Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 4 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 3 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,432 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 237 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 9 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • SIAP: U of M Dearborn Bball Team Needs the Money Cannon!
    4 replies
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    24 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    57 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    82 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    76 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    7 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    60 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    159 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    3 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    77 replies
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    21 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    17 replies
  • Coach B w Andy Katz podcast
    3 replies
  • Michigan Alumni Club Scholarship Golf Tournament featuring Honorary Chair Glen Rice - This Saturday in Miami!
    5 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    117 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • MBB: Wake Forest grad transfer PG Keyshawn Woods commits to OSU
    21 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    82 replies
  • Ibi Watson to Dayton.
    24 replies
  • NFL Draft Eve Debate
    57 replies
  • Hello? Boring Tuesday POSbang Happy Hour Thread
    117 replies
  • SIAP: U of M Dearborn Bball Team Needs the Money Cannon!
    4 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    60 replies
  • OT: National Park Week; What's Your Favorite?
    159 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    77 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    76 replies
  • PSA: 2018 FOOTBALL SEASON TICKET UPGRADES
    7 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    62 replies
  • New Q&A with Cam McGrone, video
    3 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    29 replies
  • Harmoniously OT: UM Men's Glee Club in AZ
    17 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    81 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    81 replies
  • Scrimmage Observations
    81 replies
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    79 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    78 replies
  • Rice Commission recommendations to be released today
    77 replies
  • Quote from Nebraska A.D.
    76 replies
  • OT: Avicii dead at 28
    73 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    67 replies
  • More evidence of awful culture at MSU, volleyball this time
    62 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    61 replies
  • More MSU takes. From USA Today
    60 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    59 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    59 replies
  • Auston Robertson arrested again
    59 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Revision of Al Borges Presser and Spring Practice from April 5th, 2011 at 4:42 PM

By Tim — April 5th, 2011 at 4:48 PM — 92 comments
Filed under:
  • al borges
  • denard robinson
  • photo gallery
  • video

IMG_2708.JPG

General

This is the most receptive of any group he's had coming in (at all 8 or 9 stops). It would be easy to say "we were good last year" on offense, and resist changing. It's an enthusiastic group in spite of all the changes they've been asked to make. It's easy to teach them, because they've bought in.

Shotgun - used quite a bit. "We're gonna gun more than we've ever gunned." They've run plenty of shotgun in the past, but this will be more than that. 2-tights is part of the offense, but you'll see as much shotgun as you'd see from any NFL team, and a lot of the tight end in motion.

Haven't done a whole lot of stuff this year that he's never done. "We have more Q runs, but that aside, our offense is our offense, and we're going to gear what we do to what he's capable of doing."

"[Brady] wants to establish toughness, and he wants to establish effort. And you can't talk it: you've gotta do it." Defense and offense are geared to downhill running, coming of the ball, etc. "Not that we want to turn it into 'bull elk on bull elk' on every single play."

Offense install - "We are now at install 5 today. We have 6 installs of major pieces of our offense." They'll add 'frills,' i.e. screens, 2-minute, goal line, etc. as it goes. "We've gone slower here than I have other places, because I'm trying to give Coach Funk in particular, but everybody... a chance to review and install." They'll complete install 6, and have 4 or 5 practices to review it all. "That's about 60-70%" of everything that they'll do.

The end of spring and fall camp are different beasts. In fall, you have to figure out your starters, and get them ready to play, then focus on your first opponent. "Right now, it's just an audition." They'll have a depth chart out of spring "Like anything else, it'll be in pencil."

Defense - "I very seldom on the defense other than to say 'Greg Mattison is as good a defensive coach as you're ever gonna get, and he will get every ounce out of those kids."

There's always pressure to succeed, whether or not you have talent. "If you're gonna have pressure, it's better to have talent."

"Michigan is a special place. The walls talk to you here. You walk down the hall and you can feel it... I coached at Auburn where football was a big deal, and I loved Auburn. This is a little different."

