Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 19 hours ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 22 hours ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 5 days ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 5 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,463 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,064 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,049 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 1,008 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 800 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 32 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 24 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 13 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 6-18-13
    Ace - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • MgoUser Crystal Ball Picks
    21 replies
  • NCAA 14: Early Returns & Gripes
    12 replies
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    1 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    29 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    24 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    57 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    111 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    30 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    25 replies
  • USF Camp (Cole/Scott)
    12 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    60 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    28 replies
  • Story on MBB Pete Kahler's Family
    5 replies
  • More Camp Offers, 2014 WR and 2014 CB
    23 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    1 replies
  • MgoUser Crystal Ball Picks
    21 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    29 replies
  • NCAA 14: Early Returns & Gripes
    12 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    24 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    111 replies
  • OT: How well do you know MLB rules (Quiz)?
    57 replies
  • UofMs solar car expecting to dominate world race
    30 replies
  • OT: Soccer - USMNT vs Honduras World Cup Qualifying Open Thread
    60 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • Very OT: Job Searching
    73 replies
  • OT: Griffins win Calder Cup
    25 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • 4* NJ TE/DE Garrett Dickerson's top 3: Stanford, M, Northwestern
    28 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT'ish: Michigan or Harvard?
    176 replies
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    132 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    111 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • OT: Tigers/afternoon baseball Open Thread
    97 replies
  • John U. Bacon on the GA Student Section
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Miami fans leave Game 6 early, miss incredible ending

    like I said on twitter: that was almost as intense as Iowa NIT games

    0 comments
  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  • Babcock: 'Glendening will play at the next level, for sure''

    premature congrats. One thing we can be sure of: he'll take fewer asinine penalties than Abdelkader

    1 comments
  • Spurrier may have to come up with a new UT spelling joke.

    Thanks to ugly transitions between Fulmer/Kiffin/Dooley/Davis, Tennessee is on the edge of APR penalties for football.

    1 comments
  • Report: NCAA ditching domes prior to Final Four

    i approve of this message

    0 comments
  • San Antonio Spurs may be doing something right by drafting international athletes

    strong indictment of AAU right heah

    0 comments
  • NBA draft 2013 Toss Up: Better PG prospect, Trey Burke or Michael Carter-Williams

    Glockner sides with justice

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-coached fantasy camp raises $140K for prostate cancer research

    a good cause, and a good time

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Why is Brian Griese in favor?

44 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
August 28th, 2010 at 1:40 AM
#1
dieseljr32
dieseljr32's picture
Joined: 04/19/2009
MGoPoints: 1498
Why is Brian Griese in favor?

So, why is Brian Griese in favor of moving the M/OSU game?  When he was talking about being pro-rivalry destruction, I kinda wanted to punch him through my TV screen.  I think he should be reading MGoBlog more often. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • Brian Griese
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 28th, 2010 at 1:42 AM | Wtf brian? (ntb) (Score:1)
UMxWolverines
UMxWolverines's picture
Joined: 03/01/2009
MGoPoints: 5344

Wtf brian? (ntb)

"Ohio is like a giant turd that Michigan just can't pinch off"

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 1:54 AM | can (Score:1)
MgoViper
MgoViper's picture
Joined: 05/29/2010
MGoPoints: 3442

can we get a link to this or a video of him saying this?. I never saw this.

Joined:2010-5-29

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 1:54 AM | Only ESPN could create a (Score:1)
Blue since birth
Joined: 12/24/2009
MGoPoints: 1080

Only ESPN could create a scenerio where I was siding with two OSU guys over a former Michigan player.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 2:07 AM | Brian Griese could... (Score:1)
4godkingandwolv...
4godkingandwolverines's picture
Joined: 08/06/2008
MGoPoints: 3498

... be the spokesperson for NAMBLA and he'd still be in my good graces.  The man qb'd our national championship team and being in the Rose Bowl when it all happened... yeah, you've earned yourself some slack...

Do Something. If it works, do more of it. If it doesn't, do something else.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 3:51 AM | I don't know.. (Score:1)
UMichGA
UMichGA's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 158

I wonder if I'm starting to become a conspiracy theorist.  A Michigan alum saying it's ok to move The Game?  Then I swear I saw Desmond Howard wear the opposing teams colors at least 3 times on gameday.  ESPN hates Michigan!  I think I need to drink more... or less.

