|12 hours 57 min ago||Er, you just mean "getting jobbed"||
I don't think "rim jobbed" means what you think it does
|14 hours 21 min ago||WOOOO||
You people have no faith. Has the football team broken you? Beilein knows how to coach. Don't forget that.
|15 hours 42 min ago||Just to be clear||
The people getting screwed are the student-athletes who usually get up early in the morning to work out. They're just so lucky the NCAA protects their amateur status so they can't be taken advantage of by corporations.
(obvious /s is obvious)
|1 day 2 hours ago||wit and rapport||
that is all.
|2 days 10 hours ago||But, I will say that, as a||
It'd be swell if you'd explain who you are talking about other than Les and the Harbaughs. That's a mystery third option and...Jim Caldwell? Why would he want to coach Michigan? And, seriously, who is the third pre-Les, non-Harbaugh option?
|2 days 15 hours ago||When looking a gift horse in the mouth, keep your eyes open!||
I think he'd be a pretty effective recruiter without contacting recruits at all if what he was doing instead was winning the Super Bowl.
|2 days 15 hours ago||Our TV exposure has been||
Our TV exposure has been total shit all year so far.
|5 days 1 hour ago||So who are the 4-5?||
|5 days 20 hours ago||He's had family members||
He's had family members lobbying him to transfer for years, as first noticed (by me!) a few years ago when his sister tweeted that he should become a Gator. I suspect that his family thinks he can play in the NBA, and what he'd been doing at Michigan certainly wasn't going to get him there.
|6 days 3 hours ago||Just to be clear||
You quoted a 10 year number for cop deaths and a 1 year number for killer cops. That's 150 cop deaths per year, and between 400 and 3000 killer cops per year.
Based on your numbers, I agree with you that cops are in great moral danger of becoming murderers every time they go to work, and in between 5% and 37.5% as much danger of being killed themselves.
|1 week 3 hours ago||DG's last answer is great||
It's great that these kids continue to have such a good relationship with Hoke. That'll be what we have to hang our hats on if, somehow, he keeps his job.
|1 week 14 hours ago||Your long paragraph fits me||
I was kind of willing to blame the Morris reinsertion on the doctors, and I was happy to blame the Morris press conference shenanigans on Brandon given that it really looked like Hoke got hung out to dry, but the apology to Dantonio throwing Joe Bolden under the bus was totally beyond the pale. Dantonio has repeatedly let his players try to injure/maim/kill Michigan players on the field without a peep from either side. He runs a dangerous program that our players shouldn't have to deal with. So apologizing to him was not just preposterous, but totally inconsistent with leading Michigan's football program. Even if that was Brandon controlling Hoke, at some point you've got to have a backbone if you want to be a leader, and issuing that apology was just absolutely inexcusable. He lost me for real in that moment.
|1 week 1 day ago||Marshall||
The whole point of the playoff was to give undefeated teams a shot. I have Marshall at 4 if they remain undefeated.
|1 week 1 day ago||you're right that the OP is wrong||
But I think you were wrong to take this down. All of the critics were just pointing to what the cops said, as if police reports have never gotten anything wrong before. Hoke did say that he got both sides of the story, and how he got FC's side of the story is an open (and interesting) question.
|1 week 1 day ago||The OP is not exactly wrong||
It's unclear how Hoke got enough information to make the call without speaking to Clark. But he did say he'd heard both sides of the story. I'm guessing he talked to a teammate who Clark had texted or something afterwards. You can't throw the guy off the team unless you're confident he's not being falsely accused, and you have to have something beyond the police report for that. But Hoke said he had it, and I believe him about that.
|1 week 2 days ago||Good||
Hopefully the victim heals physically and emotionally and gets Frank out of her life before he hurts her or her baby again.
As for us, after Gibbons left, we could claim to be free of violent criminals for the first time in years. With Clark booted--granted only after he turned violent criminal--we are free of criminals altogether, right? YMMV on the role of the second receiver in the Csont'e York sucker punching (I, for one, think he should also have been charged), but this is an improvement.
|1 week 2 days ago||Depends...||
Is destruction of public records a civil offense?
|1 week 2 days ago||for the computer non-savvy…why not just return it?||
My mom claimed to have gotten a really fucked up computer out of the box once. I never believed her account of any of the symptoms, and I still kind of think the Best Buy people were just fucking with her. But what she did was return the computer and buy another one later. Solved her problem with minimal aggravation.
|1 week 2 days ago||Wait a minute. Where's the||
Wait a minute. Where's the apology to Dantonio?
ETA: I posted that before I read the statement. Fortunately I don't have to revise it... In all seriousness, I hope the allegations prove false, for everyone's sake. But if FC committed another crime...ugh, see ya.
|1 week 3 days ago||Ugh||
This guy already had a second chance. Not good.
|1 week 5 days ago||Oh. I call those professional||
Oh. I call those professional programs. \academic
|1 week 5 days ago||lolwut||
Princeton has plenty of graduate students for its size, and very well-regarded programs.
|1 week 5 days ago||I'll be sad to see Hoke go||
I keep thinking of making a snowflake thread of my own about Hoke, but it's not really thread-worthy. I'm sad for him, but I'm also sad for us because I think he would've been a great fit if he could have gotten the team to perform. People have said it before, and I agree: his loyalty to position coaches who are in over their heads will eventually have cost him his dream job. You gotta wonder whether a less incompetent Athletic Director might have been able to support Hoke in a way that led to success on the field instead of Appalachian State rematches and PR disasters.
|1 week 5 days ago||Yes||
Everyone is fired, except Williams who ought to be fired and may be before this is all over (although I'm sure they'll allow him to resign if it comes to that). The accreditor has to investigate. Making sure this sort of thing doesn't happen is more or less the only thing they do. They're just very slow organizations.
I suspect that UNC will explain the actions they've taken and the accrediting body will say that's enough and put them on some kind of weak probation. Maybe the accreditors will demand some additional oversight or something if UNC's existing actions aren't sufficiently impressive.
But a really interesting thing will be what the NCAA does after an accrediting body makes it undeniably official that the UNC AD was making an absolute mockery of the whole student-athlete thing.
|1 week 5 days ago||Cool||
It would be cool if somehow this destroyed UNC basketball. I still haven't forgiven them.
|2 weeks 23 hours ago||He's injured||
He's injured, and Hoke has said as much.
