no, YOU'RE off topic
- Member for
- 4 years 36 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|17 weeks 3 days ago||Since the team has thrown in||
Since the team has thrown in the towel, is on a trajectory for a weak bowl game at best, and Hoke is not likely to return, the only thing of interest to most UM fans will be speculation about the next coach. The topics of replacing the coach and AD are taking up 90% of UM fan-site content right now. To expect a blog that seeks to attract fan traffic to avoid the topic until the axe falls (which may not be until December) is not reasonable.
|23 weeks 3 days ago||The fact of the matter is||
The fact of the matter is that if you want to be a big boy in the recruiting game, you have to be willing to play kids early. If you want to be a heavy redshirting program like Northwestern, you are not going to attract top prospects. Recruits pay very close attention to this. In fact, they will ask recruiters point blank whether they will play as freshmen during the wooing process. Coaches really can't have it both ways in this day and age.
|23 weeks 3 days ago||In the case of Taco, there||
In the case of Taco, there was no way on earth he was agreeing to RS, especially after coming in early. The kid wanted to play right away. If Hoke would have tried to RS him last year, he would not be playing for UM this year.
When it comes to recruiting, you cannot heavily redshirt guys and still expect to get top prospects. Early playing time is the #1 issue for most prospects. And they pay very close attention to which schools give younger players a shot. This may be a reason that Dantonio is not cashing in on his recent success on the field in the area of high profile recruits.
|23 weeks 3 days ago||That's a key point. Looking||
That's a key point. Looking at their redshirts after the team was good the last couple years is just a snapshot. But a lot of their key upperclassmen from 2013 played as true freshmen.
|24 weeks 44 min ago||There has to be more to the||
There has to be more to the story than just lack of reps, though. Cole came in and moved to the top of the depth chart in the spring before his freshman year. UM recruited a bunch of OG/OT swing players and it looks like pretty much all of them (Kalis, Bosch, Samuelson, Fox, etc.) have zero potential at OT. Where are the young studs? Where are the 2nd year players who are ready to start kicking tail, like many OL from UM's past?
|24 weeks 4 days ago||Dinardo in '13 was just||
Dinardo in '13 was just excited to see UM growing big OL again. And they had a bunch of "off the bus" players who look like beasts (i.e., Kalis and Braden). Attending one practice, all they really pick up on is how big guys are and how well they are moving in drills.
|24 weeks 5 days ago||He is probably 3rd-ish||
He is probably 3rd-ish string. Definitely behind Ezekiel Elliot. Probably behind Curtis Samuel. And roughly even with Rod Smith. Not sure that OSU has the clear feature back like Wells or Hyde, so Dunn may get a shot this year. The guy is in the wrong offense.
|24 weeks 5 days ago||Smith looks like a back who||
Smith looks like a back who is more capable of turning 2-yard-blocking into a 4-yard-gain. With this OL, they will need a guy who can earn the tough yards. Based on limited experience last year, Green does not fit that profile.
|24 weeks 5 days ago||At this point, we should not||
At this point, we should not consider it a surprise if Kalis does in fact get beat out at RG. UM has played a lot of young OL over the years. But his performance in 2013 could be the worst we have ever seen. He comes from a top HS program with good coaching, works out in the off season with an NFL vet/trainer, he is one of the stronger OL on the team, and had a redshirt training year at UM. So he was set up to at least be serviceable last year, but did not even come close. Just looked very stiff moving laterally in run or pass blocking situations.
One guy (possibly) busting does not tell a story because it happens all of the time with linemen. But I am starting to wonder about UM's OL recruiting over the last few years. Was hoping we would be hearing more hype about the young players. But other than Cole, we have not heard squat. That's not a great sign. Of the returnees, only Glasgow looked good (primarily at LG) and Mags looked like someone who will hold down a starting spot as he physically matures. But there's not much else to be optimistic about. UM needs a couple young guys beyond Cole to jump out of the woodwork and assert themselves.
|25 weeks 3 days ago||Agree that Funch will be||
Agree that Funch will be gone. He is that jumbo receiver that is all the rage in the NFL now. Whether or not he cleans up his drops/effort will just determine if he is a 1st/2nd rounder or a 3rd rounder.
