Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (42)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • UPDATED: New Desktop and Mobile Backgrounds for Football
    Genzilla - 3 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 4 of 4
  •  
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,430 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 643 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 425 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 337 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 5 comments
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 2 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Michigan Rowing Places Second at Big Ten Championships
    23 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    67 replies
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    33 replies
  • OT: Saturday Night Drinking/Open/Tigers Thread
    46 replies
  • B1G Network Helmet Bracket
    39 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    54 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    3 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    45 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    45 replies
  • Michigan Women's Tennis Swept by UCLA
    4 replies
  • OT: Preakness Stakes
    26 replies
  • M Softball hosting Cal in Regional - 5/18
    21 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    113 replies
  • Marvin Robinson to FSU
    51 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    41 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    67 replies
  • Michigan Rowing Places Second at Big Ten Championships
    23 replies
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    33 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    41 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    54 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    28 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    45 replies
  • B1G Network Helmet Bracket
    39 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    45 replies
  • Marvin Robinson to FSU
    51 replies
  • OT: Saturday Night Drinking/Open/Tigers Thread
    46 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    3 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    62 replies
  • Softball Open Thread 7pm vs Valpo ESPN3
    36 replies
  • Michigan Women's Tennis Swept by UCLA
    4 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Jay Harris (the rapping WR) had schollie pulled by MSU a month ago
    70 replies
  • Penn State Continues to Scoff at NCAA With Recruiting Success
    68 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones 5/12
    68 replies
  • 2014 IL LB Kyron Watson to Kansas
    68 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    67 replies
  • Denard working out at QB for Jacksonville
    63 replies
  • OT: Last Night's Dinner With Tressel
    63 replies
  • Drake Harris - Not So Cryptic Twitter Prediction on Peppers?
    63 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    62 replies
  • Mike Jones to leave Football Team
    60 replies
  • 2013 Mott Takeover Open Thread
    60 replies
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. Impressing in Early Workouts
    59 replies
  • OT - The Friday Night Alcoholics - Early Edition Thread
    59 replies
  • Hawaii football changing name back to Rainbow Warriors
    59 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    54 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments

Validity of BCS Gripes

65 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 5th, 2011 at 6:30 AM
#1
Vasav
Vasav's picture
Joined: 12/13/2009
MGoPoints: 2837
Validity of BCS Gripes

I'm sure you're all as excited as I am about the Sugar Bowl. But I'm sure you've all been pestered by friend/family/co-workers about how M is only there because it's all about the money. Or they have various other gripes. I've decided to classify these gripes, and share my unsolicited opinion with you on the internet. I'll approach this as a conversation with each of the various butthurt partisans.

(Since we are the lowest ranked BCS team in, I'll compare everyone's resume to ours)

QUIT YOUR WHINING

Sparty - I'd almost feel bad for you if you were passed over for a BCS game by us. But you weren't - you were outside of the top 14 and therefore ineligible. Why were you outside the top 14, when we both had the same number of losses and you won the head-to-head? And won the division over us? No, not the polls - we were ranked within a spot of each other in all of them. It was the computers. Why? You see, while you beat us by 14, you lost to Nebraska by 21, who lost to us by 28. Triangle of doom. Shall we look at the other loss? Ours was an ugly one in the division to Iowa - by 8 points. Which gave you the edge in the B1G West. Yours was an even uglier thumping at the hands of Notre Dame. Yes, yes, you beat Wiscy on a Hail Mary at home. And then lost to them by 3 at a neutral site. Want to count it as a tie against a top ten team? Doesn't change the fact that If you had shown up at all in that ND game, you may have had a legitimate gripe. You didn't, so you don't. Enjoy Florida. I hear it's nice this time of year.

Oklahoma - Yes, your TT loss doesn't look that much worse than our Iowa loss. And your Baylor loss looks better than our Sparty loss. But the way you got absolutely stomped in the biggest game of your season is way uglier than anything that happened to us. Also, you're 9-3 after that one. You don't deserve anything more than the Copper Bowl.

