Why did B10 announce looking into expansion?

Submitted by PeterKlima on

I thought someone might be able to answer this question.

Q.  Why did the Big Ten announce that it would be looking into expansion?

What purpose does it serve to publically announce it?  Doesn't it actually hurt the B10's ability to cherry-pick teams because the conferences "see it coming" and can try to work things out?  No one was speculating expansion before the announcement, it wasn't like it needed to be addressed. 

I don't think Delany does things by accident.

The decsion to publicly declare its intentions must serve some purpose.

MadMonkey

May 13th, 2010 at 2:03 PM ^

hysteria from when the actual decisions are made.  Politicians and businessmen long ago learned to leak information to ascertain how to best manage/manipulate public perception when actual news is released.  I suspect it is also designed to get one or more of the offerees [read: ND] to make a choice when they realize that the world is going to move forward with them or without them.  A free opinion, worth what you paid for it.

Don

May 13th, 2010 at 2:03 PM ^

I'm pretty sure expansion was actually a hot topic for a lot of people inside the conference and out even before the official announcement.

genericmichiganfan

May 13th, 2010 at 2:06 PM ^

When's the last time the Big Ten received this much positive buzz?  Instead of spending the offseason talking about how the Big Ten has struggled in football or basketball or whatever (some of which is just BS, some of which is deserved), the discussion revolves around how awesome the conference is, how much money it is making thanks to the BTN, and how it could single-handedly change the landscape of college sports. 

Plus, as others have said, it probably wouldn't be a great decision to suddenly announce one day, "By the way, we're expanding."  There would have been rumblings that would have forced the Big Ten to say something, so better to do it early on rather than just spring it on people.

MGoBender

May 13th, 2010 at 2:05 PM ^

Better to announce it than have some lowly researcher who's looking at the pro's and cons of Missouri to run his mouth to a local paper and then have to damage control.

The moment they made the decision they knew it would be well known whether they wanted it to be or not.

twohooks

May 13th, 2010 at 4:50 PM ^

If you were to add four to six new houses to your development you would like to get some idea if there is a market for them wouldnt you? Thats exactly what Delaney, Big Ten PR representation, Athletic Directors, Presidents etc are doing. Delaney is very shrewd and calculated plus Im happy he is doing it.

M2NASA

May 13th, 2010 at 2:05 PM ^

My take is that it wanted to take the pole position in something it saw as inevitable.  Other rumors recently are that the SEC is targeting Florida State, Miami, and Georgia Tech from the ACC.  This would likely force the Big Ten's hand on the New York market since if it takes only Rutgers and/or Pitt, the ACC will definitely add Syracuse and UConn and if you know the alumni and fanbase breakdowns in the northeast, the ACC will go after taking the New York/Northeast market for itself with SU, UConn, BC, etc.  If the Big Ten wants to take the NY market for itself, it's going to have to take SU and Rutgers as a couple.

sharkhunter

May 13th, 2010 at 2:27 PM ^

things are moving quick and now pressure may shift back to Delaney (B10) to act before another conference does.  Pac10 and Big 12 are looking into aligning to form their own dedicated TV network.  This could put more money into Nebraska and Missouri's hands encouraging them to stay. 

BiSB

May 13th, 2010 at 2:37 PM ^

it puts pressure on the Big East to act to protect itself.  One of the most likely ways teh Big East can protect itself is by booting Notre Dame from the conference writ large.  This will make ND much more likely to accept a bid to the Big Ten, lest their non-football sports wither and die as independents.

It's all strategory.

Yostal

May 13th, 2010 at 3:03 PM ^

This is a great strategy for the Big Ten because it keeps a lot of positives about the Big Ten, the financial strengths, the network, the academic credibility, in truth everything Jim Delany could shout from the rooftops and never have people hear, now he has dozens and dozens of reporters and bloggers repeatedly pointing these things out for him, reaching thousands of ears and eyes, and making the Big Ten's expansion THE story of the football off-season, which is long and harrowing.

If it forces the hand of the Big XII or the Pac Ten, or causes chaos among people, so be it.  Like James Madison bringing his draft of the new Constitution to Philadelphia with him in 1787, he may not have ended up with his exact plan, but the guys in the room HAD to talk about it because he had done his homework, he had the documents in front of him, he was controlling the agenda and had the credibility and command to make it work.

Tater

May 13th, 2010 at 3:23 PM ^

1.  As SeanMSC said, the positive buzz has been great.  Just a year ago, national pundits were referring to the Big Ten as a quaint artifact of a bygone era.  Now, they are suddenly leaders in the evolution of college football.  All of this was accomplished mainly on the strength of one announcement.

2.  It lets them know who is interested and who is not.  Imagine how much clandestine communication there had to be within hours of the initial announcement.

3.  It rattles ND's cage.  This is probably the most enjoyable effect for me.

4.  It gives advertisers who may be looking to the future a chance to "get in on the ground floor now," thus increasing BTN revenue.  At the very least, it is brought BTN to the attention of many advertisers, regardless of whether or not they are acting now.

5.  Because he can.

Seth9

May 13th, 2010 at 3:33 PM ^

By announcing that the Big Ten was looking into expansion and being serious about it, Delany lost nothing, as any target school that we could have gotten by not making a big deal in public about it will still come to take advantage of the money the Big Ten offers, which are unmatched by anyone (except perhaps the SEC). However, by announcing that the Big Ten intended to expand, an atmosphere of uncertainty has taken over, and there is a reasonable fear by both the Big 12 and Big East that their conferences could fall apart. As such, it can make other schools who wouldn't consider leaving their conference under normal circumstances debate leaving because their conference is under threat of falling apart.

spam and beans

May 13th, 2010 at 4:18 PM ^

For many of the reasons already posted.  And to keep Joe Pa happy.  Remember it was Joe who made a pain of himself before last season talking about expansion.  (thanks Joe)  And because Jim Delaney is the puppet master. 

About Jim Delaney, sometimes I can't stand the guy, sometimes I love him.  Lately its been more love.  Has the rest of the board found that to be the case?

energyblue1

May 13th, 2010 at 7:25 PM ^

1  conducting it quietly gets out as soon as you contact a team that really has no interest so word will spread.

2  You may actually find a few institutions intersted you didn't know would be, thus they may pursue the bigten now.....ie Nebraska and Tom Osbourne....(wich btw he is going to force the big12's hand.  Either share revenue equally or see ya later..)

3  Force Nd's hand.  Prior to bigten network nd had an advantage with nbc and money deals.  Now it is almost completely different.  Now nd gets 1.3 million yr bcs if they aren't selected, only 4.5 million if they are, instead of the full payout....and nd gets 9million from nbc and a few more million from abc/espn for non nbc games...thus the revenue stream advantage isn't what it used to be over cf across the country.  Now all bigten and sec teams make more money from tv alone over what nd's revenues are...Totally new world wich may make nd rethink it's standing in cf....

4  Bigten network gets to examine potential member universities for revenues....(me thinks this will be the deciding factor....