It's a lot safer to hold off on starting threads unless you know that you have all the relevant information, especially if you're going to write a really long OP.
|2 weeks 1 day ago||head asplode||
|2 weeks 1 day ago||I'm here for the posbang||
Congratulations to my fellow Fort Wayne native Austin Hatch.
|2 weeks 2 days ago||hooray||
But how do I watch this game? BTN Plus? I'm guessing my cable coop doesn't do that.
|2 weeks 2 days ago||I wonder what those weird||
I wonder what those weird tire marks on Joe Bolden's back are...
|2 weeks 2 days ago||wut||
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Nuss has never thrown players||
Nuss has never thrown players under the bus in order to apologize to Mark fucking Dantonio.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||So I initially upvoted this||
So I initially upvoted this thread, but then I read this comment about these coaches implementing plays for next season and switched it to a downvote.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Man, poor damn Gardner. I||
Man, poor damn Gardner. I wonder whether his season would be going much differently without the ankle injury.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||What did I miss?||
Brian posted this. Did they say earlier it was really going to be Ace?
|2 weeks 5 days ago||I'm going to a D3 game so I||
I'm going to a D3 game so I can see some better coaching decisions.
|2 weeks 6 days ago||I would prefer this cat, even though it is somewhat terrible||
See http://worstcats.tumblr.com for more pictures of this breed of cat.
|2 weeks 6 days ago||You say that like "GDI" isn't||
You say that like "GDI" isn't derogatory...
|3 weeks 4 hours ago||Thanks, Vincent||
I think it's less the word being used than it was the sentiment being expressed using it.
Most of us muggles are alumni who are committed to seeing the Athletic Department live up to the standard of excellence we associate with the state of Michigan's flagship university. Anybody who thinks a good fundraiser, wizard or not, shouldn't be held to that standard doesn't understand what this place is all about.
|3 weeks 1 day ago||Media's been saying they||
and, of course, nobody buys it. [double post]
|3 weeks 1 day ago||Media's been saying they||
Media's been saying they announced 103k.
|3 weeks 1 day ago||Thank you||
Thanks for pushing back against this stupid narrative. Dave Brandon wants people to think it was all about the football team's record. The total clusterfuck surrounding a student-athlete's brain injury, which was reflective of the total mismanagement of the Athletic Department by Dave Brandon and his ego, precipitated his firing. That was Dave Brandon's fault and Dave Brandon's fault alone. Don't let him throw the football team under the bus.
It would be unfortunate if DB and his minions managed to pull the wool over people's eyes about this. The student with the loudspeaker at the rally at the President's house gave DB much more cover than he deserved by complaining about football performance. But that shouldn't cloud the narrative for those of us who have been paying attention.
|3 weeks 1 day ago||huh||
I'm late to the party, but I don't understand what you got Bolivia'd for. You might've been speaking in greater generality than was warranted, but I was certainly embarrassed to cheer for the guy by the end of his career.
|3 weeks 3 days ago||in before delete||
This was already addressed in a thread on Mealer's comment. Of course it's disappointing, especially if these are the kinds of men Michigan has been making the past several years. There's nothing admirable about being an arrogant asshole. Mealer claims to have been joking, and I think it's possible the muggle thing is all in good fun. But hopefully the attitude his joke expressed isn't deeply engrained.
|3 weeks 3 days ago||er...||
I don't think 'wistful' means what you think it means.
|3 weeks 3 days ago||Isn't this the guy Bacon||
Isn't this the guy Bacon likes? I haven't read Fourth and Long yet but I thought it was a pro-NU thing.
|3 weeks 3 days ago||I haven't been on the site much today||
I saw the NU AD thing earlier--did anybody note that makes it seem like Bacon has somebody's ear again?
|3 weeks 4 days ago||Pete Thamel disapproves||
I am a little bit ashamed to catch this reference.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||Congratulations to Brian and||
Congratulations to Brian and Ace on the well-deserved achievement. It must be gratifying.
(I love all the whining about the NYT, too. Strong work, Section 1%ers.)
|3 weeks 4 days ago||We already had this thread||
Last time it was called "113,000+" or something like that. But yes. Of course.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||If all my students actually||
If all my students actually hated me, there is no chance I'd be doing a pretty good job in my duties.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||yeah..||
It would be disappointing if these were the kinds of men Michigan has been making. Hopefully after the shock wears off, Mealer will come around to a more reasonable view.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||what a DB||
Dave "I'm serving my University" Brandon demands $3m to resign. Color me not at all surprised.
|3 weeks 5 days ago||AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA||
YES. FUCK HIM.
Also I was finishing the cover letter for a job at Michigan when I saw this news. Hopefully nobody actually reads that last paragraph.
|4 weeks 2 hours ago||Wait a minute||
When did they fire Roy Williams? I must've missed it.
Also, you can whine all you want, but the rules for accreditation are the rules. The end.
|4 weeks 2 hours ago||I see one downside||
The only downside of firing him now that I can see is that the letter announcing he's being fired for cause for not only being screamingly incompetent, not only intentionally and illegally destroying records, but even actively damaging the program's long-term health through his own arrogance will be more awesome the longer they have to add rhetorical flourishes.
|4 weeks 3 hours ago||You can re-earn accreditation||
That endowment means that UNC probably has enough money to survive until it can re-earn accreditation, even if it really loses it. Though the much more likely (and I think probably more appropriate, given the rules) outcome would be for UNC to be put on some kind of probation. If individual departments could lose accreditation, that'd be another solution. But I don't know the rules that SACS operates by.
It might be helpful to see the kinds of things that happen when a school's accreditation is seriously threatened. Here are some details in the ongoing case of San Francisco City College, which has 79,000 students.
|4 weeks 3 hours ago||Ethics...||
I am confused about how RR got a -2 for ethics.
|4 weeks 3 hours ago||The one thing I can guarantee you is the economy doesn't matter||
Totally irrelevant. This isn't Nam. There are rules. And the rules certainly don't say that you can break them if being held to account would be bad for the local economy.
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||I believe what happens is||
I believe what happens is that institutions are periodically reviewed by their accrediting bodies on a set schedule (e.g., every 5 years). I don't know if media or institutional revelations can trigger a change in that schedule, but I would expect UNC to get some serious scrutiny in their next regular review. I would not be surprised to see the accreditor demand evidence of acceptable academic standards in UNC's affected departments during the review, although I don't know if that demand would be FOIA-discoverable, so it may never come to light.
