Time of possession record?

Submitted by blueheron on

Needless to say, lots of things jumped out at me here: http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=302750084

18:13 ... wow.

I wondered what the records were for time of possession.  According to this possibly credible source, we nearly witnessed a record today:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_holds_the_record_for_time_of_possession_i…

I'd like to know if someone finds even more extreme numbers.  OSU was close in last year's Rose Bowl against Oregon.  I wouldn't be surprised to hear that some Schembechler teams had 40+ minutes during the Big2/Little8 years.

1464

October 2nd, 2010 at 9:58 PM ^

Question, who holds the possession record in a loss?  I'm guessing that may be our somber friends at IU.  I'm not even sure our offense would have been charged any shot clock violations had we played IU in their real sport.

BlueintheLou

October 2nd, 2010 at 10:02 PM ^

I was at the game, and I was wondering this throughout. We scored so quick on almost every drive. I was certain it was over 66% in favor of IU.

Thank you for answering my question.

bdsisme

October 2nd, 2010 at 10:15 PM ^

Our time of possession would've been even lower if Roundtree hadn't been tackled at the 1 or Denard had even one of those overthrown deep balls (that seemed to be easy touchdowns).

 

I'm not complaining, but I'm just sayin' that we could've won by a larger margin AND had the ball for 3 or 4 less minutes.

Sommy

October 2nd, 2010 at 10:16 PM ^

We've gotta knock off these quick scoring drives, or we're never going to win a game.

Or wait, how is time of possession calculated into the score again?

Zone Left

October 3rd, 2010 at 11:59 AM ^

I just looked at the ESPN boxscore:

TOP on scoring drives: 91.8 seconds

TOP on non-scoring drives: 90.6 seconds

Average TOP for all drives: 91.2 seconds

Indiana totally sold out to stop the run at the line of scrimmage, and Michigan had a ton of long plays as a result.  I'd guess other teams will choose a slow death and keep the safeties back.