Florida in 2017.
What will be interesting to see is how some of the lower-ranked recruits from the 2015 class start to play. This season should at least give us some hints about how good Harbaugh is at maximizing 3* talents.
|25 weeks 4 days ago||Mgoblue.com still reports||
Mgoblue.com still reports that it starts at 11am. I will take no chances and tune in then.
|26 weeks 3 days ago||I agree, probably||
Assuming the information we have about these decommits is correct, I wholeheartedly agree.
What sucks about this is that we don't know the other side of the story. But it sounds like our staff has learned some valuable lessons and that this will improve going forward.
All that said, none of this would be getting any attention if Harbaugh wasn't killing it on the road. Success like Harbaugh has had this quickly was always going to be attacked. I sincerely hope we handle these things better in the future, but:
|27 weeks 4 days ago||February 3rd||
I will be waking up way-too-early and getting very little done that day. This is one of the few times I wish I lived in the Eastern Time Zone.
|29 weeks 1 day ago||Yikes||
And he's coaching against June Jones, who is, you know...competent.
Gonna be tough sledding for the East team.
|29 weeks 2 days ago||Fixed headline for you:||
"6-time CFP Champion Jim Harbaugh to Detroit Lions: will be replaced by long-time OC Drevno"
|29 weeks 3 days ago||Wow||
Did not realize how good those De'Veon Smith cuts were. The broadcast angle discounts how much lateral quickness he demonstrated there. If he can do that on the regular next season then he won't be BJ Askew--he'll be Chris Perry.
While I'd like to see more speed at the position, if Smith can run like he did against the Gators consistently, I can't see anyone else being our primary ball carrier next year.
|31 weeks 4 days ago||This is awesome||
Welcome to the family, Don Brown. We are grateful and fortunate to have you!
|31 weeks 4 days ago||Don Brown has coached the 3-4||
Brown has coached the 4-3, 3-4, and even the bear defense. He has adjusted to his talent and opponent in order to find success.
|31 weeks 4 days ago||Appreciate the counterpoints||
Alum--certainly appreciate your perspective, but it feels awfully slanted. I'm not saying we just got Nick Saban as our DC, but we did not just get GERG either. Not sure why you are so sour on this one. He obviously was not an expected name, but has also done more with less than most coaches. Let's go point-by-point:
Here's where I will agree with you: this is not a hire that has me dancing in the streets. He seems like a sound, accomplished coach. And while there are some up-and-comers that might have made bigger splashes, they also might have left after a year or two. Some continuity could do wonders.
My take is that this is a very, very good hire, but not a dream hire.
Lastly, a point you've made many times is that Mattison turned around our defense right away, and to that I would say two things:
All that said, I appreciate a balanced approach and that someone has some counterpoints...but man, it sure feels like you went searching for data to support your bias rather than searching for data to find your conclusion.
|32 weeks 6 hours ago||Tougher than a two dollar||
Tougher than a two dollar steak.
|32 weeks 3 days ago||Wow. We just offered a great||
Wow. We just offered a great prospect and the board is spending it's time bitching about missing on some other guys? This kid has all the tools to be great: athletic, very willing blocker, great hands and an ability to high point the ball. He needs to clean up his route running, but he could be an absolute beast.
|32 weeks 4 days ago||Excellent post||
Easy to read, nice to have the targets by position. Makes me hopeful for the future. You need moar upvotes!
|33 weeks 4 days ago||Yeah, but he totally used the||
Yeah, but he totally used the wrong picture. I mean, Krang was a very cool villain, but this guy is one of the greatest cartoon characters of all time:
|33 weeks 4 days ago||Solid List||
I would be happy with any of those guys. Not sure I trust the list, though.
|36 weeks 4 days ago||Oh yeah, he has arm strength too. Can make every throw already.||
Oh yeah, he has arm strength too. Can make every throw already.
|36 weeks 4 days ago||Only limitation I see is his||
Only limitation I see is his long delivery. And that's being nit-picky. He has accuracy, touch, poise, pocket awareness, and even speed. Bold prediction: he will go down as the best statistical QB in U-M history if he stays healthy.
|38 weeks 2 days ago||John Beilein is the best||
This is excellent news. There is no coach I would rather have.
|39 weeks 2 days ago||Coaching Level||
This is a great interview, and I loved the MGoFollowUp question. This team is being coached at an extremely high level, and the results on the field reflect that.
What's amazing is that it usually takes a couple of years for excellent coaching to have a big impact. If we keep guys like Greg Jackson around, we'll have consistently good play that will be elite play if the talent is there (which it should be at Michigan).
Today is awesome. Tomorrow is almost certainly going to be awesomer.
|39 weeks 4 days ago||He was Peyton's QB Coach for||
He was Peyton's QB Coach for one season. It's not like he developed the guy.
I am a Lions fan, and certainly wish JB Cooter the best, but can you honestly say Stafford looks like he's made much improvement under Cooter?
Please have fun with that last sentence.
|39 weeks 4 days ago||TRUTH||
You just can't make this stuff up. Only the Lions.
|40 weeks 1 hour ago||Welcome to the Family! Can't||
Welcome to the Family! Can't wait to see you strap on the winged helmet. GO BLUE!
|41 weeks 6 hours ago||He is definitely not as||
He is definitely not as shifty as Mike Hart.
He is a one-cut runner with very good acceleration and speed, but not nearly as shifty as Mike Hart. More like De'Veon Smith.
|41 weeks 6 hours ago||De'Veon Smith||
He reminds me of Smith. He's more compact, has better accelration, but doesn't appear quite as strong or balanced. Then again, he's still a junior.
EDIT: Actually, love Harbaugh's Frank Gore comparison. Same build and very similar running styles.
|41 weeks 2 days ago||This is amazing||
This play is even better than it looked--I thought the ball bounced to Lewis, but he just snatched it.
Ace...there was a Harbaugh rant earlier this year where he threw his play sheets on the ground (may have actually happened twice). I HIGHLY recommend a rant montage to this song (perhaps including some of U-M's "magic" plays and Smith tossing defenders aside):
|41 weeks 3 days ago||Biggest areas of improvement||
2015 has been an amazing year so far, and the improvement has been galactical. Here's my quick take:
If we can get to the point where we're hitting on 40% of our long pass attempts, we will become an elite team capable of beating anyone.
|41 weeks 4 days ago||Think he'll end-up on offense||
Watching his film, you see a lot more offensive highlights, and the only defensive highlights are free runs to the ball carrier. I think he would be a SS or LB, but I think he'll find a home on offense--he just loves to make plays with the ball.
He sort of reminds of De'Veon Smith--great balance, loves contact, nose for the end zone. Except he can pass. Not sure if he'll be a QB, but he could be a RB or even H-Back in our offense. Would be an amazing wildcat option.
Regardless, I think he will be an impact player for us before too long.
|42 weeks 5 hours ago||Fitzgerald is "little goody||
Fitzgerald is "little goody two shoes." Have proof:
|42 weeks 6 hours ago||AGREE||
He's like getting 100% in AP Calculus--should be weighted as a 4.33 or higher.
|42 weeks 6 hours ago||How to Fix the Lions||
Unfortunately, these probably need to happen in reverse order. But promoting Teryl Austin and hiring Joe Philbin would be a good start.
Seriously, how does Caldwell keep his job, considering he is an offensive coach whose team can't score points with Calvin Johnson, Golden Tate, Tim Wright, Ameer Abdullah, Eric Ebron (now injured), etc.?
Caldwell is the epitome of a Lions coach: a resume just good enough to get hired and mediocre enough not to get fired until he's done real damage to the organizaiton.
I wish I could somehow become a fan of another NFL team, but I can't. I love the Lions, and I am therefore doomed to NFL misery until the Fords sell the team or get lucky with a GM/Coach that are competent despite being approved by the Fords.
