Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • 2014 Recruiting Board, Offense
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Notes on 2013 B1G and Other QBs
    MCalibur - 16 hours ago
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 1 day ago
  • APR And Big Ten Football: A High-Level Summary
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 day ago
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 2 days ago
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 6 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 1,524 views
  • Devin and the White Rainbow
    MCalibur - 1,123 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part I)
    Ron Utah - 1,098 views
  • The Blockhams in "SPARTYCAN'T"
    Six Zero - 1,062 views
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 936 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part II - THE MISTAKE)
    Ron Utah - 52 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part IV - A NEW HOKE)
    Ron Utah - 40 comments
  • Notes on 2010 Big Ten and Other QBs
    MCalibur - 38 comments
  • On Endowment, Financial Aid, and Perceived Prestige
    maizeonblueaction - 35 comments
  • Who is Al Borges? (Part III - HOKE IS A STRATEGY)
    Ron Utah - 19 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT - is today the biggest mismatch in world soccer history?
    4 replies
  • Michigan could be taking 4 receivers
    54 replies
  • OT- RIP James Gandolfini
    56 replies
  • Women's Hoops Hello: Akienreh Johnson (#34, 2016 class)
    7 replies
  • OT: Kentucky Football Pulling It Together
    66 replies
  • Hello: Garrett Moores (2013 Catholic Central walkon QB)
    51 replies
  • MLIVE per ESPN: Derrick Green "Future Star"
    55 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    117 replies
  • OT - US soccer players who play for foreign countries
    40 replies
  • OT: GIF Tourney IV
    32 replies
  • CIC to Consider Starting Own Coursera-like System, BTN-style
    13 replies
  • MgoUser Crystal Ball Picks
    56 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo: Early Returns & Gripes
    57 replies
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    16 replies
  • Brian to speak in Chicago - AAUM Chicago
    43 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • OT - is today the biggest mismatch in world soccer history?
    4 replies
  • Michigan could be taking 4 receivers
    54 replies
  • Alabama prompts water feature war
    16 replies
  • OT: Kentucky Football Pulling It Together
    66 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo: Early Returns & Gripes
    57 replies
  • Women's Hoops Hello: Akienreh Johnson (#34, 2016 class)
    7 replies
  • MLIVE per ESPN: Derrick Green "Future Star"
    55 replies
  • OT- RIP James Gandolfini
    55 replies
  • One of the top DE in 2015 commits to GameCocks and trashes their academics!
    40 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    117 replies
  • Hello: Garrett Moores (2013 Catholic Central walkon QB)
    51 replies
  • OT - US soccer players who play for foreign countries
    40 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    133 replies
  • OT: GIF Tourney IV
    32 replies
  • Additional endzone tickets are available
    41 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››
  • Coolest/favorite Michigan thing you own?
    142 replies
  • Urban Meyer and Charlie Strong's "Core Values"
    133 replies
  • OT: Man Of Steel. Wow
    129 replies
  • OT: City of Detroit Epic Comeback? (Business Insider)
    125 replies
  • High Noon with Rich Rodriguez and the Arizona Football Staff
    123 replies
  • OT: Plans Unveiled for Wings New Arena
    117 replies
  • ND to play ASU in football series
    112 replies
  • OT: NBA Finals Game 6 overtime open thread
    112 replies
  • OT-4* recruit (non Michigan) posting really dumb things
    101 replies
  • NCAA 14 Demo thoughts; MGoBlogger PSN/Gamertag list
    97 replies
  • OT: Cool Story Bro!
    96 replies
  • MSU doesn't know who they're recruiting
    93 replies
  • 2015 OL Jon Runyan Jr. Offered - Buckle Up
    91 replies
  • MGoProfile to Return This Week
    77 replies
  • Cornwell to Bama
    76 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 8
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Science finally creates Periodic Table Of Muppets

    LONG OVERDUE

    0 comments
  • Michael O'Neill and Patrick Biondi head to New York after being drafted

    good luck gents

    0 comments
  • Michigan State football commitment No. 10, Jalen Watts-Jackson, another steal for Spartans

    You may be getting ahead of yourself, MLive dude. Drake Harris had 8 catches for 243 yards against Watts-Jackson's OLSM last fall.