South Carolina and Arkansas - Nobody wants to hear it. No, the limit on only two teams from a conference isn't holding you back - it keeps you from playing each other. Look, even in your good years nobody wants to see two teams from the same conference play in a bowl game against each other. And the SEC didn't have a good year - Arkansas, your best win is against the Cocks, and your escape against A&M is not as pretty as our escape against Notre Dame. And you got throttled in your two losses - you got beat worse by Bama than Penn State did. Gamecocks, your best win was against Clemson - and your losses against Arkansas and Auburn are comparable to our losses against Sparty and Iowa. But we pretty much thumped everyone else on our schedule except our rivals. Your wins were...uninspiring. The system isn't holding you back at all - your own failures on the field are keeping you out of the party. And no SEC partisans are ever allowed to complain about the BCS again, unless it's talking about how biased pollsters are towards their own.

Boise State - I usually defend you guys, but I'm not going to this time. Yes, you've got only 1 loss, and it was a close one to TCU - better looking than either of our losses alone, and certainly prettier than both put together. And your win over Georgia is comparable to our win over Nebraska. But here's the thing - your next best win was either Tulsa, Wyoming, or SDSU. SDSU was at the bottom of our resume for wins. In fact, it's so far down there we don't even think about where it is. Your second best win is our 7th or 8th best? I've got to go with our resume on this, even with the uglier losses.

Southern Miss - When both of your losses are to teams without winning records, then you have not proven you belong in the BCS. That interview gave me a good laugh though.

YOU MAYBE HAVE A POINT

TCU - I love how you guys do what you do, and you had an amazing season. Beating Boise on the blue turf and winning the Mountain West is nothing to smirk at. And while your win @Boise may be better than ours against Nebraska, and your losses are comparable to ours, I've got to go with the same argument I had against Boise - the meat of your schedule is the dregs of ours. What's that you say? Why is West Virginia ahead of you? That's a good point, but you guys know how it is in the Mountain West. That's why you're leaving next year. Good luck in the B12.

Baylor - I've had a lot of fun watching you guys, and I'm rooting for RG3 for the Heisman. And your resume isn't bad - beating three ranked teams is far better than us, and getting blown out by OK St is not so bad. Losing to K St by one isn't bad at all either. Getting blown out by A&M is way worse than anything that happened to us though. So yea, your resume is close to ours. But there's a couple of other guys in your conference who belong more, so I don't feel so bad that we're in over you.

I FEEL FOR YOU GUYS BUT YOUR CONSOLATION ISN'T SO BAD

Kansas State - You guys should be in a BCS game. Yes, your blowout at home by OU is bad, but your second loss was by seven @the #2 team in the country. You totally have an argument that "it's all about the money." But hey now, don't look at US like that - we weren't the last ones in. That would be the Hokies you have beef with - and truth be told, I think you'd probably travel to NOLA better than them anyway.

But really, getting a chance to play an overrated #6 SEC team in the Cotton Bowl - a game that was "major" back in the Bowl Coalition days - that's a major opportunity for respect, and pretty much a BCS game anyway. I mean, without the massive payout. But that would've gone to Texas as blood money anyway, right?

DEATH TO THE BCS

Oklahoma State - What can anybody say, guys. You got hosed by Alabama. They have two wins over the top 25, you have four. They lost to the #1 team at home, and you lost to an unranked team on the road - your loss is a little worse, your wins are better. No, just cause they blew out a weak schedule doesn't mean anything - you should have gotten the nod from resume alone.

What makes it ridiculous and insufferable is the obvious - this is a rematch, they didn't win their division, they're playing a team from their conference. I know you've been over it a hundred times over in your own heads. I hope you guys beat Stanford and win the Grantland Rice and the Macarthur trophies. I hope Alabama gets crushed.

But really, your gripe is way more legitimate than K-State's. It's probably the most legitimate gripe I've ever heard with regards to the BCS - yes, more legit than Oregon, Auburn, and USC have had in the past. While I've never loved the BCS, I never thought it was so broken as to screw you over for a less deserving team because they came in second in a conference that was good the last couple of years. The system is broken and you've been royally screwed by it, and will watch them play a regional scrimmage.

