Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (48)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 7 hours ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 20 hours ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 day ago
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 3 days ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,530 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 778 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 641 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 607 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 497 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 17 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 12 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    9 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    71 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    21 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    33 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us
    49 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    23 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    46 replies
  • Rivals 250 notes
    56 replies
  • ESPN: Michigan BBall article featuring GRIII.
    6 replies
  • Arkansas QB Mitchell to NC State
    24 replies
  • Detroit Lions to start new bowl pitting Big Ten vs. ACC in 2014
    43 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    112 replies
  • ESPN: Trey Burke Articles/Video/Fluff/Etc.
    11 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    74 replies
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    42 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    70 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    33 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    9 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us
    49 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    20 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    112 replies
  • Rivals 250 notes
    56 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    46 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    23 replies
  • ESPN: Michigan BBall article featuring GRIII.
    6 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    74 replies
  • Arkansas QB Mitchell to NC State
    24 replies
  • Detroit Lions to start new bowl pitting Big Ten vs. ACC in 2014
    43 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    46 replies
  • Trey Burke Combine Measurements & Comparable Players
    28 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    112 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    74 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    2 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Wide Receiver Production

37 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
April 19th, 2010 at 10:36 AM
#1
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7894
Wide Receiver Production

Alright. We're giddy. Lets talk stats. Check out these WR targets for Michigan and their career stats.

Roundtree 32 catches ( 0 in '08, 32 in '09)

Stonum 27 catches (14 in '08, 13 in '09)

Koger 22 catches (6 in '08, 16 in '09)

Hemingway 20 catches (4 in '08, 16 in '09)

I feel all four will exceed their career numbers with single season numbers this year.

Roundtree will have a 60-catch, 1,000 yard, 10 TD season

Koger will get to 30 catches. Its tough for a TE to get numbers. He's been a nice, alebit inconsistent playmaker already. One-third of his career catches have gone for at least 20 yards. With QB at a peak right now compared the previous two years where he's been in the lineup in Ann Arbor, I think he's ready to be a star.

Hemingway....its all about health. Can he stay on the field?

Stonum I think can catch the 30-some odd balls that Matthews got in each of the last two years.

Thoughts? Where am I crazt? Who will do this. Who wont do this

Give your off-the-cuff, I am way too high on spring game buzz projections for these guys.

The passing game took big steps last year. There will be an eaual, if not bigger, step this year. I think total TD passes could approach the 24-25 average that marked the 7 years of Navarre/Henne.

Discuss

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
April 19th, 2010 at 10:43 AM | Eh, I think if Forcier plays (Score:1)
West Texas Blue
West Texas Blue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1661

Eh, I think if Forcier plays majority of snaps, I could see those WR production numbers. Denard has made tremendous strides and definitely is the most improved player, but I'm still not 100% sold on him being a very effective passer. With D-Rob, I feel that it would be a more run-heavy offense. Still could get good WR production with D-Rob, but as of now feel that Forcier would only be able to get the numbers that you presented.

Roundtree is going to get his catches no matter what because of our heavily utilization of the slot, so yeah I think 60 catches from his is definitely possible. Still leary on TE utilization; started out strong beginning of last year but tapered off heavily after first month (mainly due to dropped balls and injuries). Really wish our outside WR can become effective; not being able to stretch the field hurts us.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:08 AM | He only needs to be a (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11301

He only needs to be a competent passer to achieve better production than last year. If they put 7 in the box to stop the run, that leaves 4 on 4 in the secondary. If they put 6 in the box, we have the numbers advantage and we will run all over them. With him being such a good athlete, they will probably move to stop the run and have him beat them with his arm.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 12:16 PM | The TE production started (Score:1)
UMICH1606
Joined: 02/21/2010
MGoPoints: 1861

The TE production started tapering off because they started to drop the ball. A QB is going to lose confidence in you if you start dropping balls on him. I do agree that they need to be able to stretch the field, and wish that they could get Stonum involved more doing just that. However, RR has stated in more than one interview that they need and want to be able to stretch the field vertically, so I doubt he is ignoring it on purpose. I would hope that if the staff thinks that if they are capable of it, than they will do it.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 10:45 AM | Left a few out (Score:1)
Ezeh-E
Ezeh-E's picture
Joined: 07/22/2009
MGoPoints: 193

Odoms plays receiver, T-Rob and Gallon are getting on the field, and we have a lot of new outside receivers you didn't consider.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 10:52 AM | Odoms (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7894

Odoms is hard to fit into this game of 'will they get their career numbers in this single season' because he's got over 70 career catches already, unlike these four, who are expected to have a big roles, but have yet to produce over a full season.

