September 18th, 2010 at 11:24 AM ^
I agree, you are a dick.
September 18th, 2010 at 11:27 AM ^
NO, tate carried the team on his back a few times last year
September 18th, 2010 at 11:30 AM ^
Freebreeze!
September 18th, 2010 at 11:41 AM ^
Dude, it's Febreze.... not some wind turbine company.
September 18th, 2010 at 11:33 AM ^
Why would you write this stuff? How does this help the team man?
September 18th, 2010 at 11:34 AM ^
Finally someone got it!
September 18th, 2010 at 11:35 AM ^
And you already won the ASSHOLE of the day award
September 18th, 2010 at 11:36 AM ^
But seriously - If Tate remains 3rd string I expect him to buck up, be a good soldier, and transfer somewhere in the spring.
Little man busted his ass even when hurt for us last year give him some RESPECT!
September 18th, 2010 at 11:36 AM ^
But I think Denard could be becoming the new Tim Tebow
September 18th, 2010 at 11:36 AM ^
tacopants wouldn't be too happy about your comment
September 18th, 2010 at 11:41 AM ^
No, because the Coner never would have gotten real playing time. We're one injury away (knock on wood) from him possibly starting again.
September 18th, 2010 at 11:48 AM ^
Just go away. Tate was the starter all last year, and could start for over 1/2 the teams in the Big 10. Coner was a nice guy, but he was always the last guy on the bench.
September 18th, 2010 at 12:00 PM ^
Is this the worst thread ever?
September 18th, 2010 at 12:04 PM ^
No he is not. Let's just put this away early and get Tate on the field early and often.
September 18th, 2010 at 2:13 PM ^
If Tate remains the 3 string he WILL transfer. He is just too good to be sitting on the bench. Its stupid of you to even bring this up....
September 18th, 2010 at 2:30 PM ^
But Kelvin Grady is the new (skinnier, fastier, less drunkier) Kevin Grady.
September 18th, 2010 at 2:33 PM ^
No one will ever replace the coner.
September 18th, 2010 at 2:40 PM ^
Does this mean we get more quarterback rap?