I'm way more excited for your matchup against Stanford in the Fiesta Bowl than I am for the event that precedes LSU's deserved coronation. Good luck, and prove to the nation that you deserve a shot.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • 2011 michigan football
  • Alabama
  • arkansas
  • auburn
  • Baylor
  • BCS
  • Boise State
  • Clemson
  • football
  • Georgia
  • Kansas St
  • LSU
  • Nebraska
  • Notre Dame
  • Oklahoma
  • Oklahoma St
  • Penn State
  • sdsu
  • south carolina
  • Southern Miss
  • Sparty
  • Sparty No!
  • Sugar Bowl
  • TCU
  • Texas A&M
  • Tulsa
  • West Virginia
  • Wyoming

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 5th, 2011 at 6:39 AM | This Paragraph (Score:3 Normal)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8709

"What makes it ridiculous and insufferable is the obvious - this is a rematch, they didn't win their division, they're playing a team from their conference. I know you've been over it a hundred times over in your own heads. I hope you guys beat Stanford and win the Grantland Rice and the Macarthur trophies. I hope Alabama gets crushed."- Vasav

The other thing that gets me is that, on ESPN, they sort of implied that the rematch was what "the people" wanted at one point. This makes me believe that the amount of time they spend listening to "the people" (i.e., the public) is exactly zero.  The object lesson here is that, among other things, the BCS is capable of creating games which will bring in a lot of money but be as exciting as C-SPAN. 

I'll watch OK State-Stanford - that will probably be a good game. LSU-Alabama  - I shall await the results the next morning with mild interest (i.e., I'll wait for someone to tell me). 

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 7:09 AM | a late-night, weeknight championship (Score:1)
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 5144

can be tough to stay up for, anyway; could be a long, boring game. (The much-vaunted LSU didn't get a first down in the first half against Georgia.) I'll be one of those getting up to learn the score in the morning.

OP makes a great point that MSU didn't lose out to us, but failed to qualify. None of the voters were out there asking themselves whether M or MSU should go, choosing BETWEEN us. That said, there is a good chance MSU craps the bed against Georgia; I like our odds better. 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 7:24 AM | Relating To A Point Made Yesterday... (Score:1)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8709

...about Michigan's brand equity. It gets us places. MSU can't say that really. No wonder they bitch, right? 

Anyhow, if Aaron Murray has his A-game and the receivers are completing passes for the Bulldogs, I predict a decimation of the MSU defense. 

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 10:01 AM | ESPN (Score:1)
Yo_Blue
Yo_Blue's picture
Joined: 08/24/2010
MGoPoints: 789

ESPN is a bunch of SEC slappies.  They don't listen to the people north of the Mason Dixon Line.

Should we point instead of fist pump during the Victors?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 11:09 AM | Honestly, I got the opposite (Score:2)
MaizeAndBlueWahoo
MaizeAndBlueWahoo's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 11799

Honestly, I got the opposite impression from the ESPN slobbershow last night.  Not that "the people" wanted a rematch, but that we the people wanted OkSt. to play LSU.  Which is true; most people do.  I thought the company line was "well, you people want to see Oklahoma State, but you're wrong.  LSU and Alabama are the best two teams in the country."  Which is nauseating because of 2006.

"We've beaten Michigan the last four years.  So where's the threat?"

- Mark Dantonio

Blogging the Virginia Cavaliers at http://fromoldvirginia.blogspot.com/<

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 5:31 PM | Yea, they were saying that (Score:1)
joeyb
joeyb's picture
Joined: 10/12/2008
MGoPoints: 11300

Yea, they were saying that everyone wanted OkSt but "this is the system, bla bla bla..."

Then you have them saying that the system put the best two teams in the country against each other so it works. Then you have them bitching about how teams like BSU got screwed. Then you have them all pitching their new BCS systems out there.

They don't know what they think.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 11:11 AM | I'm a Spartan, and I have no (Score:5 Normal)
Spar-Dan
Spar-Dan's picture
Joined: 10/01/2010
MGoPoints: 121

I'm a Spartan, and I have no issue with the game we got.  The Outback is a good bowl, and the Cap One wasn't good for either side since we've played there too much lately.  We were one game away from the Rose Bowl, and we had to win the game to go.  We didn't.  No BCS game wants a 3 loss team.  Most of us understand that.  Also, we understand that Michigan is a huge brand, so I'm not complaining about UM going to a BCS bowl. 