Thats why I left him out.

The others you mentioned are at zero.

But, to everyone, dont hesitate to give me e-predictions on stats of the guys I didnt mention

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:29 AM | This situation (Score:1)
Jedelman11
Jedelman11's picture
Joined: 12/15/2008
MGoPoints: 831

This situation is somewhat analogous to the situation RR faced at WVU. Its no secret that RR prefers a mobile QB, as such, he has been dealing more with "dual threat" QBs who's athleticism generally outweigh their skills as true passing QBs.

That being said, when you look as his pattern it becomes clear that as the QBs grow as passers they become more rounded and eventually put up better passing numbers.

For evidence click here:

in 2004, Rasheed Marshall connected Chris Henry over 50 times. The next season, Pat White barely hit anyone more that 30 times. Then, the numbers steadily progress until RR's final year (2007) when Pat White hit Raynaud over 60 times.

Basically, as the offense progresses, and Tate/Denard become better passers, the number will slowly improve. Given Tate's background as a passer, there is no reason to believe he won't make the leap a year earlier that Pat White did. With Denard, it might take a little longer, but the evidence (anecdotal as it may be) shows that its bound to happen.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 12:51 PM | My bad (Score:1)
Ezeh-E
Ezeh-E's picture
Joined: 07/22/2009
MGoPoints: 193

missed that part. I needz new glasses.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 10:46 AM | they definitely need to start extending the field to the outside (Score:1)
J. Lichty
J. Lichty's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1134

receivers.

Stonum is really the only burner, and they need to find a way to start stretching the field with him so teams do not just pack in a ten yard area. I look at his production as a key. Odoms/Rountree are going to get a lot of balls, but we do need to see Stonum and Stokes and Hemmingway start showing up more on the stat sheet for this offense to be truly effective.

I did not see any of that on Saturday and the only long pass plays were the seam routes by the slots.

our package is our package, and it’s pretty big. - Greg Mattison, Bowl Practice Presser Tr. 12-13-11.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 10:47 AM | barring injury... (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27455

Roundtree should catch more than 32 balls this year. He's the #1 target, whether in the slot or outside.

I don't know if Stonum will catch more than 27. He was healthy last year and couldn't do it. And if Denard is the quarterback, I think we'll see a lot more short stuff with slots catching the ball rather than outside WRs. Regardless, if Stonum and Roundtree get the most PT on the outside and Roundtree exceeds 32 catches, that doesn't bode well for Stonum's numbers.

I don't think there's any way Koger catches more than 22 balls. Rodriguez doesn't like to use the tight ends. Everyone thought that Koger would be Jemaine Gresham last year, and he caught 16 balls. Until I see it on the field, I'm going to assume that tight ends just won't be that involved in the passing game. Besides that, the WOTS is that Webb has looked better this spring than Koger. Koger definitely isn't going to catch 23+ passes as a backup.

Hemingway...eh. I'm not impressed. I'd rather see Stonum/Roundtree on the outside and have Robinson/Odoms/Gallon in the slot. Hemingway had a good game against WMU, but analysts downgraded him coming out of high school because he's slow...and he's done nothing to dispel that notion. I don't think he'll surpass 20 catches.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:11 AM | I agree about Hemingway. He (Score:1)
WichitanWolverine
WichitanWolverine's picture
Joined: 09/30/2009
MGoPoints: 18

I agree about Hemingway. He had one of the most beautiful plays against WMU (over the shoulder catch from Tate) but was completely silent the rest of the season. Yes, injuries sure didn't help the situation, but I just don't see any consistent, solid production this fall from him. I can easily see him falling by the wayside for some younger guys like Stokes who, from what I've heard, have some great speed.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:36 AM | I still think Koger has more (Score:1)
jam706
jam706's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 358

