Thaddeus Gibson Says OSU players knew selling items was against rule
Just on ESPN; a couple of columnist spoke with Thaddeus Gibson and Gibson says the coaches told the players clearly that they could not sell items when he was a player at Ohio State. Important about this is that Gibbson was a linebacker at OSU from 2007 to 2009, and according to OSU's AD Gene Smith OSU did not tell players during this period that they could sell items. Considering Gibson has no reason to lie, I call BS on Gene Smith. Good for Gibson for being honest. One more reason to hate Ohio State and sweater-scum.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:57 PM ^
December 28th, 2010 at 3:42 PM ^
December 28th, 2010 at 3:44 PM ^
Insists that Tressel will let guys play in bowl game if they commit to coming back next year. Not sure how he can enforce this, but Posey already said he is back. The other 4 have remained silent. If you don't see Pryor on the field against Arkansas, that is why.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:07 PM ^
...he'd best be served getting that in writing. I can just hear it, "I promise, Coach, I'll come back if you just let me play in this one game. You can trust me, I have never done anything objectionable before. Well, except sell awards and gifts for cash. But I did it for my family; they needed the money." Yeah, not buying it (pun intended).
BTW...I am digging your login name. Kolesar in one of my all-time favorites. I was at the 1988 game at OSU when he saved a win with his kick return and long TD catch. What a day!
December 28th, 2010 at 5:47 PM ^
Heard that too (probably same insider). He can't enforce it, but I'm not sure he's someone you want to cross (especially if you live in Ohio).
Posey did declare in his apology today that he's staying. Interesting choice, if he is to be believed.
December 28th, 2010 at 3:57 PM ^
I may have missed something from the beginning, but was it OSU's compliance office that brought this to light, or was it from another source, and the NCAA found out that way?
December 28th, 2010 at 4:28 PM ^
OSU brought it to light and suspended the players for the Sugar Bowl. The NCAA, in their wisdom, ruled the players eligible and ruled the players ineligible for the first 5 games of next year. Yes, the NCAA is really that stupid.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:40 PM ^
With self-reported secondary violations.
But it was the U.S. Attorney's Office in Columbus, which brought it to the attention of the OSU Athletic Department before that.
If it were up to me, as King of the NCAA which of course I deserve to be, I'd have accepted Gene Smith's proposed punishment as being the just and right thing to do. Punishment fits the crime.
But the reason that the NCAA did what it did was because it was following its own rules and precedents, not just making up [new] dumb ideas as it went along.
The NCAA said essentially; Four games is what we've established as punishment for football players selling their swag while still eligible. It is the same penalty that we have imposed on other players, from other teams, in other situations; four games
And then the NCAA said; And we are adding a one-game bonus penalty because these guys didn't really come clean, as quickly and as thoroughly as they should have. And that too is our standard enhancement when we see that it is warranted.
And to cap it all off, the NCAA said; We really don't like to impose penalties on any teams shortly before heading into bowl games, playoffs, or other championship matches, and so we are not going to impose anything on these guys until the start of the next regular season.
So there is method to the NCAA's madness in this case. That's the problem. There is always method to the NCAA's madness. They are long on method. And madness.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:57 PM ^
December 28th, 2010 at 6:02 PM ^
Apparently (AFAIK) prosecuting someone who had this memoriabilia (the tattoo guy?).
December 28th, 2010 at 6:08 PM ^
December 28th, 2010 at 6:24 PM ^
Well, I think it was an IRS thing. I don't have all the details, but I imagine that determining why this guy had this stuff is why the USDA contacted the university. Who knows?
December 29th, 2010 at 2:28 AM ^
IRS used Columbus PD for part of the investigation/raid, and the Columbus PD informed the university.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:35 PM ^
There is no criminal investigation of any of the OSU kids over this.
What happened (I think) was that the IRS was conducting a semi-routine seizure operation at the tattoo parlor, or the home of the tattoo parlor owner, or a storage location. Not a search warrant, and not an investigation of players or the OSU team. They happened upon this stuff as part of that seizure operation. It is common that federal agents (FBI, U.S. Marshalls) are involved in seizure operations as the "muscle" and those boys love to write reports. They went up the chain of command in the FBI and the FBI guys love to hand stuff like this over to the U.S. Attorneys office. In this case, for the Southern District of Ohio. The U.S. Attorneys picked up the phone and called OSU's Athletic Department.
And by the way, it now seems to be confirmed that Jim Delany and the Big Ten weighed in on the side of letting the OSU kids play in the bowl game. I guess, that if you know that there are going to be suspensions, and the choice is for a bowl game or not, you'd choose "not."
It's a bit confusing, with Gene Smith saying that he wanted the kids suspended (only) for the bowl game, but then saying that if the kids have to sit for five games, then let them play in the bowl game.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:36 PM ^
Think how weak TP's stats will be next year without those OOC games to pad them.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:08 PM ^
It's not a lie if you believe it.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:12 PM ^
Too bad they're only worth 700 bucks to you. If you'd have only known you weren't supposed to sell them. Oh, wait...
December 28th, 2010 at 4:26 PM ^
Did you find that image on Ebay?
