October 16th, 2010 at 6:41 PM ^
...but Denard has showed me a lot.
Imagine we actually have some great QB's going forward.
October 16th, 2010 at 6:50 PM ^
thats why hes not qb
October 16th, 2010 at 6:52 PM ^
if tate starts then we will be looking at 2009 rerun
October 16th, 2010 at 6:57 PM ^
so 2010s the same way only denard is starting???? Tate looks like a bigger threat in big ten play to me. Richrod needs to figure out how to utilize both these guys more.
October 16th, 2010 at 7:02 PM ^
The last one could have been picked off by four defenders. No receiver within 10 yards.
October 16th, 2010 at 7:02 PM ^
denard is fast which makes him a threat at any point, tate is lucky which runs out ohhh about any time he starts scrambling and decides to throw.
time to stop posting for me cant deal with OMGTATEISGR8 posts
October 16th, 2010 at 7:04 PM ^
Denard is the man...He runs and passes...Tate runs around and throws pics. We have a better shot at winning with Denard. I wouldnt mind Tate getting a couple series a gm tho.
October 16th, 2010 at 7:09 PM ^
God, you guys are asses: "Tate is lucky. Tate throws picks"
He was in desperation mode all 2nd half, and was pretty damn accurate throwing the ball nearly all day. Yes, he made some bonehead throws, but he played pretty damn well, and with a ton of heart.
I don't think he should be the starter, but give the guy some credit.
October 16th, 2010 at 10:09 PM ^
I was responding to someone who wanted to make Tate the starter. Tate is a very good quarterback. He just ain't Denard.
October 16th, 2010 at 7:10 PM ^
surely, the answer is 2 QB formations. make the transcontinental a threat on every play...
October 16th, 2010 at 10:26 PM ^
Rod already said Denard is the starting QB. There won't be any controversy.