You Asked for it, You Got it: No.2 Jersey to Get No.1 Jersey Status
According to A2.com's Kyle Meinke, Brady Hoke intends to begin reserving the number 2 jersey for the top Michigan cornerback. Also, no one will wear the number 1 jersey this year.
The first-year head coach said Friday at the Big Ten media days in Chicago he not only will continue the tradition of handing out the No. 1 jersey to Michigan’s top receiver, but hopes to institute a similar decorum for the No. 2 jersey.
He would like to save that number for Michigan’s top cornerback.
Hoke, who coached on that 1997 team’s defensive staff, was asked if any of Michigan’s talented wideouts would wear the No. 1 this year.
“No, they gotta earn it,” Hoke said. “And they’re going to have to earn No. 2, after (Vincent Smith) is gone.”
Tremendous
Likey
The greatest defensive college football player of all-time deserves an honour like this.
Did you know he's a boxer?
IMO, this is a much better way to honor a player than retiring his jersey. Now, every time a player earns #2, we'll see him making plays and think, "Wow, just like Woodson used to do" or "Man, Woodson was better than this guy.."
Next year: Roy Roundtree #1, Blake Countess #2?
I could see Roundtree getting #1 if he stops dropping passes, but Blake Countess hasn't even practiced with the team yet. There is nothing to suggest that he will even be a starter next year.
Oh, I completely agree. That was just me being hopelessly optimistic about a CB stepping up where we really need someone, and Troy will be gone after this year, so he can't earn it
Since this is the point in his career where Braylon got to wear #1 (start of his junior season), it is interesting to see what both he and Roundtree had accomplished at this point in their careers.
Roundtree: 104 catches, 1,369 yards, 10 TD
Edwards: 70 catches, 1,073 yards, 10 TD
And it isn't like Edwards never dropped a pass in his career. Roundtree took a redshirt year so it isn't exactly apples to apples but it is odd to see how differently the two players are perceived due to factors that aren't necessarily performance related.
The dropped passes didn't really bother me until he dropped 5 in a row in one game. Up until that point, they were frustrating, but still understandable.
Just pointing out that the next two years look very promising for Roundtree, despite a big perception gap between what he's done and what Braylon had accomplished at the same point in his career (when there was virtually no doubt that Braylon had "earned" the #1 jersey).
Comparing Braylon's 2 year stats to Rountree's is misleading. I have not looked up the numbers but I clearly remember that Braylon had very little impact as a freshman partly because he was "not on the same page" with Lloyd, and also the former policy of not throwing to freshman wideouts. He burst onto the scene with a tremendous year as a sophomore (wearing #80) and part of the motivation was to get the #1 jersey. Roy on the other hand had pretty good numbers as a redshirt freshman to add to his strong sophomore year, but nothing like Braylon's sophomore production.
Roundtree: 72 catches, 935 yards, 7 TD
Braylon: 67 catches, 1,035 yards, 10 TD
The gap isn't all that great (and both did it over a 13 game season). Add in the fact that Braylon's offense threw the ball a little more and Roundtree was splitting catches with 2-3 other productive wideouts (Hemingway, Stonum, and Odoms when healthy) while Bennie Joppru was the second leading receiver on that 2002 team, and the numbers are pretty darn close. You are right that Braylon basically did nothing as a freshman and that accounts for the overall difference, but Roundtree really didn't get a shot until late in the year at which point he put up 3 or 4 very productive games to close out the season.
To be fair, if we are going to include context, Braylon didn't have Safeties crashing down right after the snap to stop Denard, leaving the middle of the field open.
Vincent Smith is a junior.
True, but can we not have a DB and RB with the same number? I was under the assumption they just can't be on the field at the same time (see: Hayes & Avery, Hawthorne & Gardner, T. Robinson & Countess, Clark & Mealer, Herron & Bryant, Shaw & Carter, Hemingway & Taylor, etc.)
I'm just going by Hoke's quote in the OP.
That may be the case, but Hoke specifically said it wouldn't happen until after Smith departs:
“No, they gotta earn it,” Hoke said. “And they’re going to have to earn No. 2, after (Vincent Smith) is gone.”
I think the intention is to have only one player (the top defensive back) wear no. 2, which means no one on the offense will be able to wear it after Smith is gone.
I've felt the last couple years that Hemingway is our best receiver, if anyone were to get #1, it should be him. Dude makes plays.
