What Dave Brandon is really about
Dave will be out soon with this media frenzy that is surrounding this imploding football program and embarassing athletic department, there is simply no way he can stay - plain and simple. This guy has "created the future", just like the all-too-frequent mgoblog tags. What Dave Brandon is really all about is Dave Brandon, not the University of Michigan. That is what is bringing the football team to the depths it is at currently.
No athletic director sits in on film study, picks a coach after purposely avoiding to offer Jim Harbaugh - the biggest, most accomplished option at the time, and then 'pimping out' the school's tradition and brand while raising ticket prices. This guy stands on our sidelines during games and clearly has a presence in all of the critical events of each teams' seasons. This guy is Jerry Jones. Michigan football is now nothing like it was during the Carr years which, while not the most successful during his later years, were a period of stability and success for this team. Dave Brandon turned the football team into a product that he can supply, market, and create a profit. This has become Michigan football in name only. Things must change, from the top-down.
Dave Brandon if you read this, don't make this uglier for any of us and resign please. Michigan students, fans, alumni, whoever - they proved that we demand change. Brandon will be removed when we continue to make our voices heard. We can't let the program continue to fall apart.
Watching the rally and Brian speak today, and then later seeing the major news story that this is becoming is unreal. The fans are demanding Brandon fired, Hoke removed, and some are demanding an offer to Jim Harbaugh to be our next coach. Could Michigan become something that the University must share decision making processes with its alumni and students? A Green Bay Packers situation and maybe even the opposite of the players' union at Northwestern. This entire season has been crazy and almost surreal and I hope this is all resolved as soon as possible.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:16 PM ^
Dave Brandon is all about the "brand" but more importantly he is all about the
.
Go BLUE!!!
September 30th, 2014 at 11:21 PM ^
could it be that he's referring to himself?
September 30th, 2014 at 10:17 PM ^
$$$$$
September 30th, 2014 at 10:28 PM ^
Argh if only I could embed from mobile.
But yeah, pretty much.
EDIT: Mobile hotspot FTW! Posting this from the Crisler Center parking lot in my car.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:30 PM ^
guess you can thank Dave Brandon for the hot spot
September 30th, 2014 at 10:44 PM ^
Don't kid yourself. WD could be a closeted DB lover. He's young, loves uniform changes, and undoubtably loves Brandin'. This is just a subversive, false flag post.
September 30th, 2014 at 11:06 PM ^
Once one of DB's biggest defenders. A sheep.
This sheep has turned into a pissed off bull that has turned into a nuclear pissed off bull.
We're never ever getting back together.
I was with you at that rally today, brother.
October 1st, 2014 at 1:45 AM ^
Woot! Woot!
September 30th, 2014 at 10:50 PM ^
oh look, Dave Brandon even wears a headset. Maybe Hoke is scared to wear a headset because people might think a looks like a certain someone...
October 1st, 2014 at 1:47 AM ^
This is a great concept in this form. Any MGoBlogger producer types that can take it to another level?
September 30th, 2014 at 10:19 PM ^
September 30th, 2014 at 11:34 PM ^
I see.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:20 PM ^
September 30th, 2014 at 10:27 PM ^
This may be the first Girl Next Door reference I have ever seen. Great movie.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:21 PM ^
September 30th, 2014 at 10:22 PM ^
Just in case I didn't make the purpose of the post clear, I will post it here: The purpose is to explain how if someone asked me if I think Brandon has to go, I would tell them yes.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:24 PM ^
September 30th, 2014 at 10:56 PM ^
Actually he prefers stoic silence and the sound of chewing.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:52 PM ^
Couldn't you have just stated this in one of the other 250 posts on the same subject?
September 30th, 2014 at 10:24 PM ^
in response the firing of RichRod and subsequently the hiring of Hoke: "I hope Brandon enjoys presiding over the biggest debacle in UM Football history--one of his own making." We all know Hoke's first year should have been the beginning of a long and successful tenure for RR, who is now making good in AZ. Damn, I hated to be right.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:28 PM ^
September 30th, 2014 at 10:42 PM ^
Offense wasn't the problem with RichRod. It was the other side of the ball. Unless he'd have had an epiphany and figured out that it's possible to run other schemes than a 3-3-5, I don't think he'd have succeeded here.
September 30th, 2014 at 11:06 PM ^
September 30th, 2014 at 11:25 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 12:21 AM ^
He didn't roll up numbers on teams with a pulse.
I know! In the first season where he finally had the pieces he needed in place to get his system in work (having been left with very little by the previous regime), his offense wasn't automatically an unstoppable juggernaut against every single team it faced! What the hell! Brady Hoke has fixed everything.
October 1st, 2014 at 9:11 PM ^
It was not an unstoppable juggernaut (automatically or manually). It was essentially shut down against decent defenses.
MSU -17 points
OSU - 7 points
Miss St - 14 points
September 30th, 2014 at 10:33 PM ^
September 30th, 2014 at 10:42 PM ^
...and its all about trajectory. RR was winning more games every year at Michigan. BHoke has done the opposite. RR's offense with Mattison's D could have been something special.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:51 PM ^
The man was out of his depth at UM. The facts prove it. His lone winning season came against a charmin soft schedule.
RR was a failure and so is Hoke.
October 1st, 2014 at 12:34 AM ^
RR was a failure and so is Hoke.
Give me a break; RR and Hoke aren't in the same universe when it comes to coaching acumen. RR won everywhere he won prior to coming to Michigan, and is winning against at a second-tier Pac-12 program. Hoke was a woefully mediocre coach at every stop prior to being gifted his current job by Dave Brandon.
