CRex

August 17th, 2010 at 10:29 AM ^

Just out of curiosity what browser did you use to try to embed this? Ever since the upgrade WebKit type browsers (Chrome, Safari) have hated my embed attempts.

Plegerize

August 17th, 2010 at 1:04 PM ^

Wayy too funny. I am actually a CPR Instructor and teach CPR classes and I have to say I might have to add a little video segment now that includes this proper method of CPR. I don't know how my female students would take it, but I know the guys would love it heh heh...

pullin4blue

August 17th, 2010 at 12:14 PM ^

CPR was changed for a number of reasons. First, the number of people that have had heart attacks with effective (breathing and compressions) CPR performed in an out-of-hospital setting that have recovered and been discharged home is very low. Bystander CPR was often not given correctly, and in some instances people didn't want to give it because fear of liability or didn't want to do the breathing.

The good Samaritan act does not protect people from being sued. It is unfortunate, but true. Studies found that there was not much of a change in numbers of people that survived to a successful hospital discharge between those with compressions and ventilation and compressions alone. The real problem isn't to get oxygen to the heart, it's to get oxygen to the brain. Having a living heart doesn't mean much when the brain doesn't funcion.

Plegerize

August 17th, 2010 at 1:10 PM ^

They were planning on changing it this year, so they finally decided to?

This is somewhat old news, as they've been teaching people to do compressions-only CPR if a pocket mask or face shield is unavailable to create a barrier between the mouths.

The problem is is that you still have to put breaths in for rescue-breathing and to assess if the airway is blocked. It makes sense as the air the rescuer breathes in is really not effective in delivering oxygen to the body, it's just as effective as if you were to just open the airway and do compressions.