Something that happened one time isn't a "tradition". If Hoke thinks reserving the number can motivate a guy/guys to play better then so be it (it definitely seemed to have a positive effect on Braylon's productivity), but it isn't like the practice is some cornerstone of Michigan football history.
Traditions have to start somewhere.
The #1 jersey is most definitely a "tradition" when it comes to Michigan football, it goes back decades. And as for the #2 jersey, nobody saying this is a time-honored tradition. Hoke just said he'd be starting a similar tradition for the top cornerback.
If you mean, "some guy who was pretty good wore that number", then pretty much every number is a "tradition" at Michigan. "Earning the #1 jersey" is not a tradition. The best player at the position in school history (Desmond) never wore #1. It is something Lloyd Carr used to motivate Braylon Edwards. That is it. Everyone else who wore it got to wear it from day one, and some of them weren't all that great at playing football.
I saw Anthony Carter play live, and in a far less pass-oriented scheme than was being used when Des was around. AC was an astonishing talent. No Heisman, granted, but it'd be pretty easy to make the case he was the best WR to take the field for Mich. When a WR takes on the 1, in my mind he's trying to meet AC's very high standard. And that works for me.
you deserve all due respect as a veteran fan of the team. Wish I could've seen that too. But six wide receivers, dating back to 1979 and Anthony Carter, I'd say, is a tradition. That's where it started. Heck even the Michigan football website calls it the most coveted jersey number in Michigan football [lore] on its tradition page:
http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/021910aad.html
I'm not sure that "weren't all that great. . ." bit is true for post-AC #1s. . .and yes, yes, Butterfield did save at least one game for us single-handedly.
Er, I guess it was double-handedly, now that I think about it. Best drop in UM Football history.
I have thought this would be a cool idea for a long time now, glad to see it happening. I look forward to having a #1 receiver and a #2 corner on the team.
Three plus decades, so yep, I'd say your counting is right on. And it may not have been an "earned thing" before Braylon, but it certainly was an important wide receiver tradition.
" And it may not have been an "earned thing" before Braylon, "
That's the point - the having to earn it thing wasn't an issue until then.
get's number 21
Denard's switching to 21?
/bestsmileever
Fine with me...but PLEASE DONT LET OUR STARTING QB RETURN THE BALL!
I pity the WR that has to line up across from whoever takes the #2.
Great idea by Hoke.
If this is ever done again, it should be for #77 to the best offensive tackle. Beyond that, IME, is unnecessary.
endorse this suggestion!
There's a guy on the current team who we're all hoping (I hope) will remind us that #7 was--at least once--a great number for MI QBs.
No, not talking about Henson. . .
Henson was the most impressive quarterback I've ever seen at Michigan (been watching games since 1992).
I certainly wouldn't mind if someone came along and reminded me of him.
when we all wanted Henson to take over for Brady as a true freshman? Ah, hindsight...
For now, I'm plenty content with letting Denard show the country why he deserves the Heisman... and to retire his number.
dig up ole 98 and give it to Denard if he can start kicking successfully.....
The next person to wear #1 will be in this recruiting class....#2? Blake Countess.
So which CB from last year gets the number 2?!
I was more impressed with his 2010 film than anyone else I saw on the field.
Best thing he's done since arriving in Ann Arbor. (Not that he's not doing great things - this is just the best)
So basically #2 will become like #1 where there is talk of someone getting it every year, but no one ever actually gets it.
My suggestion would be to hire an official MGoNumerologist/Tarot Reader/Astrologer to give each incoming freshman a personal consultation and assign each of them a number based on a complex pseudoscientific formula and/or process.
.
<br>I think we know who this should be
<br>.
<br>yes
<br>.
Braylon's been gone seven years. For crying out loud, what standard is being held for someone to "earn it"?
If Manningham's 2006 season didn't qualify, I don't know what does.
Honestly I think things are getting a bit out of hand with this whole jersey thing. It wasn't even a tradition until Braylon asked for the jersey and Carr told him to earn it.
I think the #1/2 jersey should be given to a senior WR/CB who's shown good leadership, scholarship and work ethic, in addition to on-field performance. I'd like to see who gets to wear it each year, which senior gets the honor, even if he hasn't broken records on the field.
If Hoke is already saying there will be no #1 receiver - he must not be too impressed with what he sees at that position.
I don't think it's so much that he doesn't like the receivers, I think the staff wants to base it on in-game performance rather than practice. I think it goes out to Roundtree next year, don't you worry.