I will leave you with this quote from Bill Ford, Jr., which tells you all you need to know:
"I'm willing to stake my reputation on Matt Millen's success [as a GM]."
|42 weeks 1 day ago||Durkin will be the first of||
Durkin will be the first of this staff to be offered a HC job, possibly as soon as next season, but almost certainly by 2017.
|42 weeks 2 days ago||Unless something crazy||
Unless something crazy happens, Glasgow will get drafted, or, at the very least, signed as a UFA.
Could see two drafted next year among Kalis, Braden, and Mags (or even Cole).
EDIT: Houma could also be a UFA this year.
|42 weeks 2 days ago||Mea Culpa||
You were right: Morgan is the better LB. He has been lights out this season and will get drafted. He reminds me of a Patriots ILB: smart, good tackler, lacks measurables. He is sort of like Brandon Spikes in this regard.
Bolden has been a disappointment. I thought with this coaching he would be a star. To be fair, we don't even need him on the field all that often, and he hasn't been awful, but I was thinking/hoping we'd see blitzes and TFLs from him.
I will put some lemon juice in my pasta tonight to atone.
|42 weeks 2 days ago||Michigan version||
There are many, many more names on the top list, and that is how we need it to stay the next two weeks.
|42 weeks 2 days ago||Tom Herman||
Brian is spot on: Ohio State misses Tom Herman. They miss him as much are the Lions are missing their expectations for this season.
Herman has Houston--a team that fired their head coach last year--is tied for #25 in ESPN's power rankings. They are averaging over 600 yards and 45 points per game on offense. Maybe he would have been the second-best choice for Michigan...
|42 weeks 3 days ago||It is delightfully surprising||
It is delightfully surprising that every game on our schedule appears well within reach.
It is awful that I am still nervous about Northwestern.
|42 weeks 3 days ago||Agree, and I would add||
First, great breakdown by Seth, and I love the format (and title).
What I would at to SC's remarks is that one of your best clues for play design are the steps the RB and QB take. In this play, Smith's steps (and Rudock's) are telling you where this play is going: exactly where it went.
If the play was designed to go to the backside, Smith would have taken a counter-step and received the hand-off on the other side of the QB, heading for the backside hole. In this play, Rudock is obstructing the backside cut, which tells you that is NOT Smith's first option.
Here's a good video of what a true counter-step (and handoff) looks like:
In the play Seth diagrammed, Smith fakes an outside, or toss step, then immediately cuts toward the hole he chooses. This play was not designed to go backside.
|43 weeks 3 days ago||Not sure||
That will depend on how Maryland tries to defend us. I would expect a few wrinkles--we have had them every game so far, even the jet sweep vs. UNLV.
|46 weeks 2 days ago||Much to learn||
Oregon State will actually be a good test for this defense. Don't get me wrong--I expect us to win comfortably, but their offense has enough wrinkles to test us.
One thing I REALLY liked about this UFR was how well we adjusted after we busted plays. That's a sign of great coaching.
I dearly wish we had Utah as our fourth OOC game instead of our first. If we started with Oregon State, then had UNLV, then BYU, then Utah...I think that would have been much better for us.
Can't wait for Saturday--feels good to say that after almost dreading it last year.
|47 weeks 2 days ago||This Year's Stupid||
This Year's Stupid Predictions
YES. I believe Rudock will be highly efficient, probably #3/4 in the conference (Cook, OSU, Hackenberg)
YES. The OL will be a pleasant surprise by season's end. Despite the tougher schedule, Michigan will improve from last year's 4.60 YPC, and improve on last year's middling protection numbers.
NO. Unless you mean spot duty, I don't think we'll see much of Dawson this season. Braden will hold the job.
YES. The boldness of this prediction makes it much less likely to occur. That said, I love it, and believe it's plausible.
YES. That Smith is listed without an "OR" on the depth chart is getting less attention than it should. I think Johnson will be a true back-up, though.
WTF? Do you know something I don't know? Without insider information, this is an extremely bold prediction. Would love to see it happen, but I think Kerridge will be the main backfield receiving threat.
YES. See above.
|47 weeks 2 days ago||Special Teams||
This is one of the many reasons I believe the computers are wrong: I think our new ST coach is probably worth at least half of a win on his own. If we had not lost our kicker and punter, I'd say a 1-win increase.
9 wins...it's very doable.
|47 weeks 2 days ago||AGREE||
I am on board with 9 wins. All of the models out there say 7.7-ish wins, and do not take into account the impact of the coaching changes. I would say that Harbaugh & Co. are worth an extra win, maybe more.
My prediction is 8.7 wins. I believe 7 wins is far less likely than 9, but more likely than 10 because of the tough OOC schedule. Here's my best guesstimate:
All other regular season win totals would be outliers.
|47 weeks 2 days ago||An iPhone up vote for you sir.||
An iPhone up vote for you sir.
|47 weeks 3 days ago||Love it||
This is great stuff, thank you Ace.
Ross looks pretty good to me. I would agree that he is probably a more natural fit outside in Michigan's scheme, but he could be a good player at any LB spot.
Hamler is the real deal. He is explosive and could play WR or CB. I think he looks more like a college CB, but he could have success at either spot.
|47 weeks 4 days ago||Amazing game||
This looks like just about the most fun HS football game ever. Wish I could have been there to see it.
Peters is ridiculous, and Evans looks pretty good as a slot or perhaps a safety. Some great athleticism there.
Happy to have both of these guys in the fold. Peters looks like he'll be the recruiting steal of 2016, considering that he was a fringe four-star when he committed in April and unranked by Rivals as recently as December.
|47 weeks 4 days ago||Ace||
Ace's team is the best. Rudock is competent and Ferguson is serviceable, but everywhere else his team is strong, particularly on D-Line.
|48 weeks 19 hours ago||Hi Buddy||
Welcome to the family. GO BLUE!
|48 weeks 19 hours ago||Hi Buddy||
Welcome to the family. GO BLUE!
|48 weeks 5 days ago||Did Hurst play?||
Did Hurst play?
|49 weeks 2 days ago||Great post||
Brian nailed it. If you are a sports junkie, ESPN insider is super cheap and has loads of content. If you are a U-M football junkie, any of these are worth a subscription. If you are a U-M basketball junkie, Scout is the choice. If you are a college football recruiting junkie, 24/7 is probably your best bet. And if you want in-depth recruiting content (and, I believe, the most accurate ratings that are NOT the 24/7 composite) then Rivals.
And always, always MGoBlog. And for goodness sakes, people, at least by HTTV. This site has the best (not necessarily the most or most in-depth) content, and they have earned your business. Or buy a t-shirt. Just pay for something you want anyway, even if it's not much.
|49 weeks 4 days ago||Hate to say it||
But I'd pick Ace's team. Rudock may be the worst starting QB of the bunch, but he's also got Braxton Miller as an option, and with Thomas, Hamilton, and even Carter and Breneman, whoever takes the snaps has plenty of options. A dominant defensive line helps with any back-end problems, and the LBs are a strong group. The lone weakness here is his OL, which is just okay, but the weapons and possibilities of the offense overcome that weakness.
But I can't wait to see Ace photo-shopped into a Buckeye jersey, because he's earned it with his selections.
2nd Place: Seth. Not only did he find value with his U-M picks, his defense is bolstered by two HSPs that are All-B1G talents in Caputo and Peppers. Of course, Peppers is still just "potential," but if he's half as good as advertised, Seth's team will be able to control the middle of the field. Offensively, Carroo, Price, Marshall, and Geronimo (it should be illegal to ever use his last name) are more than adequate targets for the efficient Cook, and Clement is a ridiculous talent at RB. Add in a strong OL...this is a good team, and there are no gimmicks.