-UMichGA

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:33 AM | Can we preemptively agree to (Score:1)
bluebrains98
bluebrains98's picture
Joined: 01/14/2009
MGoPoints: 1239

Can we preemptively agree to never bring up the Desmond tie-color thing at all this season? That was one of the biggest wastes of mgoboard space all last season. Griese suggesting the game be moved is a topic worthy of discussion here...not neckwear fashion.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 4:21 AM | Griese saying this because (Score:1)
Snidely Doo Rash
Joined: 10/17/2008
MGoPoints: 248

he and many on this board support the decision to separate us and the bucks.  If Brian Cook and 9 out of 10 UM-OSU fans see it differently than so be it.   It feels weird as a avid fan of the team and MGOblog when your fanhood is questioned repeatedly because you see things differently than the majority.

There was a time when UM-OSU transcended CFB that has long passed.  The league is trying to get it right for all members of the conference and propentents of the reactionary view need to chill out.  The point made by another poster that no one wants to be in a division without either UM or OSU is a valid one and Delaney is still on top of this and will not be swayed by sentiments about the spoiling "the game."

I have a hard time believing that any fan this passionate about keeping the game last in the season and ergo space pig UM-OSU in the same division will not want to beat OSU's ass everytime we play them in the future whatever the commish et al decide.  Glad to see that others want us to beat Nebraska's ass as payback as well.  

The new big ten is okay with me no matter how this shakes out.  What is important is that all members feel they are respected and treated equally (compare to the Big 12).   The high ground for UM and OSU is that we do not want any special favors regarding alignment due to our traditions and the game.  The low road is whining about "the game".   Just my opinion.

 

 

I hope don't press means press right away! --Homer, 2003 A.D.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 7:57 AM | I couldn't agree with you (Score:1)
mgoblahhh
mgoblahhh's picture
Joined: 11/20/2008
MGoPoints: 209

I couldn't agree with you more.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:02 AM | We do not... (Score:1)
Togaroga
Togaroga's picture
Joined: 11/10/2009
MGoPoints: 467

...owe them anything.  I makes no sense for us to be selfless and give up our traditions.  The other members of the conference, according to you, seem to be looking out for themselves.  They want to make sure the new alignment benefits their school as much as possible...but apparently we should not be so "selfish" or "whiny".  We should not seek our rightful place on top of the conference's pecking order.  That assertion is bonkers. 

Ultimately the conference alignment matters far less than the date of THE GAME. 

You have a right to your opinion.  I find your rationale to be very very flawed, but that is my opinion.  But, complaining that other people's opinions hurt your feelings then insult others for their opinions in the next breath doesn't make sense.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 8:37 AM | I respectfully disagree... (Score:1)
milhouse
milhouse's picture
Joined: 05/29/2010
MGoPoints: 372

I'm sorry, but this notion that moving rivalry games to any time but the final week of the season is not progress.  To me, this isn't just about 'The Game' (though that is a part of it) it's about all of the rivalries in the Big Ten.  Their is a reason, as Michigan fans, that we care so much more about beating Ohio State then we do about ND, MSU, or Minnesota.  While part of that is the history of the game and the long standing quality of the opponent I believe that the timing on the schedule is at least equal.  In fact, I can make a convincing arguement that without U of M - OSU being played the last week of the season it would not be the rivalry it is today.  People on both sides talk about the times that the game decided more then who was headed to the Rose Bowl.  By having ALL Big Ten teams play there biggest rivals the last week I feel we would ensure several important things. 

1. Every game would be a gauntlet. There would be no laying down for this one.  Nothing would mean more to a mediocre team then ensuring their biggest rival wouldn't play for the championship.

2. You build toward the end.  No matter what the rest of the season looks like every fan base (and team) has their eyes focused on the last game.  It's hard to 'give up' on a season when you haven't played your rival.

3. You ensure a dramatic championship game.  How will teams respond after a close win/loss to there biggest rival? If (on the rare occasion) two rivals meet again how will things change? What will coaches do differently? 

