just what the Pistons need: a third string center. Joe Dumars was replaced by a mean ol' alien a few years back you guys.
So what's the deal with Kovacs?
October 7th, 2012 at 2:45 PM
#1
So what's the deal with Kovacs?
October 7th, 2012 at 2:47 PM | 
Well he was healthy enough to
Well he was healthy enough to
October 7th, 2012 at 2:48 PM |
So whats the deal with
So whats the deal with
So whats the deal with airline food?
Are you a park ranger at Yellowstone? Say hi to Yogi Bear for me. - the_big_house 500th
I may not be a 70 year old man. - Herm
October 7th, 2012 at 3:06 PM |
Peanut allergies
Peanut allergies
They can't give out peanuts anymore. I haz a sad.
So hot. Milk was a bad choice.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:08 PM |
Can we still get pretzels?
Can we still get pretzels?
Can we still get pretzels?
If you don't like Michigan you are a peasant
October 7th, 2012 at 3:50 PM |
These pretzels are makin' me
These pretzels are makin' me
These pretzels are makin' me thirsty!
"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk
October 7th, 2012 at 8:31 PM |
Here...
Here...
These 3 ice cubes with a splash of Sprite should do the trick...
“True loyalty is that quality of service that grows under adversity and expands in defeat. Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise — the other, loyalty.”
October 7th, 2012 at 4:11 PM |
Yeah
Yeah
But you only get like 3 of them. And don't get me started on the international meals. That calzone did some nasty things to my digestive system.
So hot. Milk was a bad choice.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:13 PM |
Delta still gives out
Delta still gives out
Delta still gives out peanuts. Which is good because I'm allergic to gluten.
Want a winged helmet hat? See this post: Link
October 7th, 2012 at 5:01 PM |
So what's the deal with fish?
So what's the deal with fish?
So what's the deal with fish?
October 7th, 2012 at 10:19 PM |
Fish sticks?
Fish sticks?
Wow, what a great audience
We're not teaching them about sports, we're teaching them about life!
October 7th, 2012 at 2:48 PM |
Hopefully this week should
Hopefully this week should
Hopefully this week should give him a chance to get out of the game early. Illinois looks downright terrible.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:25 PM |
I hope they are.
I hope they are.
I'm going to the Illinois Game with my cousin. He is an Illinois grad, so I'll be amongst the orange. I hope they hate me.
May you have a strong foundation
When the winds of changes shift
October 7th, 2012 at 2:50 PM |
SNOWFLAKES!!!!!
SNOWFLAKES!!!!!
SNOWFLAKES!!!!! AAAAARRRGGGHHHHHAJSJJMXMSSSMSWMS
I poop excellence
October 7th, 2012 at 2:52 PM |
I thought snowflakes referred
I thought snowflakes referred
I thought snowflakes referred to opinion about the game, not legitimate questions about the game/team/players, etc? Relax.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:13 PM |
If Kovacs was hurt, this
If Kovacs was hurt, this
If Kovacs was hurt, this would be a legitimate question. But asking why he didn't tackle as much?
If you're doing nothing, how do you know when you're finished?
October 7th, 2012 at 3:58 PM |
That's not what he asked. He
That's not what he asked. He
That's not what he asked. He asked if there were any updates on his condition.
October 7th, 2012 at 4:22 PM |
What condition? He had a knee
What condition? He had a knee
What condition? He had a knee brace on, and played every snap. It's not like he had to leave or was dealing with an earlier injury
If you're doing nothing, how do you know when you're finished?
October 7th, 2012 at 8:57 PM |
You are 100% correct, except
You are 100% correct, except
You are 100% correct, except for the fact that he was dealing with an earlier injury. Which was news... and which some of us are interested to know more about. Hence the OP.
October 7th, 2012 at 2:57 PM |
Well he was wearing a knee
Well he was wearing a knee
Well he (Kovacs) was wearing a knee brace. However he played the whole game, IIRC.
I'm a little more concerned about Denard's hand. He clearly injured it towards the end of the game.
