Football Display Case
I don't think they changed Les at all actually
national champs baby
Patrick Hruby is doing God's work.
first comment: "EVERY ATHLETE HAS ASPIRATIONS OF WINNING AND WE HAVE OUR FAVORITES BUT IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO OTHER STUDENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, TOO!"
stupid Pistons and their refusal to tank properly
rundown of Michigan's riser
needs moar usage
so much for that
This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.
will be michigan's highest pick in a while
money has to go somewhere
I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.
the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection
but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?
Man, that butterfly is a hell of a lawyer.
he was trying to make a funny. The stereotype is not that there is a DIRECT correlation between # of tattoos and IQ, it is that there is an INVERSE correlation between # of tattoos and IQ.
or maybe he was just trying to be an asshole.
either way, I LOLERGAGGLZE!
I do it for my love of the Streets
Mind sharing the Reports number?
I just googled it, since my wife is busy with the baby. I think 10-1018 is it, or that's a different number. Anyway, the case was Filarsky v. Delia.
This is not, strictly speaking, evidence of intelligence.
RIP my avatar, June 14, 1998 - October 26, 2012.
Regardless of the make up, being in a position where you're entrusted to draft a writ of certiorari to the SCOTUS certainly does.
i wish i had your faith in the meritocracy. but good on her at any rate. sounds like a catch.
You do realize that you can be cynical without actually insulting people, right?
Are you insinuating what my wife got to where she is based on something other than merit? Because if you are, we have beef. Why don't you call it a day on this thread and go back to dressing up your dog.
i didn't mean you to take the bit about your wife in that post as sarcastic. i meant to insinuate that, despite your ignoring the initial joke and repeating that her accomplishment is evidence of merit, i can't see how it is. that's why the rest of the post (after the first sentence) is nothing but positive. the thought process was: some other person randomly took offense at the first post, which might not have been funny, but wasn't supposed to be offensive, so maybe i should clarify what i meant. but it doesn't work if you ignore contrastive words like "but" and "at any rate" in order to read something in that's not there.
anyway, since you're so busy being defensive, i give up. your wife apparently lives in LA, and she's a lawyer, and she married you, and she has a tramp stamp for some reason, so she's probably a terrible person. now that i have pointlessly insulted somebody i don't have an opinion about, you can be mad about what someone said on the internet without being wrong about what was said. thumbs up. downvote away. i'll go cry.
oh, hey, football's on. i'll try to remember to be upset about this later when i don't have anything better to do, like if the power goes out while my wife's asleep and i forget how to read, play cards, or sleep.
Seriously... you have to politicize someone's acoomplishment?
If you wanted to trivialize the judicial system without insulting a Michigan man's wife, you would have said something like, "wow, yet another, in a long line of 9-0 overturns, for the 9th circuit court."
but mostly i have no idea what you're talking about. i didn't insult his wife. in fact, i have every confidence that his wife--unlike you, who i gather isn't exactly the electric lime of the crayola world--would be able to read what i wrote and recognize that i didn't say a single thing about her.
also, since i just googled the 9th circuit court after writing the above, i have absolutely no idea how what you suggested would "politicize" her accomplishment less, since the recent record of the 9th circuit court is supposed to be a feature of the politics of its judges. what i did: insult the abilities of the SCOTUS justices. what you wanted me to do: bring up the alleged political slant of the 9th circuit. why would the latter politicize anything less? that really makes no sense.
edit: i have now said mean things about her. i totally meant them and was not mocking her husband for being defensive about nothing. boo that guy's wife. boo. i really have opinions about these denizens of the internet. i am not at all just wasting time until this commercial is over. none of this is trolling in any way. it totally deserves to be on the board to be read by everyone and every downvote is a complete injustice. if one of the mods deletes it, that's a total travesty. 100% worst thing ever. oops, commercial ended, gtg.
It was me that posted:
Nothing is ever going to not happen as much as this.
Props to you, I really didn't think you'd go through with it.
"It would be a travesty, it would be ridiculous to all of a sudden come back and get the feeling back, get the health back, feel good again and then all of a sudden go throw some other colors on my shirt and go coach."
"The mario tatt will serve as a lifelong reminder that anyone who grabs a floating red leaf before it hits the ground can immediately sprout furry ears and a tail"
is beautifully put.
double post woops
"What" ain't no country I ever heard of. They speak English in What?
Dude, that mario tattoo is so awesome, great artwork and very well done! Now you just need to get duck hunt on you somewhere
I admire your principles and your fandom. And taste in tatoos- that Mario one is excellent.
No more bets for you....
At least you didn't pull an Aaron Rogers.
So, is the tat a W or an M?
he totally should've gotten it put on upside down.
...although that might suggest he's a fan of whatever team the guy getting squashed on Jerel Worthy's arm plays for.