What Dave Brandon is really about

Submitted by StoneRoses on

Dave will be out soon with this media frenzy that is surrounding this imploding football program and embarassing athletic department, there is simply no way he can stay - plain and simple.  This guy has "created the future", just like the all-too-frequent mgoblog tags. What Dave Brandon is really all about is Dave Brandon, not the University of Michigan. That is what is bringing the football team to the depths it is at currently.

No athletic director sits in on film study, picks a coach after purposely avoiding to offer Jim Harbaugh - the biggest, most accomplished option at the time, and then 'pimping out' the school's tradition and brand while raising ticket prices. This guy stands on our sidelines during games and clearly has a presence in all of the critical events of each teams' seasons. This guy is Jerry Jones. Michigan football is now nothing like it was during the Carr years which, while not the most successful during his later years, were a period of stability and success for this team. Dave Brandon turned the football team into a product that he can supply, market, and create a profit. This has become Michigan football in name only. Things must change, from the top-down. 

Dave Brandon if you read this, don't make this uglier for any of us and resign please. Michigan students, fans, alumni, whoever - they proved that we demand change. Brandon will be removed when we continue to make our voices heard. We can't let the program continue to fall apart.

Watching the rally and Brian speak today, and then later seeing the major news story that this is becoming is unreal. The fans are demanding Brandon fired, Hoke removed, and some are demanding an offer to Jim Harbaugh to be our next coach. Could Michigan become something that the University must share decision making processes with its alumni and students? A Green Bay Packers situation and maybe even the opposite of the players' union at Northwestern. This entire season has been crazy and almost surreal and I hope this is all resolved as soon as possible.

StoneRoses

September 30th, 2014 at 10:22 PM ^

Just in case I didn't make the purpose of the post clear, I will post it here: The purpose is to explain how if someone asked me if I think Brandon has to go, I would tell them yes.

eachtyes

September 30th, 2014 at 10:24 PM ^

in response the firing of RichRod and subsequently the hiring of Hoke: "I hope Brandon enjoys presiding over the biggest debacle in UM Football history--one of his own making." We all know Hoke's first year should have been the beginning of a long and successful tenure for RR, who is now making good in AZ.  Damn, I hated to be right. 

Blue2000

October 1st, 2014 at 12:21 AM ^

He didn't roll up numbers on teams with a pulse.

I know!  In the first season where he finally had the pieces he needed in place to get his system in work (having been left with very little by the previous regime), his offense wasn't automatically an unstoppable juggernaut against every single team it faced!  What the hell!  Brady Hoke has fixed everything.  

SalvatoreQuattro

September 30th, 2014 at 10:51 PM ^

his defenses got WORSE(trajectory heading downwards), and his special teams were horrifically bad. In sum he sucked at two of the three areas of football team, never defeated UM's two main rivals, and had a horrid Big Ten record.

The man was out of his depth at UM. The facts prove it. His lone winning season came against a charmin soft schedule.

RR was a failure and so is Hoke.

Blue2000

October 1st, 2014 at 12:34 AM ^

RR was a failure and so is Hoke.

Give me a break; RR and Hoke aren't in the same universe when it comes to coaching acumen.  RR won everywhere he won prior to coming to Michigan, and is winning against at a second-tier Pac-12 program.  Hoke was a woefully mediocre coach at every stop prior to being gifted his current job by Dave Brandon.

RR took over a team with next to nothing on offense, an unsupportive fanbase, and in his second year, a media witchhunt that was a constant distraction and completely undermined his ability to recruit.  And yet by his third year he'd still managed to get the pieces he needed to make his offense work very effectively.  Yes, it struggled against good defenses, as do many young teams.  But it was inarguably getting better, and as a true spohmore, Denard was Big 10 offensive player of the year working in RR's system.  