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||Of course it won't. The||
Of course it won't. The question is whether it should. And I do think they'll have some serious questions to answer during their next accreditation review.
I also wonder what the next external review of their Department of African, African-American, and Diaspora Studies will be like. The media ought to be watching that and putting serious pressure on the external reviewers to be thorough.
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||The relevant difference||
The relevant difference here is that university presidents don't give a flying fuck about athletics or amateurism. They have real jobs to do. But ensuring that academic standards are upheld well enough to meet the basic requirements to retain accreditation and the associated ability to receive federal financial aid dollars is a central part of that job. They really do care about that.
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||Yes.||
This website is amazing. Yukon Cornelius. What the fuck.
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||Wow, thanks||
I don't know how to divide or use calculators, so your comment was really helpful.
But this reminds me that somebody should really do something about calculator companies. Calculator companies are super greedy. I mean, they're too cheap to buy enough ink for the second plus sign on calculators--you know what I mean, the funny symbol with the dots above and below the horizontal line that results from not using enough ink when trying to make a plus sign. Even worse, that plus sign doesn't even work. It's always returning numbers that aren't whole numbers even when you add two whole numbers. Calculator companies just the worst!
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||There are a number of regional bodies||
UNC's accreditor is the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||You missed the point||
Accreditation is controlled by much more serious people than the NCAA. It is in the hands of actual adults.
|4 weeks 4 hours ago||They were discussing faculty||
They were discussing faculty and staff, yes. Who filed those charges? I haven't filed this closely. I'd imagine there are other crimes here that are sufficiently distinct that double jeopardy would not apply.
|4 weeks 5 hours ago||Yes||
It might be worth noting that 3000 students is 150% of the size of the student body at Macalester.
|4 weeks 5 hours ago||Re: federal funds||
If you wade into the comments on the CHE article itself, you'll see some discussion of whether people should be going to jail for defrauding the federal government by stealing federal aid funds in connection with these classes.
Curioser and curiouser.
|4 weeks 5 hours ago||They did find that, I think||
The benefit, AFAIK, was not reserved only for student-athletes.
|4 weeks 5 hours ago||Well, read the article||
The classes weren't only taken by athletes.
And despite the pull quote in the OP, I'm not convinced the real accreditation question is what feels most appropriate. There are standards for accredited institutions to uphold, and UNC blew it.
Your last point is plausible. I don't know what the usual course of events is, and while the headline of the article says UNC should lose its accreditation, the body says only that it should be suspended (per the pull quote in the OP). Are those the same thing? Either way, do you at least agree that UNC should now be subject to the kind of warning period you have in mind?
|4 weeks 6 hours ago||Hoke, yes. Brandon, no.||
What you say is a reason to let Hoke resign with some dignity. Dave Brandon has embarrassed himself and the University while apparently repeatedly breaking laws regarding record keeping. He should be fired for cause and marched out of Schembechler Hall by security.
|4 weeks 15 hours firstname.lastname@example.org is the||
email@example.com is the (formerly) tightly held address.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||posbang here we come||
I regret not having been the one to start this thread. WD posbang in full effect.
I will post my FOIA appeal to President Schlissel, demanding a stop to email deletion practices among other things, when I have time to write it (probably next week).
|4 weeks 1 day ago||This still makes me so angry.||
This still makes me so angry. They try to injure our guys seriously over and over and over and we apologize to them!? It's bullshit, and it's why supporting the team requires demanding a new AD and a new coach.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||Mark Dantonio very obviously||
Mark Dantonio very obviously has a serious emotional disorder and he needs help. I don't think we should make fun of him.
\s fuck that troll
|4 weeks 1 day ago||Fear not. I have uncovered the truth of this matter.||
MSU is 100% our institutional little brother, and a decade of a topsy turvy football world is not going to change the century of domination you have experienced and will return to experiencing in the next few years. Also, Mark Dantonio has some kind of emotional disorder.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||I forgot kenpom was||
I forgot kenpom was basketball for a minute and was looking for us at the bottom of the list.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||Not when the amateur status||
Not when the amateur status is a sham for other people to appropriate what is rightfully yours, no.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||last straw?||
Thus Hoke loses the team. The players can't possibly support him after being thrown under the bus like this, can they?
|4 weeks 2 days ago||I'm pretty sure I'd just be||
I'm pretty sure I'd just be happy not to be in your marriage if I witnessed this...
|4 weeks 2 days ago||JG moment||
My thoughts exactly. This is as pathetic as public embarrassments come.
This is the infantile, big-eyed "We apologized" of Dave Brandon's disastrous media tour writ large as Michigan's new official PR strategy. I can't believe somebody is being paid to come up with this shit.
|4 weeks 4 days ago||video issues||
The videos in this post are screwed up. The first video should be Oregon throwing deep to a slot receiver, but it's Lippett catching a Hemingway-style jump ball. The second video should be Lippett, but it's a video game #fail thing. Also not sure what's going on with the Moment of Zen.
|4 weeks 4 days ago||Good||
He did nothing wrong. The NCAA rules are what's wrong. It is now, finally, being fixed. Welcome back, CWebb.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||This is a good point||
The emails in question could've gone through the publicly accessible email instead of DB's uniqname, which is what I used. Brian's FOIA is more general and should come back faster than a resubmitted request from me would.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||Please forward it||
Please forward that email (with all headers) to the gmail address starting with mgobisb (so, mgobisb [at] youknowwhatgoesherehintit'sgmail [dot] youknowwhatgoesheretoohintit'scom), and ask him to forward it to me. If what you say is true, I will appeal the response to the President.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||jmfc, CGV||
First, holy unnecessary legal argot. Please see item 1 at http://www.kentlaw.edu/academics/lrw/grinker/LwtaLegalese.htm. If you want further replies from me, you'll have to speak regular English so everyone who is interested in this exchange can follow it easily. I would also like you to either (i) acknowledge that you were wrong on the law re: what it takes to freeze FOIA'd documents in Michigan or (ii) provide evidence that you were not wrong on that question. (To satisfy (ii), please cite Michigan or federal legislation or a case that constitutes binding precedent on Michigan circuit courts, and provide direct hyperlinks.)