I think pretty much everyone, though, understands the whole BCS thing is rather slimy.  I have a bigger issue with teams like Oklahoma State not going.  VT got blasted in their game--why isn't Okie State in a BCS?  Also, the Orange Bowl is a joke--why is that even considered a BCS game? 

So, good luck in your bowl game.  We both have good matchups, and hopefully we do the B1G proud. 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 11:25 AM | Oklahoma State is playing in (Score:2 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

Oklahoma State is playing in the Fiesta, they're just not playing for the title (which I agree is bullshit).

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 11:48 AM | +1 for being a reasonable (Score:2)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

+1 for being a reasonable Sparty.

But Okie State did not get left out of the BCS - they are playing Stanford in the Fiesta Bowl. They got the autobid as the B12 champs (and would have gotten an autobid for being ranked 3).

Also, it's interesting that MSU is playing a team in the exact same position: Georgia is 10-3, won their division in an AQ conference but got bounced from the BCS for losing their conference championship.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 2:19 PM | Spar-Dan (Score:1)
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2782

You seem to have a good understanding of some things that most Spartans are not grasping.  it is not to insult them but actually to lessen their pain.  The BCS national championship game picks the No. 1 and No. 2 teams in the country.  The remainder of the BCS games do not pick the next best eight teams and match them up, that is not the purpose of the remaining BCS games nor has it ever been.  There are conference affiliations that take up many of the spots (if you want to hate anybody, hate West Virginia), and the remaining at large bids do not necessarily go to the "best" teams nor are they supposed to.  The BCS is simply a bowl alliance, formed independently of the NCAA.  Aside from No. 1 v. No. 2, what they want is appealing matchups to the masses, much like the bowl system of old did.  Michigan going to the BCS is not anybody saying that Michigan is "better," they are just the team that the Sugar Bowl wanted, nothing more.  Although I think the Michigan v. Michigan State game was a lot closer than most Spartans admit, State was the better team this year.  And Georgia is probably better than Virginia Tech.  So the Outback bowl has two better teams than the Sugar Bowl.  Nobody, including the Sugar Bowl, is claiming otherwise.  If you are in the National Championship game, you have been identified as one of the two best teams in the country.  If you are anywhere else in the BCS, you are just a good team that a particular bowl wanted.  MSU v. Georgia is going to be a good game, maybe better than the Sugar Bowl, and you don't have to stay up until 1:00 AM on a Tuesday to watch it.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 6:41 AM | posted from iPhone (Score:5 Normal)
willywill9
willywill9's picture
Joined: 09/22/2008
MGoPoints: 11256

I'm really disappointed at how immature Cousins has been about this. Specifically how he called M out for "sitting on a couch watching MSU" yet to still go to a BCS game. That coupled with his statement of how upset he was that his friends still root for Michigan. For such a standup guy, and a leader, he's very petty and immature. Kind of takes on the personality of his coach.

Touchdown Michigan!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 6:51 AM | If There Was Anyone... (Score:3 Normal)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8709

....who ever deserved this board's "pretty pretty princess" imposed tagline (and this is coming from a guy who uses Rainbow Dash as his avatar), it would be this kid after hearing the quotes yesterday. Thanks, Kirk, your cries were heard - we'll let you know how things are  in New Orleans. 

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:50 AM | I never thought (Score:2)
megalomanick
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 1992

I never thought a Sparty QB could be more of a whiny little bitch than Drew Stanton was. Thanks for proving me wrong Kirk.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 2:25 PM | wait (Score:2)
oriental andrew
oriental andrew's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4538

I thought Jeff Smoker was the whiny one.  Or am I confusing them?  Who was the one that called U-M the University of Puke?