3rd Place: Adam. A weaker OL (comparable to Ace's) is helped by a great selection of skill players, but I'm not sure it's enough. Westercamp and Butt would be the stars of this passing game, with Barrett and Jackson combining on the ground, but I don't see this team can beat Ace's. Seth's squad can match-up because Caputo or Peppers can neutralize Butt, and Likely can handle Westercamp. Then what? Seth's defense is built to stop the option, and really only lacks a pass rush, but Turay can come in on obvious passing downs to add spark there.
4th Place: Brian. I don't know, man. Hated the Cardale Jones pick (has no value other than as a back-up QB) and the Cole gimmick. But there are bigger problems: you have the best passing QB and no real threats at WR/TE. Yes, Elliott is a beast and your OL is good, but in todays CFB, you've got to be able to throw the football effectively, and Kugler leaves a weakspot for the DTs to attack. Defensively, Zettel and Collins are good, but Johnson and Ngakoue are just fine. Biegel and Wartman-White are strong, but Ross has been a pernnial underachiever. I like the secondary, but I'm not sure the pass rush is giving them enough time to do their job, and the safeties are solid-not-spectacular types.
|49 weeks 6 days ago||Someone needs to vouch for this campaign. Looks like a scam.||
Someone needs to vouch for this campaign. Looks like a scam.
|50 weeks 2 days ago||Wish him the best||
Always liked Norfleet and hoped for that return we knew he was capable of. Hope his career finishes well at Tuskegee. I don't think he would have contributed much this year, so perhaps this is best for everyone.
|50 weeks 3 days ago||YES||
Logged in to post the same thing. He was an amazing coach--111-43-4 at Ohio State--but just could not beat Michigan, especially when it mattered most. In '93 and '96, Michigan accounted for their only losses and kept them from winning a MNC. When he finally managed to beat Michigan in '98, he blew a 15 point lead to a 6-6 MSU team that Michigan had handily dispatched earlier that season.
It was an era of dominance for us that fliipped almost exactly during the Tressel years, and it was the last time it was easy to be a Michigan football fan. The year 2000 is a long time ago now...
|50 weeks 3 days ago||Rams or Raiders||
I'd pick these two as the most likely, but I think we'll go another year without a "worst-to-first" team. If the Rams played in a different division, I think they'd have a real shot. The Raiders' division will be down this year, but Manning, Rivers, and even Alex Smith are all pretty damn good QBs, and Denver and KC have reloaded on defense. That division is going to be a mess, IMO.
|50 weeks 3 days ago||Kevin McHale||
How do you not hate Kevin McHale? One of the easiest basketball players in history to hate, IMO. McHale was just a gangly guy looked like he had no business playing with professional athletes, yet managed to be extremely effective (sometimes against the Pistons). I still don't understand how he was good. Athletically, he made Larry Bird look like LeBron.
|50 weeks 4 days ago||Some great picks in this edition||
Time to start judging (from best to worst in each position group):
QB: Adam, Seth, Brian, Ace
OL: Seth, Brian, Ace, Adam
RB: Brian, Seth, Ace/Adam
WR/TE: Ace, Adam/Seth, Brian
DL: Ace, Adam, Brian, Seth
LB/HSP: Seth, Ace/Adam, Brian
Secondary: Brian, Ace/Adam/Seth
Using a simple scoring metric, here are my standings:
I would probably pick Ace's team right now. Willie Henry was a very good value, IMO, and Ace's WR/TE group is absurdly good. His OL is ranked third, but it's close to Brian's and very good. His only weakness is at QB, and Rudock's film suggests he's plenty good enough to distribute the ball to those athletes.
Seth has, in my opinion, a deceptively strong offense, and still has a TE to add. But with the best OL and a close-second at RB, Seth's team is going to make you put 8 in the box. And Cook, Carroo, and Marshall will make you pay for that. The trouble for him is his DL. I believe that weakness outweighs Ace's QB issues.
Adam's team is boom/bust on offense and middle-of-the-road on defense. He's got a great QB and two good weapons in Westercamp and Butt, but the weakest OL does not pair well with a RB that is just okay, IMO. His strong DL and good back seven give him the #2 defense. Though the score suggests otherwise, I think his team is on par with Seth's.
Brian...why do you always take the double-QB? Cardale Jones, IMO, does not have value if he's not playing QB, and neither does Hackenberg. Jones is no Braxton Miller, whom I unfortunately believe will be a terror. But a strong OL and an amazing RB--a true Heisman contender--do a lot to offset a lackluster receiving corps. Boddy-Calhoun and Jourdan Lewis were both high value picks, IMO, and Wilson and Nicholson are adequate on the back end. The fourth lineman is going to be an issue on the DL, as is the other LB. If Brian had taken a DT, LB, or even an OG in round 6 instead Jones, he's probably in the discussion for second place. In the fantasy world, Jones was a good pick. In real life, I'd rather have more talent at a different position.
|50 weeks 5 days ago||Do you not?||
Do you not?
|51 weeks 2 hours ago||Agreed||
Logged in to post the same thing. Just a perfect line.
|51 weeks 4 hours ago||Running Game||
Stanford put up 190 yards at 5 YPC last year against Utah. Their problem was that they only managed 3.7 YPA in the passing game, with lots of lost yardage on bubble screen attempts.
I believe the Utah run defense vs. the U-M run offense will be a close match-up, and I believe the U-M run defense--one of the best in the nation last year and should be even better this year--is advantage U-M.
Further, I believe Utah's pass defense and hyper-aggressive rush will cause big problems for our passing attack. If that turns out to be an even match-up, we will win this game. However, I'd give Utah the advantage there.
There is no doubt this is still a coin flip game, and U-M has to prove they can compete with well-coached teams again. Will be a great barometer absent our usual against ND.
|51 weeks 7 hours ago||One of my most favorite movie moments ever|
|51 weeks 2 days ago||Yes, Yes, and Yes||
Great questions. Here are my answers:
1) How much effect does this inspiration/motivation have on a game? Can this compensate for talent gap?
Inspiration/motivation has a HUGE impact on every game. Having been a part of upsets (both winning and losing) I can tell you that while talent dictates a majority of success, the increments provided by inspiration and motivation can overcome a talent/technique gap and create an opportunity for a less-talented team to win. That said, there is a physical baseline that is required to compete at a high level. There is zero doubt in my mind that Michigan has players that are at or above the physical baseline to compete with every single team on our schedule. Ohio State is probably the only team with superior athletes. But I am concerned that our technique may not be as refined as it needs to be to be a dominant team.
2) Is there a chance this clicks and the team plays their asses off, surprising everyone?
Lots of people equate Harbaugh's first season at Stanford with his first season at Michigan. This is a mistake. Stanford's 2007 roster had sub-par athletes that simply did not meet the physical baseline to be competitive. It took guts, luck, and masterful coaching to pull off a narrow win against USC, and part of the success was that USC lacked motivaiton and inspriation. It was perfect storm not dissimilar from The Horror.
A far better comparison is Harbaugh's first season at the 49ers. Inherting a team with talent but lacking cohesion and motivation, Harbaugh took the 49ers to a 13-3 regular season. He took excellent athletes and helped them reach their potential. But before you get your hopes too high, there is a key difference: Harbuagh had some top-flight talent that had proven that talent at the NFL level. Frank Gore, Patrick Willis, and Michael Crabtree are examples. That said, Harbaugh seemed to improve the performance of every player on the team (even though the stats may not have fully reflected that). Michigan has very little "proven" talent. Remember too that 49ers team won a lot of close games, and, statistically, should have 12 instead of 13. So there was definitely a bit of luck as well.