Quarterbacks

Denard and Devin both excited about the change. Doing some "next-level oriented" things, and that's attractive to QBs. More effective in this offense? "We want to pose a balanced distribution of the ball in an aggressive style." The tailbacks will be more involved. That will sacrifice numbers for the QB, but he might be able to throw more effectively with a power running game. He also poses a threat in the passing game as a runner with his scrambling.

Drop mechanics are toughest for Denard - even though he was a dropback QB in high school. With footwork issues - the biggest change - he has really grasped that concept well. "He's still a work in progress, but he's done very well."

"You run for yards but you pass for miles," though Denard is a better checkdown as a runner than than throwing to a checkdown receiver might be. "Make plays, and let the good lord make miracles." They want him to use good judgement, but they'll let the kid run. "You have to give him a chance to do what he does."

Who compares to Denard? "Michael Vick is similar. Yeah, he's the first one that comes to mind." Most comparable with speed and passing ability.

Anticipation throws: "That is what he's been doing very well." Good on timing routes and throwing before the breaks. "The guy's an accurate passer... When they guy's open, he's gonna hit him more often than not. When he isn't open open, [Denard] has a way to create... A good passing game, the ball's delivered as the receiver comes open in a manner and fashion that allows the receiver to run with the ball once he catches it." Denard reading defenses: "He's a pretty good decision-maker." His struggles are more within the offense, not making reads. "He's not hitting defenders in the chest with the ball."

No designed QB runs in last year's SDSU offense, but with Denard's ability, they'll go back to Cade McNown plays, for example, when Borges did have designed QB runs. "More people are going to touch the ball, yet he is going to be the focal point of the offense." If he's more effective running than the backs, he'll be used more as a runner.

Denard came out of 10 games last year with injury, SDSU's Ryan Lindley didn't come out of a single game last year. If giving the RB the ball a bit more keeps Denard healthy, then that's good. The tailbacks have to be worthy of those carries.

"He poses the threat of a quarterback draw every play." Scrambling - "If you understand the footwork of our offense, that comes naturally." The guards set the depth of the pocket, and the tackles set the width. With only 4 rushers against 5 linemen, there should be scrambling lanes if necessary. "Certain quarterbacks will run 5 or 6 yards, he may run 55 yards." They tell Denard "Don't turn down wide open receivers, but if they fall off, run like hell."

Devin competition - "Devin is formidable." He does some really good things. Has some same traits as Denard, but is a taller prototype with pocket passer height. Can work inside the pocket more easily, but he obviously isn't as fast as Denard. "You play or somebody replaces you. It's that simple." At this point, Denard is the starter, and there's no reason to believe he won't be in the fall - even though Devin is pushing him. "They're competing and I love it."

Play some QB minutes for backups? "I would never say never, but it's never been my approach." Borges doesn't really believe in putting the backup in for a series every game or something.

Running Backs

"I've been happy with out tailbacks... We've had flashes of excellence from all of them, and [picking a starter]'s not a decision we have to make today." For one back to stand out, he'll have to be a complete player. "Block and protection, run the football, be consistent. The guy who demonstrates the most consistency is the guy who's gonna play."

"Vince Smith is a pure football player, I mean in every sense. He's coachable, tough, not real big obviously but I've had guys his size be very effective... Vince has a good football IQ. You tell him something, he understands what you're talking about, and he'll do it."

"Michael Cox has done some very nice things."

Michael Shaw just came back to padded practices (from a broken hand) and he's made some nice plays.

Who can be downhill RBs - "All of them really... Cox has done it, Shaw came back the other day and he did it, Stephen Hopkins is just that kind of runner, period." Hopkins is a lot like Atlanta RB Michael Turner. He is a hybrid RB/FB, and has done some nice things.

McColgan has done a great job leading the way for the backs. Not gonna show up in the scoresheet, but helps the running game.

Wide Receivers

"I think Roy's had a really good spring. All them, really. We've had some nice catches." Roundtree has been very consistent. Junior Hemingway is moving well, and has great range. Darryl Stonum has also played well. "Jeff Hecklinski does a nice job with those guys. He'll coach those suckers up." They're running more intermediate cut routes in this offense. "We throw it down the field a lot, but more intermediate cuts."