For my privacy, my new username is "non-Oriental non-Andrew"
 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 2:34 PM | That was Stanton. Smoker was (Score:2)
WalMartWolverine
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 587

That was Stanton. Smoker was the one who was way too cranked to care.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 10:16 AM | Cousins has as strong weenie (Score:3 Normal)
WalMartWolverine
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 587

Cousins has as strong weenie streak beneath all his Jesus talk. The whole world knew going in that the B1G CG was an elimination game: win and go to the Rose, lose and it's Tampa or Orlando.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 12:44 PM | Seriously.  I never really (Score:3 Insightful)
BlueVoix
BlueVoix's picture
Joined: 06/25/2009
MGoPoints: 5546

Seriously.  I never really saw the guy for anything but a bullshit artist, hiding his moral pedantry and pettiness behind a thin veneer of faith and "good sportsmanship."  Good sports don't bitch about not going to a big time bowl.  Take your moral outrage back to the west side.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 6:42 AM | I hope LSU runs up the score (Score:5 Normal)
Serth
Serth's picture
Joined: 01/20/2010
MGoPoints: 785

I hope LSU runs up the score on Alabama 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 7:05 AM | The Spartan's are such sore losers (Score:1)
Wolverrrrrrroudy
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 160

It is almost annonying how bitter MSU is with Michigan.  They have three losses by way of the Big 10 Championship game.  They knew what was at stake but were already making excuses before the game was even played.  The flaw of the Championships for all conferences is exactly what we see this year.  In the past before most conferences had these tournaments it was always a way for the SEC to beef up their position before bowl selection.  But, it cut's both ways.  The loser will fall in the polls. 

Even if a tournament is eventually part of the BCS, Sparty it appears, will still be complaining about teams they beat earlier in the season.  Guess what, there are no do-overs.  Michigan doesn't get credit for the fact that they did not complain much about the Iowa no-touch down call or the fact that we in 2006 got jobbed and should have had the best case for a rematch.  Look we lost at OSU by 3, the consensus homefield advantage figure.  Alabama lost at home to LSU, why should LSU have to play them again on a neutral field.  None of those arguments came from the SEC this time around and they got what they wanted.

Let's home BLUE takes care of business in the bowl and I look forward to going to the game in Texas against Alabama next year.  Hopefully we can start the year on a HIGH note with a Big victory there.

 

 

WolverRoudy

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:25 AM | perhaps the rest of the nation (Score:3 Normal)
maizenbluenc
maizenbluenc's picture
Joined: 07/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2677

should boycott the MNC game. Wonder what the ratings would look like if just SEC viewers were watching.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:09 AM | I'm in (Score:1)
awnitsol
Joined: 08/04/2009
MGoPoints: 237

No way I'm watching that

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:28 AM | If anyone does feel an urge (Score:4 Normal)
CRex
CRex's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 8727

If anyone does feel an urge to watch it, grab a stream of FirstRowSports and deny them their ratings.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 2:31 PM | or (Score:2)
oriental andrew
oriental andrew's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4538

watch a replay of Michigan's Sugar Bowl victory on the Big Ten Network (hey BTN - do this!  or, if Wisco beats Oregon, I can understand you replaying the Rose Bowl too). 

For my privacy, my new username is "non-Oriental non-Andrew"
 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 7:24 AM | posted from iPhone (Score:1)
allintime23
allintime23's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 2381

Great post. So many of these scenarios should seem easy to see for the teams on the outside. It's hard to understand how State can bitch as much as they are, but then again it's state. You lost your last game after you had all but had it won. Your balls to the wall dirty play came back to haunt you. It is called karma. Now face mask your way down to Florida. Outside of Lansing , nobody gives a shit. Nobody.

All in for some manball.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 7:25 AM | Boise State's chances were (Score:1)
ixcuincle
ixcuincle's picture
Joined: 08/11/2010
MGoPoints: 3173

Boise State's chances were pretty much done when they lost to TCU because they couldn't kick a FG. 

Good read 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:09 AM | When ESPN says "This is what (Score:4 Normal)
Callahan
Callahan's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1957

When ESPN says "This is what the people want" re LSU/Alabama, you have to consider that they are literally the SEC Network. Having two SEC teams in the title game pushes the myth that these teams are head and shoulders above the rest, thus pushing the brand. Never mind that the Big Ten will win the head to head bowl matchups.