Second, the FOIA request is already reproduced above, so you can read it for yourself if you're interested.
Third, I believe I've already adequately responded to everything else on this thread.
To reiterate: I will not respond to any more posts from you unless you cut the legalese and speak plainly.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||Not really...||
I didn't say that I think it's fake in the post you responded to. I said that we now have "at least some evidence" that the email is fake. That's a pretty weak claim. (Compare: The extended Bronco chase was at least some evidence that O.J. was guilty. The glove not fitting was at least some evidence that O.J. was innocent.)
|4 weeks 5 days ago||uh...||
I believe a FOIA request freezes the document from the time of the request to 180 days after the U's written denial (at which point my legal right to appeal to the President and/or sue them for disclosure expires).
Also, BiSB is a lawyer, and saw my FOIA request a long time ago, and also I believe submitted one of his own on behalf of MGoBlog. But I appreciate the unwarranted sanctimony of your response; sometimes I think I know everything, too.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||my request should've caught it...||
Dear Ms. Sellinger, This is an official Freedom of Information Act request for a complete email chain, including the email described below, which I will call EMAIL ONE, the email sent from the email address to which it was directed as a response, and any other FOIA-accessible email related to it via the common reply or forwarding email functions. I also hereby request any email originating from firstname.lastname@example.org containing the phrase "have a happy life" and any email originating from email@example.com containing the phrase "without you". I believe EMAIL ONE originated from firstname.lastname@example.org. I believe the content of EMAIL ONE to be, at least in part, the following: I suggest you find a new team to support. > We will be fine without you. > Have a happy life... Please confirm receipt of this FOIA request at your earliest convenience. Thank for your prompt attention, Professor [Jon06] (AB '06, MA [xx], Ph.D [xx])
|4 weeks 5 days ago||I would assume it doesn't exist, but who knows||
AFAICT, it does not guarantee that the thing doesn't exist. But it either doesn't exist or they don't have to disclose that it does. It might just not be a "responsive" record, if part of what "responsive" means is that the thing is FOIA-accessible. There are a variety of law enforcement exceptions that allow agencies to deny that a record exists, for example. Maybe his emails aren't FOIA-accessible, and that allows the same move. IANAL and anyway I can't tell what the law requires here.
But I take this as at least some evidence that the email was fabricated. (We could tell how good the evidence is if someone would FOIA some emails they know to exist to see what happens then.)
|5 weeks 1 hour ago||Please reserve your self-righteousness for actual causes||
The Susan G. Komen Foundation is a corporate branding machine that requires shockingly little of associated products. I'm all for the football program doing things to raise money for (breast) cancer research, but wearing pink is not the best way to do it. It's basically just the Brandon way to look like you're trying.
|5 weeks 17 hours ago||Funk can only be the second worst...||
Tony Gibson. That is all.
|5 weeks 17 hours ago||You're not overreacting||
If that's true, it's ridiculous. It's hard to imagine what this coaching staff thinks it's doing.
|5 weeks 1 day ago||Still in progress||
They gave themselves a 10 day extension at the end of the initial 5 days. They emailed me today to ask for an address to which to mail the response, which I provided.
|5 weeks 4 days ago||:(||
Sorry about your dog, and dad, and mom. Nightmares you can't wake up from are the worst. You have my sympathy.
|6 weeks 13 hours ago||He uses them consistently.||
He uses them consistently.
|6 weeks 16 hours ago||[you aren't] asking me, but i'll respond||
Earlier today I said (in some MGoBoard thread...maybe not this one) that I don't buy the narrative about a team-wide talent development problem. It seems right at QB, OL, and RB (and maybe I should add TE), but not elsewhere. I do not think the problem with Countess is how he is being coached. I think the problem is the scheme change, which I don't consider a talent development problem even though it was obviously the coaches' decision. Hopefully that makes sense. For what it's worth, I think Lewis has always been pretty good, and I don't have any opinion about how he's being coached. (I may be confusing Lewis and Stribling here, but I think Dear Leader thinks he's just stopped getting beat by perfect throws and/or phasing out of existence when the ball comes at the whim of a pissed-off gypsy.)
As for Stribling, I can't tell whether he got any snaps because I had a hard time distinguishing 6 and 8 on the jerseys from my seat during the game. Every time I thought he was in the game, it turned out to be Taylor.
ETA: I just realized you were asking somebody else. I am apparently an overactive OP today. Sorry.
|6 weeks 19 hours ago||I do.||
|6 weeks 20 hours ago||yeah yeah||
In my defense, you can be a heck of a muse.
|6 weeks 22 hours ago||an unrelated question for you||
Where do the conventions for abbreviations you use come from? I've never seen them before, but they seem to be completely unambiguous and easy to decipher, so I assume it's from some established newspaper or gambling typographic system.
|6 weeks 23 hours ago||It's my fault on this thread||
Usually the snarkers are to blame but I did it to myself here. But no worries--there is some real discussion above, and hopefully there will be more below.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||yep||
From the OP:
The way this discussion board thing works is that you read the OP before you comment on it. /snark
|6 weeks 1 day ago||one point of disagreement left||
I disagree with this, because (having had it pointed out to me already on this thread that it's hard to play in the NFL if you literally cannot play man) I think he's basically a depth CB and/or a practice squad player who earns his keep simulating zone defenders. I think it's easier to catch on as one of those things if you can get a team to spend a late-round draft pick on you than if you're an UDFA, and I think somebody would spend a late-round draft pick on Countess if he can record a few more interceptions next year. But I think that'll only happen if he's playing in a zone coverage scheme.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||oh fuck off it's a metaphor||
[ETA: wait a minute...are you guys just quoting Austin Powers? My bad. Leaving this for posterity anyway.]
You can find hundreds more if you want, I'm sure.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||Look upthread||
Blue in Yarmouth raised this issue upthread, where it already has one response. Please continue that discussion up there--it's an interesting question.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||Yes.||
It is really surprising that BC has played so poorly this year after he'd looked so good early in his career. It's worth talking about.
I do think the #2 thing makes it more ironic than it'd otherwise be, though. (See tags.)
|6 weeks 1 day ago||agree to disagree?||
If he can prove he's still an A+ zone merchant, I think he's easily worth a 6th/7th round pick. But I also think that's a reasonable thing to disagree about, so ok.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||i'll play||
So I told you what advice I'd give him, and I'll tell you now as explicitly as I can that I think it's supportive to give people the advice that you think is actually in their best interest, even if they don't want to hear it.
