Why Rich Rod is Not Josh McDaniels

Submitted by scottydreisbach on

[Ed-M : Interesting comparison, but not a diary]

So the big news in the NFL was the Broncos firing Josh McDaniels as their head coach.  When both Rich Rod and Josh McDaniels were hired, there were some parallels in the type of hiring that took place.  I think Michigan and the Broncos made a similiar coaching decision when hiring their respective coaches.  Happily, the bottom line is that Rich Rod is a better coach and a much better person, two factors that will hopefully weigh heavily in Dave Brandon's pending decision.  

Michigan hired Rich Rod knowing that he was a paradigm changing coach for our program. He was/is relatively young, though with a track record of real success.  We took a chance on the exciting prospects of higher octane offense and schemes on both sides of the ball that had built West Virginia into a real program.

The Denver Broncos hired Josh McDaniels following the Mike Shanahan era.  Shanahan's time in Denver was not unlike Lloyd Carr's at Michigan.  Shanahan won Super Bowls in 97 and 98 with John Elway, only to spend the next ten years with successful- but not championship-caliber teams.  The Broncos needed a change even though Mike Shanahan was an excellent coach, a feeling many of us had about Lloyd in 2007.  (Obviously no disrespect to Lloyd Carr, he was and is a class act and one of our all time greatest coaches.)

McDaniels was hired because he was going to bring fresh life to the Broncos.  As a Belichick disciple, McDaniels had done extremely well as the Pats offensive coordinator.  He built Matt Cassel into a legitimate NFL quarterback.  He was a young, bright coach who was going to bring a new and exciting system to Denver.

Fast forward to today and the firing of Josh McDaniels.  Part of the decision to fire McDaniels was his overall win-loss record.  Since starting 6-0 last year, McDaniels had subsequently gone 5-17 with the Broncos.  This sounds not too dissimilar from Rich Rod’s 4-0 and 5-0 starts over the past two years, right?  No, not even close.  Here are the differences:

1.  McDaniels had lost the team's confidence

If one thing came out of the end of this season, it is clear that the players still believe in Rich Rodriguez.  Our guys believe in Rich Rod and want him to succeed.  Effort has never been an issue this year.  Even our defense, which admittedly has been tough to watch, has played hard for Coach Rod week in and week out.

2.  McDaniels was arrogant and destroyed the talent base

Say what you will about Coach Rod's speech last week, his message was humility and belief in the Michigan program.  He is not arrogant.  Josh McDaniels didn't get along with his star players and destroyed the Broncos by trading Jay Cutler, Peyton Hillis and Brandon Marshall. Rich Rod has been quietly building and improving this Michigan team.  The talent level of this Michigan team is rising.    

3.  McDaniels was coaching for himself, not for the players

When watching Broncos games this year, one thing above all else struck me about Josh McDaniels.  He had little to no interaction with any players on the sidelines.  Literally none.  He was aloof and didn't bother to check in with his players, whether things were going well or poorly.  Chatter from within the Broncos organization was that McDaniels was not well received by the players this year, after having alienated many of the veterans.

Rich Rod is clearly fully invested in his players at Michigan.  He cares about them and is fully engaged in their success as athletes and people.  One example: he wouldn't let Denard back into the game against Illinois out of concern for his head injury.  Rich Rod was emotional last week at the Bust when talking about how much his players mean to him.  

While no one is ecstatic about the win-loss column over the last three seasons, it is instructive to see how Rich Rodriguez looks when compared to Josh McDaniels.  The two shared more than a few commonalities when hired to be the new head coaches of their respective teams. Luckily, Michigan hired a guy who has maintained a high quality environment for the Michigan football program.  Josh McDaniels provides a great reference point for the type of coach who should be fired.  Rich Rodriguez deserves a much better fate.  

tybert

December 6th, 2010 at 11:49 PM ^

RichRod won conference championships as a HC.