3) Can the first year of a coaching change forge this aspect of a team? (Hoke's seemed to, chance this happens again?)
There is no doubt in my mind that the team will take on Harbaugh's personality, and that drive and competitive fire will lead to incremental performance improvement. The question is, will the talent/technique advance enough to make that motivation/inspiration add-up to more wins? I believe that it will be tough early, but that we will have some surprising wins. Most are guessing 8 wins; I would project 9, and 10 is more likely than 7 but less likely than 8. I would not be even a little surprised to see us at double-digit victories this season, and I would attribute that to the coaching change.
|51 weeks 4 days ago||Disagree||
The drafting is much better this year, IMO. I don't see a clear winner, and each team has an advantage somewhere. By this point last year, Seth's team was out of the running and Ace and BiSB were pulling away from Brian.
FWIW, I think the Cardale Jones and Jabrill Peppers picks are the worst of the draft so far, and neither pick was terrible. The worry is that Jones may not see the field, and Peppers, while cleary an amazing ball of potential, is still just potential.
That said, both Seth and Brian have plenty of talent. I like Adam's offense but think Ace has the best D.
If you're just looking for the team that will earn the most post-season awards, that might be Adam. If you're looking for the team that I think could beat everyone else, that would probably be Ace or Brian. If Seth can find some D-Line gems, he'll be right there.
We'll see how it plays out...
|1 year 1 day ago||Source? This is interesting||
This is interesting if true.
|1 year 1 day ago||Facts||
Thanks for the data. Polls don't determine what's going on in the world, and neither do anecdotes. It's good to have some raw numbers to look at and consider.
|1 year 2 days ago||No so sure...||
From Nauta himself:
"Georgia, from the beginning, and when I made my decision, they were in my top four, but really they were in the top two," Nauta said last week. "They have always been at the top for me. Really the proximity to home plays in their favor. One thing about Georgia and Florida State is that they both have great tight end coaches in Coach John Lilly and Coach Tim Brewster. I love to be around both of those guys. So Georgia has atmosphere, closeness to my family and a great tight end coach as advantages."
|1 year 3 days ago||YES||
|1 year 6 days ago||Thanks for the info||
This is a great post, and now that the class is filling out and we're getting to "crunch time" (senior seasons) it's a much easier and more accurate read on the situation.
This is a very, very good class that will only get better, and will form a foundation for U-M's success going forward. It is not an elite class, but we'll have that after Harbaugh wins a signature game this year.
|1 year 1 week ago||Love it||
Not a single pick I can really argue with so far, except for maybe Peppers, and that could end up being a great pick. Cardale Jones is certainly gamble, but if we wins the job it was the best value in the draft by far.
Bravo. It's going to be hard for me to pick my favorite team this year...
|1 year 1 week ago||Correct Answer||
This is the right answer.
|1 year 1 week ago||5th years and PT||
I'll just leave this last comment here, because we generally agree.
5th-year players transfer all the time. Mostly, they transfer for PT reasons. Heitzman was aware of his PT situation, and did not initiate a transfer. Once Harbaugh told him he had to try out, he started looking.
Yes, PT was part of the decision. But the try out is what made him think about leaving, and I do believe it's fair to say that represents a lack of desire to compete for a roster spot. Do I blame him for feeling that way, after working for four years to earn his spot? No. Do I think that's the type of player Harbaugh wants in his program? No. Do I think that's the way I would have handled it? No.
The kid is not a jerk, a weakling, or a malcontent, as far as I know. Like I said, I wish him the best. But neither is he the type of competitor Harbaugh is looking for. I would have been upset if I had been in his shoes, too, but he had the opportunity to prove himself for a new coach with a demonstrated track record of success, and he chose instead to try his luck at a lesser program that is likely to offer more PT.
|1 year 1 week ago||Inaccurate||
Magnus, I've upvoted lots of your comments (I am in favor of empathy and being reasonable about a kid's choices), but you keep asserting that Heitzman transferred because he thinks he can get more playing time elsewhere. While that's part of the equation and I certainly hope he can get more PT at a lesser program, the fact remains that the catalyst for his transfer was that he had to try out. A fair and reasonable conclusion is that he did not want to compete for his roster spot at U-M. And that is a completely understandable position to take, and also a completely understandable reason I don't think Harbaugh would have wanted him on the team.
But please, stop asserting that playing time was the reason he transferred. Before he heard about the try out, he knew what his playing time looked like. He could have decided to transfer then. But he didn't. He decided to look around after he heard he had to try out.
|1 year 1 week ago||Not worked up||
Who's worked up?
I don't have any ill feelings towards Heitzman. I don't think he made a bad decision. I think he made a decision that I would not have made, and that it indicates that his competitive drive is not what Harbaugh is looking for.
I wish Heitzman the best at Ohio and beyond.
|1 year 1 week ago||Reason for leaving||
"Obviously, (Jim) Harbaugh coming in was going to change things at Michigan — do things his way,"Heitzman told the Dispatch. "But I didn't know if I wanted to try out. That definitely took me off-guard. I was bummed out."
The try out is why he looked elsewhere. Without the tryout, he would not have. Like I said, I have no problem with him looking for what he believes is a better situation for him, but if the reason he's doing it is because he's not sure he wants to try out, a fair and reasonable conclusion is that he did not want to compete for a roster spot. I understand that sentiment, but it's not how I would have handled it, and it's not the kind of mentality I want on the team.
|1 year 1 week ago||Guaranteed Scholarships||
Everyone at U-M has 4-year scholarships. NOT 5-year scholarships. If you're not a 5th-year, your scholarship, and therefore your place on the roster, is guaranteed (they can ask you to accept a medical waiver).
Everyone is auditioning for playing time; the 5th-year guys have to earn their scholarship, and this is standard practice almost everywhere. Calling it a "tryout" might sound more harsh, but it's actually just an honest statement of most schools' policy on 5th-year guys.
|1 year 1 week ago||Conflation||
You're conflating two issues here and missing my point. It's fine for Heitzman to seek an opportunity he perceives is better at Ohio. I have no problem with that at all. But he would have seen that Butt was a better player whether he had to audition for his spot at U-M or not. He could have chosen to transfer (like a lot of 5th years do, ie Blake Countess) based on his desire for a better opportunity, and not because he was bummed about having to try out.
From Heitzman's comments, it sounds like the tryout impelled him to seek opportunities elsewhere. To me, that's the sign of some one who did not want to compete for their spot on the team. It sounds like, absent the tryout, Hetizman stays at Michigan. That is VERY different than just deciding to transfer because you believe there is a better opportunity elsewhere.
|1 year 1 week ago||Reason for leaving||
But the reason matters. Heitzman did NOT leave for playing time reasons--he would have made that decision if there had been no tryout. He is quoted as saying he "didn't know if [he] wanted to try out."
The tryout prompted his decision to look elsewhere, no the playing time. I'm sure playing time was a factor, but if the idea of a tryout makes you look elsewhere, then yes, I do question your competitive drive.
What I don't question is his emotional reaction of, "that sucks" to the idea of tryout. I would have felt the same way. But a tryout would not have prompted me to consider transferring.
|1 year 1 week ago||Better way||
You don't have to say "no comment." You can say, "I was grateful for getting to play at Michigan. I saw an opportunity at Ohio that I believed was a better choice for me, so I transferred."
|1 year 1 week ago||Big difference||
Between being bummed and deciding not to compete. I would have been bummed, and then I would have done my best to go out and prove that I deserved my spot.
|1 year 1 week ago||There is no chance any of||
There is no chance any of those guys would have transferred or done anything but go out and prove themselves. No one likes having to try out, but everyday in college athletics is an audition, and true competitors would take the challenge.
