UM @ Indiana highlights
http://youtu.be/wkMtmAa4aVs
November 14th, 2015 at 9:27 PM ^
Sorry, too exhausted to even watch that already. Delano Hill swatting that damn pass away is all I have energy left to see. A thing of beauty.
November 14th, 2015 at 9:28 PM ^
but I would have appreciated a warning about the RAWK music.
November 14th, 2015 at 9:41 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 14th, 2015 at 9:28 PM ^
Are there any alternative angles of the final play? All the replays I've seen have that one angle. Hell, the ESPN3 feed cut away before even showing a replay.
November 14th, 2015 at 9:29 PM ^
November 14th, 2015 at 9:32 PM ^
Highlights are nice. Could do without the rock music.
November 14th, 2015 at 10:31 PM ^
Agreed. Music is annoying.
November 14th, 2015 at 9:43 PM ^
is sooooooo bad at her job. ESPN was clearly trying to fill it's quota and said "hey we need a hot hispanic chic to go along with our other hot chics from various backgrounds that do football."
Except she's AWFUL. She can barely put a sentance together.
And then if you watch, you'll get the Rudock postgame interview and he says the chapter of this part of the season is called "nitty gritty" and you'll laugh.
November 14th, 2015 at 11:09 PM ^
..terrible talent all over the place. In the booth. On the side line. In the studio. And among the terrible on-air people are whites, blacks, hispanics, asians, etc., etc.
So why do you have to think that one of ESPN;s many terrrible on-air people was hired only due to her ethnicity? Do you also point out that white on-air personalities at ESPN are probably only got the job because most ESPN viewers (especially college football) are white and ESPN wants the on-air people to look like the audience?
Anyway, I thought Brock Huard was better than most as the commentary guy. I'll take him over many of the ESPN and/or Big Ten Network commentary people.
November 15th, 2015 at 12:33 AM ^
He was really good today.
November 15th, 2015 at 1:11 AM ^
He was rooting for Indiana basically the whole time during the broadcast.
November 15th, 2015 at 7:37 AM ^
thought the play-by-play guy was the one that was not balanced.
The play-by v-play guy kept saying how shocked he that IU could run on Michigan, but only rarely mentioned the Glasgow injury, and/or started to talk about it very late in the game, as a major factor.
He also underplayed the fact that IU's offense had been very good against other very good opponents (OSU, Iowa, MSU). He made it sound like a top rated D was getting dominated by a mediocre offense, when in fact IU probably has the second best offense in the Big Ten (especially with Howard healthy).
Huard seemed more or less balanced to my ears.
Brian Greise is a really good color commentator. But I think Brock Huard is far better than most at ESPN.
November 15th, 2015 at 2:06 AM ^
But her voice is super hot.
November 15th, 2015 at 7:52 AM ^
I wonder if she uses "its" correctly and knows how to spell "sentence"... Or maybe you're also filling a quota at your job?
November 14th, 2015 at 9:53 PM ^
Rudock's throws, the accuracy is beautiful
November 14th, 2015 at 10:06 PM ^
I didnt see it clean, and havent seen a real good replay, but was that snag and place of a bad snap on that last kick a game saver?
November 14th, 2015 at 10:12 PM ^
November 14th, 2015 at 10:24 PM ^
Saw that and told my wife "That punter just saved our asses and no one will even notice since we didn't lose because of it"
Note: She would have no idea who O'Neill is, which is why I said that punter. I also don't feel he was responsible for the MSU loss. Was very glad he made that play, was a hell of a save under pressure.
November 14th, 2015 at 10:19 PM ^
November 14th, 2015 at 10:19 PM ^
Here's a link to a shorter version (without music) on mgoblue: http://www.mgoblue.com/collegesportslive/?media=514149
November 14th, 2015 at 11:26 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 15th, 2015 at 1:31 AM ^
November 15th, 2015 at 9:31 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad