things go poorly
Wojo & Angelique question.
They're journalists... they shouldn't be "All In." They should be fair and accurate.
my comment really was about their relationship with the program. It is very well known how close Angelique and LC were... I am not suggesting that they should behave like "homers" and not be objective... My comment is more based on the fact that if they had close relationships with the program in the past.... is it the same with the current administration/program... or is it more of an arms length relationship...?
Based upon my observations, I believe it is the latter... and I wonder why? That's all.
Go Blue !!
I don't understand why it's a journalist's job to be "All In" for anything. Note that this is a different thing from having an agenda.
I've found Angelique to be extremely good at balancing "homer" with "realistic," and Wojo to have a knack for writing a pretty well-thought-out column on a consistent basis.
In comparison to the Freep the relatively fair and objective coverage by these two made them appear like they were "All In."
Is all IN!!!! I don't go anywhere else for my UM news!!!!
Those relationships take time to form. New coach, new AD. Give it some time and the go to reporters for the current crop will emerge, maybe AC, maybe not.
when you compare them to this blog.
doing each other. Oh, that wasn't the question?
I don't think any reporter is that close to the program after everything that we have been dragged through the last few years. It will take time before a reporter can build trust with the program.