I'm not arguing it wouldn't suck to hear you have to "audition" as a 5th-year, but damn if I wouldn't have gone out and done my best to prove myself.
|1 year 1 week ago||Agree with your sentiment||
It would be tough to hear that you have to earn your spot, after four years of hard work.
That said, any player not up to that challenge should transfer. When I played college sports I always knew that everyday was an audition, and that I had to earn my minutes. THERE IS NO WAY I would have transferred.
I feel bad for Heitzman, but if he wasn't up to the challenge, I'm glad he's somewhere else.
|1 year 1 week ago||LOVE Draftageddon||
Great read, great research, fun snark. Can't wait to see more.
|1 year 1 week ago||THIS||
Loved this approach.
The only problem is that it makes each position have equal value. BiSB won with this system, but Ace's team would have beaten him in a game, IMO. Have to look at positional value as well, which is why we have JT Barrett, who may not even start for OSU, as a legitimate #1 pick.
|1 year 2 weeks ago||He ain't passed the bar but||
He ain't passed the bar but he know a little bit.
|1 year 2 weeks ago||Win-Win-Win||
Personally, I'm happy about all three, but I'll never be a huge spender on apparel.
|1 year 2 weeks ago||Another fun fact||
|1 year 2 weeks ago||Hope you're right. One thing||
Hope you're right. One thing we know for certain: starting in 2016, whoever wins the QB job will have earned it by besting top-flight competition. So whether it's Gentry, Malzone, Morris, Speight, O'Korn, or even Peters or Vic Viramontes, it's going to be a really good player who has won the job over other really good players.
|1 year 2 weeks ago||Jim Hackett||
He's amazing, but he's not John Beilein status yet.
|1 year 2 weeks ago||Disingenuous||
Come on, Don. I love Denard as a player and person, but you're comparing two very different eras of football. Denard was not a very good passer. JH was. Who would you rather have throwing the football? JH would have put up monster passing numbers in today's college football, was a first round pick at QB and a successful NFL QB.
That said, I agree the poster's criticism was a bit extreme--Denard's arm did a few great things for U-M while he was here.
|1 year 2 weeks ago||Woodson, Wheatley, Perry...||
Woodson is my favorite, but there are some other guys that deserve love that haven't been mentioned much:
|1 year 2 weeks ago||So much good news||
Please, Rashan Gary. Go Blue. It will be the best decision you have ever made.
|1 year 2 weeks ago||Or just use the commonly||
Or just use the commonly accepted definition of maize Hex triplet #FBEC5D
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Human Nature||
The color previously labeled "Iowa Official Yellow" is in the middle of yellow-orange range, as well as being the middle choice in the data set. It is a statistically proven fact that human beings are most likely choose the middle option when presented with several choices.
That said, a lot people just don't realize (or maybe even like) how orange real maize is.
|1 year 3 weeks ago||TRUE||
We've had a great historical OOC schedule, and that was before the CFP incentivized having better OOC schedules.
If college football keeps moving in its current direction, we'll see more P5 teams in the OOC schedule, not less. And neutral sites won't matter because everyone will want home-and-homes.
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Sex Wolverine is the only||
Sex Wolverine is the only possible name for this product. And it should smell like Gatorade and cereal.
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Chris Perry||
One of my all-time favorite Wolverines. If he could have stayed healthy, I believe he would have been one of the best RBs in school history. I will never, ever forget his game vs. OSU in 2003. One of the best individual performances in school history.
|1 year 3 weeks ago||PAT||
Actually, I enjoyed it. Only criticism is showing the Utah PAT...only show those if they're missed.
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Tough One||
OSU - 70%. Wanted to go lower here to leave more room for the other bastards, but I just can't do it. I can't root for these guys no matter what the circumstances are. If OSU had to beat anyone--let's say Maryland--and it would put us in the CFB Playoff, I still couldn't root for them.
MSU - 20%. Dantonio and MSU have the most ridiculous complex in the history of God. I hate them, but still can't quite take them seriously, even though I know I should.
ND - 5%. Seriously dropped now that the series is over and since we pretty much owned them even when we sucked. To hell with them.
SEC, PSU, Tressel - 5%. These three are just bastards.
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Just curious||
BJR, what would hate percentages look like? Have to believe your disdain for MSU has increased. Are they your #2?
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Lessons from Yoda, you have.||
Lessons from Yoda, you have.
|1 year 3 weeks ago||IT MATTERS||
It's not about a fashion contest. I'm not sure what line of work you're in, but dressing appropriately not only helps to create an impression, but also helps get you in the frame of mind to perform at a high level.
In my experience as a coach (and player), this absolutely holds true with players. We got our team new uniforms for district playoffs and went out and played the best game of our season. Obviously this is just anecdotal evidence and I do not believe that uniforms = success, but the point is that the unis did hype the kids up walking into the locker room with each player having his new uniform hanging at his locker was a special moment for them, and for us as coaches.
When I was a player, uniforms were the last thing on my mind. But it sure did feel good when we got new ones, especially if they had a cool design.
I seriously, seriously doubt that we will get any recruits just becuase Nike makes our stuff, but I do believe that having Nike as our sponsor is more attractive and just adds another positive for most (not all) recruits.
This a long way of saying that if having Nike as our sponsor is a positive in the eyes of most kids, why not do it?
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Not any kicker||
If you can get Quinn Nordin, you take him. The kid can already kick a 65-yard field goal off the ground and a 50-yard punt with good hangtime. Kickoffs would be touchback city.
That said, if you can't get him, I'm not sure we are actively pursuing more kickers. Andrew David was a great prospect as well, and we've got the Aussie this fall.
But yeah, if Nordin wants to come, he's well worth a scholarship.
|1 year 5 weeks ago||NJ/MD bunch?||
Aren't there some pretty amazing NJ kids visiting right now? Or is it MD kids?
|1 year 5 weeks ago||Hard to go wrong on NW lower||
Hard to go wrong on NW lower Michigan. I believe the Leelanau Peninsula is the best... Homestead or Glen Arbor area are amazing and right next to the dunes. Leland is a great little town. Traverse City if you want a more urban feel. Even Suttons Bay and Northport are great. Empire is another underrated spot. Basically, find a spot you like on M22.
|1 year 5 weeks ago||If you are there already and||
If you are there already and can get into Canada, Lake Superior Provincial Park is the best hiking on the Great Lakes. Porkies and PR tie for second but the Porkies are FAR. Nordhouse Dunes third.
|1 year 5 weeks ago||Yes and No||
The Tyus Battle comparison is spot on. It's important to note that the bulkiest group of decommitments were guys looking for greener pastures.
Alabama hasn't been hurt by Saban's style, which is that a scholarship offer is really just an invitation to try out for the 'Bama football team. Much the same could be said for the rest of the SEC. I'd much rather have Harbaugh pulling offers or stopping communication when recruits still have ample time to flip than have him bring kids in and send them packing with a forced transition year.
It's clear that the a lot of kids do not believe that a commitment is actually a commitment, just a way to hold their place in a class. But that doesn't excuse dishonesty from coaches.
Sadly, it has gotten to the point that this is how the game is played. Hoke was a successful recruiter (based on the rankings) and this article really brings into focus why he would not allow committed players to visit other schools: he believed in honoring commitments.
We can't have things both ways. If we, as Michigan fans, want a coach with a flexible recruiting philosophy (unlike Hoke) we're also going to conceed that there will be some less than honorable tactics used to get the possible class on board. Let's not pretend it's honorable, but let's also accept that's how the game is played, and we want to win.