Gallon and Dileo, et al, role has not changed a whole lot. Odoms and Roundtree have played inside and outside. "We're not a spread team, but you're gonna see we're in 3 and 4 wides a lot now."

Tight Ends

TE position is similar to the FB - not heavily featured in the recent past, but they're catching more balls than they've caught in the past. "I'm a tight end guy."

Brandon Moore has been very effective. Steve Watson caught a TD pass the other day. "Steve's fired up."

"We've got some good people there, and I think when it's all said and done we'll be pretty good there." They will recruit tight ends heavily going forward.

Offensive Line

Injuries on the offensive line haven't affected installation too much. "We found a way to get 5 of them out there, and they haven't done a bad job." Some guys are having to learn multiple positions.

Lewan could be a good football player - needs to add weight, and work on some fundamental technique issues. He has the talent for a bright future.

"We're a downhill running team." Their scheme is geared to O-line getting off the ball and being aggressive. "We're in a 3-point stance and we're gonna do our best to move whoever's in front of us." It's different playing from the shotgun every snap.

Practice Photos and Video

Placeholder for video while Youtube encodes it.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
April 5th, 2011 at 5:05 PM
#2
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
In those pictures...was that

In those pictures...was that Mike Martin I saw standing up as a rush end!?

I like what I'm hearing from Borges about our offense and our guys.  Sounds like we're going to have a lot of stuff we can pull from on that side of the ball this year.  If we can find that one or two RBs that can really stand out, it could very special.

PS  I think Kovacks might actually be paler than I am.  That's pretty hard to do.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:41 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
AnthonyThomas
AnthonyThomas's picture
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 15140
Yeah, it's on the Rivals

Yeah, it's on the Rivals practice video as well. It looked strange seeing Martin in a stand up position.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:15 PM
#4
Cosmic Blue
Cosmic Blue's picture
Joined: 10/13/2008
MGoPoints: 488
is that Borges' impression of

is that Borges' impression of the 'not sure if serious' meme?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:44 PM
(Reply to #3) #5
TrppWlbrnID
TrppWlbrnID's picture
Joined: 10/29/2009
MGoPoints: 9842
(No subject)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:15 PM
#6
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 32944
I'm still leery of the

I'm still leery of the changes but I think RR was coaching Denard to never scramble, and I wish he'd scramble.  If Borges is coaching him to scramble sometimes then that's a plus for sure.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:25 PM
(Reply to #4) #7
david from wyoming
david from wyoming's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 2981
RR was coaching Denard to

RR was coaching Denard to never scramble

Pretty sure you just made that up...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:43 PM
(Reply to #10) #8
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 9529
I am making no assumptions

I am making no assumptions about what Robinson was or was not coached to do, but there were plenty of broken plays last season in which Robinsons would roll out, have a ton of space in front of him, and then just wait for a receiver to open up rather than run. Again, not saying he was or wasn't coached to do it, but Robinson gave up a lot of potentially big runs to stick with a pass.

(What I am assuming, though, is that by "scramble" people mean taking off running when the passing play breaks down.)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:44 PM
(Reply to #10) #9
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 607
Do you know what the

biggest knock on running QBs is?  That they trust their feet more than their arm and bail on a play too quickly without going through the proper progressions.  Denard is very obviously more inclined to be an actual QB than a runningback who receives the snap and throws sometimes, just based on what his instincts tell him to do when a play breaks down.  He doesn't just run, he keeps his eyes downfield and looks for a receiver.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:24 PM
(Reply to #35) #10
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Or, just as (probably more)

Or, just as (probably more) likely, he was indeed coached up to spend more time reading the receivers. By deliberately fighting his natural instinct to take off, he may have just overcompensated.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:04 PM
(Reply to #4) #11
Farnn
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 11643
I'm pretty sure RR was

I'm pretty sure RR was coaching Denard to do just the opposite.  I recall a few times when RR implied they wanted Denard to consider his legs as a check-down but he almost always chose to throw it.  I know it's easy to lump everything on the old coaching staff, but some of the issues were player problems/inexperiences.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:16 PM
#12
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 9529
Nice to hear good things

