Stokes Injured

Submitted by MGoAndy on
I noticed in the latest post from Spring Practice up on Rivals that Je'Ron Stokes wasn't anywhere to be seen at practice yesterday. I saw Je'Ron outside of South Quad on Wednesday evening sporting a hard, walking cast/boot thing on I believe his left foot. He was limping pretty obviously. No idea how bad the injury is, but given some of the concern about outside receivers it isn't good news. Hopefully nothing major. UPDATE - Chenglis confirms on Twitter it's an ankle, no mention of severity. (Vlad knee sprain too )

Bando Calrissian

March 21st, 2010 at 5:39 PM ^

I always love these on-campus MGoStalker posts. Anyone remember the fiasco it was when the Michigan Daily reported Daniel Horton walking around campus with crutches circa 2005?

MGoJen

March 21st, 2010 at 6:14 PM ^

Posting about a potential injury is not the same as posting, "OMG I went to the bathroom and TAE ODOMS was there brushing his teeth!" Posts like this one are much appreciated and almost always legit when coming from reputable MGoBloggers. I think similar information surfaced about Tate's arm being in a sling after the Indiana game.

BiSB

March 21st, 2010 at 5:57 PM ^

but even if he's 100% by fall, young guys can always benefit from some solid reps in spring practice. I, for one, was excited to see Je'Ron in the spring game. Benevolent 2010 Michigan Tolerating God, let it be minor...

jvp123

March 21st, 2010 at 6:03 PM ^

Is he injured or not? And...is it really necessary to attack a poster before we know all the facts? It's not that I care; I'm just new, and need to know the rules...

WichitanWolverine

March 21st, 2010 at 7:07 PM ^

I had heard that Roundtree was moving from the slot. With him, Stonum and a healing Hemingway, I think the receiver position is one of the least of our problems. If this were a Forcier, RVB, Woolfolk, or Molk (although he's not playing yet, I know) injury I'd be pretty nervous.

JC3

March 21st, 2010 at 9:41 PM ^

Roundtree is working at both the slot and the outside position. Still, I'm not sold on it. We have no real viable deep-threat step up last year (Hemingway was for about a game, then was injured) and Stonum only showed flashes at times. We need a player like Stokes or hopefully Robinson/Miller/Jackson to step up and give our offense a vertical threat. Otherwise 2010 will become a repeat of 2009.

Blue in Yarmouth

March 22nd, 2010 at 8:00 AM ^

Only one of those guys you mentioned have the speed to stretch a defense (Robinson). Jackson and Miller both look more like the possession type WR's more so than burners. With Stokes out and Hemingway up to like 227 we aren't really deep with speed at the WR position. Stonum did show some sparks at times last year but his route running was not very good many times. If he improves in that area he could be great with his speed though. Lets just hope Stokes is good to go soon, and the fact that he is wearing a boot eliminates the possibility of ligament issues. If it is a break or sprain he should have no trouble being ready by fall unless he suffers a serious setback for some reason.

Tamburlaine

March 21st, 2010 at 7:38 PM ^

Last night at a hockey game. But seriously--the reason I think mosts of these posts are bullshit is because the "sighting" always seems to happen at South Quad. It's as if no one can see a player unless said player is poking about some "quad". Shit, I wonder why no one sees a football player at the library? Hmmmmm

MaizeNBlu628

March 21st, 2010 at 7:49 PM ^

Umm I believe most "sightings" happen at either south quad, is because it is right across from west quad, where most athletes live. So they'll either go to the cafeteria at either south or west quad, cause everynight each has a different set of foods. Have you ever been to the campus? Also, most students study at like the ugli or grad libs, not at schembechlar hall where the athletes study, so naturally it's more likely to see them right by where they live/eat.