I still think Koger has more upside, but Webb put on 12 lbs and looked great in the spring game running across the middle on a ~20 yd reception. If he's 12 lbs bigger and can move like that consistently, I'd be okay with him getting more looks this fall

Now MGoBlogging from Seoul

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 10:55 AM | Stonum (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8047

I'd like to see Stonum get more involved. The QB's didn't really look for him during the spring game. He has all the potential, but seemed to disappear in games last year.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:34 AM | Stonum's potential (Score:1)
PhillipFulmersPants
PhillipFulmersPants's picture
Joined: 01/06/2009
MGoPoints: 1170

seems somewhat limited to me. Great speed, yes, but he hasn't really shown great athletic ability in adjusting to balls, using his body, etc. to be a scary outside threat. Maybe he'll improve in this area, but seems a lot of this is natural--kids either have it or don't. Not that I'm down on the guy. I think he's a decent B10 receiver, and could end up being a pretty good one. He can certainly take it to the house if catches it in the open field, but he doesn't seem like much of a threat working in fairly tight one-on-one coverage (whereas outside guys like Manningham and Braylon could get separation and adjust on deep balls). I hope he proves me wrong.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 10:55 AM | Stonum looked extremely frustrated (Score:1)
Maize and Blue ...
Maize and Blue 4 Life's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 3516

during the spring game. I don't remember the ball being thrown his way much if at all. He is the one guy we know can stretch the field and needs to be utilized as such.
I don't think we have enough information yet to determine WR production. Who is going to be the QB? What direction is the offense going? If Denard starts can he do it against a real D that isn't playing vanilla, is disguising coverages, and is blitzing? Will the Oline provide better protection(I expect so, but I need to see it in a real game)?
Hopefully in the future, the spring game can present 1s vs 1s and 2s vs 2s so we can get a real barometer of things to come. I would expect next year barring injuries with a big freshmen class coming in and a small senior class leaving.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:35 AM | In a way, I feel bad for (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27455

In a way, I feel bad for Stonum. He committed to play for Lloyd Carr and, if we still ran the same offense, Stonum would probably be catching 50 balls a season. It has to be frustrating to play with quarterbacks (and a coach, in some ways) who can't/won't take advantage of your talents.

He and Roundtree are probably our two most talented wide receivers (although Roundtree played in the slot exclusively last year) but Stonum doesn't have much to show for it.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 1:16 PM | Stonum (Score:1)
blueheron
blueheron's picture
Joined: 03/26/2009
MGoPoints: 2302

Agreed -- offhand I can't think of anyone on the current team that was harmed more by the changeover than Stonum.

What I don't know is whether RichRod would throw downfield if he had someone (say, like Henne with running skills) who had the arm for it.

"..."

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:07 AM | Je'Ron Stokes (Score:1)
BrayBray1
BrayBray1's picture
Joined: 07/15/2009
MGoPoints: 4247

Haven't heard much about him...How is he doing?

What the Hell. -Jack Burton

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:24 AM | He was injured most of the spring (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8047

He had a nice TD grab from Tate on Saturday, and another near-touchdown that was either batted away or dropped.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:11 AM | "With QB at a peak right now" (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19203

?? If we're truly at a peak of QB play right now, we're in trouble.


  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:23 AM | It (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7894

It certainly is at a peak compared to where its been the rest of Koger's time here. That was my point. And it was pretty clear. Thanks for playing in the thread

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:28 AM | I think he means that this is (Score:1)
DrewG32
DrewG32's picture
Joined: 01/21/2009
MGoPoints: 401

I think he means that this is the best the QB's have been during Koger's time at Mich.

Edit: beaten to it.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:12 AM | Koger (Score:1)
CalifExile
Joined: 03/02/2010
MGoPoints: 1333

HOLD ON TO THE DAMN BALL

and the coaches will have more confidence in you.

"After all was said and done, there was nothing left to do."

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:19 AM | Giddy is right (Score:1)
oakapple
Joined: 02/06/2009
MGoPoints: 1316

Basically, you're predicting that 4 different guys will catch more balls in 2010 than they did in 2008 and 2009 combined. When is the last time that happened on any football team?