Nice to hear good things about Roundtree, especially his consistency. He seemed oddly absent from the videos (not totally absent, just not really featured as much as I'd expect). I have very high hopes that he can get his case of the "Braylons" under control and catch the ball before thinking about the end zone.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:25 PM
(Reply to #6) #13
MI Expat NY
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 7498
It wasn't exactly his fault

It wasn't exactly his fault that a killer play always seemed to follow one of his drops, but I would certainly like to see him drop less easy ones next season.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:24 PM
#14
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 16431
Great glimpse; sounds like a

bright guy. Nice ed/write-up job, Tim. I had worries about Denard, but it sounds like he's just one bright dude who can handle the changes, embracing them with all his usual enthusiasm. And it sounds like Borges is flexible, too.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:26 PM
#15
BobbyRizigliana
Joined: 11/11/2008
MGoPoints: 410
Borges' comments about the Defense

scare me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:48 PM
(Reply to #11) #16
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12887
That was in the context of "I

That was in the context of "I am the offensive coordinator, it is not my job to pay attention to our defense" more than anything.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:25 PM
(Reply to #19) #17
DutchWolverine
Joined: 01/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1064
I agree.

I agree. I don't think he was saying or implying anything negative. He just focuses on his side of the ball.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 9:53 PM
(Reply to #48) #18
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12887
I'm not "thinking," I'm

I'm not "thinking," I'm "knowing." That's how he meant it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 6th, 2011 at 11:16 AM
(Reply to #68) #19
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1743
Quick question

You all do realize that this "Tim" is the same "Tim" that attended the press conference and wrote the post?

Y/N

His name is right there on the byline.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:27 PM
#20
profitgoblue
profitgoblue's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19557
Cade McNown?

Did I just read that Borges is going to design plays that he designed for Cade McNown back in his UCLA days?  Dear Little Baby Jesus, please tell me that was a joke.  Borges' response reminds me of the job interviewee that has no experience in a particular field and instead makes up something to avoid not answering the question . . .

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:27 PM
(Reply to #14) #21
AeroSteve
Joined: 02/19/2009
MGoPoints: 3
Win

I couldn't put my finger on who he looked like, but you took care of that.  Thank you.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:29 PM
#22
Wolves
Joined: 02/26/2009
MGoPoints: 25
Multiple Offensive Sets

Once again the pictures showed the read option.  I am impressed with the multiple formations they are showing in the early part of their first spring training.  It looks like Borges is truely adapting his offense to the skill sets we have coming back.  While we all hope the defense gets back to its old school ways, this is defintely not our father's offense.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:40 PM
#23
Blueroller
Blueroller's picture
Joined: 06/08/2010
MGoPoints: 925
Vincent Smith

I've had a feeling that reports of the demise of Vincent Smith may be premature. I bet there's a good chance a lot of his struggles last year were due to the effects of his torn ACL. I can see him developing into a Jamie Morris between-the-tackles kind of runner. Any back who can catch and block as well as he can is going to be hard to keep off the field.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:15 PM
(Reply to #15) #24
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 27680
I wasn't surprised by Borges

I wasn't surprised by Borges saying VS is "just a football player."  I was however surprised to not hear any mention of Fitz.  Hopefully that doesn't mean anything and he is having a good spring.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:23 PM
(Reply to #24) #25
DutchWolverine
Joined: 01/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1064
Fitz

Agreed. I was hoping to hear mentioned of Fitz as well. Hopefully he will eventually work his way into playing time.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:11 PM
(Reply to #18) #26
rcrichlo
Joined: 09/16/2010
MGoPoints: 36
yup

pretty much how I read it. all sounds good. Video clips of Denard rolling out look great too. Talk about options.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:19 PM
(Reply to #18) #27
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
It probably means little on the football field

But statements like that just make me warm and tingly inside. They get it. (standard caveat that it doesn't mean anyone else "didn't get it". Maybe "too".)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 6th, 2011 at 4:14 AM
(Reply to #43) #28
2 Walter Smith
2 Walter Smith's picture
Joined: 08/17/2009
MGoPoints: 978
Borges isn't a politician,

but a football coach.  It's just coachspeak at this point.  Chill.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 5:55 PM
#29
Captain
Captain's picture
Joined: 06/12/2009
MGoPoints: 12438
So a lot of double tight-end

