maizenbluedevil

August 6th, 2012 at 4:50 PM ^

Yep, exactly.  All 3 are the same template.

I remember when we first signed the Adidas deal, one of the stipulations - and something people were excited about - was that Adidas was going to make Michigan's gear unique, not just apply the standard design templates they do for all their other schools.

Hmmmm, what ever happened to that?  

With the UTL jerseys it looked like we actually got something unique, but now that Adidas is recycling the big letter on front design, turns out not even that is unique to us.  

Mr. Brandon - Adidas sucks, the people want Nike back, please make it happen.

mGrowOld

August 6th, 2012 at 1:51 PM ^

And yet, despite their radiant ugliness, somewhere in Madison stores are getting calls asking right now asking if they have the new jersey in stock yet.

South Quad Squirrel

August 6th, 2012 at 1:58 PM ^

Is it just me, or do all Adidas alternates look the same?

 

That being said, I sort of like the simple block W, and the tilt on the helmet makes it look interesting.

 

But it really seems like a copy and paste of existing Adidas alternates.

Harperbole

August 6th, 2012 at 1:58 PM ^

It's not even that they look all that bad really. It's that like all the other techfit jerseys they're completely uninspired. If you're going to have a special edition jersey designed than put some effort into it.

yoyo

August 6th, 2012 at 1:59 PM ^

This alternate jersey thing is getting out of hand.  What's the point of having a "normal" jersey when you make alternates for EVERY friggin game? I respect the NFL for making alternates once in a long while like the chargers powder blue jerseys.  That way, they screw up only once in a few years.

 

Especially since most of these jerseys look like someone puked on a t-shirt.

turd ferguson

August 6th, 2012 at 2:11 PM ^

Well, having every Adidas school's "throwback" uniform have an identical style sure adds to their charm.

Honestly, if you need proof that life is absurd, all you need to know is that we're now dressing football programs (and baseball teams!) in fake throwback uniforms unlike anything they've ever worn.  Love you, shoe companies.

LSAClassOf2000

August 6th, 2012 at 2:05 PM ^

NBC Sports CFT site had some of the official release here (Link).

Ostenibly, the "W" is a nod to the 1962 Big Ten Champion team that played USC in the 1963 Rose Bowl.

Even so, when Nebraska and Wisconsin play this season, between the two uniforms, there really won't be much "WN" in any given pile in anything other than the literal sense. That being said, I do like the idea of a more symmetrical "W" for Wisconsin, at the very least. Most everything else about it reminded me of a candy striper for some reason.

M Fanfare

August 6th, 2012 at 2:17 PM ^

They did, back in 2005.



Full article: http://www.helmethut.com/College/Wisconsin/Wisc2005.html

Money quote: "Wearing 'throwback' style uniforms to honor the past is not a new idea. Unfortunately, most teams have taken great liberties while trying to replicate their historic past designs and their results sadly reflect their casual or negligent approach."

angry byrne

August 6th, 2012 at 2:13 PM ^

I'm torn between liking those old helmets and thinking how dumb they look.  On one hand, they're really unique, and the current "W" on Wisconsin's helmets is lackluster, in my opinion.  I think it'd look cool if they took these helmets and put the number on one side and the straight "W" on the other.

His Dudeness

August 6th, 2012 at 2:08 PM ^

Kids these days... not everything that is different is "cool." Your blue hair and septum ring are going to come knocking in 10 years to remind you just how big of a dumbass you really were.

FrankMurphy

August 6th, 2012 at 2:11 PM ^

*sigh*... I guess we can take consolation in the fact that no one is immune from this nonsense.

As an aside, I wonder about the extent to which these uniform shenanigans are forced on the athletic departments by Adidas (or Nike). After all, it's the apparel manufacturers who pay the universities, not vice-versa. They're probably yet another one of the big entities in college football that have become much more assertive about getting their piece of the pie. 

turtleboy

August 6th, 2012 at 3:03 PM ^

Well even though I don't really care for the Adidas jerseys, I'm glad that at least they don't make me want to vomit explosively like Nike does sometimes.

EDIT: Ok, you asked for it.

*barf*

Mr. Yost

August 6th, 2012 at 2:21 PM ^

The letter on the front of the jersey went from COOL when we did it...to played out and stale. Adidas ruined something unique and original.

Is UCLA going to have the letters across their jersey this year when they play Southern Cal? Make it stop.

I'm all for concept uniforms, but don't take the one cool idea you guys had and ruin it. Both teams in the UTL game had something special when it came to uniform design (ignoring the fact that it was shitty material that dissolved when you sweat in it).

Section 1

August 6th, 2012 at 4:02 PM ^

It was an adidas design.  With "input" from, well whoever you want to believe.  They aren't ripping anybody off if it is their own design.

Best you can do is to dig up all of the one-year-ago criticism aimed at Michigan's UTL tribute unis by Wisconsin and Nebraska bloggers and say, "Remember this?" 

It's adidas' world; we just live in it.