Roundtree is the safest bet, since he had zero in 2008 and only came on strong near the end of 2009. Then, maybe one of the other two.

Koger is probably the least plausible. For him to catch 30 balls, he’d need to average more than 2½ per game. That seems awfully unlikely, as this offense does not feature the TE, and it appears he will be splitting time with Martell Webb.

You’re forgetting several other guys who figure to get playing time, like Tay Odoms, Jeremy Gallon, etc. Rodriguez likes to rotate his wide-outs, which makes it difficult for one guy to light it up game after game.

It’s safe to say that if Michigan is going to have a winning season, somebody had better be catching the ball, but for four guys to all have career years just doesn’t sound realistic.

Comparing the current QBs to the best of the Navarre/Henne era is likewise unrealistic, as Michigan is now much more dependent on the short passing game and the QB running the ball.

Marc Shepherd
New York, NY

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:30 AM | Not really (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7894

Hemingway needs five more catches this year than last year and Koger needs 7 more catches this year than last year for either of them to pull this "feat"

If they dont see their reps decreased from a year ago, it wont be that hard.

The Webb/Koger dynamic bears watching. If not Koger getting 23 balls himself, I think its reasonable to assume the TE group could amass that production.

Stonum would have to double his production over last year. He is the only one that needs to make a major stat leap in this one.

And on the QB comparison, Michigan averaged 24-25 TD passes a season in that era. We had 11 and 15 the last two years. All I said is we can approach that. Frankly, I think we see 20 TD passes this season and that's all i was really trying to say with that one. We'll be approaching that level of production. We'll be in the ball park of getting the same amount of points out of the passing game as we did during that era.

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:56 AM | Any one of those things... (Score:1)
oakapple
Joined: 02/06/2009
MGoPoints: 1316

Any one of those things could happen. I'm just saying that the odds they'll all happen are low.

Marc Shepherd
New York, NY

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:39 AM | i hope woolfolk, dorsey, cam (Score:1)
TrppWlbrnID
TrppWlbrnID's picture
Joined: 10/29/2009
MGoPoints: 7885

i hope woolfolk, dorsey, cam and vlad each catch about 4 passes this year.

see what i did there?

2013 resolution - make it onto the 2014 favorite MGoPosters post, not ironically
  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:34 AM | Other than Roundtree (Score:1)
Space Coyote
Space Coyote's picture
Joined: 06/18/2009
MGoPoints: 4365

I expect pretty much the the same production out of everybody else and the new guys (those essentially with under 10 catches in their career) splitting the extra completions. I could easily see Koger getting an equal amount, with maybe a slight increase in production from Webb.

I think another key might be how much we run out of the I-formation this fall. We saw a bit of it during the spring game. Out of the I-form the TEs might be the most dangerous player on the field, especially with some of the natural ability Koger has (if he holds onto the ball, again).

I think Odoms gets his, probably some where between his '08 and '09 stats. I really think Odoms is starting to be slept on, even though his production has been solid. But because his production slipped last year they are forgetting how good he can be, and has proven to be (if he doesn't drop the ball). We need to get him the ball as he can be electric with it.

As far as Hemingway, sometimes to torrents of spring don't equate to fall production, but I don't see his numbers drastically going up. With all the talent at slot, RB, and TE, there just isn't enough to get all the outside guys enough balls their way, especially with the trends we've seen of RR offense.

4/23/13 - Denard Robinson's NFL Future, Part II

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:33 AM | QB play... (Score:1)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10370

The OL and QB's will have a very loud "say" in how well the recievers do. I think the OL will be improved because they are a year older and bigger. This should help both in protection and in a good enough running game to help open up the field for recievers.

As for getting the ball down the field, it appears that DG is the only QB with a rocket launcher, and we really can't predict whether or not he will make it onto the field this year. I still think we will see a few plays like the 97-yarder, but I also think they will be to wide-open recievers because of gross mismatches and blown coverages caused by the spread.

I think the determining factor on WR stats will be the ability of both Forcier and Denard to throw the intermediate route. If they can get the ball out there with enough speed and accuracy against defenses who are really getting after it, we may be pleasantly surprised. If they struggle, the offense may depend on RB's and slots.

