LB

August 30th, 2010 at 10:43 AM ^

Having the support of the goalie can only help! (just kidding, I like the pic).

And somehow, I have a tiny suspicion that we have been gamed this year. I suspect Forcier has helped deflect a lot of attention this year, and we will be seeing plenty of him at QB.

Yes, it might be wishful thinking, or I could be lost on a river in Egypt, but that nagging thought has been there and won't go away.

If I'm wrong, have you heard that Denard is really fast?

Flying Dutchman

August 30th, 2010 at 8:57 AM ^

For whatever reason, last night I dreamt that the final score was UConn 63, Michigan 60, in Overtime.  I have to get right with my subconscious if that's the score I'm getting while asleep.

I'll take the 60, maybe we can "only" give up 28-30, and we're all happy Saturday night.

Firstbase

August 30th, 2010 at 10:00 AM ^

...I think Tate is the more comfortable choice at QB. Denard is the more exciting option, but with that comes the unknown variable:  his composure under duress and his ability to make "antiTacoPants-like" throws and hit receivers in stride.

I like Tate's ability to improvise when things break down. 

We shall see...

 

 

Flying Dutchman

August 30th, 2010 at 11:00 AM ^

Well played on the dream comments, mates.  Good laughs.

That would be a great basketball dream.    However, it wasn't.

 

We can put up 60.    They can't put up 63 on our iffy defense, right?   RIGHT?