I'm drunk, so I'll just tell you to mark my words. Norfleet will house at least 1 return this year.
You and Musberger
We won't play a team anywhere near that good again this year. That's the first and most positive thing.
Norfleet looked dangerous, against less talented teams I bet he breaks one.
Fitz is back next week.
Hopefully we will have excised EvilBorgeous for a while.
Gallon and Gardner showed some ability to get separation downfield. Gallon was terrific, making plays on the ball when he had the chance and picking up YAC. Gardner is still raw - he needs to get better at adjusting to the ball - but that TD should give him confidence.
I thought Gardner showed some good promise. I expect we'll see some very good things from him this year.
Is we won't be playing them again
Denard to Devin!
Sporadic DL pressure on a veteran OL!
An epic beatdown every now and then is good for you.
Bad: Countess injured, Lewan injured, Denard injured(?)
and work on getting better instead of cruising into the conference schedule riding high and getting brought back down to earth then.
The run blocking was terrible, Robinson threw two horrible interceptions, the run defense is going to be a problem all year, and the tackling looked like Eastern on a really bad day, but there were some positives:
1. The pass rush was good.
3. Robinson stepped into his deep throws instead of arm-punting them off his back foot.
We didn't miss much by not getting Dee Hart?
EDIT: ....and I don't have to change my signature line to read, "I am a douchey, negative Nancy."
Maybe someone needs to bring me to reality, but I'm not really worried about Big Ten play. I think we can win the division and then the championship game. This outcome didn't change my stance. Maybe because I completely expected this to happen, so it doesn't bother me.
One thing though, I'm thinking that we have a realistic shot at winning the B1G still, but I'm sitting here watching this Oregon game... oh boy, that wouldn't be fun.
1. We stayed injury free. No one of importance got hurt.
2. Denard looked pretty impressive - leaps and bounds better than last year. And even when he got hurt or didn't play, the backups stepped up and performed quite adequetly.
3. Run game impressed. Even without Fitz, we were able to run all over the field. I was really impressed by Rawls and Smith.
4. CBs - Played some lock down coverage all day.
5. Our offensive line gave Denard awesome time. And opened up massive holes for the RBs. And like 0 OL penalities - so that was pretty good.
6. Our front 7 was able to shut down those Alabama RBs.
Right, we only lost our starting corner, all-American left tackle, right end, and banged up our qb. All while getting our asses whipped up and down the field. Other than that, no damage done.
I'm guessing you didn't sense the sarcasm?
C'mon. All Big 10.
Is my sarcasm meter broken?
Seriously? Had a great time at jerry world, but are you talking about the same game I just witnessed?
As said above, Dennis Norfleet looked pretty good. I also think DG will be a good wide receiver long term for us, and maybe we'll remember that Denard has to be able to run sometimes.
I'm reminded of our losses last year to Iowa and MSU. We didn't really deserve to win either game, and we didn't. If we had, we would have won our division, and gone on to get destroyed by Wisconsin in the B1G title game. That would have been much larger national exposure/much worse for us than a couple midseason losses. We then went on to a better bowl game because of it.
I recall reading here that this game was schedule shortly after Hoke took over, and while it's good to schedule the best, it's an issue of timing. If this had happened later this year, or a year or two from now, the team might have gelled more, and/or more of Hoke's guys would be in, we would be deeper, bigger, etc. This was a bad loss, however, it's only the conference games that determine if we go to the Rose Bowl or not, so we have a chance for a good season, but it lets us know that we're not ready for an NC yet.
The game was scheduled a year before Hoke took over. At the time, it was assumed that it would take place in year 5 of the RichRod era.
I don't think you read that here... Game was scheduled before Hoke arrived.
RR is losing to Toledo.
Well that's nothing new for him.
- Pass Protection looked good
- BWC seems much improved
- Norfleet looks like a gamebreaker
- Devin Gardner at WR
We won't be wearing those uniforms again.
1) Jimmies and MF'in Joes, man. That was an NFL roster just waiting to be drafted. Nobody else on our schedule will be even remotely as talented.
2) This has no impact on whether or not we win the B1G (unless Lewan, Countess, etc. are out for extended periods of time).