McDaniels, though perhaps talented, came across as a real dick, starting with the Jay Cutler episode. Josh also was an ASSISTANT, never a real head coach.

Hey, I love enthusiasm as much as anyone, but, after McDaniels went 6-0 to start his rookie year, and finished 5-16 after that.

He was also an assistant at Michigan State in 1999-2000. That is a huge strike against anyone to be associated with "little brother" U.

Glad to see the cocky bastard go.

tybert

December 7th, 2010 at 12:02 AM ^

McDaniels was a "hot" coach who bombed under pressure after replacing a guy who had won titles.The team is clearly on the downturn --- the hated Raiders crushed Denver for its worst home loss in ages.

RichRod, though we definitely want BETTER than 7-5, is improving performance.

Denver was still a top notch franchise, when Shanahan ("crazy eyes") was forced out. Even though the program had slumped a bit, it was still a revered franchise.

tybert

December 7th, 2010 at 12:16 AM ^

But also have to say...that ANY change, whether NFL or college, will have its detractors.

Lou Holtz, Steve Spurrier, Nick Saban, et al BOMBED as pro coaches, but have HOF careers as college coaches.

But guys like Bill Walsh (Stanford), Marv Levy (California et al), Jimmy Johnson (Okie State, Miami), were successful college and pro coaches.

Coaching is all about motivating people (in college, 18-22 yr old kids).

RichRod has had TWO full recruiting classes to build his team.

In the NFL, a coach can influence changes pretty fast, but still needs a few years to show whether he gets it or not.

I watched the Bronco's meltdown at home vs. the hated Raiders, McDaniels' player QUIT on him. Even though we got smoked in our last two games, I didn't see any QUIT from out guys,

tybert

December 7th, 2010 at 12:07 AM ^

No one is crying that the Belichek clone is forced out after a Detroit Lions' like 3-9 start.

Not a single player has stepped up to say anything on McDaniel's behalf.

At least some guys like Martin, RVB, and such have stepped up to back OUR coach.

I don't totally absolve RichRod from his mistakes, but think the Detroit Media hates his guts and is doing whatever it can to bring him to down.

Dantonio was getting sainted even after a 6-7 season, with a post-banquet brawl, Why??? Because he wasn't RichRod. WTF???

mgoO

December 7th, 2010 at 1:52 AM ^

Blaming McDaniels for trading Hillis is completely absurd.  

He started the season buried behind a useless Jerome Harrison in Cleveland and is unlikely to have any sustained success past this year and perhaps next.  He'll wear down.

Cutler?  Really?  Jeff George 2.0

McDaniels wasn't ready to be an NFL head coach (yet) but I'd let him run my offense any day.  He'll land on his feet and I could see him as a very successful college coach if he ever decided to go in that direction. 

profitgoblue

December 7th, 2010 at 6:41 AM ^

Technically, they are different people because they have different parents and different DNA makeup. Plus, they have different legal names. And for all the reasons above too. And this should not be a diary.

Mitch Cumstein

December 7th, 2010 at 7:38 AM ^

Honestly, I know we like to conjecture and compare, but can we just let Rich Rod be Rich Rod for better or for worse.  I feel like everyday I read something new on this board about how Rich Rod is like Bo, or Rich Rod is like John L.  I think we should just let Rich Rod make his own legacy.

SysMark

December 7th, 2010 at 9:18 AM ^

Major difference - RichRod had a long track record as a successful head coach.

Being a successful Belichick assistant does not require the leadership and organizational skills required to be a head coach.  Look at Eric Mangini.  He was supposed to be the second coming with the Jets and now is close to being out in Cleveland.  It just isn't the same - even Belichick failed his first time around as HC in Cleveland.

profitgoblue

December 7th, 2010 at 9:43 AM ^

1.  Both are homo sapiens.

2.  Both are caucasian males.

3.  Both are American citizens (?)

4.  Both are/were football coaches.

5.  Both went to college.

6.  Both have met Tom Brady.

7.  Both wear clothing.

Any others I've missed??