Super Bowl XLVII Thread

Submitted by MaizeMN on

I guess somebody had to do it. Less than an hour until the Cake-Demanding Harbaughs take on the Demands-Yet-To-Be-Uttered Harbaughs. As Bo smiles from football Valhalla...

Commence.

CRex

February 3rd, 2013 at 10:46 PM ^

That was surprisingly, no hook and ladder option set up at all.  I know they like their returner and all but you figured you'd have that set up as an option.  

Jskohl88

February 3rd, 2013 at 10:49 PM ^

The lesson, as always...

Big Bro > Lil Bro

Just kiddng. Kind of. That turned out to be a really entertaining game. I had no rooting interest, I'm just happy to be entertained

Go.Blue.Hail

February 3rd, 2013 at 10:53 PM ^

I don't understand the complaining about the refs. The calls were fair for each team and the refs stayed out of things for the most part which led to an entertaining game. I enjoyed it.

Sopwith

February 3rd, 2013 at 10:54 PM ^

because that's the ball game if you throw it, and there's a plausible handfighting argument (plausible, I said), and we know you just don't get that call without blood being drawn at the end of a game...

...but as a Michigan fan that had to watch that Rose Bowl ref take his flag out then put it back in his pocket on New Year's Day 1998 after the Wash St. receiver shoved Chuck Wood to the ground on the late fly route... I say do your job and throw the laundry.  

At least this one wasn't quite as blatant as that shove.

 

South Bend Wolverine

February 3rd, 2013 at 11:59 PM ^

I'm just baffled that everyone's only talking about *that* call.  How about the ridiculously blatant helmet-to-helmet hit the play before?!?!  The defensive holding is debatable, the helmet to helmet was not, esp after how much emphasis the League has been putting on that all season.  Inexcusable officiating & it had a huge impact on the game's outcome.

TheGhostofYost

February 3rd, 2013 at 10:57 PM ^

If the refs had called the blatant hold on the punt, what would have happened?  Would the yardage be assessed on the free kick?

Sopwith

February 3rd, 2013 at 10:59 PM ^

Would have had exactly the same result, with the same amount of time on the clock.  Good instruction to all punt blockers at that point to go ahead and just tackle the man across from you, because what the hell, gives us more time to run around back there.

CRex

February 3rd, 2013 at 11:12 PM ^

I'm sure it will be addressed sooner or later.  Just add the time the play took back onto the clock for all safeties or something.  Buddy Ryan used to field 13 men goaline units and 14 man punt teams when he was more concerned about killing the clock than the yards from too many men on the field penalty.  After the Giants did the same thing in a Super Bowl, the rule was changed to the play is blown dead if a team lines up with over 11 men on the field.  

CRex

February 3rd, 2013 at 11:24 PM ^

I'd say that if the offense gives up a safety with under 2 minutes left in a half, the entire time of the play should just be put back on the clock.  If you blow the play dead you still have the delay where the ref processes the hold mentally, throws the flag, and blows his whistle.  Then they'll have to go dick around with instant replay to figure out the exact time in some cases I bet.  Also refs will forget to blow the play dead in some cases since the rest of the time they don't blow the play dead for holding.

Plus there is the edge case where the team gets away with two holds but the third one is noticed.  If you put the entire play back on the clock it covers the first two that were missed.  End of the day though, the self safety is so rare there might not be a huge move to change this rule.  

Brodie

February 4th, 2013 at 2:37 AM ^

I'll never cease to be amazed by how desperately people grasp at any tenuous associations with success. Would the Ray Lewis is the Devil screeds still be pouring out if this were 2002 and Elvis Grbac were quarterbacking Baltimore?