I am always optimistic, so I think that Forcier will fully heal this summer and come out with enough arm to get the job done. I also think Denard's progress is real, and that he will have enough arm to get the job done; with him, the determining factor will probably be recognition of coverages.

As for the individual recievers, I still don't feel that we have seen enough from any of them to guarantee a great year for anyone individually. There is a lot of talent and potential, but there are still a lot of question marks. I like Roundtree a lot, but they have to be able to get him the ball.

All in all, I think the offense will average 33-35 points a game, but with the bulk of the offense coming from the inside, with the WR's being more like decoys at least 80 percent of the time.

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:47 AM | What happened to DRob being our #1 wideout?! (Score:1)
KinesiologyNerd
KinesiologyNerd's picture
Joined: 02/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5974

Seriously though, as long we have a couple guys who can catch the ball, run really really fast, and only let go when giving it to the ref I'll be happy.

I know from experience dude. If you know what I mean.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 12:12 PM | My no-basis-in-fact predictions for 2010 (Score:1)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2906

Roundtree: 40 catches, 500 yards, 5 TD
Odoms: 30 catches, 350 yards, 2 TD
Stonum: 20 catches, 350 yards, 2 TD

Koger/Webb: 30 catches, 350 yards, 3 TD
Other Slots: 30 catches, 350 yards, 2 TD
Other Split-ends: 30 catches, 400 yards, 3 TD
Running backs: 20 catches, 200 yards, 2 TD

Totals: 200 catches, 2500 yards, 19 TD, 12 INT

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 12:43 PM | I would flip Koger/Webb with (Score:1)
Irish
Irish's picture
Joined: 06/05/2009
MGoPoints: 3693

I would flip Koger/Webb with Running Backs but that looks pretty good I think

Current Smug rating: "lethal"

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 12:35 PM | As long as UM operates a run (Score:1)
Irish
Irish's picture
Joined: 06/05/2009
MGoPoints: 3693

As long as UM operates a run first offense I think your numbers are a bit high. I would expect the QBs to be more accurate this year and increase the 189 receptions from last year but I wouldn't expect RR to call more pass plays. If the QBs can increase their accuracy to 60% collectively, which is pretty good, you can expect just under 200 catches. To give nearly half of those receptions to Koger and Roundtree seems unlikely.

I would expect more RB receptions though. If one guy emerges to carry the ball then I would expect him to be 3rd or 4th in receptions at the end of the year. Though I am basing that on one spring practice scrimmage, a RB seemed to be out in the flat a lot.

Current Smug rating: "lethal"

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 4:43 PM | So let's say there are 30 passes per game and 12 games (Score:1)
colin
colin's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1332

That's 360 passes to be caught. 60% caught is decent, so that makes 216 catches. So those numbers look fairly reasonable to me. I'm still not sold on Stonum's ball skills and I think Odoms is probably as good or better bets to be the next leading catcher after Roundtree. Also, I really liked Gallon and Robinson, but they might need another year. Koger's production is dependent on the degree to which the two slots breakout (as well as his own breakout potential), but let's say the distribution looks like:

60
45
30
30
15
15

From most to least, I like Roundtree, Odoms, Stonum, Koger, Gallon. Next best: J. Robinson and Stokes.

...the Canadians make up for it with their emotion and classic ice-dancing skill.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 5:16 PM | Always thought Stonum should (Score:1)
Braylon1
Braylon1's picture
Joined: 02/02/2009
MGoPoints: 376

Always thought Stonum should get some time in the slot as well to get him more touches. Stonum doesn't have the strong body or the route running ability of a Mario Manningham to have a ton of success on the outside. He needs to get the ball somehow plain and simple.

go blue go

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 6:53 PM | Stonum (Score:1)
Hard Gay
Hard Gay's picture
Joined: 10/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1072

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaFjSU_MQbk

Please, I want to see more of this

Brady...Hoooooooke!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 19th, 2010 at 11:33 PM | One thing to remember (Score:1)
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1948

and maybe this is being overly optimistic. I'm hoping UM isn't having to come from behind in the 4th quarter of just about every game. How many games last year were they behind and predominantly throwing the ball in the 4th quarter? I'm hoping this year to see a few more games where they're ahead in the 4th quarter and keeping the ball on the ground.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.