|25 weeks 3 days ago||Actually expecting Chesson's||
Actually expecting Chesson's role to diminish a little in '14. He benefitted in '13 from UM having only one good WR in Gallon, until Funchess moved over. But they have what looks like three good WR's from the get-go this year. Mo Ways is apparently looking impressive lately and could play this year too. And they have a couple guys coming off of redshirts. The days of only having to beat out Jeremy Jackson or walk-on's to see the field at WR appear to be over.
|27 weeks 22 hours ago||Watched Big 10 Icons on BTN||
Watched Big 10 Icons on BTN the other night when they were covering Charles Woodson. At the end of the program, they hit his good citizenship hard (support for Mott, the football program, etc.). Brandon and Madej kept hammering the point that he was "giving back" to the university. Between the two of them, they must have used the phrase six times.
It struck me that Brandon and Madej should be "giving back" to Woodson. His Heisman trophy and his part in the undefeated season is basically all that UM football fans can point to over the last 25 years of ho-hum football. It's great that Woodson is loyal to the unversity and presumably generous with his resources. But the gall of guys in the AD to imply that UM's shining star Woodson was on the receiving end of things during his time at UM is over the top. Could you imagine the state of modern UM football without Woodson and '97? We think things are bad now, but it woud be in a much darker place.
What has really pushed me over the top on this issue of compensating players is the arrogance and complete lack of shame or self-awareness on the part of the NCAA and AD administrators. If those guys showed any humility or appreciation for the players at all, they'd probably have a lot more support from the average fan.
|27 weeks 23 hours ago||I tend to think he'll burn||
I tend to think he'll burn the RS. Mags is going to be a first year starter, coming back from off-season surgery, moving over from guard. There are some question marks there. Maybe he'll become an instant anchor and play injury free all year. But there's no way the coaches can bank on that from a risk perspective. They need to get eight or so OL ready to play and one of them needs to be a back-up LT.
Redshirting is great and all, but UM's tackle recruiting has not completely worked out the last couple years. LTT is looking like a slow-developing project at best and some guys they recruited as swing players like Samuelson and Fox are looking more like pure guards.
If Cole is in fact the #2 guy at LT, I think it is too risky not to develop him as the back-up and plan to get him game snaps this season.
|27 weeks 23 hours ago||I kept a close eye on Braden||
I kept a close eye on Braden in the spring game and came to the complete opposite conclusion. Thought he looked quite stiff both in run and pass blocking. Did not fire out of his stance at all on running plays and seemed tentative. Thought it was a night-and-day improvement when Glasgow subbed in for him - he was noticeably more aggressive and comfortable.
The last two springs have not been a lot to go on, but I'm wondering if Braden has it between the ears. The coaches are obviously pulling for him because he is not only huge, but also light on his feet for a big guy. But this was the second spring game in a row where he looked like he did not belong in the starting lineup. Braden may start out the season at RT, especially if Glasgow is still needed at C. But I'll be surprised if he is good enough to hold onto it.
|29 weeks 3 days ago||With MSU, I think it||
With MSU, I think it typically comes down to the DB's. If the CB's continue to blanket/rape WR's and the safeties continue to switch effortlessly between coverage and run support, MSU will keep rolling. MSU had good front seven players last year, but they were not all studs. So I don't think Narduzzi needs a Jerel Worthy to have a great D.
|29 weeks 3 days ago||OSU definitely should have||
OSU definitely should have had a better defense last year. Their offense never put them in bad situations, and they have a lot of talent on paper. They currently lack the stud in the middle of the DL to clog up the running lanes. Their back-seven was also undisciplined and arguably poorly coached in '13. OSU has a couple new defensive coaches this year who will be influential, so it's hard to predict what we'll see in '14. Their DE's can be all-world (and Bosa was terrific as a FR), but if the DT's are only so-so, teams will be able to run on them.
|29 weeks 3 days ago||Good analysis. The other||
Good analysis. The other thing UM has going for it that will help the running game is depth and talent at CB. In general, if you can cheat safeties, you get TFL's. Of course, that has been a big key in MSU's success - reliable DB play allows Narduzzi to get aggressive up front.
|29 weeks 3 days ago||Agreed M1jjb. I was about to||
Agreed M1jjb. I was about to make a similar post until I saw yours. PSU's front seven will take a step back this year. Just don't have enough bodies at DT and LB. They lost their stud DL coach to OSU. And they still have a couple holes in the secondary, which means they will have difficulty cheating safeties up against any team that can pass. PSU has a garbage schedule so that will make their defense look better than they really are. Their defense is fortunate to miss some of the B1G's power-rushing teams like Iowa, Wisky, and Minny next year.
