Which players should be offered a 5th year?

Submitted by WichitanWolverine on

Sorry if there's another thread already on this, but I wanted to gauge those more knowledgeable than me on who will likely get a 5th year offer.

How generous is Harbaugh typically with giving out 5th years? How many guys are even eligible for a 5th year next season?

getsome

December 2nd, 2015 at 4:24 PM ^

wow thats a little harsh.

this blog mainly analyzes m sports and it consists of daily entries, posts, threads, etc which assess the past performance and project future prospect of teams / individual players / units / coaches, etc and its usually done respectfully and thoughtfully - very few people trash players (intentionally or not), though theres obviously bad apples in every sample.

its pretty easy to take offense if youre actively looking to be offended.  

if mentioning names is bad - coaches likely welcome back all projected impact players and depth players for 5th years though i can see them not offering 5th years to an OL who hasnt played, a DL rarely played (and has bounced around positions), a CB who hasnt played, a smallish LB who hasnt played much - but thats just off top of my head.

most of the 5th years should be starters or big contributors which has been rare of late.  and most of those leaving the team will prob be underclassmen seeking better fits or more PT elsewhere along with the usual few forced to hang it up for medical reasons

Templeton Peck…

December 2nd, 2015 at 4:31 PM ^

Michigan just doesn't have the required depth (as evidenced by the Bryan Mone and Ryan Glasgow injuries). The D-line was widely considered by many (including yours truly) to be the deepest part of the team before the season started. Things did not go well when the aforementioned key players were injured. Experience counts in the college game and Michigan needs to hold on to that experience for as long as possible as their new talent adjusts to the speed and violence of the college game. 

Hannibal.

December 2nd, 2015 at 3:49 PM ^

I think anyone who projects to play in a reasonably worst case injury scenario needs to stay, and I think that encompasses almost everybody remaining from the 2012 class.  Even the guys who have had next to no playing time. 

DISCUSS Man

December 2nd, 2015 at 3:53 PM ^

Derrick Green is already gone. I know this for an absolute fact. Cannot share how, so don't ask.

it's pretty obvious he was going to leave but he wasn't even there for The Game. let's just say his mom didn't like the amount of playing time he got this year and voiced it to the coaches.

ypsituckyboy

December 2nd, 2015 at 3:55 PM ^

While it's laughably childish to have your mom complaining to your coaches when you're a grown man, I do feel bad for Derrick Green. He took a risk by coming to UM, seems like he tried hard to make it work, but in the end it just didn't. Hope he does well somewhere else and makes some money playing professionally.

CAwolverine

December 2nd, 2015 at 4:49 PM ^

You completely lost me at he took a risk coming to UM. What risk was that, a wide open depth chart, playing for a Power 5 program, getting the opportunity to be the next great UM RB?

How exactly did he try hard? He can in overweight and out of shape as a freshman and never delivered consistently on the field. He did try hard by getting mommy to fight his battles for him.

Avon Barksdale

December 2nd, 2015 at 3:54 PM ^

But I think we can conclude that the following are for sure returning:

WR - Darboh, Chesson

OL - Kalis, Braden, Mags

DL - Wormley, Henry, Glasgow

LB - Gant (because we do not have anyone else)

DB - Clark

ST - Allen

Bocheezu

December 2nd, 2015 at 3:55 PM ^

Brian won't talk about it and I think that extends to the board as well.  Some of the athletes probably do read the board, and to be told that you aren't worth a 5th year probably isn't the best thing to tell them.