I think in this scenario you set up the Big Ten to own college football for the two weeks of the season.  Whats better for branding then that?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:26 AM | The new big ten is okay with (Score:1)
bobmurph
bobmurph's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 1562

The new big ten is okay with me no matter how this shakes out.  What is important is that all members feel they are respected and treated equally (compare to the Big 12).   The high ground for UM and OSU is that we do not want any special favors regarding alignment due to our traditions and the game.  The low road is whining about "the game".

I could not disagree with this more.  No matter how it shakes out, huh?  

DB needs to be fighting for M to have the best opportunity to win the conference and to preserve the traditions its fans hold dear.  That's it.  It's his job.  You better believe this is exactly Barry Alvarez and the AD's are fighting for.  They're not going to lay down so everyone can be treated "equally".  The equality will balance out naturally if each AD is looking out for his schools best interest.  It is of no importance that DB look out for other schools best interest...just Michigan.  

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:55 AM | Regardless of whether or not (Score:1)
iloveyellow
iloveyellow's picture
Joined: 08/11/2009
MGoPoints: 427

Regardless of whether or not I agree with you:

"There was a time when UM-OSU transcended CFB that has long passed."

Then why did Brandon say it was so important to try to get them to play twice in the same season? He said that was the best-case scenario. Not, say, Indiana vs. Illinois.

aesthetics are wonderful. prolixity is inevitable.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 6:47 AM | So, why is Brian Griese in (Score:1)
Not a Blue Fan
Not a Blue Fan's picture
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 2574

So, why is Brian Griese in favor of moving the M/OSU game?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:07 AM | Well if the Macallan is behind it (Score:1)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6051

I've got to forgive him a teensy weensy bit. The Macallan is liquid nirvana.

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 8:01 AM | a player's perspective might be different (Score:1)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2689

David Brandon has repeatedly said that it would be a shame if Michigan never played OSU again for the conference title and trip to the Rose Bowl. Brian Griese certainly has been there and done that, complete with Roses in the teeth, etc. That is the experience they are trying to preserve (but it won't be the same, because it won't happen in Michigan Stadium or the Shoe -- Soldier or Lambau Field maybe, Lucas Oil Stadium, Metrodome, or Ford Field not even close).

It occurs to me that a player's perspective on what is important about the game might be different than a fan's. Of course if you talk to Cooper year players, their perspective may be different than a '96 team player or a Bo / Woody era player.

As for me, I want the game in late November, but would be OK with the game being the Saturday before Thanksgiving, and a minor non-rivalry in-division game coming the week after (maybe while some of the other Big Ten rivalries are played).

My other thing is MSU IS NOT an acceptable replacement as a season ending game. You can't swap a rivalry game based on begrudging mutual respect, out for one based on jealousy and disrespect.

If they slot in a major game, Penn State or Nebraska would be my choice, but then my fear is those games take over the importance of the game over time.

As I've said before, the other matchup that might be interesting is Minnesota (if they are in our division) for the Little Brown Jug. With that matchup you could play the game the week before Thanksgiving, and still have a compelling, but historically less competitive made for TV matchup the week after.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 8:19 AM | That's an interesting point (Score:1)
Not a Blue Fan
Not a Blue Fan's picture
Joined: 08/03/2009
MGoPoints: 2574

That's an interesting point of view RE: the players. I would point out that all of the OSU players who I have seen interviewed have been adamantly against moving the game. I'd like to see more data; I highly doubt that it's a clean UM/OSU party lines split on the issue. However, right now it's DB/BG vs Herbie and Robert Smith (which is too small a sample to reach any conclusions).

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 11:23 AM | More former player opinions--all anti-moving the game (Score:1)
Raoul
Raoul's picture
Joined: 09/29/2009
MGoPoints: 5515

Found a Columbus Dispatch article from today titled Past players plead: Leave game alone.

Writer interviewed Stan White Sr., Dan Dierdorf, Allen Wahl, Chris Spielman, Rob Lytle, Jim Lachey, and John Kolesar. All are against moving the game, as is Earl Bruce. The only contrarian: John Cooper.

Here's an excerpt:

Dan Dierdorf, a television football analyst, native Ohioan and 1970 All-America lineman for Michigan, said the timing is an integral part of the rivalry's appeal.