RR took over a team with next to nothing on offense, an unsupportive fanbase, and in his second year, a media witchhunt that was a constant distraction and completely undermined his ability to recruit. And yet by his third year he'd still managed to get the pieces he needed to make his offense work very effectively. Yes, it struggled against good defenses, as do many young teams. But it was inarguably getting better, and as a true spohmore, Denard was Big 10 offensive player of the year working in RR's system.
Hoke took RR's players and, in what would have been RR's fourth season, won 11 games including the Sugar Bowl. (Can you imagine what RR's tenure would have looked if he'd had the same players in hist first year that Hoke had in his?) The import of Greg Mattison was obviously a huge deal, but let's be honest - Mattison is a good DC; he's not the god we'd like to make him out to be, as games against any team that runs tempo on offense have demonstrated. Which suggests that RR with a good defensive coordinator could have worked (and I think RR learned his lesson from the Gerg fiasco). As for everything else Hoke has done, it has been awful. The more players he brings in, and the further away we get from RR, the worse this team gets. That's undeniable.
Hoke was a failure before he arrived; his current performance is entirely consistent with his prior accomplishments. RR had established himself as an excellent coach prior to arriving in Ann Arbor. Firing him before giving him a fourth year, notwithstanding all the bullshit he had to deal with, seemed like an irrational decision at the time in the absence of Jim Harbaugh taking over. That has borne out; his firing has proven to be a terrible, terrible decision. We're in far worse shape now than we were in 2010.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:54 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 8:18 AM ^
Name any team Michigan beat in the last 4 years that comes close to Arizona beating Oregon last year?
Are you seriously arguing that RRod got a fair deal here and that he proved everything he could prove in 3 years, which were more like 2 because of the hard 1st year transition?
October 1st, 2014 at 9:40 AM ^
He's saying that just because Hoke is a bad Michigan coach now doesn't mean RR was a good Michigan coach then. He wasn't.
October 1st, 2014 at 11:55 AM ^
Based on all the hurdles he had to face here I think it's unfair to judge RRod on 3 years of production. At best you can say it was incomplete.
And if he is only bad here, I would say the problem wasn't him....it was us. Especially given the dysfunction and huge slide in performnce we've seen over the past 4 years despite 4* classes the past 3-4 years.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:58 PM ^
RichRod went 2-6, 1-7 and 3-5 in B1G play. Do you really see a huge upward trend there?
I have absolutely no idea why you'd think Mattison would want to work for RichRod. Being a RichRod DC is awful if you're not a 3-3-5 guru. He insists on that scheme yet doesn't know how to implement it himself. It's like Hoke and the power running game.
October 1st, 2014 at 11:45 PM ^
Except that Hoke doesn't insist on a power running game and never really used one before he got here. His SDSU teams passed about 55% of the time and even with Ronnie Hillman in the backfield it was an even split (and yards were 2:1 passing).
You're still missing the elephant in the room.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:58 PM ^
Yes, he is 8-5 but it's not in the BigTen/MAC. That division is brutal with UCLA, USC, Arizona State, Utah (yeah, that Utah), and Colorado. Nevermind the teams that reside in the north division. Also, it's Arizona. A program that has never made a Rose Bowl, is in the middle of no where and historically a sub .500 program. So 8-5 in his first two years with two different QB's, one a walk on, is pretty good and is now starting a freshman QB.
He may not of proven anything yet but he's on the right track and that is pretty hard to deny.
September 30th, 2014 at 11:09 PM ^
Would take this Michigan team behind a woodshed and beat it like it fucking stole something
October 1st, 2014 at 1:35 AM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 3:31 AM ^
the standard by which you judge a good coach- can your team bet the crap out of this Michigan team? Because I gotta tell you, thats a fucking long list of candidates. Rich Rod was terrible, Hoke is terrible. Just because 1 is less terrible than the opther doesn't mean he can coach here.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:38 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 12:37 AM ^
The difference between Hoke and Rich Rod is that Hoke hasn't been a coach anywhere. Rich Rod had a legitimate resume when he was hired. We didn't give him enough time, despite the fact that he was expected to rebuild the program, and started with very little. Firing him without having Jim Harbaugh in hand was a collassal fuckup.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:25 PM ^
He has a contract through 2018 for many millions. He has not done anything that is an offense that would invalidate his contract. So, are you willing to pay the millions needed to get him to leave early? Yes, the AD has done some unpopular stuff, but I would not pay millions just to have him gone. Also, it is not clear to me that most AD's do things that may upset a part of the fan base.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 30th, 2014 at 10:30 PM ^
But UM can afford it. I mean, we could go private if we wanted to. I will give him credit for scheduling some heavy hitters in football so my girls in 2nd grade and kindergarden can watch Texas as Freshmen. Other than that? It's been a give year 4 year clusterfuck.
September 30th, 2014 at 10:30 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 30th, 2014 at 10:53 PM ^
If not, we should fire them! You could give 20,000 students free tickets for many years for the buyout! So, buy-out or free student tickets?? I would guess that none of the issues that aggravate this blog so much are on Brandon's scorecard of performance metrics. Amusing to see the blog play with other people's money because they don't like the music played at the Big House!
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 30th, 2014 at 11:08 PM ^
October 1st, 2014 at 8:24 AM ^
The buy-out would come from athletic department funds/revenue - which is pretty well de-coupled from the rest of the university's assets.