One thing that's great is how ESPN analysts were pushing the story on Saturday that the Heisman is between Luck and Richardson and everyone else is playing for a trip to NYC. Heisman polling on Sunday showed RG3 comfortably in front of both, as he should be. (And Honey Badger should be second). There's an award for guys like Luck and Richardson. It's called the first pick in the NFL draft, and it pays much better.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:13 AM | Pat Forde has an article on (Score:2)
nikj
Joined: 01/04/2009
MGoPoints: 1099

Pat Forde has an article on yahoo sports where he says that the Sugar bowl matchup is a travesty. He mostly focuses on VaTech, but mentions we don't deserve to go based on schedule strength. The funny thing is that the article has a table with the NCAA strength of schedule and we're tied with VaTech for 17th. Most of the other qualifiers are in the 30s and 40s. Stupid Pat Forde, he's just pissed that his mizzou tigers are going to the independence bowl.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:27 AM | Link (Score:1)
Vasav
Vasav's picture
Joined: 12/13/2009
MGoPoints: 2837

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news;_ylt=AjMhFltaR8XgbFIbbWmxqowcvrYF?slug=pf-forde_rematch_right_sugar_bowl_travesty_120411

This whole article is the real travesty. I don't disagree with VT having a weak resume, but if you take us out, then who do you put in, Boise? If strength of schedule is your argument, us and VT are the only options based on your table, Mr. Forde. If you think VT is unworthy, then you replace them with one of the B12 contingent. And who would you replace us with, Sparty? Idiot.

And his rant on why Bama should play in the title game pretty much ignores that with limited data points a rematch is absolutely NOT the right call. But since the guy can't compare the numbers in his own table, I don't imagine he knows what a data point means. There are options other than a playoff that can match up the two most deserving teams. But a team that doesn't win its conference doesn't deserve it unless you have a large playoff.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 10:27 AM | All of the bowl games, except (Score:1)
WalMartWolverine
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 587

All of the bowl games, except the BCS CG (such as it is), are merely exhibitions. Always basically have been, strictly promotional events. So whining about travesties and such is pointless. You want to have the right to whine? Support a playoff.

Or don't attempt a high risk play you don't absolutely need late in a critical game.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:44 AM | Which is perfect. (Score:2)
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3440

Because Pat Forde is a travesty. And a buffoon. If he supported the bowl selections, I would immediately begin to question them.

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything."  B. Simpson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:16 AM | I know you want Alabama to (Score:3 Normal)
Maize 'n Chew
Joined: 10/29/2011
MGoPoints: 11

I know you want Alabama to get crushed because it makes the BCS look stupid and all, but I'd actually like to see Alabama win and OK St beat Stanford convincingly - then let chaos reign down on the BCS.  Who's #1 in the AP after that?  That'd be a much bigger end of season clusterf*ck than we've had before...

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:31 AM | But it'd legitimize the Bama pick as #2 (Score:2 Normal)
Vasav
Vasav's picture
Joined: 12/13/2009
MGoPoints: 2837

I think LSU has reasonably proven itself as the #1 team, and honestly a loss to Bama would not change my mind. Maybe if they lose in a blowout, but even then I'm not sure.

But if they lost to 'Bama, all these same folks and all these SEC fans would say "SEE!? Bama WAS #2 deservedly, and now they should be #1! Or the AP should give the SEC two titles in one year WHOO  SSSSSEEEEECCCCCCC!!!"

I'd prefer LSU prove that they dominate the SEC, and us always be left wondering what could have been with OK St. And I'd prefer seeing everybody else (see: B12 presidents) have ammunition in pushing another "tweak" to the BCS that you have to win your conference to play in the BCS title game. I'd like to continue the traditino where non-conference champions get smoked in the BCS title game.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:37 AM | The rules are the rules (Score:2)
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3440

All of the FBS teams signed up for a system with a set of rules and now they have to live by them. The rules say that any team in the top 14 of the final BCS rankings can be selected as an at-large pick to a BCS bowl. They don't say #7 must be selected over #13. Sometimes the rules work in your favor and sometimes they don't. For example, if Michigan did not work its way back into the top 14, we would not be going to the Sugar Bowl. But we did and we are. Period.

