WSJ takes on the Brandon situation
Here: http://online.wsj.com/articles/michigans-sports-ceo-takes-a-hit-1412207549
The money quote:
If Hoke ultimately is replaced, Ross said, "[Brandon] will look for a Michigan person that will fit Michigan.
Please fire this asshole.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:08 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 9:12 PM ^
Yeah, but you don't NEED a 20M rowing center. It is a great luxury we can have and we certainly would rather have it than now. But it certainly isn't NEEDed, even by the rowing teams. They could survive with a standard facility, just like M football survived before Glick.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:18 PM ^
He speaks and they will listen.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:23 PM ^
The new business school is the DEFINITION of buildings we DON'T NEED. Ross before this new renovation was ALREADY the nicest academic building on campus. The engineering and science buildings on the other hand...
All Ross' donations for the Bschool do are make Bschool kids more smug than they already are with their A- curves.
October 1st, 2014 at 10:09 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 11:39 PM ^
Stop. Building. Buildings.
UM, especially the athletic department, is now (for the foreseeable future) overbuilt. Brandon doesn't stop, however, primarily because he is an empire builder. In addition, keeping UM dependant on his rich friends as donors offers a nice side-benefit to Brandon.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:02 PM ^
When will those in power learn that the entire concept of someone who is a "Michigan Man" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THEIR PREVIOUS TIES TO MICHIGAN.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:16 PM ^
When will those in power learn that the entire concept of someone who is a "Michigan Man" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THEIR PREVIOUS TIES TO MICHIGAN.
This. Bo was THE Michigan Man and he had no connections to UM before taking the job. John Beilein is a Michigan Man. Carol Hutchins is a Michigan Women who went to and coached at MSU prior to taking over the M softball program.
It's representing the University with loyalty and integrity. It's not simply being someone who worked/graduated from UM previously.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:35 PM ^
Hutch never coached at MSU.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:41 PM ^
My bad, I knew she coached at another B10 school (Indiana) before coming to Michigan. Thought I remembered it as her alma mater.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:25 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 9:12 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 9:18 PM ^
His money is not wrong for us. He's defending the guy who convinced him to donate $200M. If you agreed to give $100M to someone's organization, you'd probably want that person to stay with the organization as well.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:55 PM ^
Why should $100M buy him the right to dictate to the constituents and leadership of a public university?
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:09 AM ^
It absolutely does not give him the right to dictate. It does give him a right to express his opinion and have it listened to more than mine. I would prefer that he not do it through the Wall Street Journal, however.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:28 PM ^
Ross is certainly going to have a larger say about the direction of the Athletic Department--and the University itself--than I am. And he should. I am not naive or delusional--though if I were delusional, I might not know it. The fact is Ross and his $200 million do far more for both institutions than I do. But there is a line somewhere out there where his money shouldn't trump the right thing to do. That's all most of us expect.
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:06 AM ^
Pus infinity for this comment.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:34 PM ^
Here's the meta-take: one of Ross' lawyers makes a phone call to the WSJ, a notorious pro-business rag, probably at the request of Brandon's lawyers, and this is the result. This article (1) reassures the audience that Brandon is going nowhere soon, (2) mischaracterizes and minimizes the case against Brandon, and (3) overstates the case for Brandon's positive revenue impact on the University, by implicity crediting him with the fruition of the Big Ten Network, and omitting the problem the AD now finds itself in where for the first time in over 30 years it can't sell season tickets to the Big House.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:41 PM ^
They have abandoned Hoke. He is done.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:47 PM ^
Yeah, but Ross is trying to position Brandon as the guy to conduct the next search. Hoke is a symptom, but not the disease.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:52 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 9:58 PM ^
Precedent for ignoring the money man:
Down here in Austin, the new AD (Patterson) didnt give a flip who billionaire Red McCombs (whose name is on the Business School--sound familiar?) wanted to hire as a replacement for Mack Brown. Instead Patterson asserted his authority and hired who he felt was the best candidate.
Word is that the search was conducted for most part outside of the influence of the big boosters --and this helped create an environment in which a large culture change was possible in the football program. McCombs even said some fairly derogatory things about Strong immediately after he was hired--and was solidly and quite publicly rebuked for it.
So, there is a predecent out there. Ross is not the owner of the Wolverines. Real change CAN happen.
October 1st, 2014 at 10:05 PM ^
Yes!
What is troubling to me is not the prospect that Ross' money will be pitted against the Regents' principles--both sides have too much at stake for it to ever get to that point. But this article confirms that Brandon will fight, and not bow out gracefully, at least at this point.
October 1st, 2014 at 10:13 PM ^
Hoke's going and DB choosing a new guy may not be catastrophic. After all, Martin hired both RR but then Beilein. Brandon should go for turning Saturdays from an enjoyable ritual to an exhibition of corporate greed.
October 1st, 2014 at 10:16 PM ^
The fact that our football team sucks is only mildly related to hoke. Almost all of us loved hoke after the sugar bowl season. Even at the start of this year. The majority thought 9 wins at least.
Well, the fact that we are awful is on hoke and db. Hopefully, hoke can turn this around.
October 1st, 2014 at 11:58 PM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 2:05 AM ^
The PR flacks are diong their job for Brandon.
Yes, actions will speak louder than a few hundred people showing up at the diag. But will people actually boycott? That remains to be seen.
October 2nd, 2014 at 3:06 AM ^
David Brandon is definitely in trouble. The more bad media coverage Michigan gets, the worse it is for Brandon. Ross has some influence, but not enough to help Brandon keep his job.
October 2nd, 2014 at 6:14 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:04 AM ^
To me, the money quote reveals the poor quality of the job done by Dave at his previous marquee job:
Domino's stock price, essentially flat for the part of Brandon's tenure that the company was publicly traded, has risen sixfold since.