    0 comments
  • Why some corners can't play zone coverage

    i find this extremely interesting

    0 comments
  • Brady Hoke-Urban Meyer not on the Bo Schembechler-Woody Hayes level, Hoke says, pointlessly because who would believe it was

    i may have altered the title

    0 comments
  • Police: Man arrested for masturbating while riding bike through The Diag

    i thought this was america

    0 comments
  • Miami fans leave Game 6 early, miss incredible ending

    like I said on twitter: that was almost as intense as Iowa NIT games

    1 comments
  • SF Kameron Chatman Talks UConn

    ...talks about how UConn hasn't been in contact and how they're out. (HT: UMHoops)

    0 comments
  • AIRBHG Invades Steelemas!

    wow

    0 comments
  • NBA Job Interview: Trey Burke (With Scouting Report!)

    Jalen, Burke, and Simmons.

    0 comments
  • 2013 World Dwarf Games to be held at MSU

    Mike Hart the heavy favorite in the trolling competition

    0 comments
  • NBA draft rumors: Pistons like Cody Zeller, but not Trey Burke - Detroit Bad Boys

    just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.

    4 comments
  • New college grads: Don’t sell your time for a living

    this would be a close approximation of hypothetical graduation speech

    9 comments
  • College World Series Misspells "College" On Dugout

    no you guys they're just super pumped about COLLLLLLLLLLLLEGE

    0 comments
  • Michigan no longer looking for a transfer quarterback, Brady Hoke says

    not a surprise

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

We are becoming Notre Dame

154 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
November 1st, 2010 at 4:11 PM
#1
Captain Obvious
Joined: 03/17/2009
MGoPoints: -465
We are becoming Notre Dame

MGoBoard-the last bastion of civilized thought in the sports message board world-finally hit a brick wall and has turned into every other sports message board.  Even Brian is calling for certain coaches' heads in the middle of the season, without regard to whether this would actually hurt or help the team.  Where did the patience go?  Where did the rationality go?  Where did the radical idea that coaches and teams should be judged on their body of work rather than a single game go?  When did we stop looking at extenuating circumstances like critical injuries and just start flailing around instead?  When did we start giving up on coaches and players before all the games have been played?

It's entitlement; the same thing that has kept Notre Dame down for years.  We aren't going to win just because we are Michigan.  Parity has come to college football and a large chunk of our fanbase remains unaware.  There's no quick fix.  If we go searching for one soon then our transformation into ND will be nearly complete, needing only another decade of constant rebuilding and unmet expectations to make it official.

I guess I'm the weird one.  I had fun watching the PSU game and didn't get upset when we lost.  I like cheering on the team and my weekend isn't affected by the outcome of the game.  I think there's more to measure a team and its coaches by than wins and losses.  If a college football game makes you genuinely sad and depressed then you probably should find another team or another hobby.  This team will probably make you mad or upset for a few more games this year and many years to come.

To those that have already mentally dismissed the coaches for this year - what if we improve?  Anything can happen in college football and there are still 4 games left to play.  Won't you feel a little silly if we manage to overperform and show signs of improvement?  How about we wait until all the games are played before we give up on the team and coaches?

I know there's at least a few people that think like I do left on the board.  We turned from a majority to a tiny minority overnight.  I wonder what it will take to satisfy this new majority of angry fans?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 1st, 2010 at 4:14 PM | False. We wont become notre (Score:1)
go16blue
go16blue's picture
Joined: 04/28/2010
MGoPoints: 3467

False. We wont become notre dame unless we fire rodriguez.

COYS and Vive Le Rouge of Detroit FC!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:17 PM | I understand this defense is (Score:1)
mmiicchhiiggaann
Joined: 01/31/2010
MGoPoints: 2131

I understand this defense is awful but I don't understand why everyone is suddenly going nuts. Most people predicted 7-5 anyways. Still very possible or 6-6 with a win against Wisconsin or OSU. Theres still alot of football to be played.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:32 PM | I'm convinced because it was (Score:1)
icefins26
icefins26's picture
Joined: 02/01/2009
MGoPoints: 10565

I'm convinced because it was a primetime game on ESPN and we got embarassed.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:39 PM | Embarassed? (Score:1)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

I know the defense sucked, but the offense was as exciting as ever, especially in the second half.  Is it fair to say that Michigan got embarassed with such a great offensive showing?  Am I fooling myself into trying to stay positive?

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:59 PM | Well, honeslty, it wasn't (Score:1)
icefins26
icefins26's picture
Joined: 02/01/2009
MGoPoints: 10565

Well, honeslty, it wasn't embarassing i.e. blow out, etc.  but basing on it being a potential bowl clinching win, RR screaming at refs, McLoin looking like Joe Montana, the White Stripes being sung by the crowd every 42 seconds, it was in a sense an embarassing display (at least on defense) on national TV.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:38 PM | No, it was embarassing.  We (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 29067

No, it was embarassing.  We lost by 10 to a crap opponent and needed a second-half rally to even make it that close.  We trailed 28-10 at the half to a team averaging 20.3 ppg and playing without its top two QBs.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:48 PM | Again, levels (Score:1)
robpollard
robpollard's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 601

Losing to a 3-9 Toledo team, at home, is really embarrasing.  Losing to a Div 1-AA team, at home, with multiple experienced top level NFL picks on the roster and national title hopes, is really embarassing.

Losing by two scores to a Big 10 opponent, who will likely have 6-8 wins, on the road, in a night game is embarassing, but our defense is really bad - UMass and Indiana taught us that.  Unless we borrow Doc Brown's DeLorean, our woefully inexperienced backfield will continue to get lit up by 250+ yards by all comers.

It only ends once. Anything that happens before that, is just progress.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 6:32 PM | I didn't say it was one of (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 29067

I didn't say it was one of the worst losses in school history (which 2008 Toledo was).  But it was definitely embarassing.  If you could go back in time to Saturday afternoon and ask people how they'd feel about losing 41-31 to PSU with McGloin at QB, what do you think they'd have said?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:05 PM | Yes. (Score:1)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2998

Am I fooling myself into trying to stay positive?

Yes.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:12 PM | I had a feeling that is the case (Score:1)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

Well, nevertheless, ignorance is bliss!  Here's to sticking my head in the sand and pretending this defense never happened!

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:11 PM | 2 points per possession while (Score:1)
nazooq
Joined: 07/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1371

2 points per possession while the game is in contention is exciting?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:38 PM | Yes, you're fooling yourself. (Score:1)
gnarles woodson
gnarles woodson's picture
Joined: 04/22/2009
MGoPoints: -164

Yes, you're fooling yourself.  They were down 28-10 before the offense decided to show up.  And They still lost the game by 10, with PSU kneeling inside the 5 to end the game.  It was another blow out loss and I am stunned MORE people aren't calling for an end to this disaster of a hire.

 

“The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.”
  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:40 PM | Levels of embarassment (Score:1)
robpollard
robpollard's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 601

I agree, essentially with your point.  However, I would have been considerably more embarassed if we laid an egg like MSU vs Iowa (I don't bring MSU up to say, "Hurr, SPARTY!" but rather as a point of comparison to another important game that same day in which the opponent built a huge lead).

B/c the defense was embarrassing/frustrating/stomach-churning, I literally was ready to stop watching before the second half started, but decide to stick it out.  The way UM fought back to make a game out of it, I was at least satisfied the team had not quit.  Watching a team quit and/or get bombed 49-7 (or whatever) is truly embarassing.

It only ends once. Anything that happens before that, is just progress.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:47 PM | Levels of embarassment? (Score:1)
Yooper
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 1886

This is what we argue about now?  This is what it has come to?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 6:04 PM | Yes - the D is who we thought they were (Score:1)
robpollard
robpollard's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 601

Yes, it is what we've come to - we're trying to hash out, as a fan base, is it better to stick with the head coach we have or completely upturn the apple cart again.  Because the difference between the offense and defense is so great, it's worth pointing out that "I'M EMBARASSED" has a lot of shades to it (vs. 2008, where both were bad).  As I pointed out above (UM-Toledo; UM-App State), it always can be worse.  The question now is do we believe it will get better overall (like the offense has gotten markedly better from 2008 to 2009 to 2010, and likely will again in 2011) if we keep Rodriguez. 

It only ends once. Anything that happens before that, is just progress.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:30 PM | It could have something to do (Score:1)
JClay
JClay's picture
Joined: 09/14/2010
MGoPoints: 2100

It could have something to do with people thinking our offense would be good, but not great, before the season started. When it turns out our offense is elite and we have a once every few decades talent in Denard, and its completely mitigated by RR not being able to ascertain defensive talent in recruiting, not being able to convince the few good defensive players we have to stay here instead of NOT getting drafted, hiring a walking punch line as his DC, and not seeing the team improving AT ALL from week to week, then yeah, our perspective on 6-6 changes.

"Here we are at Ohio Stadium, in front of 10,000 alumni and 74,000 truck drivers." - Bob Ufer

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 6:13 PM | Recruiting and Donovan Warren (Score:1)
MightAndMainWeCheer
Joined: 09/16/2010
MGoPoints: 512

1.  Recruiting - His recruits would be at most true junior / redshirt sophomores.  In general, these players are at least a year away from becomming dominant players.  Harris, Woodley, Graham didn't become dominant players until their upperclassmen years, and Graham was even at times a liability on the field as a freshman/sophomore.  Underclassmen tend to not play as well as upperclassmen; I thought that was already an accepted idea on this blog.  RVB and Mouton are the only recruits from 2006 and 2007 who are positive contributors on defense; Rogers, Banks, Patterson, Sagesse, Ezeh, etc are all just below average space fillers.  Without making this a counter-productive Lloyd vs RR argument, the fact is that there exists a giant void in our roster of upperclassmen talent on defense and I would have to believe that both men are to blame.  RR's recruiting is not why our defense sucks; even if we recruited lights out 5 star guys, I'm not sure they would have made a difference in their freshman/sophomore years.  Manti Teo will be very good for ND but he hasn't exactly been stellar for ND the past two years, Jelani Jenkins redshirted his freshman year at Florida, William Gholston hasn't seen the field much for MSU this year; they were all highly-touted consensus, 5-Star, top 50 guys.

2.  Donovan Warren - I wish the guy luck; he played hard for Michigan.  He, however, made a very bad decision when he decided to enter the draft.  He also kind of got screwed b/c there was some sort of official player evaluation list released by the NFL that said he would be drafted somewhere in the first couple of rounds.   He, however, decided not to wait for additional feedback from the NFL as RR had advised.  I'm not sure what more RR could have done to get Warren to stay; he asked/advised Warren to wait for better information which Warren ignored.  Some guys just want to get to the NFL as quickly as possible, and I respect Warren's decision (even though in hindsight it was a horrible decision). 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 6:53 PM | Not a good 7-5/6-6 (Score:1)
The Name
The Name's picture
Joined: 10/06/2010
MGoPoints: 535

Before the season I would have been one of those who said that a 7-5 win season absolutly secured Rich Rod another year. However, this 7-5 isnt exactly what I had in mind.

Yes, the offense is great, out of this world even. But the defense? The defense is girl you have been sleeping with turns out to be a sister your parents gave up for adoption 4 years before they had you bad. Yeah we may make a bowl game, but even if we beat Purdue, and somehow get a win against a pretty good Illinois team, would that make anyone feel confident entering next year? Not me.

To be clear I really like Rich Rod, I really do. I think he gets dumped on way too much. But if we dont make a change with the DC, I'm not feeling that next year is going to be any different even if we win 7 games. There is no progression that you would have hoped to see in a 7 win team, on the D that is.

Hey Dirk Nowitzki you just won the NBA Finals, why the long face?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:17 PM | Also, Bob Loblaw Lobs Law (Score:1)
Keeeeurt
Keeeeurt's picture
Joined: 09/04/2009
MGoPoints: 3645

Also, Bob Loblaw Lobs Law Bomb

I love that show

Me fail english thats unpossible!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:41 PM | Bob Loblaw (Score:1)
profitgoblue
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19416

Did you know that there is actually a Bob Loblaw Law Blog?

Disgruntled former moderator.  I got a lot of problems with you people!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:20 PM | So every school that fires an (Score:1 Offtopic)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 29067

So every school that fires an underperforming coach is Notre Dame?  Give me a break.  I'm sure Alabama, Florida and Stanford are regretting firing the coaches they had before Saban, Meyer and Harbaugh.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 6:40 PM | Firing Rich Rod (Score:1)
Wereverine
Joined: 10/14/2010
MGoPoints: 1254

Does not automatically lead to Notre Dame status. Their problem is that they continue to get it wrong. There are teams that get it right the second time around, Florida in particular comes to mind. Hiring a Bob Davie, Ty Willingham, Charlie Fupa caliber coach will land us in purgatory but I believe, should he go that route, that Dave Brandon will make a wise and successful pick.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 9:08 PM | I believe you forgot someone... (Score:1)
MaizeyBlue
MaizeyBlue's picture
Joined: 09/25/2009
MGoPoints: 344

GEORGE O'LEARY.  With a name like O'leary its amazing he didn't stick around to coach in South bend......

UM 2001-2005

  • Login or register to post comments
November 3rd, 2010 at 1:50 AM | You're right. (Score:1)
Soulfire21
Soulfire21's picture
Joined: 03/18/2010
MGoPoints: 3191

It doesn't put us at Notre Dame status, but it certainly moves us a step closer.  Who's going to come in to this train wreck of a program if Rodriguez can't figure everything out?

People want a pro-style coach to come in when we are just only getting to the point where we finally have spread offense people.  Talk about trying to put a square peg through a round hole on that one.

On a side note... how long does anyone think Rich Rod sleeps at night?  Can't be much, I know it wouldn't be much for me...

HAIL.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:17 PM | What will it take to satisfy fans? (Score:1)
Blue_Sox
Joined: 09/30/2010
MGoPoints: 4916

Wins.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:22 PM | And chocolate. (Score:1)
MaizeSombrero
MaizeSombrero's picture
Joined: 07/19/2008
MGoPoints: 1938

And chocolate.

I'm a cucumber.  | Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:24 PM | Not cucumbers? (Score:1)
Blue_Sox
Joined: 09/30/2010
MGoPoints: 4916

Not cucumbers?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:27 PM | Are you asking me to satisfy (Score:1)
MaizeSombrero
MaizeSombrero's picture
Joined: 07/19/2008
MGoPoints: 1938

Are you asking me to satisfy you?

I'm a cucumber.  | Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:28 PM | cucumbers for some... (Score:1)
BrayBray1
BrayBray1's picture
Joined: 07/15/2009
MGoPoints: 4247

drilled out melons for others.

What the Hell. -Jack Burton

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 7:21 PM | Miniature American flags for (Score:1)
BlueVoix
BlueVoix's picture
Joined: 06/25/2009
MGoPoints: 5546

Miniature American flags for all!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 7:58 PM | Great Treehouse of Horror reference (Score:1)
jshclhn
jshclhn's picture
Joined: 09/12/2010
MGoPoints: 496

And always twirling, twirling towards freedom!

Also, don't blame me - I voted for Kodos.

Crunch. Zip. Live to fight another day.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:27 PM | That's not true. (Score:1)
Blue Bunny Friday
Blue Bunny Friday's picture
Joined: 05/01/2009
MGoPoints: 847

They'll still be upset because the team didn't win a certain way, didn't have the right run/pass balance, the coach says something that isn't coachspeak, their favorite recruit doesn't turn into an All-America...

I love a hoppy ending!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 7:00 PM | Not really (Score:1)
The Name
The Name's picture
Joined: 10/06/2010
MGoPoints: 535

If we win every game on the way to a national title like we beat UMass and Indiana then clearly we have nothing to complain about.

However, when we win by shootout over a not good Indiana team and struggle to beat 1-AA teams, yeah im not jump up and down happy.

We want wins that show progress, wins that show in two years we can compete for Big Ten/National Title. If you think the 5 wins we have so far indicate anything more than additional seasons like this, you dont get football guy.

Hey Dirk Nowitzki you just won the NBA Finals, why the long face?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:18 PM | Stop it (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 29067

Stop vilifying the fanbase.  Our coach is 4-16 in Big Ten play.  That is a bad record for anyone, not just bad by Michigan standards.  It is perfectly reasonable to be upset.  If anything, it's becoming irrational to deny the problem.  There is nothing "entitled" about wanting your school to do better than lose 80% of its conference games.  Minnesota just fired a coach who actually had a better conference record than RR.  It takes some real mental gymnastics to argue that RR has more handicaps to deal with than Brewster did.