If the schools, as a group, want to change the rules next year (or after 2013, actually), they can. But individual schools can't sign up for a system with one set of rules and then complain about those rules later simply because they don't happen to work out in their favor. And if the BSU's and KSU's and MSU's do not like the current CFB system, they are free to go off and start their own. No one is forcing them to ride on the coattails of ND and Michigan and Texas and Alabama and USC and all the other elite programs that spent the last 100+ years investing in and building CFB into what it is today.

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything."  B. Simpson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:41 AM | Seriously? (Score:2 Normal)
remdog
Joined: 05/14/2009
MGoPoints: 110

Teams aren't free to "sign up" or not sign up since there is essentially a monopoly in college football at the highest level.

You're basically saying that if somebody sticks a gun to your head and forces you to sign a contract that you're ethically bound to that contract and that you have no right to complain since you "signed up."

You may have a good idea though.

It would be great if teams routinely excluded from the "national championship" were able to secede.  Since non-SEC teams were effectively barred from competing for a "national championship" this year,  maybe all non-SEC teams should just form their own league and declare the winner the "true national champion."  People would watch the new league since their would be a real champion decided by a playoff and teams would actually play offense not just defense.

Unfortunately, that's not a realistic possibility but one can dream.

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 10:00 AM | I'm fairly certain that there (Score:2 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

I'm fairly certain that there was no violence associated with the MWC signing on for the BCS; that's as ridiculous a comparison as I've ever seen. The mid-majors signed on because the BCS offered them a share of primetime football that none had ever seen before. They saw a better oppertunity and took it.

The truth is, any one of the teams currently in the FBS could leave to either a) a division with a tournament, or b) start their own division (the NCAA would welcome a tournament from the MWC, WAC, Sun Belt, C-USA, MAC, ect.). They don't want to do that without forcing the B1G, SEC and Pac to do the same, so things will remain more of less how they are.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:36 AM | I'm actually taking pleasure (Score:3 Normal)
death by trident
death by trident's picture
Joined: 08/31/2011
MGoPoints: 1036

I'm actually taking pleasure listening to Georgia fans complain about having to play Sparty.

Can UGA hold out on the Outback offer until they agree to give us Penn State? I'd rather play them than Mich St

Jesus, the past 24 hours have not been kind to me Really, I can't overstate how unenthused I am as a fan about watching us play Michigan State

I'm trying to pretend that we don't have to re-face Michigan State again (did it in 09 and it was a snoozefest). Would much rather play a Michigan, Texas or Baylor

I don't even think I'll watch another UGA-MSU game. I mean I'll flip over to check the score, but I'll watch something else. COmpletely worthless bowl game.

frick Let's just opt out and focus on recruiting. frick Mich State

 outback was fun when i went 2 years ago.  the stadium was empty so you could sit wherever you want


 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:35 AM | Excellent (Score:2 Underrated)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10358

Over the last week or so, I posted quite a few times that the best-case scenario was for Sparty to lose and have to watch MIchigan go to a BCS bowl while they don't, because I would enjoy their whining and complaining.    

Sparty fans crying in their beer while we celebrate is a beautiful thing. I intend to enjoy it for all it is worth.

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 8:54 AM | Great Post (Score:1)
randyfloyd
randyfloyd's picture
Joined: 08/19/2008
MGoPoints: 1040

Cry babies >> Kirk Cousins

It's tough being Blue in Columbus!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:53 AM | Kirk Cousins = Sidney Crosby (Score:2)
jabberwock
jabberwock's picture
Joined: 07/04/2008
MGoPoints: 3529

Kirk Cousins = Sidney Crosby

Love & Hate are horns on the same goat.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:01 AM | Scott Bell (Score:3 Normal)
BrownJuggernaut
BrownJuggernaut's picture
Joined: 10/02/2010
MGoPoints: 2790

Scott Bell had an interesting tweet about how Michigan played 10 bowl bound teams and won 8. I got Curious and started looking at other teams that have "gripes." Michigan State played 8 bowl bound teams and won 5. Arkansas played 7 bowl bound opponents and beat 5. South Carolina also played 7 bowl bound teams and won 5 of those games. Georgia played 8 bowl bound teams and won 5 of those games. In the Big 12, even including Miami (YTM), Kansas State only played 8 bowl bound teams, winning 6. Lastly, Baylor played 9 bowl bound teams, beating 6 of them. 