So a lot of double tight-end sets with 3 or 4 wide and a fullback paving the way for split backs?  Sweet.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:04 PM
(Reply to #20) #30
Foote Fetish
Foote Fetish's picture
Joined: 05/12/2009
MGoPoints: 1913
It's About Time

It's about time they let us put fifteen players on the field.  Now if only they'd let us use flame throwers too.  THEN we'd have a game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:21 PM
(Reply to #22) #31
Captain
Captain's picture
Joined: 06/12/2009
MGoPoints: 12438
And a decoy football - you'll

And a decoy football - you'll never know which is the game ball until the play is over. 

Also jetpacks.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 11:08 PM
(Reply to #25) #32
brandanomano
brandanomano's picture
Joined: 09/05/2009
MGoPoints: 5086
OMG THAT MEANS WE'RE RUNNING

OMG THAT MEANS WE'RE RUNNING DUAL QB SETS THIS YEAR YES!!!!!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 6th, 2011 at 6:04 AM
(Reply to #75) #33
STW P. Brabbs
Joined: 08/27/2008
MGoPoints: 3372
Haha

I haven't been paying close enough attention - has anyone already put for the first "I'm just putting this out there: think of how badass it would be to have Denard AND Devin in the backfield" comment of the year yet?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:25 PM
(Reply to #20) #34
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
No, no

He's just trying to freak Brian out by unveiling his new "2 O-lineman, 0 QBs" formation.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:00 PM
#35
griesecheeks
griesecheeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 643
Roundtree

Good to hear him mentioned first with 'consistency' thrown in there.

While he's small, and a definite slot receiver, he's not a burner and never will be. I think with this coaching staff, he will continue to be a solid posession receiver. I love the way he gets his feet moving downhill after the catch. His dropsies thing from last year was so strange, because before we started noticing a trend, he was, to me, one of the most reliable receivers in recent memory.

I don't see him, however, as a number one guy... I really think Stonum or Hemingway needs to break out and be the big play threat we will need down the field. I think Roy will lead the pack in receptions/yards again, but look for Stonum and Hemingway to be 40-50 catch guys at 15+ YPC with some big play TDs.

What I love the most, though, is the depth of that WR corps... Odoms at #4? Gallon, Grady, Stokes, etc after that? This is good news.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:06 PM
#36
Mosley
Joined: 04/05/2011
MGoPoints: 1
Multiple Formations

 Borges is beginning to encourage me with his comments. It seems like running multiple formations is going to be the norm and I see that as a good thing. With the multiple references to "the power play "  that Hoke has thrown out over the past few months, I began to wonder if he would scrap the zone read in every way, shape and form. Apparently, Borges has seen the light and realized that lightning in untied shoes has it's benefits.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:21 PM
(Reply to #23) #37
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 27680
I don't know if Borges ever

I don't know if Borges ever needed to "see the light."  He is a great coach with lots of experience with different types of players.  I think we, especially Brian, freaked out about MANBALL comments from Hoke.  As a head coach Hoke is trying to drive the toughness mantra, while Borges knew what he had and is now adding plays to the base offense. 

All that matters for me is to know that Denard is happy is this offense.  If Denard is happy then I'm happy.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 6:44 PM
#38
lhglrkwg
lhglrkwg's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 27713
i was a big RR supporter, but

i was a big RR supporter, but it's so refreshing to hear all the new coaches talking about adapting to the players we have and letting denard run around and doing some shotgun. it helps me sleep at night knowing we're probably not going to bomb our awesome offense into oblivion

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:34 PM
(Reply to #28) #39
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 607
Did you watch 2008?