"I think that's one of the things that has captured the nation's attention," he said. "It's cold. It's gray. It's in the Midwest. It's November. It's Michigan-Ohio State. How do you just start chipping away and removing certain aspects of the game? You're taking away the underpinnings of what makes it what it is."

...

For those in the rivalry, the final game represents an entire phase of the season.

"I think how a generation of Ohio State fans was brought up is that you had the non-conference part of the season, the Big Ten season and then Michigan," said former Buckeye linebacker Chris Spielman.

...

And what does Lytle think Schembechler would say?

"He would have hated this," Lytle said. "I'm glad he and Woody don't have to go through it. They're probably sitting up there just shaking their heads or tearing down-markers and stomping on the field. They're probably marching around throwing tantrums right now."

Twitter: @Raoul_000

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 1:20 PM | That Lytle quote is (Score:1)
Topher
Joined: 07/05/2008
MGoPoints: 737

That Lytle quote is hilarious!

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 8:38 AM | Excellent points. (Score:1)
jabberwock
jabberwock's picture
Joined: 07/04/2008
MGoPoints: 3589

(but it won't be the same, because it won't happen in Michigan Stadium or the Shoe -- Soldier or Lambau Field maybe, Lucas Oil Stadium, Metrodome, or Ford Field not even close).

Damn straight, +1

You can't swap a rivalry game based on begrudging mutual respect, out for one based on jealousy and disrespect.

Double Damn straight +1 your next 10 posts!

If this plays out the way it looks, at least let us finish with Nebraska.

 

Love & Hate are horns on the same goat.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 8:42 AM | Maybe it's because reasonable (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2496

Maybe it's because reasonable people, nay, even reasonable Michigan Men can disagree on something without one of them being evil? Brian Griese said what was important to him was playing for the Rose Bowl (as long as the reg. season game was in "early November" followe by a one or two big divisional games). Considering he's done about eleven million times more for Michigan Football than I, I have to respect that opinion even if I disagree with it. So it's kind of silly to want to punch him.

Wait, this is the internet? Sorry, carry on.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 8:58 AM | Exactly.  The opinion that he (Score:1)
Clarence Beeks
Clarence Beeks's picture
Joined: 09/06/2008
MGoPoints: 3497

Exactly.  The opinion that he stated was a very reasonable position from someone who has played in the situation and expressed what he, personally, views as important in the rivalry (i.e. playing for the Rose Bowl).  The people here who are disagreeing with him need to realize that the premise of his argument was that OSU and Michigan should be in separate divisions (something that I think most purists would agree with), which, as a consequences, essentially requires that the game be moved, so that they could have the possibility of playing for the right to go to the Rose Bowl (even if it wouldn't happen all that often), since if they were in the same division they would never play for the right to go to th Rose Bowl.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:14 AM | I agree on Nebraska . . . (Score:1)
cutter
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 197

If everyone is compromising on how the Big Ten divisions are set and the schedules, then Michigan has to insist on ending the season with Nebraska and not Michigan State.  That's particularly true if Ohio State and Penn State are playing at the end of the season.  In fact, that would be a great back-to-back package of games on the last Saturday of the regular season.

This also makes sense in terms of basic symmetry and how the teams in the conference stack up competition wise.  If UM, UNL, OSU and PSU are acknowledged to be the top four teams in the confernce and the top two in their respective divisions, then they should play one another on the same date in late November.

Just to expand on things a bit further, I'd like to see all the teams within the division play one another in the last five games of the season--not just the last two.  Because inter-division games aren't (apparently) part of the tiebreaker, those games at season's end are going to be crucial in determining who gets to the Big Ten Conference Championship game.  For Michigan, the last five games of the season would probably be against Illinois, Iowa, Michigan State, Nebraska and Northwestern.

This divides up the season into five parts:  4 non-confernce games (to become 3 in 2015), 3 inter-division games (to become 4 in 2015), the  5 intra-division games, the Big Ten Championship and the bowl season (including the national championship game).