Here's a related example: I have a student right now who is about to walk away from a 60k/year scholarship at my current SLAC doing something he's good at to transfer to a community college in order to pursue a degree in my field, with which he's fallen in love. I give him a new reason why this is a stupid idea every week, because I think it's a stupid idea. But I'll also write him a recommendation letter when he does it anyway, because I want to support him in whatever he ultimately decides to do. That's how to be supportive, IMO.
In Countess's case, I'd present him with all the reasons to transfer that I could, because that's what I think is in his professional best interest. I'd also support him if he decided to stay, of course, but I don't think whoever's advising him is being supportive if they're not advising him to the best of their ability, which will sometimes involve telling him what's true even if he's not inclined to believe it or act on it.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||I know :)||
Why do you think I put the over/under so high on this otherwise good thread? I know how the internet works. I've just never seen a bear I didn't want to poke.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||I mostly agree||
I hope I didn't seem mad at BC. I think it's sad that the staff changed schemes in a way that put him in a position to fail. (I kind of think the NCAA should have one-time no-fault transfer rules that allow student-athletes to switch programs if there's a scheme change, even if there isn't a coaching change.)
I'm not sure about the development issues on a team-wide level, though I do think there are serious questions about our RB, OL, and QB development. I agree that talent identification is a big problem when it comes to getting the most productive players on the field, although as recently as this summer we all thought this coaching staff was very good at identifying high school talent.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||just couldn't resist||
…I know. That's why I did it. I'm sick, doc.
Substance: I don't think it's coaching. I think it's 100% a bad fit with the new scheme.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||gimme fuel gimme fire gimme somethingsomethingsomething||
More supportive? If I were advising Countess, I would tell him to transfer to a program with an established zone coverage scheme. He has high-level skills that are not being used in this defense, and it's endangering his future in his craft. The fit is just bad for him in a press coverage scheme. It's best for the program if he stays, but I'm not sure that's best for him.
I really don't know how saying that is unsupportive of a student-athlete, though. I think he can be great and make it to the League if he gets himself on a zone coverage defense.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||Wellllllll….||
I'm a Michigan grad x 3 and I am pretty sure I can be a dick on the internet with the best of them.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||I believe PSU also got an||
I believe PSU also got an illegal blocker downfield call against them, which this site believes does not get called often enough.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||So you're taking the over,||
So you're taking the over, eh?
|6 weeks 1 day ago||I don't understand why it||
I don't understand why it took so much to get DB to listen, but if he's finally listening, that's positive.
He should still be fired for cause for the post-concussion embarrassment, though. That was total moral bankruptcy and abjectly terrible leadership.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||I thought there was less||
I thought there was less piped-in music. I also didn't notice any ads for wedding rentals and that kind of stuff.
|6 weeks 2 days ago||This is false||
Morris did take part in pre game warmups. I watched him throw a pass.
|6 weeks 2 days ago||a simple request||
Can you post more? I get more points from upvotes for disagreeing with your stupidity than I can spend downvoting you.
|6 weeks 2 days ago||You are not as B1G as they||
You are not as B1G as they come. No conference should get two.
|6 weeks 2 days ago||Also MIA at AD tailgate||
My folks were at the official Athletic Department tailgate, where Brandon usually makes an appearance, and to their knowledge he did not show. President Schlissel was there, and talked about supporting the student-athletes.
|6 weeks 4 days ago||I blame Dave Brandon's Athletic Department for that||
If we had a leader in Schembechler Hall, it would already have been made clear to those players that fans are only doing what they think will be best for the program as a whole, including the players.
|6 weeks 4 days ago||Where's the mic drop gif?||
Isn't this where you declare yourself victor of the argument?
|6 weeks 4 days ago||Just out of curiosity: you||
Just out of curiosity: you are on board with the idea that players should be getting paid, since you have no problem with players' images on branded advertisements, right?
|6 weeks 5 days ago||I have always been willing to compromise||
I think Brandon should be allowed to resign instead of being tarred and feathered on the field, for instance.
|6 weeks 5 days ago||That's how I understand it.||
That's how I understand it.
|6 weeks 6 days ago||Whoda thunkit||
There really is an absolute zero of cluelessness. I never would've guessed.
|7 weeks 5 hours ago||I like what you're thinking||
I like what you're thinking but I don't think SAs should have to stand up to an incompetent AD administration themselves. I think that's too much to ask of them.
Incidentally, this pretty much is a school in the middle of a civil war, isn't it? The whole point of continuing to protest is to show them that the tension will be here until the root problem is fixed.
|7 weeks 5 hours ago||Why?||
Why, exactly? This morning I wake up to find I'm up 30 MGoPoints from before I started the thread, which now has 35 upvotes to 26 downvotes. I've been the only one arguing my side against literally the entire board before. I've even been wrong--badly wrong--on the internet before. It's ok, it happens. I'm an adult, so I can handle it. But in this thread there's a pretty deep disagreement, more people upvoted the OP than downvoted it, and I'm not quite the only one on my side no matter how deep you go in the comments.
|7 weeks 5 hours ago||It must've been the 90s,||
It must've been the 90s, because I can remember it pretty clearly and I was born in 1983. In fact, I have pictures of myself in the stadium in 1989 and I'm almost certain the wall is short then.
Also, Wikipedia says 1991.
|7 weeks 13 hours ago||?????||
I genuinely have no idea what you find wrong with that comment. A guy with 200 MGoPoints suggested the problem was DB lining his own pocket. That is not and never has been my complaint, nor anyone else's major complaint. The only time DB's money comes up is when somebody trying to defend DB pretends he's "serving his university" rather than raking in beaucoup bucks to try to make us feel bad for criticizing his poor job performance.
If I make another handle and get it 200 points then agree with something you say and offer a terrible reason for agreeing with you, will you thereby be committed to that terrible reason?
|7 weeks 13 hours ago||...I've been married for like||
...I've been married for like 3 years, but thanks?
|7 weeks 13 hours ago||Congratulations||
You found a picture from another platform. Here is an equally relevant picture:
|7 weeks 13 hours ago||People can read through the||
People can read through the longer exchange and see what they think. You obfuscated and lied. You can go ahead and claim I lied if you want to muddy the waters.
|7 weeks 14 hours ago||You are probably right||
I hope the powers that be realize why people aren't interested in the tickets.
|7 weeks 14 hours ago||Please read the first four||
Please read the first four words of the title of the OP and get back to me with your apology ASAP.
You may wish to read up on the number of AD employees DB initially fired, and the number of yes men he subsequently hired. Counterpunt's last column has those numbers.
|7 weeks 14 hours ago||Do you have any suggestions||
Do you have any suggestions about what to do with them or are you just complaining?
|7 weeks 14 hours ago||let's agree to disagree||
Social media strategies are individuated by platform and obviously change over time. I agree that I didn't make that explicit before but I thought you weren't an idiot. Mea culpa. Thanks for the additional pictures of coaches' quotes and things from other years. I appreciate their continued irrelevance.
The Funchess picture is still not on Facebook. You are still lying. I am still not super impressed with your candor here.
|7 weeks 14 hours ago||I think Brian Cleary has been||
I think Brian Cleary has been getting mocked because of his statement, and that the AD bears responsibility for that. That's all I mean.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||NOT ON MICHIGAN FOOTBALL FACEBOOK PAGE||
Does the mic drop mean you want me to respond to this one? It's hard to tell because you also posted a bunch of irrelevant things, like images of coaches' quotes after I told you like 5 posts ago that previously they'd used coaches' quotes. I'm not really fluent in obfuscationism.
Let's just respond to this one. You work for the AD, right? Is that why you're pretending this image was on the Michigan Football Facebook page, which is the only thing we've been discussing here? It wasn't. Simply wasn't. You're lying. See the previous image I posted. I confess it was relevant after all. Why are you lying, dude?
It's not a tin foil thing to point out that you're lying, which you are, plain as day. It's just not there. You and the other Brandonites can downvote me all you want, but you know I'm right, which is why you first posted a bunch of coaches' quotes I already told you were there, and then you came up with this image which was never on the FB page. So, are you ready to agree the social media strategy has changed now?
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||I'm confused about what||
I'm confused about what game we're playing here. Am I just supposed to compare a number you pick with another number you pick? Why do I care about revenue rather than profit? Do you even have to pick numbers that both represent profits or can you pick profits in one case and revenues in the other case? Are we allowed to engage in "hypothetics"? I mean, can we compare what the profit would be if DB hadn't alienated a ton of fans with what it turns out to be?
Let me know what the rules are and then maybe you can tell me how to feel about the comparison if you're feeling generous. I mean, I hear I only have an EMU degree so you might have to help me out. My poor Eagle(?) head is spinning here.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||Yes, those were all coaches||
Funchess is also wearing last year's number in that photo. What year is it from? We're trying to establish whether they changed their PR strategy to avoid the kickoff boycott by using a SA. The Funchess picture isn't from the FB page in 2014. I mean, I could also post irrelevant things. For example, here is a picture of a movie poster:
But let's focus here.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||Easy fix: I don't believe||
Easy fix: I don't believe that.
ETA: there are a few people just downvoting everything I say on this thread, but maybe this one requires more explanation. Michigan taxpayers have an interest in how virtually every part of the University is run, regardless of whether their tax dollars go to any particular part of it. In the case of the AD, unused dollars become General Fund dollars, so stupidly used dollars or stupidly foregone dollars (in the case of alumni told to find other teams to support) are dollars that do not end up in the General Fund. That's a connection that involves only following the money. I also think Michigan taxpayers have an interest in their public institutions being run in a transparent and accountable manner, which is another source of interest in the AD despite its self-sufficiency on paper. There is also the fact that the current AD's points policy undermines academic fundraising by dispensing privileges disproportionately on academic donors, which both President Schlissel and academic development officers do not like. Ok. Just spelling out the rest of the easy fix for all you haters.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||what is this shit||
I don't hang out with cats, mofo.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||This made me laugh||
But we know the AD revamped PR strategy last Wednesday. I urged President Schlissel, in the same email where I notified him of my pending FOIA request, "to instruct the athletic department to put an immediate end to any activities intended to produce positive social media buzz about the current athletic director in a way that places current student-athletes at risk of harsh public censure."
At the time I was reacting to last week's spate of pro-DB SA tweets. But this image is more of the same, and it should be beneath Michigan Athletics to repurpose an athlete's enthusiasm to protect the Athletic Director from a protest.
Ain't no reach.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||Close, but not quite||
He's a bag of ashes in a small wooden box in my home office.
Anyway I'm not really in mourning anymore. I just like the picture. Sorry if it offends you. I'm sure your childhood dog was also great, if you had one.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||The guy with less than 200||
The guy with less than 200 MGoPoints probably does not speak accurately for the guys with thousands of them.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||Oh, I must have missed all||
Oh, I must have missed all the pro-DB tweets from before this scandal. Might you be able to link me to them?
By the way, I don't think and have never said I think that DB is forcing SAs to support him. I think he is doing things that encourage them to support him publicly (wink wink nudge nudge), and otherwise (as here) publicly repackaging/repurposing what they say to prevent protests directed at him personally.
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||Go to Michigan Football's||
Go to Michigan Football's Facebook page and see if you can find something. (Hint: nope.)
At this point I would just like you to admit that it is a change in social media strategy. Then we can work on getting to the acknowledgement that it is a change in social media strategy that treats SAs as pawns to save DB's job.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||Please explain the||
Please explain the coordinated spate of tweets in support of Brandon last week.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||?||
Happy to clarify. Where'd I lose you?
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||You forgot "Have a happy||
You forgot "Have a happy life..."
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||Who makes the decision to||
Who makes the decision to change social media strategies to put players' names and quotes on promotions which previously had just images or coaches' quotes? That's not an entry level decision.
It was probably also made by one of the 118 yes men DB hired after he fired a ton of AD employees for risible reasons.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||What's the issue here?||
Are you not attempting to stand in the way of getting DB fired? Analogies too hard for you? What is it?
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||I'd love to come together and||
I'd love to come together and listen to the band--a version of the band I can actually hear--and cheer for Michigan Football.
