This thread is invisible.
thank you was waiting for this to be posted so i can download it.
I fucking love you. Was trying to find it on a torrent all day long.
They just threw that up on YouTube without any copyright infringement?
Something seems.....fishy...
It'll get taken down, so watch it quickly.
March 15th, 2011 at 12:18 AM ^
Thanks for your concern but this video is unlisted. I doubt it will get deleted and if it does we'll just upload it again.
Get it while it's hot!
Downloading that shit right now!
I was hoping this would pop up today, missed it last night.
Dudes, I know the younguns in this day n age like the idea of massive dissemination of media, immediate access, everything-is-for-everyone. Some malcontent older folks do, too.
But, we got these things called LAWS. They often are inconvenient and designed by miserly mean people (=Republicans) (and =Democrats operating within budgetary limitations) (like any of THOSE exist) to inhibit the fun and free lives of Americans. But, well, we have them.
Downloading TV shows that are available elsewhere under license for charge is a rather blatant infringement of the Copyright Act. There is likely a copyright statement to that effect in the credits of the show, although that would not be required. There is plenty of caselaw that probably supports that a TV show like this is not free for downloading.
Consequently, download at your peril.
If you neg me, it's only because you dont WANT it to be true. But, sorry, it is what it is.
You want a legal solution? They are called VCRs, DVRs, and Tivo. Look into them. The show times are made public and if you copy it yourself for your own home use, it's perfectly legal. Downloading over the internet, not so much.
What better motivation?
WTF ARE YOU THINKING? ARE YOU SPARTY?
ARE YOU, WHAT, GONNA GO SELL YOUR BIG 10 RINGS NOW AND GET A FREE TAT WHILE YOU'RE AT IT???
ACT LIKE CLASS!
...because of this "They often are inconvenient and designed by miserly mean people (=Republicans) (and =Democrats operating within budgetary limitations)"
From the FAQ's
UNWELCOME, KTHX
- Politics
Oh, and EXCESSIVE USE OF CAPS - what are you, 12?
How is it unwelcome politics if I'm bashing both sides of the aisle? In an obviously J/K comment?
And weren't the caps intended to draw attention to the final points?
Geesh, I think you try to hard to find reasons to neg something honest that you can't really refute. If YOU were over 12 and, like, had a law degree from a top-3 institution, you might actually be able to carry on a cogent discussion about the issue. Guess not, huh.
I told you why I negged you, it wasn't really bashing just one and either way it's still politics. Also, it's a long standing meme around here that if you are going to go all caps it's not for 4 lines with excessive punctuation.
But, good for you, you keep patting yourself on your back for that law-degree.
You're not really bashing both parties. You're suggesting that one is miserly and that the other is apparently OK with this but has its hands tied at the moment. It's just not worth debating this.
How is it unwelcome politics if I'm bashing both sides of the aisle? In an obviously J/K comment?
Because two wrongs don't make a right.
I'd think that if ESPN would just host the doc on their website, with commercials here and there (like it was on TV), people wouldn't fall back on illegally attaining the file nearly as much.
I totally agree. If it were free in some other simple way, the "market" dries up.
(The perfect example of the economics you describe is paparazzi and stars. Stars complain about paparazzi always following them; well that's because of a market for free photos of the stars in daily situations. if the stars had their OWN photographers taking pictures of them daily and publishing them, the paparazzi would disappear b/c papers would have free sources of the same photos.)
I would say, thought, I bet ESPN's contracts with cable providers makes it impossible for ESPN to webhost their own content, except within limitation. There are also probably bandwith issues there. Like, SportsCenter is not yet online either, you'd think that would be. I have seen the TV commercials for ESPN streaming over the internet, but I wonder if you can access anything that isn't live (actually airing at that moment).
Or why dont they all cut to the chase and just provide ALL TV over the internet. Isn't it heading that way anyway?
you're playing the holier than thou card while banging the pulpit and condemning both sides to hell. got it.
And it will be free again, when they rebroadcast it.
Logically, how is this any different than had I recorded it last night to watch it today?
Is that when some 20 year ban ends?
In 2003, the NCAA slapped a 10-year ban on contact between the university and Webber, Taylor, Traylor and Bullock.
I DVRed this last night and I have watched three times already. I get chills whenever it starts. Phenomenal. It is really hurting my brackets today cause I have filled out dozens at work and since I watched this so many times 90% of them have Michigan winning. Shock the world.
You're going to be a rich man!
/optimism
March 14th, 2011 at 10:03 PM ^
However, I will stand up for Bobby Hurley in this respect: It is a misconception to think that just because he played for Duke, he was this lilly white spoiled little rich kid from the suburbs.
He was an in-your-face Jersey kid from Jersey City (not a very nice place) that could go toe to toe with any trash talking from Detroit.
He sounds ready to go at it again with Jalen Rose and Jimmy King on the audio. Good stuff.
Hornet's nest, meet stick. The Duke=Uncle Tom stuff is going to blow up. If we wind up playing them in the Tournament on Sunday, look for lots of buzz about it.