Tell me about the Big Ten

Submitted by DISCUSS Man on

what are your opinions on the fanbases of the other 13 B1G schools?

mine-

Illinois: strange fixation thinking they are a rival of Michigan's

Indiana: arrogant basketball fans who think they're god's gift to basketball when they haven't been to a Final Four in over a decade.

Iowa: Humble corn lovers

Maryland: Kind of have that lost puppy vibe. They don't have a rival and don't really care about football as shown by 6 years without a sellout crowd that ended this year when OSU fans took over their stadium.

MSU: what do Michigan, MSU and OSU fans all have in common? They're all obsessed with Michigan. Nuff said.

Minny: They're humble midwesterners.........unless you're talking about hockey fans then WOW are they irritating.

Nebraska: probably the nicest fans in the conference and they're the best fitting addition to the league.

NU: other than students who are fans of NU, who grows up an NU fan?

OSU: what do Michigan, MSU and OSU fans all have in common. They're all obsessed with Michigan. Nuff said.

PSU: Delusional drunkards

Purdue: at least you didn't finish in the B1G cellar this year! Wooo!

Rutgers: Too busy fist pumping to be good at sports

Wisconsin: I remember them being drunkards but that's about it since Michigan hasn't played them in football since 1903.

edit: DISCUSS

 

Bambi

April 16th, 2015 at 6:50 PM ^

Michigan fans: write condescending posts thinking they're God's gift to the world when they haven't been good at football in over a decade

rambouhh

April 17th, 2015 at 1:26 PM ^

So is Princeton and Yale relevant then? They have over 50 national title between them. The answer is no they are not relevant. Right now, Michigan hasn't been affecting the national football scene like state has, hopefully that will change though. 

ThadMattasagoblin

April 16th, 2015 at 9:17 PM ^

Where did he say anything arrogant in this post? Since when did we apologize for being arrogant on here anyways. If other schools are offended too bad. We have 11 national championships and 915 wins.

Commie_High96

April 16th, 2015 at 9:36 PM ^

Bambi, you forgot to add that we UM fans love to point out that while we may suck at sports these days, we are better at school than the rest of public Big schools. Even though we were ranked higher in both school and sports 20 years ago. I am so sick of posters retreating to school rankings on a sports blog. It is the "Northwestern defense" and it is sad and desperate

jmblue

April 17th, 2015 at 12:03 PM ^

This community has become aggressively self-flagellating.  It's becoming tiresome.

It's OK to talk trash about rivals - especially on a forum that is 99% Michigan fans.  It's sports.  It's not that serious.

 

Yostbound and Down

April 16th, 2015 at 7:05 PM ^

Where's the customary "DISCUSS"?

Edit: OK OP nice add.

In general I have no ill will towards Indiana, Iowa, and Illinois. In fact am applying to those for grad school. Wouldn't mind if I got in there although obviously hope to get into UM

Minnesota I somewhat dislike because of the hockey program and I want the Brown Jug back.

Wisconsin fans have always annoyed me. 

Many Northwestern grads are even more prickish than a stereotype of the prickish M grad. 

State...nothing needs to be said, the inferiority complex applies in all areas here.

Purdue just seems incredibly boring.

Penn State are delusional rabid losers.

OSU has a good football team which I hate and little else going for it.

Rutgers and Maryland still don't count, should be in the ACC.

Nebraska can be hickish but seem generally nice.

DCGrad

April 16th, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

Illinois: A University so big it takes up 2 cities. Can't hire a successful football coach and hired a basketball coach because he beat UM once.

Indiana: Crean's criminals

Iowa: Could be dangerous if they had an competence in either sport, somehow Denard lost to them.

Maryland: Those people are everywhere out here. Fear the turtle, indeed.

MSU: by all accounts not a very creative group. (See yearly basketball t-shirts, little sister chants). Good memory and would probably do better in school if Mike Hart was a professor.

Minnesota: Hired a football coach that looks like their mascot. Well played, Minnesota.

Nebraska: could be nice, I've never actuall met anyone from there. Definitely delusional about their place in CFB. Toilet TV's

NU: Hey at least they are smart, right?

OSU: By far the most hated B1G. People I know from other B1G schools can agree with on that. Really good at spelling Ohio.

PSU: ?? Good at getting out of trouble I guess? State College is in the middle of nowhere.

Purdue: Always plays ND tough. Decent academics, seem like nice people?

Rutgers: Most people thought NJIT was Rutgers basketball team. At least their new coach doesn't mistake basketball for dodgeball.

Wisconsin: Seem like nice people I guess. Between all the beer and the cheese they've given us I guess I can't really complain. Probably Packer fans though.

UM: Arrogant? Sure. Will be dangerous in a variety of sports soon. HARBAUGH. Needs to work on painting skills.

 

Cali Wolverine

April 16th, 2015 at 6:59 PM ^

as good academically and athletically as Michigan. Confused as why their good teams don't get as much national love as Michigan. Ohio State: Big Assholes Michigan State: Little Assholes Nebraska: Nice Americans, good football fans.

JTGoBlue

April 16th, 2015 at 7:14 PM ^

My experience with Penn St fans is they are super nice and classy as well, at least when they visit. Never been to an away game there, so perhaps a different experience.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Commie_High96

April 16th, 2015 at 9:43 PM ^

Oh, I can tell you they did not! As someone who went to grad school there, they do not like UM at all! I married into a Pennsylvania family and have not been popular with them since I made honest comments about Joe Pa at thanksgiving in 2003. P.S. I was right, he should have retired in 2003, and I don't care how unpopular I am when I hit that note each thanksgiving since the scandal.

UMgradMSUdad

April 16th, 2015 at 11:33 PM ^

Well, or how you credit wins to a guy who was sitting in the press box with no headphones and no communication to the sidelines.  IOW the last several seasons he was just a spectator and a figure head--not a coach in any stretch of the imagination.

TyTrain32

April 16th, 2015 at 7:25 PM ^

My opinion of the Big Ten is that they should have added Syracuse and Pitt instead of those two weird teams. They would be more along the lines of a Nebraska and would be competitive in football and basketball.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Wolverine Devotee

April 16th, 2015 at 7:29 PM ^

Syracuse and Pitt football have both been without a pulse for quite awhile now.

Just a couple years ago Pitt got beat by something like 3 TDs at home against an FCS school.

Would add a great basketball program and an okay one as opposed to a good one in Maryland and a non-existent one in Rutgers.

TyTrain32

April 16th, 2015 at 7:35 PM ^

Historically though, Syracuse has a strong history in football. Heck, look how bad Rutgers has been and they beat us! Pitt also during the Lesaen Mccoy and Larry Fitzgerald days. Admittedly though, I dont know much about Pitt football before that time period. Also, Pitt used to be a power in basketball for a while there. Being part of the BigTen would have elevated the perceptions of their programs automatically.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Yostbound and Down

April 16th, 2015 at 7:45 PM ^

Pitt has a much stronger football history than Syracuse... Tony Dorsett, the 1976 national title and a bunch of claimed titles back in the day. Because they used to be able to get great recruits from the talent rich area of western PA/eastern OH. I wouldn't be opposed to either instead of Maryland and Rutgers but they do little for me.

justingoblue

April 16th, 2015 at 7:44 PM ^

It doesn't excuse everything, but Pitt has gone through the same number of coaches in the past 5.5 years that Michigan has since 1990. I don't know if the program will ever be what it was from the nineteen teens to early eighties, but I would wager that the past five years of futility will be seen as an anolomy in future decades.