WolvinLA2

April 10th, 2012 at 11:50 AM ^

Bummer there's no Kugler, but four top-100 OLs is disgusting. EDIT: also weird, he has a bunch of ND commits ranked way higher than any other service (or that their offer lists would justify). Mystifying.

WolvinLA2

April 10th, 2012 at 12:40 PM ^

It's legit.  Tom Lemming does these rankings, and despite his biases, he's been doing this longer than anyone else. 

The nice thing is that there are lots of data in recruiting rankings, which is why doing some sort of aggregate, like Ace does in our Big Ten Recruiting Rankings or that other posters have built for individual recruits, is the best way.  For example, if you look at the top 100 for Rivals, Scout, MaxPreps, ESPN and 24/7, it's hard to tell which list is better than any other, but if you get a bit of a consensus, you're in better shape. 

RationalBuckeye

April 10th, 2012 at 12:00 PM ^

One trend that I've noticed in the rankings this time of year is that the really early commitment guys don't get rated as high, a lot of times because the offers don't roll in as fast and because their not active in camps like the rising prospects. I wouldn't worry about Dymonte. Anyone who looks at his tape can see a top 100 guy, whether one "expert" puts him there or not.

Duck4President

April 10th, 2012 at 2:44 PM ^

These sites clearly have to sell subscriptions, and that is a very difficult thing to do if the whole top 100 is committed to (or in the process of committing to) Michigan. But in reality, I feel like we see this every year: aside from the truly elite players, these services slide kids up and down with almost zero rational basis for doing so.

WolvinLA2

April 10th, 2012 at 12:32 PM ^

Now that recruiting has gotten so big and there are so many competitors to Lemming (most of which have passed him, actually) I doubt he has the power he used to.  Lemming used to be The Guy in football recruiting, now he's kind of an after thought compared to Rivals, Scout, even 24/7 and ESPN.