Hoke took RR's players and, in what would have been RR's fourth season, won 11 games including the Sugar Bowl.  (Can you imagine what RR's tenure would have looked if he'd had the same players in hist first year that Hoke had in his?) The import of Greg Mattison was obviously a huge deal, but let's be honest - Mattison is a good DC; he's not the god we'd like to make him out to be, as games against any team that runs tempo on offense have demonstrated.  Which suggests that RR with a good defensive coordinator could have worked (and I think RR learned his lesson from the Gerg fiasco).  As for everything else Hoke has done, it has been awful.  The more players he brings in, and the further away we get from RR, the worse this team gets.  That's undeniable.  

Hoke was a failure before he arrived; his current performance is entirely consistent with his prior accomplishments.  RR had established himself as an excellent coach prior to arriving in Ann Arbor.  Firing him before giving him a fourth year, notwithstanding all the bullshit he had to deal with, seemed like an irrational decision at the time in the absence of Jim Harbaugh taking over.  That has borne out; his firing has proven to be a terrible, terrible decision.  We're in far worse shape now than we were in 2010.  

MileHighWolverine

October 1st, 2014 at 11:55 AM ^

Based on all the hurdles he had to face here I think it's unfair to judge RRod on 3 years of production. At best you can say it was incomplete.

And if he is only bad here, I would say the problem wasn't him....it was us. Especially given the dysfunction and huge slide in performnce we've seen over the past 4 years despite 4* classes the past 3-4 years.

snarling wolverine

September 30th, 2014 at 10:58 PM ^

RichRod went 2-6, 1-7 and 3-5 in B1G play.  Do you really see a huge upward trend there?  

I have absolutely no idea why you'd think Mattison would want to work for RichRod.  Being a RichRod DC is awful if you're not a 3-3-5 guru.  He insists on that scheme yet doesn't know how to implement it himself.  It's like Hoke and the power running game.

 

Tagg

September 30th, 2014 at 10:58 PM ^

Yes, he is 8-5 but it's not in the BigTen/MAC. That division is brutal with UCLA, USC, Arizona State, Utah (yeah, that Utah), and Colorado. Nevermind the teams that reside in the north division. Also, it's Arizona. A program that has never made a Rose Bowl, is in the middle of no where and historically a sub .500 program. So 8-5 in his first two years with two different QB's, one a walk on, is pretty good and is now starting a freshman QB. 

He may not of proven anything yet but he's on the right track and that is pretty hard to deny. 

HAIL-YEA

October 1st, 2014 at 3:31 AM ^

the standard by which you judge a good coach- can your team bet the crap out of this Michigan team? Because I gotta tell you, thats a fucking long list of candidates. Rich Rod was terrible, Hoke is terrible. Just because 1 is less terrible than the opther doesn't mean he can coach here.

Blue2000

October 1st, 2014 at 12:37 AM ^

The difference between Hoke and Rich Rod is that Hoke hasn't been a coach anywhere.  Rich Rod had a legitimate resume when he was hired.  We didn't give him enough time, despite the fact that he was expected to rebuild the program, and started with very little.  Firing him without having Jim Harbaugh in hand was a collassal fuckup.  

DarkWolverine

September 30th, 2014 at 10:25 PM ^

Lots Of Brandon Haters
He has a contract through 2018 for many millions. He has not done anything that is an offense that would invalidate his contract. So, are you willing to pay the millions needed to get him to leave early? Yes, the AD has done some unpopular stuff, but I would not pay millions just to have him gone. Also, it is not clear to me that most AD's do things that may upset a part of the fan base.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

MGoCombs

September 30th, 2014 at 10:30 PM ^

Even from a financial perspective, can we afford to keep him around? How many millions can he potentially cost staying around? This isn't a test. People are actually mad. Some are completely fed up. He cannot remain the AD until 2018 for many reasons, but one of them could very well actually be financial. I get your sentiment though. It isn't like the $ you're talking about is couch change. It's part of the equation.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

DarkWolverine

September 30th, 2014 at 10:53 PM ^

The new President and Regents are sensitive to costs and a potential buy-out of millions of dollars.
If not, we should fire them! You could give 20,000 students free tickets for many years for the buyout! So, buy-out or free student tickets?? I would guess that none of the issues that aggravate this blog so much are on Brandon's scorecard of performance metrics. Amusing to see the blog play with other people's money because they don't like the music played at the Big House!


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad