mgoblue0970

October 1st, 2011 at 3:31 PM ^

That and if Minny wasn't so stupid, more of M's kickoffs would have been out of bounds.  I like how the defense is coming together and Denard has a confidenced building passing day, but special teams is atrocious so far this year.

BigBlue02

October 1st, 2011 at 5:35 PM ^

I talk about recruiting and basketball and our football team this year and where I think we are headed. I post plenty on things not related to RichRod.

Although thank you for reading and following my posts so closely.

bluebyyou

October 1st, 2011 at 3:27 PM ^

Perfect game?  It was a sold and improving Michigan team against a hapless Minnesota team with its starting QB out with a coach who has missed a lot of practice.  Never the less, some very intersting offensive play calling, several field goals and a coach who was classy in victory.  Lots of room for improvement on kickoffs and punts, but when you win 58-0, there is little room to complain.

El Jeffe

October 1st, 2011 at 3:28 PM ^

Michigan played very, very well. But Minnesota is an absolutely terrible football team, Gray's injury notwithstanding. It's nice to see our O and D not being competition invariant, though.

This was like a 1970s Big 2 Little 8 beatdown of yore. It was a little like watching a snuff film at times, though. I felt a little queasy when Avery scored. Oh well, karma and AMBHG owe us big time after the last three years. Not to say that the coaches and players didn't earn it, of course.

Yianni

October 1st, 2011 at 3:29 PM ^

I hope this game can give Michigan hope's for an undefeated season. Sometimes a win like this can give teams confidence but it can also make teams to confident and then can screw up.. it goes both ways?

WojoRisin

October 1st, 2011 at 3:31 PM ^

There will be plenty of things to learn from the game film. For example, there were a few drops and a few bad decisions throwing the ball. They played very very well, but the old saying "it's never as good as it looks, and it's never as bad as it looks" certainly applies to this game film.

uminks

October 1st, 2011 at 3:32 PM ^

Both the offense and defense played well. Special teams are still a work in progress that will need to improve in the next week. They seem quick enough and get down field but they just fail to contain and many miss tackles. This will have to improve!  Kicker will need to kick the ball deeper! 

This was not the MN team that played USC close...but USC may not be that good of a team.

Next week we need to keep scoring those points and hope the D continues to play well.

kb

October 1st, 2011 at 3:32 PM ^

but what is most encouraging to me is that this team continues to make progress and improvement on a week-by-week basis. It may have been just a bad Minnesota team, but it was a shutout AND I seem to recall struggling to beat a pretty bad Indiana team in the Big Ten opener last year.  For the first time in years I can tell that team is coming together as the season progresses and it's making me look forward to the Big Ten conference games.

Wendyk5

October 1st, 2011 at 3:35 PM ^

No doubt we're getting better every week, especially on defense. And the fact that we now have a kicking game makes a huge difference. But it's hard to judge against a team like Minnesota. If this had been Michigan State or Ohio, I'd say yes, it was the perfect game. 

Ted

October 1st, 2011 at 3:37 PM ^

No. 3 silly penalties including one that negates a TD. Kck coverage needs work. IMO you dont show the gadgets before you need to. No reason to give NW or little brother a chance to plan.
<br>
<br>A very solid performance but not perfect.

Vasav

October 1st, 2011 at 3:48 PM ^

Toussaint wouldn't have been able to burst through the line if he hadn't held (or gotten his head around and gotten a good block). So that penalty was the cause of the TD, IMO

But yes we've still got lots to work on agreed. SHUTOUT! sorry. 

Brown Bear

October 1st, 2011 at 3:54 PM ^

I believe that's the point of Gorgeous calling all those. Every other team we are gonna have another headache to think about besides the big one Denard already is. Good luck B1G defenses!!

M-Wolverine

October 1st, 2011 at 5:19 PM ^

You're in trouble. The whole point is teams do need to plan for it now; which means they're taking time from planning for the bread and butter. Making that more effective. Nothing they were running were real surprise tricks. Just packages that makes preparing for them a pain.

ppToilet

October 1st, 2011 at 3:56 PM ^

but it was the best performance Michigan has shown in a long long time.  We were supposed to beat Minnesota and we did.  After years of games being "too exciting" when we were supposed to dominate, it's good to have one of these under our belts.

With that said, I do feel for the gophers and the trouble Coach Kill has had.  I hope they regroup and win some games.

Waveman

October 1st, 2011 at 3:57 PM ^

But that's the most complete game Michigan has played in a long, long, time.  I know Minnesota is really bad, but they didn't just cover the spread, they almost tripled it. Minnesota was in Michigan territory twice. We averaged more than 7.5 yards per carry. Denard was 15/19, with 2 drops. Won turnover margin 2-0 with a fumble return for TD. 3/3 on field goals, 7/7 on extra points.  3 penalties total. Minnesota had twice as many yards in punts as they did in offense... and it was a SHUTOUT! 

nmajali

October 1st, 2011 at 4:02 PM ^

Well, we actually kicked a couple of average kicks, makes me feel much better.. Also important to note that both defense and offense were super today.. One slight note is kick return coverage and punt return coverage, we need to work on that side of special teams.. Go blue