Zerodark is right...every school that's winning is using questionable "roster management" practices. It sucks, and I don't like it, but it's the current market and the recruits are no more honorable than the schools.
|1 year 5 weeks ago||Not Chesson||
Will eat a lemon and a lime on the internet if Chesson does not get his 5th-year. Hard-working, athletic, willing blocker...this guy fits Harbaugh's style.
|1 year 5 weeks ago||Disagree||
While everything you said is true, I would prefer that Michigan only offer a top-level experience, even if that means limiting the size of the camp.
That said, this camp is not a reflection of Fisch (or Drevno's) play-calling or organizational skills, as I seriously doubt either had much of a hand in the logistics and neither was calling plays. Harbaugh obviously put his stamp on the day and focused on the top talent. I can't argue with that approach, but, like I said, it would be nice if they would limit the size.
|1 year 6 weeks ago||YES||
|1 year 6 weeks ago||That's Terrance Davis||
That's a favorable tweet from another highly-ranked 2016 OL who is trending blue...
|1 year 6 weeks ago||TRUE||
Swenson, Onwenu, Bredeson, and Davis would give us four top 200 247 composite OLs...awesome.
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Terrance Davis||
Could still add another top 100 OL.
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Welcome to the family!||
We are honored to have you as part of the 2016 class. GO BLUE!
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Embed||
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Welcome to the family!||
Another great pick-up...we are looking for all of the jumbo athletes to get the TE University train going.
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Yeah, that doesn't pass the test||
Unfortunately, this "second-best win" thing just goes to prove the "Little Brother" complex even further.
U-M's record was worse than Maryland, Rutgers, and Nebraska. Heck, even Penn State finished bowl eligible and with a better record, though they were behind us in the conference standings.
Beating a 5-7 team and counting it as your second-biggest win is just silly. But even more silly is that even after all of their effort to be noticed, MSU will never be more than our second-biggest rival, and perhaps only that because the ND chickens bailed.
When we won the Outback Bowl in 2002, did we put the score of our victory over the 5-7 Spartans? Can you imagine ANY situation where we would put the score of a win over a 5-7 MSU team on our championship rings? Would NEVER happen.
Please. This is the ultimate LB move.
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Yes and No||
Dude is not as fast as Shoelace, and not as elusive, but he's a close comparison when it comes to excitement. He is definitely my current favorite 2016 commit. I believe he will make big plays no matter where he ends up.
He just makes plays. His reel is full of broken plays turned into big gains from his athleticism, competitiveness, and great arm.
It appears we're done with 2016 QBs, but you never know...HARBAUGH!
|1 year 7 weeks ago||Great post||
Love this. Brian is at his best when he is disrobing idiocy disguised as altruism.
|1 year 7 weeks ago||Welcome to the family! It's great to be a Michigan Wolverine!||
Welcome to the family! It's great to be a Michigan Wolverine!
|1 year 7 weeks ago||I'm going to be mayor of titty city||
I'm going to be mayor of titty city
|1 year 7 weeks ago||Obvious troll is obvious. Our||
Obvious troll is obvious. Our class is fine and getting better. Just got a top MI prospect in Onwenu. Only an idiot would believe Harbaugh would win every battle, and I wager our class will comparable to or better than MSU when it's all over. Silly troll.
|1 year 8 weeks ago||Not worried about recruiting||
There has been a lot of alarm about recruiting on the board, and there is no good reason for it. Harbaugh just needs a little time. This summer will be big, and I expect we'll have a Top-15 class before it's all said and done. Patience...
|1 year 8 weeks ago||Co-Sign||
I think we could lose to Utah, and maybe even one other non-conference game, but be good enough later to beat one or more of MSU, PSU, and OSU.
I expect the team that plays Ohio State in Novemeber will be vastly better than the team that plays Utah, whether or not we beat the Utes.
|1 year 8 weeks ago||Yes, Yes, and Yes||
|1 year 9 weeks ago||Valenti is a douchebag||
|1 year 10 weeks ago||Logged in to upvote||
Well done, sir.
|1 year 10 weeks ago||Better than the offense?||
This is bad--horribly bad--but it still might have been a more productive recruiting class than the 2010 offensive version. Only Gardner would wind-up a consistent starter, and Dileo was the only other significant contributor.
All-in-all, 2010 was pretty much the worst on every level.
|1 year 10 weeks ago||Competency||
If our defense can be as good as it was last year (and it could be better), then we just need a competent offense to get us to 8 wins.
What's clear is that a healthy Rudock is, at least, a competent QB. He may not be a game-breaker like Henne or Henson, but he may be able to manage a game and take what the defense gives him. I do believe we'll struggle vs. great defenses (like OSU) but 9 wins seems plausible, with at least 8 probable with Rudock at the helm.
If Morris beats him for the job, that's a very good sign, IMO.
|1 year 11 weeks ago||Old arguments||
RR is a good coach. He develops players, installs a scheme that maximizes his talent, and seems to genuinely care about his team.
But damn if he didn't shit the bed a few times while he was here, and this class was one of those.
|1 year 13 weeks ago||YES, and...||
Not only is this the begininng of something special, it's an opportunity to support this awesome site that provides the best Michigan content on the web FOR FREE.
Paying even just $15 gets you amazing content at a fair price and supports MGoBlog. This is a win-win.
Seriously people, buy the magazine. Love the magazine. Feel good about helping the people who help you get your Michigan addiction every day (or several times a day).
|1 year 13 weeks ago||Really?||
A steamroller that almost lost to PSU, Indiana, and Michigan? 2OT vs PSU, up by one going into the 4th against Indiana, and up by 7 at the start of the 4th against Michigan.
|1 year 13 weeks ago||HARBAUGH!||
April 24th has never been so much fun in the college football world.
Thanks for making my Friday, Jim.
|1 year 14 weeks ago||If Saban could do this he would||
Since he cant,
|1 year 14 weeks ago||NO||
"Really, there is no body of objective evidence, other than that, to indicate he has earned that offer."
That statement is patently FALSE. The kid has camped at U-M, has coaches who have seen him practice and play, and has played in JV games. Just because he doesn't have film that's publicly available or a high school stat sheet doesn't mean there is no objective evidence to indicate that he has earned the offer.
Here is a correct statement: "I can't find any objective evidence on the internet to indicate that he has earned the offer. Therefore, I will assume there was no reason other than his legacy status, despite the fact that his brother did not recieve an offer an is paying his way, and despite the fact that his coaches and our coaches do have knowledge of him. I will make that assumption because I am entitled to an opinion about everything that happens no matter how it makes a kid feel or how it might affect our football program."
Do you want to be the guy saying that last statement? That's what this board should be asking itself.
|1 year 14 weeks ago||Welcome to the family, Carter!||
We are grateful to have you! We need more enormous, athletic, committed young men on our team.
As far as everyone who is saying that this offer doesn't make sense...don't you think it's possible that Harbaugh knows more than you do? Carter has camped at Michigan and has obvious Michigan connections. HS stats for a sophomore aren't everything.
I'm excited to have another member of the family.
|1 year 14 weeks ago||(No subject)||
|1 year 14 weeks ago||Triumph?||
Is that you?
|1 year 15 weeks ago||Pretty sure this is Jim Delany||
|1 year 15 weeks ago||Too systematic||
I don't think we need applications and the formality proposed here.
In my opinion, the biggest problem with the Legends jerseys was that there were too many of them. Dudes that were most certainly not close to being legends were wearing them, and that watered-down the mystique.
Basically, we should only retire numbers of dudes who are legends (Heisman or some other equally amazing feat) and if those jerseys are brought back into circulation, it should only be for players that have already demonstrated they have a realistic shot at repeating those amazing feats, and that would be at the HC's discretion.
