Wherefore art thou 247 4stars from 12 and 13
February 12th, 2015 at 10:48 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 10:59 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 12th, 2015 at 10:47 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:00 PM ^
They all had offers from across the country.
Obviously many players have not received the greatest coaching, but I'm not sure how you can put someone like Kugler in this group, seeing as he was a RS freshman last year. What evidence is there that he won't play this year? Because Miller is still around? That isn't really Kugler's problem.
In the same vein, someone like Richardson was only going to live up to his rating if he put on a bunch of weight. For whatever reason he hasn't. Maybe that was Wellman's fault or maybe his body can't carry much weight. Another thing, we have had hardly any attrition over the last few years. Where is someone like McCray supposed to play?
There are certainly disappointments (Strobel is one of them), but not everyone can be a starter or even big contributor. With how good the 2012 and 2013 classes were, there were bound to be highly rated players who wouldn't pan out.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:37 PM ^
February 13th, 2015 at 2:50 PM ^
Besides the year of transition, every Hoke class was well regarded by both the recruiting services and other schools as evidenced by the offer sheets most of these kids had. Regardless college football is littered with 5 and 4 star players who never make a significant contribution to their team. Scouting and recruiting is an art not a science. Many top level teams have big time recruits, who they expected plenty of, sitting on their benches. You can't hit on every player.
If Hoke had a bad eye with some guys, then you have to believe the inverse with others. Guys like Kovacs and Jake Ryan come to mind. Both were players seen as MAC guys that played above all expectations.
I do not buy the idea that the cupboard is barren, that is why I am bullish on a good year next year. We have depth issues, a question at QB and a lack of playmakers in the skill positions. All those can be handled with a little luck and some good coaching.
Hoke was an excellent recruiter, a good man and beloved by his players and the University. He did not excel in delegation, time management and player deveolpment. Hence the sloppy play that surrounded our team. I believe Harbaugh will rectify this and I also believe it is way too early to dismiss a kid who hasn't played to his potential. Some are late bloomers.
Hoke was also too stubborn for his own good. I may literally get goosebumps the first time I see Harbaugh wearing a headset on the sidelines.
February 12th, 2015 at 10:50 PM ^
Calling out players who have either been hurt or blocked by others is pointless.
February 12th, 2015 at 10:51 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 12th, 2015 at 10:53 PM ^
It is either going to be Shallman or McCray who makes impact next year.
Mike McCay has been a big contributor on special teams and is going to be either 1st or 2nd on the depth chart at ILB.
February 12th, 2015 at 10:53 PM ^
that we misevaluated that much talent (and everyone else too). It's gotta be lack of development from the prior staff. Maybe lack of offensive system played a part for the O guys I have no other explanations for the D guys.
February 12th, 2015 at 10:57 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 12th, 2015 at 11:10 PM ^
considering QB's and guys now transferring It's up to 10 or 11. You can make the attrition argument but those were highly regarded players who didn't do anything for us. Not to mention Bama oversigns and redirects. That's not our system. Losing/not developing scholarship players hurts us far more than it hurts Bama.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:25 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:25 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 10:57 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 10:57 PM ^
A lot of these guys still have junior and senior seasons to play.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:01 PM ^
Why would you start Kugler over a senior Jack Miller? Why not rotate enough guys through to have a consistently upperclassman line?
February 13th, 2015 at 9:07 AM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:03 PM ^
This team is awful in OT.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:03 PM ^
Sorry, wrong thread.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:23 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:05 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:06 PM ^
most of these guys are still hanging around and guys like mccray, fox, kugler and shallman still have a lot of potential and a lot of time to fullfill their potential.
but im gonna be honest, i totally forgot tom strobel even existed.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:20 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:27 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:11 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:23 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:16 PM ^
February 13th, 2015 at 2:23 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 13th, 2015 at 9:35 AM ^
February 13th, 2015 at 11:53 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 13th, 2015 at 12:16 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:29 PM ^
might also benefit yet from the HARBAUGH EFFECT.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:33 PM ^
First, what's your source on TRich's medical redshirt? Not saying I don't believe you, but this is the first I've heard of this.
Second, the younger offensive linemen were beaten by guys who were older than them (Glasgow, Miller, Braden) and if we've learned anything over the past couple season, offensive linemen take longer to develop. Just my opinion, but once Miller and Glasgow graduate after next season, I think Kugler and Dawson secure starting spots on the line.
Lastly, when you take 47 kids in 2 years, some (regardless of star ratings) are not going to pan out due to being poorly ranked in the first place. This happens at Bama, Ohio State, USC, everywhere. And others, that are more underrated, will exceed expectations (Funchess, Henry, the Glasgows) or you get glimpses that show they are moving in the right direction (K. Hill, Strib, Drake, Godin). I also think you're giving up on Shallman and McCray way too early as there are some pretty good senior football players in front of them on the depth chart.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:45 PM ^
February 13th, 2015 at 6:11 AM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:38 PM ^
And where the hell is PeeWee MotherFucking Pipkins? I thought he was gonna be awesome.
February 13th, 2015 at 1:05 AM ^
February 13th, 2015 at 2:28 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 12th, 2015 at 11:47 PM ^
Wherefore means "why" . . . so your headline reads, in modern English, "Why are you 247 4stars from 12 and 13."
February 13th, 2015 at 7:46 AM ^
February 13th, 2015 at 9:41 AM ^
The line meant, "Why are you Romeo?" Juliet is wondering why he has to be who he is, because she can't be with someone from that family.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:46 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:47 PM ^
February 12th, 2015 at 11:54 PM ^
"Wherefore" means "why," not "where."
EDIT: and now that I scrolled down, I see people are onto this. Quite the sharp crowd.
February 12th, 2015 at 11:55 PM ^
Wither doesn't work. That's what happens to an old, dead plant.
Whither sort of works. But a good old-fashioned where is the best bet here.
February 13th, 2015 at 10:17 AM ^
Fuckin' olde English grammar police...
February 12th, 2015 at 11:57 PM ^
February 13th, 2015 at 12:43 AM ^