What Brian said is perfectly reasonable: RR has four games left to give us a reason to believe.  If he does, great.  If not, that's it. 

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:23 PM | wait till next year. (Score:1)
Mitch Cumstein
Mitch Cumstein's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 9649

Its not RR's fault.  Our players are young.  You're just listening to the negative media too much.  That b10 record means nothing, it doesn't show the whole story. 

/s

 

How many times have you read these things on this board?  I'm still shocked by the lengths people go to defend this sinking ship.  Our team looked lost on Saturday, and the OP is blaming the fanbase for being upset.  That is clownish.

"A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:37 PM | Upset != irrational "OMG FIRE (Score:1)
BlockM
BlockM's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 25326

Upset != irrational "OMG FIRE EVERYONE"

It's not as simple as choosing fire them all or keep them all. You don't have to love the situation to support the team and the coaches for the rest of the season. We should all be able to engage in rational discussion without resorting to name calling and jumping to conclusions.

@pnbloem | Ultra-MGoBoard

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:41 PM | I mean (Score:1)
Mitch Cumstein
Mitch Cumstein's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 9649

The OP is essentially saying anyone who is upset with the result on Saturday is giving up on the coaches and players.  If I'm missing something let me know.  And I never said to fire anyone before the season is over.  I will admit, there are still positive things that can happen to change my feelings.  I just don't know how you can try to spin positives out of anything we've seen on the field and pretend like things are getting better before they are getting worse.

"A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:56 PM | People can be upset without (Score:1)
BlockM
BlockM's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 25326

People can be upset without giving up. It's frustrating. I'm just as frustrated as anyone else.

We don't need to "spin" positives out of the offense. It does a good enough job of that on its own. The defense is bad, and will possibly require some coaching changes in addition to the development of the young players to improve.

@pnbloem | Ultra-MGoBoard

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:07 PM | Offense (Score:1)
Mitch Cumstein
Mitch Cumstein's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 9649

I'm actually skeptical of our offense too.  We scored 10, 7 and 10 in the first half against our last 3 opponents.  We didn't put up most of our points/yards until being down by 2 or more scores (just a feeling, but most non-elite teams let off the gas when they're up big).  Yes, our offense would be fine if our defense was average, but its not, and I think our offensive numbers are inflated from racking up points/yards after being down multiple scores.

"A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:13 PM | And I think they're being (Score:1)
BlockM
BlockM's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 25326

And I think they're being held back because the defense should be capable of getting them another 2 or 3 possessions a game.

Don't forget, the offense is also going to return almost everyone next year. They are not underperforming. Top 5 in yardage and top 20 in scoring after the last two years shows improvement, and nothing suggests that will slow down in the future.

@pnbloem | Ultra-MGoBoard

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 7:10 PM | He kind of has a point... (Score:1)
romeyjdogg
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1207

Against solid big ten opponents, the offense has sputtered. I don't see how there is any debating this. Sure, they racked up 500 yards against Iowa, but did they score? What matters: yards gained or putting the ball into the end zone? Against PSU, the offense was abysmal in the first half when PSU was playing tight. Isn't it reasonable to think that defensive units loosen/change a bit when you're up by 3 scores? No wonder the offense started to score. Its the same reason as Texas starting scoring on Alabama in the NC game last year. The defense loosened up b/c the game was pretty much in hand. It wasn't because Texas just suddenly turned it on...

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 7:14 PM | So what you are saying is (Score:1)
BigBlue02
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 1853

So what you are saying is that turnovers are one of the main problems. That is why we get 500+ yards against possibly the best defense in the B10, right? You know what helps reduce turnovers.....returning 10 out of 11 starters. I still don't get why our offense is bad. We are halfway through the B10 season and we have one of the best offenses in the nation, not just the B10. If anything, you would think having a questionable offense in the 1st half and a lights out offense in the 2nd would be great coaching and changes at the half, but what would I know. Do you honestly think being up 2 scores against any team will be enough for them to "let up" so we rack up plenty of yards that way? I am sure Penn State and Iowa were both not worried in the least up one score with 8 minutes to go in the game. I mean, they just let us back into the game, right?

