MGoCooper

July 6th, 2011 at 8:57 AM ^

The article did say he's going to wait until after he finds out what OSU's sanctions will be. But, you have to think we're in the lead at this point.

Harballer

July 6th, 2011 at 9:01 AM ^

I am a little skeptical about us leading at this point only because he hasn't actually been on campus yet.  But it definitely is plausible.  Does anyone know which schools he has visited so far?

Maize.Blue Wagner

July 6th, 2011 at 9:08 AM ^

I think they schedule a trip over Memorial Day weekend (I guess without checking with the coaches). Then the coaches told them that that wouldn't make much sense cause no one would be there to welcome them (Washington and Stanford). 

 

ND Sux

July 6th, 2011 at 9:03 AM ^

aren't even on our schedule!  /s

Srsly though, if these two went blue together, it would fill two key remaining 2012 spots with top talent.  It may even prompt decisions from a couple others. 

turd ferguson

July 6th, 2011 at 9:55 AM ^

This could explain the "one more DT" thing. If we took Washington, Wormley, Pipkins, and O'Brien, I think that would be 12 guys for the defensive front seven. It would be an amazing haul, but that seems like a lot of guys for one class.

arsenalb32

July 6th, 2011 at 9:31 AM ^

Who was the recruit that said that the academic presentation blew him away when he visited? The name slipped my mind, but I remember that he had said we did a spectacular job of selling the education you receive at Michigan. This very well could work nicely in our favor.

WeCheerThemAgain

July 6th, 2011 at 9:50 AM ^

I believe it was Caleb Stacey's parents who were "blown away" by the academics side of Michigan (http://mgoblog.com/diaries/tomvh-commit-caleb-stacey-visit-reaction) and Tom Strobel who was surprised by Michigan's "academic reputation" (http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/ohio-de-comments-michigans-academic-reputat…).

In your defense, though, a lot of prospects and commitments have positive comments regarding Michigan's academics.

WeCheerThemAgain

July 6th, 2011 at 10:40 AM ^

I couldn't find anything on Blake's comments about our academics.  A link would be appreciated.

On a side note, I've been reading this blog for a couple of years, but never have I been this interested (I'm scared to use the word 'obsessed') in our recruiting process.  Hoke uber alles?

Blue in Yarmouth

July 6th, 2011 at 12:14 PM ^

Hoke uber alles indeed!

I don't have a link, just going off memory. He said something along the lines of how impressed he was when they got to take in the academic side of UM on their visit and that he would like another chance to meet with the academic people there. To be perfectly honest, I can't say 100% percent that quote came from him, that is just what I remember (I would say I am 90% sure it was Bars).

Protoman20xx

July 6th, 2011 at 9:29 AM ^

I havn't followed Washington to closely.  Who is the biggest challenger for us out of those other 4.....I always fear talented recruits will drink the "Saban Kool-Aid".

neoavatara

July 6th, 2011 at 9:34 AM ^

I think he has always intended on visiting.  I think we have always been in the conversation, but I doubt anyone is leading.

Shocked that OSU is not on the list...they must be destroying this kid over on Hineygate for being a traitor right about now.

I think he will visit, and visit means we have a chance.  I LOVE this kid...he and Wormley makes our DL elite for the next few years. 

MGoReader04

July 6th, 2011 at 9:43 AM ^

I love how often we're seeing recruit's lists exclude OSU!  I noticed that Monday with Tom's update - all of those guys listing 10/11 elite schools and OSU nowhere to be seen, then yesterday with Lewis's dad saying that they would pick any Big Ten school except Ohio, now this!   Its great to see that this scandal seems to be destroying their reputation with recruits!

Logan88

July 6th, 2011 at 9:44 AM ^

'Bama is probably the biggest challenger to Michigan for the following reasons:

1) SABAN!!!!!!!!!!!

2) The SEC roolz!!!!!!!

3) 'Bama boosters/hostesses

4) 'Bama is a popular pick to make it to the MNC game this season (no snark on this one)

MGoCooper

July 6th, 2011 at 10:02 AM ^

Some OSU fans are so delusional! This whack job over on the Bucknuts forum just said " most are expecting minimal sanctions, i'm hearing most kids are just holding their spots at other schools, until this blows over". They have lost their minds! I wonder if the poor bastards in Hitler's bunker sounded like this?

Blue in Yarmouth

July 6th, 2011 at 10:10 AM ^

but what he says could well be true. A lot of the guys the buckeyes are losing out on were once super heavy OSU leans (locks even) and have chosen other schools. With that in mind you have to assume the major reason was fear in regard to the penalties that OSU would face as a result of the NCAA investigation.

If the NCAA decides that OSU should get off easy, it wouldn't surprise me if a few of these Ohio players who committed to other schools don't flip to OSU (not saying any of ours will, just that some Ohio recruits might).

I have to say that given the circumstances (Tressel resigning and Pryor leaving) I am a little concerned the NCAA might give OSU a slap on the wrist. They have done nothing in the recent past to give me any confidence that they understand the notion of "the punishment should fit the crime".

74polSKA

July 6th, 2011 at 10:12 AM ^

are convinced that the BMV finding no wrong doing in the car deal case means the NCAA will take it easy on them.  I have to admit that I'm starting to fear that they will get a slap on the wrist too.  There haven't been any more LOA's from the NCAA with the new stories that surfaced, cargate turned up nothing (so far), and there appears to be no evidence in the Talbott case.  Plus the new stories with UNC, Oregon and Georgia are taking the spotlight off Columbus.