The State Of Our Open Threads: After Northwestern

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

Well, it might not have looked pretty, but we did win, folks.

We were very productive from a swearing standpoint, even accounting for several attempts to inflate the numbers a little bit. Fortunately, the overwhelming majority of those attempts involved the word "fuck", so it was relatively easy to come up with the adjusted totals. That being said, a special shoutout should go to MGoBlogger Gameboy who had a post which contained almost 140 instances of the word "fuck", and although this was removed from the grand total, I have no doubt that many of us were thinking that very post during the first half of the game.

How productive were we specifically? Along the tracked metrics, we managed 624 instances across almost 2,200 posts in two threads, which is a 33.97% increase in overall swearing from last week. This also represents a slight increase in the relative frequency of swearing - an instance every 3.50 posts this week, compared to one instance every 3.76 posts last week, or about a 7% increase in frequency. I consider that a significant increase. 

Here is the overall cumulative picture as of this morning:

  TOTAL AVERAGE STD. DEV. % OF TOTAL
"fuck" 1688 168.80 154.78 47.83%
"shit" 417 41.70 20.83 11.82%
"damn" 361 36.10 44.52 10.23%
"fire" 289 28.90 32.79 8.19%
"suck" 423 42.30 31.87 11.99%
"ass" 227 22.70 24.43 6.43%
"put in Morris" 124 12.40 13.63 3.51%

Not much has changed from last week - we still clearly prefer "fuck". Indeed, when we try to inflate the numbers and confound the metrics, we stick with "fuck", so I post this also to show you where there is clearly some room to make more impact in the relative frequency of tracked words. Once again, "shit" and "suck" are a distant second and third, but the most significant jump actually belongs to references to firing people, most notably Al Borges. The frequency of these references jumped from 6.23% to 8.19%, so clearly the discontent with coaching and coaching decisions is beginning to rise significantly even from what it was. 

Here is the game-by-game bar chart - you can click on the picture to go to Photobucket and see it at full size:

 photo SOOTNorthwesternBar_zps209de0e6.png

The normalized values show the relative trend in calling for heads, but again, for overall rage, we still have Penn State:

 photo SOOTNorthwesternNormal_zpsdbefb48c.png

It should be noted here that I did adjust for some attempts to inflate the "fire" references too, but even after that, the Z-score for this metric was 2.41, which is VERY impressive and speaks to the lack of satisfaction with recent games / decisions. Even the "shit" metric, which typical was steady and in the background, jumped to a Z-score of 1.21, much of it used in a simile describing the overall quality of play.

Here is the "Fuck-Fire Relationship", which shows "fuck" starting to lag a little bit when compared to the overall trend of wanting people fired:

 photo SOOTNorthwesternFF_zpsc227d09c.png

Here is the Mood Chart, which made an appearance on Twitter after the Nebraska game. The shift in normalized values that the Northwestern game caused may result in the quadrants being renamed, but it made sense when I created it. If you have suggestions, do post them.

What you can see, however, is that we have more confirmation that PSU is still the watershed moment of the season for both comments and cussing, but we were just as verbal if not as profane for yesterday's game. 

 photo SOOTMoodChartNW_zps9453f929.png

LSAClassOf2000

November 17th, 2013 at 9:38 AM ^

Yeah, although that spreadsheet is the one I left at work so it won't be updated until early this week. I have been keeping up with it, however. As the offensive line issues have continued, people have focused their irritation - it was pretty even after Penn State and even through MSU, but Nebraska and probably this game have seen exactly what you mention. 

Princetonwolverine

November 17th, 2013 at 9:25 AM ^

A question for the computer geeks out there...........Is there anyway to make it unnecessary to hit refresh keys to see new postings? 

BlockM

November 17th, 2013 at 10:34 AM ^

Not on the client side (unless you want to write an app/chrome extension that will just simulate hitting F5 instead of actually hitting it...).

Seems like there might be a Drupal plugin that would do auto refreshing, but that would be something for Brian to set up.

macdaddy

November 17th, 2013 at 9:29 AM ^

I can envision a scenario in which profanity usage maintains its current rate through Iowa - a potentially winnable game then falls, perhaps significantly, for ohio when we are soundly thrashed beginning to end and the dominant emotion is not anger or frustration but rather resigned depression.

JohnnyV123

November 17th, 2013 at 10:31 AM ^

Just curious LSA, were you the one who "was too chicken" to post this originally after the UConn game and instead had CooperLily post it? Sorry if you answered that before

InDee

November 17th, 2013 at 11:39 AM ^

The data clearly indicates that 'damn' is on the decline and 'shit' is holding steady.

I also see that the number of fucks are correlated to the overall length of a game - case in point, the 2 OT games. 

KBLOW

November 17th, 2013 at 12:34 PM ^

Probably would take a closer reading of each comment, but is there a way to see how many of each word were used in a positive or negative connotation?

Seems, "shit" and "fire" might always be used negatively, but something like "that catch was so fucking awesome!" comes up pretty often (although probably not in the previous two games.)

 

LSAClassOf2000

November 17th, 2013 at 12:46 PM ^

I believe you were the one who brought it up last week or perhaps before that, and it was an excellent suggestion. As part of the season-end report, I might give a brief discussion of this - I have the approximate positive  negative split figured out only as far as Akron right now, but there is time to finish yet. 

MonkeyMan

November 17th, 2013 at 2:55 PM ^

I read the game thread for once- the 3 things that I found most common among statements were: 1. we can't block  2. Borges playcalling is terrible  3. DG is not a very good/smart QB. Strangely, while there have been multiple threads on the first 2 subjects there hasn't been much discussion about the third. There seems to be no serious QB controversy.