The problem with the Legends jerseys, and even the #2 jersey, during the Hoke era is that it was WAY too easy to get one. Not one of the players wearing a "Legends" jersey turned out to be anything close to a legend, perhaps save Jeremy Gallon--but even that is a stretch.
|1 year 15 weeks ago||Devin Lucien, UCLA|
|1 year 15 weeks ago||Hello!||
Welcome to the family, Blake! We are fortunate to have you and look forward to bringing the B1G championship back to A2 where it belongs.
P.S. - Negging a "Hello" post should be cause for a ban. I'm sure I don't understand all of the squabbling that goes on around here, but no matter what you think of a poster, don't neg the news that we've added a valued member to our family. You can find other places to relieve your angst.
|1 year 16 weeks ago||Not that clear-cut||
First of all, I think they are very close--Bolden is not way ahead of Morgan. I think they are very different players who offer different things. I'd prefer Bolden. The previous staff (which had pretty good defensive chops and was led by Greg Mattison) agreed with me.
Morgan is more consistent. He fills his gap, stops the ball, and does his job.
Bolden is more athletic. On every play, he has a lower floor and a higher ceiling than Morgan. Bolden can blitz, come off the edge, and cover more field. He blew-up a screen in the Outback Bowl that really illustrates my point: Morgan could not have made that play on his best day, but even after he got there, I was worried Bolden might miss the tackle--Morgan would not have given me that cause for concern.
This is pretty nit-picky--I like both guys and only incrementally prefer Bolden. On 3rd and 1, give me Morgan. But Bolden can do things that Morgan can't, and I would slightly prefer his diverse skillset.
We'll see what this staff thinks. I'd like to see both on the field, but Bolden's diverse skillset gives him the slight edge in my mind.
|1 year 16 weeks ago||almost 100% agree||
Other than the injured guys who may make pushes (Drake Johnson, Khalid Hill, Ty Isaac) I think you pretty much nailed it.
My one quibble is that you have Bolden and Morgan reversed; pretty much everyone but you puts Bolden ahead of Morgan. But it's your list.
Also, +1,000 points for you for the Lebowski reference w/Kerridge.
|1 year 16 weeks ago||Watson||
Agree on Watson, and I forgot about him in my diary.
The secondary will be fine, especially after Lyons joins. The only remaining concern on defense is at DE, where we'll be okay, though we might not have any gamebreakers.
Offense is a different story...two or three OL spots, one WR, the RB, and...oh yeah, the QB--all up for grabs. And not in a good way like the #3 safety (Thomas, Hill, and Clark all looked good). More like when you go to the grocery store looking for a ripe avocado and they're all bright green so you just take the one that you can barely press into with your finger but you're still not sure if you just pushed harder on that one.
I hope Harbaugh, Tolbert, and Co. help the boys work wonders this summer, because wonders are needed on offense.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||Big Miss||
Ryan Glasgow will either start or be heavily in the rotation at NT. He was one of our best players last year. If we ever see the draft order, it will come out that he went very high. The fans missed this one in a big way.
Also, Erik Magnuson is a versatile player that has more talent and experience than a few guys above him. I'd put him ahead of Dawson, LTT, and Braden.
Other than that, I think we did a pretty darn good job. I think Bolden is ahead of Morgan and I think Drake is ahead of De'Veon, but that's picking nits.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||Don't get the Maize love||
I think Blue has the better O-Line and D-Line; Maize only has four scholarship O-Line players.
It's close, but I like Blue.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||I like Blue||
See below for complete explanation, but Blue is stronger on both lines and has the secondary to compete with Maize's loaded WR corps.
Should be fun to watch.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||Winners (my two cents)||
At first glance, I thought Maize looked better...upon further review, I like Blue's chances to win. Stronger on the lines and no real weaknesses on defense. If Isaac and Shallman can move the ball, they'll be okay only have two proven receiving threats in Darboh and Butt. Maize will need its WRs to outplay Lewis, Countess, Wilson, and Thomas to win. I'm not sure their O-Line will be able to hold-up against Blue in the running game.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||O-Line||
Can they open holes? Can they pass protect?
The Hoke era should have taught us one important thing: In a pro-style offense, the team goes as the O-Line goes. We're only in spring, but has Drevno picked-up where 'Nuss left off (a competent running game) or do I have to worry about TFLs being an official play call again?
We have the bodies; we'll see if these coaches can get them to execute.
I'm not worried about WR, and I'm not sure why we would be. Poor O-Line and QB play--not to mention scheme--has distorted that position's production. I believe Darboh, Chesson, Norfleet, Ways, Canteen, and even Jones, Cole, and Dever give us plenty of options. Maybe there's not star, but there's a competent group there.
RB would be my #2 position to watch...we have talent, but I'm real curious to see how it translates in this system.
DE would be #3...pass rush?
|1 year 17 weeks ago||Agree, but...||
What's our ceiling? Harbaugh has demonstrated that he can win games against superior teams, so is our ceiling a spot in the CFB playoff?
My prediction is now 9 wins; our schedule is pretty tough, even with our rivals coming to us this year. Utah, Oregon State, and BYU are all non-conference threats, with Maryland, Minnesota, and Penn. State joining MSU and OSU as potential losses. That said, I think we'll only drop three of those eight games.
It's awfully hard to put a ceiling on this team, but I'd say 11 wins is on the edge of reason, and going undefeated is implaubsible.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||YES||
As Brian said, this is a massive relief. Our biggest question mark just changed dramatically: our floor at the QB position is a competent B1G starter. If Rudock doesn't win the job this fall, it's because we have a pretty darn good alternative.
This is amazing news, and pushes my win prediction to 9.
Welcome to the family, Jake. GO BLUE!
|1 year 17 weeks ago||No names, but plenty of talent||
While this transition lacks a Denard-type star, it's not a question of if but rather who.
QB is the biggest question mark and potentially limiting factor on this team's ceiling. We really have no idea who's going to start, and we won't have a much better idea after Saturday. But I'm not too worried about any position other than QB, and possibly TE.
The point is that other than QB, we have starting talent and even adequate depth (other than TE). There will be stars...we just don't know who yet. I'm excited to see who rises to the top of the meritocracy.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||During the weekend, or following the weekend?||
Actually during the event, I'll take under.
By the end of next week? Over.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||Relationships w/HS Coaches||
And I would that coaches are a generally tight-knit community; relationships aren't going to vanish because a guy goes to the NFL. If they trusted Harbaugh before, they will trust him now, unless he gives them reason not to.
HS coaches are almost always looking out for the best interest of their players. Access to a school like Michigan and a staff like ours--led by Harbaugh--is a good thing for their players and their programs, and they will want to rekindle that relationship with Harbaugh. Sending your player to a great school that can also prepare him for the NFL is a win for you, the player, and your program...HS coaches want to see their players go as far as possible, and to be able to say, "You know who So-and-So rookie of the year in the NFL is? He played his HS ball here and got a degree from Michigan."
I seriously doubt JH's time away from college football has had much of negative impact on his connections, and I believe those bonds will be re-formed quickly.
The real problem is location--a lot of kids say, "distance isn't a factor," but most end-up committing close to home. Like Carr, if Harbaugh can get a couple players a year from CA, he's doing well. Ditto for Texas and the southeast. If we're pulling 6 elite or very good players per year from those regions, chances are we've got plenty of talent--that would be 20-30 of our total roster in addition to the talent we get from the B1G footprint.
|1 year 18 weeks ago||My Board||
This is a lot harder than it should be. We need more standout players, and I suspect that by B1G season, this will be much easier (and in the future). In a draft, of course, a lot depends on what the other team does, but in terms of overall value I would load-up on defense (assumes all players are healthy):
|1 year 21 weeks ago||Kap and Hack are examples of||
Kap and Hack are examples of what happens when your offensive line play declines precipitously. Hackenberg didn't become a ba QB as a sophomore and Kaepernick didn't become a bad QB because he's a year older. The O-line play directly impacts the QB and both guys faced softer protection this year. That's not all there is to it, but that's a big part of it.
|1 year 21 weeks ago||If this is half true, I'm||
If this is half true, I'm excited. HAIL-YEA, the defense should be ahead of the offense at this point. It is much easier to pick up scheme on defense than it is on offense where timing, precision, and chemistry play a bigger role. Not to mention that we have no established QB, very little WR experience, and a very different coaching style on the O-Line. On top of all that, our defense is simply better--they've been coached better and played better for years, and there is more experience.
|1 year 22 weeks ago||This is the winner||
"I MUST WIN...I MUST WIN!!!" He spends another few minutes repeating and talking about that phrase after he breaks the projector with his enthusiasm.
|1 year 22 weeks ago||Texas||
I actually like the Longhorn on the front of the helmet.
