Trey had a great game

Submitted by Sllepy81 on
Final stats...
Utah: T. Burke 24 Pts, 4 Reb, 15 Ast, 1 Stl

Thought it was worth posting, 15 assists and 24pts, they lost to Golden State though. THJ had a rough night though, 0-7fg.

Ghost of BCook…

April 7th, 2014 at 10:19 AM ^

One does not have a "great game" in a 28 point loss. Was Trey not on the floor when Golden State scored its 130 points?

Ghost of BCook…

April 7th, 2014 at 11:45 AM ^

It was a very good offensive performance.  But yes, losing by 28 and allowing 130 points (60+ attributed to his man) says his overall game (and that of his teammates) was not good enough. 

ThWard

April 7th, 2014 at 11:53 AM ^

 Of course he wouldn't. But standard athlete/coach-speak doesn't override the objective evaluation of a player's performance. Bball is a 5 on 5 game. Believe it or not... sometimes 1-2 guys play objectively well but the overall 5 man team gets trounced

Ghost of BCook…

April 7th, 2014 at 12:04 PM ^

Football is a sport that you can have a great game in a losing effort because you only play on one side of the ball.  A running back that goes for 350 yards and 4 touchdowns but whose team loses by 28 cannot be faulted for his team's terrible defense that he isn't a part of. 

Basketball is not that, you have to evaluate offense and defense in the same breath.  The Jazz were -18 when Trey was on the floor with the majority of damage being done by the guy Trey was checking (who is awesome, no doubt). 

I don't see why we can't just say Trey had a great offensive stat line without trying to somehow protect the guy from any criticism that should rightly come with participating on the wrong side of a 28 point, 130 point allowed beatdown. 

ThWard

April 7th, 2014 at 12:10 PM ^

Yeah, OP overstated "greatness" here, but your response seemed overstated, too. 

 

Let's try again -- (1) for a rookie point guard, (2) on a really bad team, (3) going against one of the top 10 players in the league, and (4) perhaps one of the 3-4 best pure scorers, and (5) KNOWING that Burke's got a long way to go on defense,

Trey Burke had a good game last night... 

 

No one is protecting Trey Burke. That's silly. Criticize all you want; I just thought you were being a touch pedantic towards the OP. Curry went for 37 and 11 in a loss to OKC in January. I would say Curry had a great game offensively against OKC and a great game offensively against Utah, too, despite the different results. If Curry poured in all of his points against Burke on isos, then so be it, maybe Burke is a net negative on the court despite what he brings offensively. Nonetheless, for a rookie going against a certified offensive star and on an out-matched team, Burke had a good game last night.

Ghost of BCook…

April 7th, 2014 at 12:43 PM ^

Well said - with those caveats, I would agree with you (and the OP, if that's what he was implying). 

I'm a little sensitive to these types of discussions -  There are some here (a minority, I'm sure, but a rather vocal one) that would rather see gaudy statistics in a loss than meager statistics in a win.  This isn't hyperbole on my part - I remember a football thread where posters specifically said they value their own personal entertainment over winning. 

BradP

April 7th, 2014 at 12:13 PM ^

To come to your defense a bit, Trey did have 14 uncontested field goals and scored at least half of those points when the game was well out of hand.  And he had a ludicrous 118 touches in the game, so he is gonna have big numbers.  However, even though he had all those touches, he only had 3 turnovers, which is ridiculously good.

Stephen Curry was otherworldly, however, as those numbers of his came on 60 touches.  That means on average he contributed well over a point every time he touched the ball.

DrunkOnHiggins

April 7th, 2014 at 11:24 AM ^

I know it's just a video game but last night I was playing my Pistons season (yeah I know, laugh it up) and played the Jazz. Trey dropped 37 points, 9 assists and had a few rebounds and steals. It was a close game that I won but without Trey they wouldn't have had a chance. He's damn good in NBA2K14.

UMaD

April 7th, 2014 at 1:26 PM ^

If you had just said "puts up nice stats", no one would be arguing with you, but instead you said "had a great game", which is hard to back up when you get blown out and your opposing matchups puts up even better stats than you (even if he's an All-Star and you're a rookie).

 

Sllepy81

April 7th, 2014 at 3:17 PM ^

I look at NBA players more as individuals at work, he had a great game, despite losing. Sorry. If he went 0-7 shooting and won I would not of said great game.