But if Dave Brandon is still AD on Saturday, I'm going to get a Dave Brandon Superbowl-Lite Wow! Experience Presented by Special Sponsor Chobani.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||I assume you also missed the||
I assume you also missed the half-dozen other SAs who "spontaneously" posted about how much they love Brandon during his tour of practices last week.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||Let's be honest here||
Downvote this post if you're paid by the athletic department to downvote posts that criticize Brandon. I'm putting the over/under on AD sockpuppets at 12. Any takers?
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||But it's not their job||
Football players are at the Universty of Michigan to play football and to get an education. They are not here to help DB put out PR fires he created through his own arrogance and incompetence. If he can't do his job without asking student-athletes to spend their personal political capital to stop the fans from protesting him, he can't do his job.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||Because there will be consequences to ignoring it||
First, it's a public school, and aside from having paid Michigan taxes for several years, I'm also an alumnus (x3) and periodic donor. They include several of my academic accomplishments on various umich.edu pages to boost their own profile. How dare they not care what I want?
But you're right, aaamichfan. There's no reason in all that that some of them--e.g., Dave Brandon--can see for them to care. That is, there's no reason they can see for them to care unless they repeatedly get bad press for flouting their fans' desires. That's why the boycott must go forward. That's why the students should again be on the Diag and on the President's lawn demanding change. We have to give them reason to care what we want.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||Please read the comments||
Please read the comments above from your fellow Wolverines--not just me--about the appropriateness of this specific change in PR strategy.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||Perfect illustration||
We're going to have days if not weeks of jokes at Brian Cleary's expense because of the way DB is encouraging student-athletes to go out on a limb for him. The AD should be telling student-athletes to stay out of it and emphasizing to them that the fans only want what is best for them and the program. But instead the AD has them all convinced there's no distinction between boycotting Brandon and criticizing student-athletes. That's yet another instance of Dave Brandon's Athletic Department letting student-athletes down.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||It's the first time all year||
It's the first time all year they've used a quote from a student-athlete instead of something made by a graphic designer with no quotes, or occasionally a Brady Hoke quote or (once) a Swag Mattison quote.
They're changing their social media strategy specifically to combat the boycott. They're well within their rights to do that, but using student-athletes as pawns to stop a protest is a bridge too far.
|7 weeks 16 hours ago||Too convenient||
It's the guy who fields kickoffs. But DB is counting on people being as gullible as you'd like me to be.
|7 weeks 17 hours ago||The point is not to let them||
The point is not to let them know what we want. They already know that. The point is to get what we want.
|7 weeks 23 hours ago||Hooray unnecessary police||
Hooray unnecessary police brutality?
Seriously, are you celebrating this? Offering it up as a joke?
Is there another angle that makes this look like a justified use of force rather than a cop punching an excited person for no good reason?
|7 weeks 23 hours ago||It proves they actually need to fire Brandon||
If people give up now, as all these DB puppets are suggesting, then DB will be able to tell President Schlissel and the regents that people were just emotionally overreacting to the Utah loss. He'll be able to tell them it will all blow over soon. He'll be able to survive.
If you're a DB supporter, just own it. Don't pretend you want him gone while you work to save him. That's some Benedict Arnold shit.
|7 weeks 23 hours ago||Ah, now we're communists.||
Ah, now we're communists. Good. I assume you are a Nazi. Shall we fight in the streets of 1930s Munich?
|7 weeks 1 day ago||This is how the rest plays out||
Brandon must be sent on his way. He will not just go.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||This is not indirect. This is not failing to support the team.||
This is visible and public. It is direct. It will be maximally direct if they show up for pregame events and then leave en masse for kickoff before returning.
There is no distinction between demanding DB's firing and supporting the team. People want DB fired so that an AD that better supports the team can be hired.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||omg, he's so selfless…oh wait||
He has a high paying job here, Professor. Higher paying than the job you purport to have, for instance.
Also, nobody is saying he's evil. He's just not good at this job.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||They can do both||
They can also be in the stadium for the pregame stuff and leave for kickoff. In fact, doing that would send the clearest message. (I actually think they should do it for the entire first quarter, but what they actually do is up to them.)
|7 weeks 1 day ago||"Decatur"?||
Wish I understood the rationale behind all the names here.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||Brandon out||
I think Brandon has proven too divisive and must go ASAP. I'm willing to give Hoke a chance to turn it around under competent leadership, but they need to fix the AD leadership now so that the turn around can begin this season. I think it'll be hard to justify giving Hoke another year under new leadership next year if we haven't seen signs of improvement with Brandon already gone towards the end of this season.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||The real issues are not about football performance||
I think DB should be fired because it's totally believable he would send insulting emails to the fanbase. If the FOIA requests come back showing he's actually done it as egregiously as reported, he's simply not fit for the job no matter who supports him or what coach he can hire.
Corporatism/profiteering is another disqualifying feature of DB, IMO, but the most serious issue is that he appears to be unable to accept responsibility in any substantial way for any problems that have occurred. Not only do they all have their own story, but that story certainly exonerates DB.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||I'm not the right person to ask about this||
I think of FOIA as only applying to government agencies, but I suppose publicly traded companies also have some obligations. But IDK. IANAL, and I've never done this before. 5 business days + a 10 business day extension for complicated requests is how FOIA law works in the state of Michigan. But I only know that from Google.
This is not in Brandon's hands. He doesn't oversee FOIA releases, and UM has bigger problems than we all think if he can personally obstruct them.
Re: legal action: I have lots of lawyer friends, but I love Michigan and have every confidence in the people who run the place (at least, outside of the current AD administration). I do not expect to have to make any decision about legal action.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Aw shucks, Muttley. You really understand me!||
That's what I had in mind. I'm glad it came through.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||I confess that the Alanis||
I confess that the Alanis Mmoorriisseettee (that's brilliant, btw) song came out when I was at such a tender age that I am always worried about whether I've got it right.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Ah, yeah, I knew when the||
Ah, yeah, I knew when the event was, I just didn't remember when I threw the fit. I guess it must've been over the summer before that season, then.
I feel like they're in violation of the law if they routinely give themselves 10 extra days for every request. That would be disappointing.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||I kind of expect it on Friday||
They didn't confirm receipt of the request on Friday despite the fact that I sent it Thursday evening, but I got the confirmation of receipt on a Saturday (so outside business hours) from a person whose job I would not expect to require being at the office on the weekend, a little over a day after I emailed President Schlissel's office and mentioned that I'd sent the request in. To me that says his office has someone checking on the situation. That could be overly optimistic, but who knows.