But yeah, lots of these are just bigger logos...
|1 year 22 weeks ago||No big deal||
I'm not worried.
If our staff is as good as we think it is, this won't be a huge issue. What makes me say that? OSU's defense this year featured 13 players on the two-deep with one or no years of experience. Their safeties each had one season of experience.
Would it be nice if the recruiting classes would smooth out a bit to prevent this in the future? Yes and no. Having years where you are loaded with seniors does seem to correlate to national success, so it may be worth having some lean years.
But like I said, Saban, Meyer, and even Fisher have demonstrated the ability to reload each year. Harbaugh will do the same.
|1 year 23 weeks ago||Numbers changing||
Unfortunately, I think transitions have made this look worse than it is.
I expect these numbers to change as Bolden, Wilson, Butt, Taco, Dymonte(?), Canteen, Cole, Mone, Watson(?), and Mason Cole move up through the ranks and rack-up some PT.
Then again, we just had another transition, and if those guys aren't willing to eat cereal and gatorade (that's a metaphor) then they won't see the field under JH.
|1 year 24 weeks ago||This should be Posbanged||
Morgan is a very good player who seems to have the tenacity Harbaugh craves. While expected, this is amazingly great news.
|1 year 24 weeks ago||Book your ticket to Indy||
If we beat both MSU and OSU, you can bet we'll be playing in Indy for the B1G championship. I'm sure it's not likely, but doesn't it feel good that it's possible?
|1 year 24 weeks ago||OSU||
The article also points out the running game's success against Ohio State, which was extremely encouraging when you consider how strong OSU's defense had gotten by that point.
But to answer your question, I dont know. I'd love to see someone research that, but it won't be me. Anecdotally, I do remember offenses finishing strong and then looking better the following year, like MSU '13.
|1 year 24 weeks ago||WRONG||
The laws of probability prove that if something has any chance of happening, it eventually will. Something that has a 0% chance of happening must truly be impossible.
|1 year 24 weeks ago||Burning bridges||
There is no way Urban didn't know about Drayton's departure. Drayton must know that if he even wants to coach college football again that he needs to be open and honest with his head coaches--especially guys that the influence that Meyer does.
This was dirty, slimy, under-handed. And if U-M does it, I'll say the same thing.
I'm not going to give Meyer the blanket label of "slimy," but OSU played this kid, and they should rip-up the LOI if he asks them to.
|1 year 25 weeks ago||ND press coverage||
We pressed ND unsuccessfully. Countess, in particular, was getting torched. Will Fuller was getting clean releases on slants and fades, and we had to soften coverage to try to stop the bleeding.
We tried to press ND, just couldn't do it.
|1 year 25 weeks ago||Heh||
But, as you've proven, self-righteousness is not a lost art.
|1 year 25 weeks ago||Missing the point||
I am excited about/for every kid that commits to Michigan, regardless of their recruiting rankings. Our coaches should be, too.
There is no possibility of negative consequences from these tweets, unless you're the type of person that only believes that highly-ranked recruits are desirable.
Harbaugh turned Stanford into a national powerhouse with 3-star players...anyone he invites that accepts the invitation should excite us.
I have never, NEVER been anything less than excited for a "Hello" post, and I doubt I ever will be. It's always a blessing to welcome another member to the family.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||Ace||
Yeah, well said, Brian.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||Yeah, but not Gollums.||
Yeah, but not Gollums.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||Seth referenced it||
Smart football makes complex concepts accessible to the layman.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||Gut feeling||
I believe Clark is going to pick UCLA.
And if he does, I am fine with that, because I think it indicates that there are things that are more important to him than football. Don't get me wrong--I've lived in LA and Westwood is an amazing spot--I can't blame the kid for loving it. But Harbaugh's system is proven to be an NFL TE factory.
I wish him the best and hope he goes Blue, because I honestly believe Michigan gives him a far better chance of becoming an elite TE and a high NFL draft pick.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||Early returns||
So far, he appears to be a good addition. The recruits he is visiting seem to like him and he's getting kids to come for visits.
Time will tell, but there is certainly nothing to criticize yet.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||I wish||
I could upvote this. Great work, and lots of it. We tend to only remember the whimpering end, but Fred had a pretty good career here.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||Broncos?||
He missed lots of hires. 49ers, Broncos, Jets. He named the guys that hired his assistants.
There really is nothing to see here.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||Really?||
Your comparisons are completely invalid. First of all, no one has any idea who (if anyone) deflated the balls, or who ordered it. It's more likely Tom Brady is guilty than Bill Belichick, but that's not the story out there.
Second, if you want to compare, let's use a valid comparison. The Seahawks break contact and pass interference rules all the time, and don't get flagged every time. Should they be fined and docked draft picks? They are doing it in plain sight, same as the footballs. This isn't cheating on a test, it's an open, obvious practice that the refs had the opportunity to stop AFTER EVERY SINGLE PLAY. And comparing this to putting lives in danger by driving drunk? SMH. That's beyond ridiculous.
Finally, the balls were re-inflated at halftime, and the Pats proceeded to annihilate the Colts. This game's outcome had NOTHING to do with deflated balls. ZERO.
Honestly, the Dallas Cowboys and Detroit Lions were hurt by far more egregious officiating errors, and there was no recourse. Give me a break. If this wasn't Belichick's team that has a chance to be the most successful ever, then it wouldn't be a story.
To answer your one reasonable question: YES. Blame does get shifted if someone is paid to enforce the rules. As my other examples above indicate, it is the referee's job to make sure the rules are followed. That's why we have refs. That's why you don't call your own fouls in professional sports. If you were ever an athlete or coach in a terribly officiated game, then you understand that bad officiating tilts the scales, and, if properly enforced, rules are broken far, far less often.
Have you ever played a sport and broken a rule? Ever fouled someone in basketball and not had the foul called? What did you do? Did you tell the ref to stop the game and give the guy some free throws?
The self-righteousness of our society is staggering.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||Iman Marshall||
The starting spots are all wide open with the new staff, but CB seems to be particularly open. Iman Marshall is very much what Durkin looks for in a CB, and I think he could win the job and start opposite Lewis by B1G season, if not from day one.
Countess was average at best on the outside last year, and I don't see the aggression that Durkin's CBs played with at Florida. I think we'll see a renewed emphasis on speed at all positions, and Peppers playing that HSP role that UF used last year sounds perfectly delightful.
This defense will, schematically, somewhat resemble Mattison's 2011-2013 units, but it will have a very different feel with personnel and execution.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||EXACTLY||
This whole thing is such a joke. If the balls were deflated to a point that would have made a difference, then the referees are the ones that are at fault here. They handle the balls after EVERY play, and if they couldn't tell they weren't properly inflated, then they should be reprimanded, not the Patriots.
Anyone who has played any football can immediately tell--just from gripping a football--if the ball is properly inflated.
This is more about media attention and making a stroy than anything, but if there is a story, it should be the continued incompetence of NFL officials.