Roachgoblue

August 6th, 2012 at 2:48 PM ^

There was a reason they upgraded uniforms in 1960. They look like total crap and I would be embarrassed to wear that crap. The Nebraska game against them will look like Super Mario figures.

SamirCM

August 6th, 2012 at 3:06 PM ^

Why is it that each time they announce a new alternate jersey, it instantly becoming breaking news? I mean this as a serious question, and not an attempt to neg the OP. 

MGJS SuperKick Party

August 6th, 2012 at 3:43 PM ^

Things I have learned about Adidas and their one time use jerseys:

1. We love colored shoulders, UTL Bumblebee, MSU Bumblebee, Cowboy Classic and This.

2. We love giant letters on the front of uniforms.

JamieH

August 6th, 2012 at 3:48 PM ^

At this point the most shocking thing would be having a team wear their standard uniform in a big game.  Maybe if we billed it as a throwback........

maizeandblue32

August 6th, 2012 at 3:50 PM ^

I personally dont care much about other teams jerseys...and I honestly dont get too upset about UM trying out new looks especially for big games. I have a much bigger concern that Michigan, adidas' largets contract team and (correct me if im wrong) the highest selling team merchandise wise, is being templated. 

All adidad uniforms are looking the same...not only in structure but also in creative elements (stripes everywhere, letters, etc.) ... this is one thing that the "THIS IS MICHIGAN" tagline truly supports. We are different and should be treated as such. Imagine an ad agency doing the exact same template for all their brands. They would be fired before the retainer could get signed.

Nike/UA has made some bad designs...but at least they are somewhat unique. I hate to see our team put through a template rather than an original solution.

Section 1

August 6th, 2012 at 3:57 PM ^

The current helmet W is call the "Motion W":

The academic W (it is also on the Fieldhouse at Camp Randall) is called The Crest:

The throwback uniforms, as noted above, really are approximations of the old helmet logo, except that in those days (I still think there was some NCAA rule about numbers on helmets; but I've never found it) it was positioned on the front and back and not the sides.

The best Wisconsin helmets ever were the ones with Bucky Badger on the side (on which Bucky is wearing yet another "W" font!);

Their band features about six more kinds of W's:

Wolverine Devotee

August 6th, 2012 at 4:31 PM ^

All of this college football uniform talk is making me dizzy. Too much is being made of the fashion of college football. What happened to the days where uniforms were the last thing on your mind in the offseason?

WolverineHistorian

August 6th, 2012 at 4:41 PM ^

It's just a money thing which rules all of course combined with today's players liking ugly new uniform designs. 

I'm with you.  I miss the days where the biggest uniform issue/debate was should we bring the helmet stickers back or not?

This whole thing is madness. 

Darth Wolverine

August 6th, 2012 at 4:45 PM ^

Now awful, but not great by any means. I guess I'm OK with them. Also, obviously Adidas' thing now is just putting a big letter on the front, which I actually like since it's different than the number (obviously) and what we're used to.

I still love M's UTL jersey.

WhoopinStick

August 6th, 2012 at 4:49 PM ^

The W is similar to what Wisconsin had on their helmets from 1957-1966.  I believe they also wore something similar in another recent retro game.

maizeandblue32

August 6th, 2012 at 5:29 PM ^

 

I personally dont care much about other teams jerseys...and I honestly dont get too upset about UM trying out new looks especially for big games. I have a much bigger concern that Michigan, adidas' largets contract team and (correct me if im wrong) the highest selling team merchandise wise, is being templated. 

All adidad uniforms are looking the same...not only in structure but also in creative elements (stripes everywhere, letters, etc.) ... this is one thing that the "THIS IS MICHIGAN" tagline truly supports. We are different and should be treated as such. Imagine an ad agency doing the exact same template for all their brands. They would be fired before the retainer could get signed.

Nike/UA has made some bad designs...but at least they are somewhat unique. I hate to see our team put through a template rather than an original solution.

Setshot

August 6th, 2012 at 6:08 PM ^

Those socks are hideous. All I think about when I see those is Michigan wearing maize and blue striped socks... And it's not a happy thought...

ChicagoB1GRed

August 6th, 2012 at 6:35 PM ^

they just used Wisconsin's colors. Nebraska's went heavily with black which isn't Nebraska. Yes, we have the blackshirts, which Adidas then ignored when adding all the black everywhere else.