I'll bet dollars to doughnuts you'll see less spread this year than you saw pro-style in 2008.  But they sure are talking a good game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:30 PM
(Reply to #33) #40
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
The difference is

Spread is not the only way to utilize Denard's talents. The spread was no way to utilize our QB's talents in 2008. The funny (not ha ha) thing is we ran more zone read that year than we did last year. Go figure. But you're right, just like in 2008, it may be all talk. But I think the poster is hoping we don't make the same mistake twice.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 9:58 PM
(Reply to #49) #41
Tim
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12887
There was no way to use our

There was no way to use our QBs' talents in 2008. That was the problem. The options were a walkon/career clipboard guy (and God bless Sheridan; it's not his fault he was on the field) and a frequently-injured second-year version of a guy who only had a 133 passer efficiency rating as a 4th-year player.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 10:10 PM
(Reply to #69) #42
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
So using them in the LEAST effective way

Makes the most sense? It'd be great if it was all just instituting the system for the other guys, but we ran stuff we used infrequently again. Zone Read option all over the place, which made the defense key in on the RB, and was even worse if the QB kept it. So we get Denard, then run far less Read Option for power QB sweeps. So a lot of it was for nothing.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:34 PM
(Reply to #33) #43
Pete99
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 230
Tell us, oh wise one, just

Tell us, oh wise one, just how much you think RR had us in a pro set or I-Form in '08.

 

We will use a variety of different formations in this new offense. More than we did in RR's.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:17 PM
#44
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 52761
Did anyone ask Borges if

Did anyone ask Borges if stats mean wins?  Just curious. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:27 PM
#45
Rusty Shackleford
Joined: 04/03/2010
MGoPoints: 5981
I love it

This coaching staff understands the teams strengths and they are building around that, not trying to force everyone into a scheme that wouldn't be as effective. I was expecting to see at least one of the receivers get minimal playing time because of 2 wide sets, and he's already talking about 3 and 4 wide formations.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:41 PM
#46
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 607
I could be wrong, but

"If he's more effective running than the backs, he'll be used more as a runner."

 

Isn't this EXACTLY what Rich Rod did?  Saw that Denard was his most effective ground threat (by far) and used him more as a runner?  And by "more", I mean a little less than half (291 passes, 256 rushes).

 

And I'm really getting tired of all the "downhill, toughness" talk.  I don't remember running many sweeps last year.  Denard ran mostly off-tackle.  And the inside handoff is between the tackles.  That's "downhill".   And "emphasis on getting off the ball"?  That's just rhetoric.  Every coach on every team at every level teaches you to get off the ball hard and fast.  That's like saying "we're going to emphasise playing with our feet on the ground." 

 

How is it that everybody just eats this stuff up?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 7:47 PM
(Reply to #34) #47
El Jeffe
El Jeffe's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 19400
Why do you hate TOUGHNESS and

Why do you hate TOUGHNESS and GETTING AFTER IT and DOWNHILL RUNNING and AMERICA??????????

In all seriousness, I have mocked the TOUGHNESS coachspeak more than anyone, but I am optimistic that Borges knows that he has the keys to a Ferrari and won't treat it like a Yugo.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:01 PM
#48
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 607
Why does Taylor Lewan "need

Why does Taylor Lewan "need to add weight"?  I don't recall him having any issues whatsoever blocking last season.  Why would you want more weight than you need to do your job?  Just to have it?  It's not like he's 270.  He was 294 last year, presumably more right now.  Did he lose weight over the off-season?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:08 PM
(Reply to #37) #49
rcrichlo
Joined: 09/16/2010
MGoPoints: 36
3 straight posts

trying really hard to find stuff to complain about huh? Dig a little deeper I suppose. Or take a step back and realize that a lot of this is coachspeak. That and the few tactical things mentioned all appear to be good for the returning O players: ie lots of shotgun

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:13 PM
(Reply to #39) #50
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 607
You're right

about the coachspeak.  So why are we quoting it? 

 

I'm not trying to do anything.  I'm pointing out what I feel like pointing out.  And I'm not going to repost what other people have already posted just because I also feel that way about whatever it is.

 

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 5th, 2011 at 8:22 PM
(Reply to #37) #51
Pete99
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 230
Because Lewan only weighed

Because Lewan only weighed 284 lbs. at the start of spring practice. They want him around 300 lbs.

Also, Lewan DID NOT weigh 294 lbs. last year. His listed weight at the start of last season was incorrect.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.