Based on the rankings in this post, I'd switch Iowa and PSU. Even though they lost their LB's, Iowa will be difficult to run on with their DL. I was impressed with that group late last season, and they all return. Iowa will have LB's running clean.
|36 weeks 3 days ago||I guess the coaches telling||
I guess the coaches telling Furbush he is a MLB is less far fetched than telling Shallman he is a TB. It will work itself out. Maybe they start him at LB but start working him in as a nickel DE this season. Both DE spots could be wide open in 2015, unless Taco has a breakout year. So they have to develop some kids there soon.
|36 weeks 3 days ago||The kid is definitely a DE.||
The kid is definitely a DE. Any LB talk is a waste of breath/ink. Furbush is going to report to camp a legit 6'4" 250 lbs. There are occasionally effective LB's who get there by the end of college, but they sure as heck don't start there. Coverage is also becoming a bigger deal for LB's in CFB, so that makes it even less likely.
DE may be the weakest position group on UM's defense this fall, so there is a good chance he plays right away. Mattison is craving outside pass rushers big time and he does not really have the pieces yet. Great opportunity for Furbush. He is a good looking player. I expect both Furbush and Pallante to eventually out-play their HS rankings.
|41 weeks 2 days ago||That's what I meant by the||
That's what I meant by the word "bootleg". Play action to one side, QB keeps and rolls out to the other. If they move him outside without the play action, I would just call that a roll out.
|41 weeks 2 days ago||the point was that Dawson ran||
the point was that Dawson ran by an unblocked LB and chased a player who was already engaged by the FB. I don't doubt that the C screwed up too, though.
|41 weeks 3 days ago||That was Dawson.||
That was Dawson. He bounced around between OG and T in his first spring under Nuss, so we can expect him to be pretty raw at this point. Would not give the same leeway to guys like Kalis and Miller.
|41 weeks 3 days ago||A lot of Devin's bad||
A lot of Devin's bad decisions seem to come when he is drifting sideways or backwards, and most roll-outs would probably fall in the same category. All play action bootlegs where the QB turns his back to the LOS should be banned from the playbook. So I agree that he is best off with the straight dropback, and that he should be coached to scramble forward only (area between the two OG's).
|41 weeks 3 days ago||If he has a QB he trusts, he||
If he has a QB he trusts, he will definitely open it up. Devin will have to earn that early in the season. Hoke sure as heck is not going to micromanage him like Saban did.
|41 weeks 3 days ago||I'm expecting to see||
I'm expecting to see something along the lines of Jim Bollman's offense with Terelle Pryor. Very simple, lots of blockers, let the QB keep drives alive with scrambles, and take the occasional shot downfield.
We've heard comments about Nussmeier making life difficult for the QB's during practices. But come gametime, I think he'll do what he can to protect Devin from passing too much. We'll see a bunch of 2-4 yard runs by RB's, which will be boring but nonetheless a huge improvement over last year.
|48 weeks 3 days ago||Those are the two reasons.||
Those are the two reasons. The blitzing capability is a big one. It is basically a waste of time to send Bolden or Morgan on a blitz. GMatt needs decent blitzing ILB's to give his zone-blitz scheme teeth.
|49 weeks 2 days ago||I think it is more likely||
I think it is more likely that one of the SAM / WDE propects plays than an ILB. SAM / WDE was a major recruiting target this year and of course they have both starters going into their final seasons, with shaky back-ups. If a guy like Furbush comes in ready to contribute, he will play.
|51 weeks 3 days ago||You could argue that Jon||
You could argue that Jon Reschke was an MSU win in 2013. UM did not get in on him until late and the probability of turning him was low. But Hoke apparently did offer a commitable offer and did truly want him.
|1 year 10 weeks ago||Some attrition was||
Some attrition was inevitable. UM's RB group is stocked with guys who were back-burner targets. For example, Hayes, Rawls, and Johnson were all Plan C, place-holder guys. Now with the '13 class and beyond, the staff is back in the game with legit RB's again.
We are going to see the same deal at WR next year, where it's likely that some of the '13 recruits are going to find themselves buried by '12 and '14 WR's.