Michigan is a really good team that played a really great team tonight. They were one of a few teams in the country to actually have some balls and schedule a big opener, against an SEC team, that happened to be a national power.
They didn't take the easy route and schedule savannah state, miami university, north texas etc. I commend them for this.
Still knows absolutely nothing about defense. Didn't he lose to Toledo in his opener here too?
I'm not worried about the WRs anymore..
Gallon - looked the best of the bunch. He caught four passes. I believe 2 of those were bubble screens. So he caught 2 actual passes. No other wide reciever on the team did anything. Gardner caught a pass...after his CB fell down. Roundtree had 2 short ones in garbage time. Dileo had one impressive grad, but that's all he contributed. Jackson/Robinson were non-existent. The WRs looked really weak to me.
Gallon looks really good. Roundtree is good, just don't know why he doesn't seem to be involved. Gardner looks like he can be a beast. I feel like some of his routes were pretty bad, specifically two times early in the game where it looked like Denard threw an inaccurate pass, but I thinkg Gardner just didn't complete his route/get to the open space. We'll see in the ufr I gues
He wasn't targetted until the last 5 minutes of the game. And he's supposed to be our #1 WR. It's looking like this year is going to be a repreat of his 19 reption season last year. Gardner had a chance to bring a couple more receptions in. And the one he did catch - well, no one was within 10 yards of him. He sure looks the part, with his speed and height, but he proved nothing to me in this game. We'll get a better feel for the WRs once Denard learns(?) to throw the ball in their direction.
Watch the Gardner TD a bit closer. He juked the DB right out of his shoes - that's why he was so open
There was one route where Denard threw a fly route and Gardner came in a bit, so the ball looked like it was thrown over his head. I tried explaining it to my dad, but he was hanging up on Denard's other bad passes that he wasn't getting what I was saying.
Brent Musberger anymore tonight - he's painful
I actually turned the volume off for the entire second half. Completely off.
Gallon is good.
Norfleet was good/very good in the return game and our punter was very good at times but out kicked his coverage.
The DLine played good against the best OLine in the country. Roh was disappointing but the rest played well. I know others will disagree but we had pressure and couldn't tackle.
Lastly, This is the best team we will play.
I think the D line was decent most of the night. The LBs were horrible though
We can all settle down now and let the team grow. Don't forget, they are only a season out from being rolled just as badly by teams like Wisconsin and Ohio State.
We're not there yet. We can stop talking about it and focus on improvement and recruiting. Lightning struck last year, we were very lucky to go 11-2. But the next realistic step for this team is not 13-0. It's steady improvement and depth.
Devin can catch the ball when there isn't a CB within 10 yards of him. Should have a huge game against ND.
Nobody is going to buy those ugly jerseys.
This video doesn't show it but the reason he got so open was he juked the DB right to the ground. Pretty nice route running actually.
1. Norfleet looks good
2. James Ross looks good...I feel like he will replace Demens at some point
3. Pipkins looks good and will replace Washington at some point
4. Gardner looks good and will look even more so against non 6'1" 200lbs DBs
My question: Why is that we seemed to get knocked back on both sides of the ball. My first instinct is to say they are bigger, but I don't think thats always the case. In one instance in particular I remember their DB Sunsari #3 had a collision with Rawls and decleated Rawls. When their DBs are decleating our bruising/physical RB that is not good, but I digress.
That was one of my major takeaways from the game today. Coach Hoke talks about playing physical and Rawls running angry. He go blown up by that safty (#3 I think) whom it out weighed by at least 20 lbs. One of many times where we didn't play or look physical. Not good in the long run.
but watching the replay, Rawls bobbled the pitch a little bit before Sunsari hit him. He was too focused on not fumbling and not focused on getting his balance right.
Exactly that. Rawls was running sideways and was trying not to drop the ball, while the safety was going full-speed toward him. Anybody could have hit Rawls like that
We aren't Arkansas State
Send your punter to the showers, not the field.
Never give the ball away yourselves, make the ref, or your QB hand it over.
Hopefully Hoke & Co. remember this.
Just a little tip from your Uncle Lar.
(Google it kids)