Wojo: 8-4 is reasonable, plus damning Kalis quote

Submitted by wolverine1987 on

Wojo as usual with a reasoned take on the upcoming season, also of note in the article is this quote from Kalis that made me very sad:

“Coach Harbaugh is awesome. And the way coach (Drevno) coaches us, it’s just working. We’ve had days where we’re rolling guys 10 yards off the ball, and that never happened before. It’s not that we couldn’t do it, it’s just we didn’t know how to do it.”

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/2015/08/28/harbaugh-wants-see-w…

EDIT: here is another Kalis quote, elaborating on the above, from a different article:

“We definitely have more of a grasp on how to play the offensive line,” Kalis said. “How to get a rhythm. Technique. Footwork. Stuff we would never really practice or have a knowledge of before.”

 

 

004

August 28th, 2015 at 10:52 AM ^

If this staff can do for offense what Mattison and the last staff did for defense... without doing to the defense what the staff before them did... then...

.. oh crap, let's just get the season here already

 

StephenRKass

August 28th, 2015 at 11:00 AM ^

As we come to the brink of the season, I realize I'd be happy with 8 - 4. And yes, 9 - 3 would be better, but I want Michigan to head in the right direction, for the long haul. 

newtopos

August 28th, 2015 at 11:13 AM ^

After the 27 carries for 27 yards performance, Hoke's response to the media: "I've got a great offensive line coach." 

The scary part: I think he might have actually believed that.

The Man Down T…

August 28th, 2015 at 11:21 AM ^

especially if one can come against MSU or OSU.  I think 7-5 is the low level where disappointment comes in.  We should beat UNLV, Oregon State, BYU, Maryland, Rutgers, Indiana and Northwestern.  That's 7.  That leaves taking one from OSU, MSU, Utah, Minnesota and PSU to get to 8-4.

 

Above that, gravy!

 

Good God next Thursday can't come soon enough...

jaydubya

August 28th, 2015 at 11:32 AM ^

The final record is important, of course, but more than that, I want to see honest improvement and some quality, fundamentally sound football.  I'd like to see us run the ball consistently and not be last in the nation in turnovers.

JFW

August 28th, 2015 at 12:13 PM ^

I want to see constant improvement in understanding, execution, and physical toughness as defined by going toe to toe with a team for 4 quarters. 

If we do that and go 8-4 I'm okay. If we lose to MSU but it looks like Creed/Balboa I instead of like Tyson/Spinks, I'm okay. But the path to the future has to be there. 

Wolverine fan …

August 28th, 2015 at 12:07 PM ^

Awesome. I would expect that a player's assessment of the O-Line and coach Drevno be a positive one, but those quotes are direct, clear examples of superior teaching that tell me there is a ton of unrealized potential out there, just waiting to be unleashed. When JH said in his presser that the goal of the submarine approach was to "forge" a football team, all I could picture was a red-hot, glowing piece of iron being hammered into shape constantly, throughout the winter workouts, spring practices, summer workouts, two-a-days, scrimmages, etc. He is bringing these guys together via brute force and who knows what else. That's the whole point of the submarine. What happens with this team stays with this team.

Kevin Tolbert and the rest of this staff know how to prepare a team for bruising, nasty, last-man-standing, defense/run first types of games, and I am assuming there will be a few of those. The coordinators and position coaches are apparently coaching the players in ways they have never been coached before. They are getting sharper, stronger and more prepared for battle every day. I would be willing to bet that the level of camaraderie, confidence and focus is like nothing they have experienced in the past 5 years.

 

Is 8-4 reasonable? Yes. Are they capable of notching 10 or more wins? Absolutely. I feel like 7 wins is the floor for this team. Jim is forging a group of winners. I can't wait to see them on the field in six days.

markusr2007

August 28th, 2015 at 1:51 PM ^

I think they will have a very scary spread option rushing attack with their OL, RB Booker and a platoon of dangerous QBs that run and pass well. But their passing game is big question mark. just like Michigan, with a lot of unknown quantities at WR and TE.

Their defense had a lot of returning starters (8 at one point) then they lost star CB D. Hatfield to criminal justice charges and LB Gianni Paul to inj.  They really needed Hatfield, because they lost their two starting CBs, FS and SS to graduation last fall. That secondary wasn't very good either, and I remember Utah gave up a lot of points last year, though they were ranked 58th in total defense.

Also no more Nate Orchard, thank goodness.

Utah Offense vs. Michigan defense. This is strength vs. strength here. Probably the best part of the football game to watch.

Utah Defense vs. Michigan offense.  I have no idea what to expect other than "Harbaugh!", and probably some horror music for the 2015 Utah secondary.

This IS going to be a critical home game for Utah this season. It's year 5 in the PAC-12. They've gone 8-5, 5-7, 5-7 and 9-4

They have to play at Oregon, at USC and at Arizona and frankly I do not trust Utah to win on the road at night at Fresno State this year as it is a trap game before Oregon and after they destroy Utah St.

UofM Die Hard …

August 28th, 2015 at 1:02 PM ^

I want him to have a great season.  When he flipped from OSU to UM I was so pumped, but obvioulsy the coaching just wasnt there for him.  I hope he just goes nuts this year, and has a great NFL career.  Pulling for that monster. 

steve sharik

August 28th, 2015 at 1:04 PM ^

“...we’re rolling guys 10 yards off the ball, and that never happened before. It’s not that we couldn’t do it, it’s just we didn’t know how to do it.” “We definitely have more of a grasp on how to play the offensive line,” Kalis said. “How to get a rhythm. Technique. Footwork. Stuff we would never really practice or have a knowledge of before.”
I got paid $5K per season to be a DC and the previous OL coach who was responsible for the above rec'd hundreds of thousands of dollars. Wow, have I made some bad choices.

samsoccer7

August 28th, 2015 at 1:09 PM ^

If this is true, the how did Hoke and staff recruit the sons of former o-lineman? I'm sure those dads asked stuff about technique and coaching. Did our coaches just make stuff up? Did they BS through the interview? How does this happen?

TheCool

August 28th, 2015 at 2:07 PM ^

It might be an issue of how to apply what they knew as coaches into practice. Coaching takes a lot more than knowledge. I've run into a lot of coaches who are brilliant as far as knowledge is concerned but didn't know how to set up and run a practice efficiently and consistently.

AlwaysBlue

August 28th, 2015 at 1:58 PM ^

these OL were pressed into duty before they should have been. It was by necessity but you can't underestimate experience. I am sure the coaching has improved but so has the student.

CAwolverine

August 28th, 2015 at 4:11 PM ^

The Mason Cole situation is extremely eye opening when combined with Kalis' comments. A big reason Cole was able to start and be so productive as a true freshman was due to the great technique his HS coaches imparted to him. I recall reading about his technique on multiple occasions. It definitely wasn't his size as a true freshman.

If what Kalis says is true, OMG we are in for a fun season.

Steve Breaston…

August 28th, 2015 at 4:25 PM ^

So what you're saying is the guy coaching at the University of Akron, one of the one football programs of the last 20 years, wasn't great? He was as good of a coach as he wasn't growing facial hair



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

UMProud

August 28th, 2015 at 5:24 PM ^

Ya I had read earlier what some of the linemen were quoted as saying.  I feel bad for the kids who missed out on potential NFL opportunities from not being developed properly.

Magnum P.I.

August 28th, 2015 at 9:24 PM ^

The previous staff should all pool their buyouts and pay allotments of $100,000 to $1,000,000 to all the players they deprived of a shot at a pro contract.