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 7:55 PM | Michigan's offense is fourth (Score:1)
nazooq
Joined: 07/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1371

Michigan's offense is fourth in the Big Ten in scoring.

When the game was in contention against MSU, Michigan scored 10 points on 7 possessions.

When the game was in contention against Iowa, Michigan scored 7 points on 6 possessions.

When the game was in contention against PSU, Michigan scored 10 points on 5 possessions.

This is not the sign of a great offense.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 8:24 PM | lol (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7902

Define contention. Lot of those games, especially the last two, were actually still in doubt deep into the fourth quarter. You're cherrypicking a little here, IMHE

It's a really good offense man. One that's only more maturation/seasoning, some consistency from the tailbacks and the burning of all third and one, I-formations out of the playbook from being great.

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 8:28 PM | I define being in contention (Score:1)
nazooq
Joined: 07/09/2009
MGoPoints: 1371

I define being in contention as the point in the second half when Michigan falls 17 points or more behind.

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 8:49 PM | So (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7902

So, historically speaking, we dont count the stats in the second half of the 2000 Purdue game? Or the 2004 MSU game.

I'd be thrilled to void out everything in the former as invalid due to game being out of contention. But, man, you're in charge of telling Braylon about him losing some 2004 numbers.

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:47 PM | Sinking ship? (Score:1)
PurpleStuff
PurpleStuff's picture
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 10418

We went 3-9 a few years ago.  The ship sank quite a while ago.  It takes time to get out of the hole. 

Referring to a team with an awesome offense returning 10 starters next year and a defense that is struggling because they start 6 freshmen/sophomores and a couple guys who would never see the field under normal circumstances as a "sinking ship" is clownish.

What is there to lose by giving the guy one more year (when his first full recruiting class will be juniors and RS sophomores)?  If we don't win 10 games then you can bitch and moan and beg for a new coach.  Or you could continue to pretend that there are coaches in the universe who would turn our current defensive roster (that every single reader of this site knew was going to produce a terrible defense) into a competent unit.

It is spelled HOKEAMANIA.  Our coach is an ass-kicking American citizen, not one of the Beatles, for Christ's sake!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 4:55 PM | Sinking ship was too strong (Score:1)
Mitch Cumstein
Mitch Cumstein's picture
Joined: 10/02/2009
MGoPoints: 9649

There is a good chance that our b10 record will be the same this year as it was in 2008, which is where I'm coming from.  But you're right, "sinking ship" was not a good phrase to use. I apologize for that.

However, I guess I don't have a problem with your premise of giving him one more year.  If that is the decision Brandon makes, I won't complain.   I do get upset when people make excuses and blame the fans for not enjoying getting beat every week.

"A flute with no holes is not a flute. A donut with no hole is a danish"

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:03 PM | Nobody enjoys it (Score:1)
PurpleStuff
PurpleStuff's picture
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 10418

I'm just trying to point out that there is an enormous light at the end of the tunnel and loads of people now seem convinced it is nothing but an oncoming train. 

The blame game is silly, but this team has been forced to operate with some severe handicaps the last few seasons that take time to correct (not having a full complement of scholarship players last year, for example) and that teams just don't overcome (there is a reason teams suck when they go on probation, and we were basically operating under the same parameters).

This offense and defense with everybody back will produce a very good team next year.  If not, I'll be the first one buying a pitchfork.  But until then I think everybody needs to vent their frustration while keeping in mind how bright the very near future can/should/will be.

It is spelled HOKEAMANIA.  Our coach is an ass-kicking American citizen, not one of the Beatles, for Christ's sake!

  • Login or register to post comments
November 1st, 2010 at 5:01 PM | What is there to lose by (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 29067

What is there to lose by giving the guy one more year (when his first full recruiting class will be juniors and RS sophomores)? 

A ton.  Next year, we have the combination of a veteran team and favorable schedule that should have us thinking Big Ten title.  But our complete lack of visible progress over the past month now makes that look like a pipe dream.  And if we're going to dumb down expectations for next year - RR's fourth in the program - then it's clear that he isn't the answer.  A program that enjoys 40 consecutive non-losing seasons does not need to go through four years of rebuilding.   When Minnesota holds its coach to a higher standard than that, we've lost our way. 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.