Do you disagree with this inequality?
Troy Woolfolk > Donovan Warren
In all honesty, I truly believe Troy Woolfolk was more of a shut-down corner last year than Donovan Warren, and I actually think that if he had declared for the draft he actually had a chance at being drafted. Many of the "experts" seem to pick players as being monumental to a team's success simply because of their star rating or hype (see Stephen Schilling, Obi Ezeh, Donovan Warren) instead of what they truly put on the field. I really think this made itself apparent when, at the end of the year, teams started to stay away from T-Wolf so they could target Warren. Although (of course) I'd rather have a solid corner stay on the team, I don't think it's correct to say that Warren was a better corner than Woolfolk.
I've also heard that Warren wasn't very good for team cohesiveness, and that Woolfolk was a much better leader in the secondary than he was.




Woolfolk at least as the speed to be an elite corner whereas Donovan was barely as fast as an elite down lineman. Other than that, Woolfolk can't get anything but an incomplete given he played part of the year at safety and was not really tested all that much in other games.