December 28th, 2010 at 4:47 PM ^
Here's the link. You might have to log in...item number 300507087519.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:22 PM ^
doesn't know this is against the rules? Seriously, are we to the point where these idiots have be told every single thing that IS against the rules or they'll think it's NOT against the rules? Dumb argument by OSU, dumb enforcement by NCAA, just dumb all the way around.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:24 PM ^
I don't see how they could not have known. They did essentially the exact same thing that got A.J. Green suspended at the beginning of the season.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:30 PM ^
Point of information: this occured in November of 2009. AJ Green sold his jersey around the same time (IIRC) and was suspended in August. The chronology of your argument is a bit backward.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:39 PM ^
Good point. Sorry.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:46 PM ^
Are you even a Michigan fan, or what?
/s
/s (this one stands for "surprise that generally surrounds comments when a newbie sees a fan from another fanbase acting rationally and contributing positively")
December 28th, 2010 at 5:33 PM ^
Are you telling me that OSU players didn't know that they were not able to profit from selling their championship rings nor their other gear? They were completely surprised that this was prohibited by the NCAA?
Why wouldn't all NCAA players (in all sports) sell all of their gear if they didn't know about this? It's an easy couple of grand a year. I mean, people pay like $80 for a new hoodie, why not pay $80 for one worn by player X?
December 28th, 2010 at 6:25 PM ^
I have no idea what they thought. My mind reading abilities are limited to geese, squirrels, and Sparty fans. You know, lower primates.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:31 PM ^
I get your joke, and I appreciate the Sparty dig as much as the next guy, but geese and squirrels aren't primates.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:32 PM ^
Says you.
December 28th, 2010 at 4:41 PM ^
It seems that recent grads are eating their young.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:03 PM ^
- perhaps other than portions of the OP - should just be deleted. One wonders how some posts survive and others get chopped quickly...
December 28th, 2010 at 5:39 PM ^
I am done defending Pryor, he is what he is. A talented, successful, yet frustrating and inconsistent prodigy. Never really unstoppable but never benign either. He has consistently embarrassed himself with his comments/actions off the field, and this is the straw that breaks the camel’s back. As the leader and figure head for the team, the fact that he allowed himself to get into this mess, his intentions (“helping his family”) noble or not, is inexcusable and selfish. I will always love him and appreciate what he has done for the university, but the Braxton Miller era can’t get here fast enough. I hope Pryor learns and grows from his mistakes, but I don’t want him back next year.
They had to know. I mean everyone knows.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:45 PM ^
He wanted so badly to help his family with money, and they were in such dire straits, and yet he decided to come back for his senior year? If he wants to make money to help them out, he could have turned pro at any time. That's kinda the point.
Something's not really meshing for me.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:14 PM ^
I agree, however he may have looked at it and thought "I wont make the top money unless I'm good enough, and I'm clearly not good enough now, so I have to come back so I can get good enough. I may need the NFL money right now, but I am not good enough to get it now, so I'll sell this stuff to hold me over, and make the big bucks when I develop enough in college."
Not saying that's what happened, but wouldn't be surprised if that was the thought process.
December 28th, 2010 at 7:07 PM ^
I have a strong feeling it was just "I can get $2,500 for this junk? Hells yes."
December 29th, 2010 at 8:26 AM ^
The whole "I'm not good enough" schtick doesn't really hold up considering his opinions that he'd "DOMINATE" in any system, anywhere, other than where he, you know, plays...
December 29th, 2010 at 6:14 PM ^
Good point lol.
December 29th, 2010 at 2:33 AM ^
It was one thing when Pryor's major issue was his lack of message discipline; he's a 21 year old college student, not a polished speaker. This crap, on the other hand, is unacceptable at The Ohio State University.
December 28th, 2010 at 5:42 PM ^
They may be dumb but they're not stupid
December 28th, 2010 at 5:44 PM ^
Well...
December 28th, 2010 at 5:53 PM ^
I'm sorry, but has this kid ever used proper grammar/sentence structure once in his life?
"I didn't mean to hurt nobody at all and I didn't mean to bring anything down or embarrassment to our university because this is the greatest university in the nation," Pryor said, addressing his comments to alumni, former Ohio State players, fans, teammates and the coaching staff.
"Hopefully I can someday get your forgiveness," he added.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:05 PM ^
Is he saying that he never meant to get caught?
December 28th, 2010 at 6:08 PM ^
He sounds pretty forgivenessful.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:11 PM ^
...there's a first for everything. I predict sometime in the near future, after signing a pro contract we will hear the perfectly uttered phrase: "I plead innocent to all charges." Lawyer takes it from there.
December 28th, 2010 at 6:28 PM ^
I wouldn't really bark up the "generic college athlete uses incorrect grammar while speaking with the media" tree. Plenty of fodder exists everywhere for a huge pot-kettle argument.
December 28th, 2010 at 8:00 PM ^
As if we didn't already smell his BS
December 28th, 2010 at 8:48 PM ^
Already stated, by Gene Smith, but "they didn't know *cough*CAM NEWTON*cough*" is going to be the backbone of their appeal. 400:1 says Thaddeus recants very soon.
December 28th, 2010 at 9:07 PM ^
Recants and issues a cease and desist order to ESPN saying he was taken outta context...only OSU!
December 28th, 2010 at 9:03 PM ^
The media in Columbus are such a bunch of sycophants that nobody will call BS on Smith. I'm just surprised the NCAA is falling for their excuse. I hope the NCAA decides to "go USC" on OSU. It would be nice to see them do a real investigation and somehow get around, through, or over the "scarlet wall" of lies, stonewalling, and excuses that any investigation of OSU usually encounters.
December 29th, 2010 at 12:55 AM ^
Why don't you head the investigation.