FWIW, I replied to say thanks, that I assumed that they'd received the request on Friday (she said she hadn't seen my request to confirm receipt at first--another sign that her attention was drawn back to it over the weekend, since she must've looked at my email again on Saturday for one reason or another), and that I'd expect the documents by this coming Friday (which is what the law more or less requires).
Now, they get 5 business days, and I could see them claiming receipt was after 5 pm Friday (though I don't know how that could be true, and her confirmation email was clear that she had initially received the email some time prior to confirming receipt), which would give them until next Monday. They are allowed to give themselves 10 extra business days for difficult-to-fulfill requests, though I don't see how what I asked for is complicated to gather. They are not allowed to take longer than that. So Oct. 27th is the absolute latest they can legally fulfill my request.
But if I don't have it by the end of business this coming Monday, I'll have to assume the search did not come back empty, and that they are taking their time editing out the names of senders of emails and the like. Should we get to that point, my further reaction will be governed by what I have heard from President Schlissel's office or other parties in the meantime.
To be honest, now that I think about it, I might make a giant sign for the Penn State game, requesting that they fulfill my FOIA request by Monday as the law requires, if I don't already have the documents come game time Saturday.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||terrible head coaching candidates for Michigan!?||
But I thought this thread was about a coach OTHER than Brady Hoke.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Oh, I meant "Jon06"||
And I'm just giving them crap because I threw a fit a long time ago about why we should be expected to give a shit about what BiSB thinks when he wasn't, IMO, a bonified expert, and then Brian basically called me a dick on the frontpage without using my handle.
Anyway Brian and I (and LSA and I, for that matter) shook hands at some event after that. Or maybe before that. But in my mind we have forgiven each other so let's pretend it's ok.
ETA: Most of them also have my real name because I've emailed them using it at various points. But really I just meant "Jon06" because I hope to one day be e-special on the interwebs.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||You're welcome||
I've been telling my wife my internet diatribes were important for years.
/s (sort of)
|7 weeks 2 days ago||One of these days you mofos||
One of these days you mofos are gonna have to start saying my name on the front page instead of obliquely referring to me all the time :p
ETA: I know this will never happen. To every man his little cross until he dies and is forgotten, as they say.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||That's because it's actually||
That's because it's actually ironic.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||It's coming in 5 days||
I got email confirmation that my FOIA request had been received Saturday just after 3 pm.
I'd emailed President Schlissel's office at lunchtime Friday to notify them of my pending FOIA request, and to ask them to put a PR professional in charge of vetting any email sent from DB's uniqname if there was any chance my FOIA request would not come back empty.
I have not received a form response to my email to President Schlissel's office; I assume it will get a somewhat more personalized response in the next day or two. (That's usually what happens when I send a spicy email to that office in which I actually make a good point.)
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Too pessimistic by far||
President Schlissel is smart enough to see through the interview tactic you think is so insuperable. The regents don't care enough about keeping Brandon around to put up with constant annoyance for more than a month or two, and it's not like they can just get a new fanbase or replace all the alumni. Bacon was saying last week that DB is already a dead man walking.
Brandon doesn't get to set the narrative, no matter how much he pays you or any other PR firm's sockpuppet.
I don't think Brandon is just "stupid and incompetent" by the way. I think he's stupid and incompetent and has a personality disorder that systematically prevents him from seeing his stupidity or incompetence. But I have no reason to think that Schlissel does not know what's up.
DB's needlessly hostile emails are still very likely to sink him, if nothing else does.
I shall call and email some regents tomorrow in your honor.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||This is why I proposed people||
This is why I proposed people wear black--so as not to show up on TV for Diamond Dave.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Unless your intention is to||
Unless your intention is to give Brandon cover, this is the wrong approach. The person who already responded to you is trying to save Brandon. Is that your angle?
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Never leaving NU. (Might have||
Never leaving NU. (Might have gotten fired if he'd tanked this year, but I'm not sure that's a reason to hope...)
|7 weeks 2 days ago||He fake apologizes, like a 7||
He fake apologizes, like a 7 year old trying to make his mom stop being "mean" to him.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||The thing about apologies...||
The thing about apologies is that they have to be accepted.
APOLOGY NOT ACCEPTED.
What you have noted is why Brandon will not resign. He is incapable of admitting fault. He will never see his responses as inadequate to the problems.
I am not a doctor, but I am more or less convinced he has narcissistic personality disorder--I'd love to get some medical opinionis based on the interviews, if anyone is willing, without examining him in person, to venture a diagnosis of the disability underlying his inability to think anything is actually his fault.
There is still hope for Schlissel and the regents. But the students must become impossible to ignore.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Name one way that will||
Name one way that will actually work.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||in the private sector||
I always assumed you did in the private sector to (at least appear to) ensure that duties to various stakeholders have been fulfilled by undertaking a rigorous search process to make the best hire possible.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||oh, right||
I also pledge to take part, and I will make sure to get there early enough for my leaving for kickoff to be apparent to those around me in section 23.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||ok dude||
Cold War, it's time for you to shut the fuck up. Morris wasn't concussed, the national media wouldn't pick up the story, it's not Hoke's fault, it's not that bad, it's not Brandon's fault, blahblahblahblahblah. You've been wrong about everything and you're now actively interfering with attempts to do something to fix the AD. Just sit this one out already.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||I like this idea||
But the message needs to be as clear as possible. If the students are chanting "Fire Brandon" in the concourse while they're boycotting kickoff, chanting "Fire Brandon" while they file in to their seats, and chanting "Fire Brandon" during every TV timeout, then I think this will be a great and effective protest. I also agree with the calls above for signs and other visual symbols of displeasure. The message needs to be clear enough and loud enough to reach Schlissel and the regents in no uncertain terms.
|7 weeks 3 days ago||Floating an idea||
How do people feel about the idea of wearing black to the PSU game? Our program is dead. Shouldn't we mourn it?
|7 weeks 3 days ago||Unbelievable.||
|7 weeks 3 days ago||First, stop talking about Hoke and the Harbaughs||
Every call to fire Hoke relieves pressure on Brandon. People calling for Hoke's firing before Brandon's are playing directly into his bullshit "people wouldn't be upset if we were 5-0" storyline. Those people are just giving Brandon cover.