I'm not saying that this means that Michigan's schedule was harder than these teams (that might be an argument for another day). I'm only emphasizing the fact that Michigan's schedule was deep with postseason teams, while some of these teams were noticeably more thin. They did exceedingly well against this deep schedule too and deserve to be where they are.

Avatar is a reference to this. Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 2:36 PM | grammar nazi (Score:2)
oriental andrew
oriental andrew's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4538

msu played 8 GAMES against bowl-bound teams, not 8 bowl-bound teams (they played Wisco twice).  Your sentence structure is correct for all the other teams you listed. 

For my privacy, my new username is "non-Oriental non-Andrew"
 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:08 AM | kstate (Score:1)
G.W. Mclintock
G.W. Mclintock's picture
Joined: 01/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1501

Had 8 wins by 7 pts or less, including a 10-7 win over Eastern Kentucky. I'm less sympathetic towards them than the rest.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:13 AM | K-State got left out. But (Score:1)
PrideandHokeinTX
Joined: 08/19/2011
MGoPoints: 34

K-State got left out. But does anyone care?

All Manball, All the time.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:21 AM | Unfortunately ... (Score:2)
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3440

... no one really sems to have noticed.

All the chatter is about either VaTech getting into the BCS or the LSU-Bama rematch. And even the people complaining about the teams left out of the BCS seem to be more interested in BSU or Baylor. No one cares about K-State.

Also, FWIW, no one has noticed that the Sugar Bowl could have selected Oklahoma because they ended up at #14. Oklahoma is a huge name in CFB and an Oklahoma v. Michigan match-up in the Sugar Bowl would have looked pretty sweet on the marquee. But the Sugar Bowl picked VaTech instead. Why? I don't know. But it's hard to understand that decision from a purely economic standpoint.

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything."  B. Simpson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 10:50 AM | This way they can pipe in the (Score:2)
Corey
Corey's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1316

This way they can pipe in the "Hokey Pokey"

"Are you coming to bed?"
"I can't."
"Why not?"
"Someone is WRONG on the internet."
  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:42 AM | Wow- if Sparty ever (Score:0 Trolling)
O Fo Sho
O Fo Sho's picture
Joined: 11/21/2011
MGoPoints: 252

earned the name "Lil' Brother" they are deserving of it now.  What a bunch of whinny lil brothers.  They are so short sited to believe that the only thing that should determine who goes to the BCS is one head to head match up.  If that's the case, Iowa State and Sparty should be playing each other in the BCS.

O-Fo-Sho

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 9:45 AM | Cry me a river little brah! (Score:1)
powhound
powhound's picture
Joined: 11/28/2010
MGoPoints: 355

Get over your giant inferiority complex and move on.

 "gonna twist the cap off a green lizard" - Jim "Mad Dog" Mandich 

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 10:35 AM | KSU Was Jobbed (Score:1)
KC Wolve
Joined: 10/09/2010
MGoPoints: 632

The whole V Tech thing is just weird.  KSU fans travel extremely well for bowl games and they would have sold out their alottment instantly.  Complete BS.  I would hope this anyway, but I want Michigan to dominate them.  

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 12:13 PM | while I don't understand the (Score:1)
ccdevi
Joined: 08/08/2010
MGoPoints: 326

while I don't understand the VT thing either, no one cares about K St, its more than just tix, its TV ratings too.  Also how does K St's season justify the characterization that they got "jobbed", granted they only lost 2 but if they had gotten selected it would have been over an Okla team that beat them 58-17 at K St (Okla outgained them 690 to 240).  K St didn't get robbed, they were just one of a number of possible choices that didn't get the benefit of the doubt.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 5th, 2011 at 3:12 PM | Well (Score:1)
KC Wolve
Joined: 10/09/2010
MGoPoints: 632

You just proved my point by saying "no one cares about KSU". They were ranked higher and had a pretty damn good season. Maybe jobbed isn't the right word but they were more deserving than any of the other options. They had one bad loss and the other loss was against a team that some say should be playing in the MNC, where if there were 10 more seconds left they would have probably scored and gone for 2 to try and win.



I know, I know, woulda, shoulda, coulda.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.