A hypothetical schedule for 2011 might be something like this (E=East Division; W=West Division):

 

Sept. 3 WESTERN MICHIGAN
Sept. 10 NOTRE DAME
Sept. 17 EASTERN MICHIGAN
Sept. 24 SAN DIEGO STATE
Oct. 1 Bye Week
Oct. 8 at Indiana (E)
Oct. 15 OHIO STATE (E-Protected Game)
Oct. 22 at Purdue (E)
Oct. 29 IOWA (W)
Nov. 5 at Michigan State(W)
Nov. 12 ILLINOIS (W)
Nov. 19 NORTHWESTERN (W)
Nov. 26 at Nebraska (W)

While all the games would count towards the BCS standings and whether or not Michigan goes to the national championship game or some other BCS bowl as an at large, the last five are significant because they will determine if Michigan wins its division and plays in a Big Ten Conference Championship Game against one of the teams in the East Division (Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue or Wisconsin).

Like baseball's wild card, this keeps teams and their fans engaged longer in the season because all the final stakes aren't decided until the tail end.  If Michigan were to get to a slow start and lose a couple of those early season games, they're still in the Big Ten championship hunt because none of those games are within its division--this kind of setup recognizes that programs may start slow and finish strong without penallizing them completely (they still have a shot for a BCS bowl through winning the conference), yet it still means the really national championship calibre teams will be the ones who are undefeated or have one loss through the season.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 29th, 2010 at 1:01 AM | BUT, (Score:1)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6534

Alverez/Wisconsin have already staked the claim to play Nebraska the last game of the season . . . properly looking out for the interests of their shchool, while our administration was busy selling us out (literally) and taking the "high road" to go along with the crowd.

What the fuck will be next?  Penn State taking our winged helmets?

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:26 AM | Making the Worst Idea Ever even worse (Score:1)
UMich87
UMich87's picture
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 3796

Sports radio discussion yesterday in which the hosts thought the only sensible solution was putting the teams in the same division and ending the regular season with The Game.  They claimed that the Big Ten was not only discussing putting U-M in the North and OSU in the South and moving the game to earlier in the season, but that non-divisional games would not count towards determining the division champion.  So, The Game would not just be relegated to a potentially meaningless contest, it would be GUARANTEED to be meaningless.  I wanted to throw up or punch a bear.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 11:37 AM | If that actually happens, (Score:1)
SpartanDan
Joined: 08/20/2008
MGoPoints: 598

If that actually happens, whoever masterminded that brilliant idea needs to be on the next rocket to the Sun along with Ed Hightower and Kenny Chesney.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 12:37 PM | If you decide to punch a bear (Score:1)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6051

Please let me know so I can buy a game ticket. I have 10-1 odds on the bear. No offense.

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:36 AM | I dont (Score:1)
Dallas Wolverine
Joined: 01/04/2010
MGoPoints: 937

need to write a book on 'the game' it should remain the same and OSU/Mich need to be in the same division period!

GMW

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:40 AM | getting angar solves nothing (Score:1)
Elno Lewis
Elno Lewis's picture
Joined: 12/05/2008
MGoPoints: 1143

why hate people who do not agree with you on something?  Everyone has a right to their opinion no matter how contrarian, absurd or illogical it may seem to anyone else.  If you don't agree with something you protest responsibly. 

 

Or just break out the pitchforks and torches.

Time wounds all heels. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwGXMryTbwE

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:06 AM | Here's my vote (Score:1)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6051

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 9:53 AM | For all the "for the Rose Bowl" proponents (Score:1)
Boof
Boof's picture
Joined: 08/22/2010
MGoPoints: 1

You want to insure OSU/Mich is for the Rose Bowl? The Rose Bowl hasn't been the "Rose Bowl" for a while now. Mich vs. Texas was a great game, but it didn't feel like a "Rose Bowl" used to. The BCS killed it. Just watch when we beat OSU in 2014 to go to the Rose Bowl and get to play.....TCU. Oh, the excitement.  I really don't care if they are in the same or different divisions, I just want the game to be where it is now. If we have to play back to back weeks, so what.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:15 AM | Not so fast my friend (Score:1)
Enjoy Life
Enjoy Life's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 2477

Sorry to burst everyone's bubble but this is TV. In many cases the personalities are told what postion they will take on an issue. If they refuse, they don't appear on that segment and may end up without a job. This is done to create controversy because the viewers supposedly want it.

I guarantee that the segment was deliberately set up to get either a M or osu personality to be in favor of moving the game.

Perhaps Griese already felt that way but I do not know if this is really Griese's opinion or just what he was told to say.

Life should not be a journey to the grave to arrive safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What A Ride!" HST

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:21 AM | Exactamundo... (Score:1)
MGoShoe
MGoShoe's picture
Joined: 04/23/2009
MGoPoints: 19325

...Enjoy Life.  Anyone who thinks this stuff isn't scripted is seriously naive. 

LSA '89 - MBB Natl Champions, Big 10/Rose Bowl Champions | @MGoShoe

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:32 AM | It's worse (Score:1)
Njia
Njia's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6051

Than the banter between Oscar presenters.

"If life is the road, then Ohio is simply a place to stop for gas." -- Scott Burgess, Detroit News, 9/16/2010
  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:45 AM | If that's not his real (Score:1)
Maize n Blue Balls
Maize n Blue Balls's picture
Joined: 08/28/2010
MGoPoints: 487

If that's not his real opinion and he actually cares about the rivalry, then why would he agree to say it?  So, since he did say it he either believes it or he doesn't care, i.e., values his air time above the greatest rivalry in sports.

In the first case:  I respectfully disagree.  In the second case:  Dude, WTF?

When Denard goes swimming, he doesn't get wet.  The water gets Denard.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:39 AM | Brain Griese (Score:1)
HailGoBlue86
Joined: 08/11/2010
MGoPoints: 425

He has obviously been tainted by ESPN.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:58 AM | I can certainly understand (Score:1)
tpilews
tpilews's picture
Joined: 10/17/2008
MGoPoints: 1756

I can certainly understand where all the "Don't Touch The Game" people are coming from, but I can also see where people would want to see UM and osu play for the Big10 Championship and not just a divisional game. Personally, I'll be fine either way, but I think a situation where The Game is played week 11, before Thanksgiving as it has been in the past, and a divisional rival, most likely Nebraska, for week 12, would be as close to ideal as you can get. This ensures that The Game still has a big impact on the Big10 landscape and is close enough to the end of the regular season to have a good bit of hype built up for The Game.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 29th, 2010 at 1:06 AM | Just don't end it (Score:1)
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 6534

with MSU.

M'Dog

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 10:59 AM | Sorry, but I was unable to (Score:1)
dieseljr32
dieseljr32's picture
Joined: 04/19/2009
MGoPoints: 1498

Sorry, but I was unable to find the video of Brian Griese's statement.  I just heard it on College Football Live. 

I don't think Brian Griese is evil as someone on here claimed I did.  I just really disagree with his opinion and was shocked to hear that he would actually be in favor of moving "The Game."  Causing me to want to punch him. Not that I actually would.  I wouldn't even punch him in the face, maybe the shoulder. Then apologize later.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 12:24 PM | Clearly you didn't actually (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2496

Clearly you didn't actually call him evil, so that was not directed explicitly at you. I was referring more to the general attitude pervading the board as of late that not only should The Game not be changed in any way but that anyone who disagrees cannot possibly be a "real" Michigan fan. I think in one thread it was actually suggested that anyone who legitamately believed that it would be okay to move The Game should be banhammered.

What are especially tiresome are the ridiculous statements to the effect of "David Brandon is an idiot who doesn't understand Michigan tradition and I know if Bo were here he would say..." This is of course ironic because David Brandon actually played for Bo - if anyone can lay a claim to what Bo Schembechler would have said (not that anyone can and it's silly to try), I'd take Brandon over some anonymous internet forum commenter.

I'm generally on the "keep UM-OSU together" side, but it's probably wise to move away from the overheated rhetoric to the next stage of coping / constructive protest. We're all on the same team, after all.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 28th, 2010 at 4:05 PM | Because even though he played (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 29060

Because even though he played here, he's capable of being misinformed.  The thing is, no Michigan player or fan knows what it would be like to play OSU in October, as a cross-divisional game.  A small minority are guessing that it wouldn't be very different.  A large majority are guessing that it would be very different, and for the worse.

  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.