October 7th, 2012 at 4:22 PM |
From the looks of it he just
From the looks of it he just
From the looks of it he just followed through a little too far and clipped his thigh with it. It looked like a stinger more than anything, I wouldn't be worried.
"I'm the guy who does his job. You must be the other guy."
October 7th, 2012 at 8:11 PM |
That's what they said on tv
That's what they said on tv
But I watched his follow thru in slo-mo (my wife is right- I'm a geek) and his hand didn't touch his thigh. I'm concerned that he ruptured a tendon or something is strained from earlier contact... No doc
October 7th, 2012 at 9:01 PM |
Denard hurt his hand late in
Denard hurt his hand late in
Denard hurt his hand late in the 2nd quarter when he was tackled in the backfield on a failed zone-read play. After the play, he was shaking his hand as he was trotting off the field. I'm assuming that since he was back out there to start the 3rd quarter, there were no broken bones.
October 7th, 2012 at 6:10 PM |
I wouldn't worry about it
I wouldn't worry about it
I wouldn't worry about it. Back in the early 1900's the Cubbies had a pitcher named "Three Finger" Mordecai Brown. Old Mordecai had a deformed right hand that he used to his advantage by developing a nasty curve ball. So Denard should be fine.
October 7th, 2012 at 2:58 PM |
Illinois:
Illinois:
Illinois:
Got a quarter?
October 7th, 2012 at 3:05 PM |
What's up with Joaquin
What's up with Joaquin
What's up with Joaquin Benoit?Thats a better question.
"Are you an official here?Because you've officially given me a boner."
October 7th, 2012 at 3:06 PM |
So what's the deal with
So what's the deal with
So what's the deal with people acting like the sky is falling?
If you don't like Michigan you are a peasant
October 7th, 2012 at 3:31 PM |
If Denard's wrist actually is
If Denard's wrist actually is
If Denard's wrist actually is injured it might be.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:11 PM |
The real question:
Who is
The real question:
Who is
The real question:
Who is John Gault?
Here's hoping for a bright future. This team does try hard and I will continue to support them.
October 7th, 2012 at 4:07 PM |
It's Galt...
It's Galt...
It's Galt...
October 7th, 2012 at 4:42 PM |
Exactly
Exactly
So that begs the question, who is John Gault? Or more interestingly, who is Jon Gault?
October 7th, 2012 at 5:46 PM |
John Gault
John Gault
Wasn't he Willie Gault's slower, less famous brother?
October 7th, 2012 at 3:12 PM |
Purdue didnt do much to get
Purdue didnt do much to get
Purdue didnt do much to get into Kovaxs' area.
If you need drugs to be a good writer, you're not a good writer.
-Rod Serling
October 7th, 2012 at 4:48 PM |
KOVACS!!!!
KOVACS!!!!
Come on, man - you can certainly spell that one correctly... I know you can!
October 7th, 2012 at 5:17 PM |
KOVACS X
KOVACS X
October 7th, 2012 at 3:17 PM |
I do think Kovacs looked a
I do think Kovacs looked a
I do think Kovacs looked a little slow out there....
Obviously, the defense played really well as a whole, but there were a few plays that TerBush completed passes, and Kovacs was pretty far behind his guy...
Just saying...
October 7th, 2012 at 3:20 PM |
Purdue was lacking a vertical
Purdue was lacking a vertical
Purdue was lacking a vertical passing game for the most part, but I was somewhat surprised to see that he wasn't used as a blitzer at all. Probably wasn't brought to the line as a blitzer due to Purdue's scheme in which the ball remains in the QB's hands for a maximum of 2.5 seconds. If he was seriously injured, he wouldn't have been in the game.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:20 PM |
The safeties weren't really
The safeties weren't really
The safeties weren't really needed against Purdue, because the Boilermakers couldn't get past the second level.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:20 PM |
So whats the deal
So whats the deal
So whats the deal with, "so whats the deal."
Hail! to the Victors Valiant Hail!
October 7th, 2012 at 3:27 PM |
Seriously.
Seriously.
Do we need a "Seinfeld" tag to go along with the Snowflakes?
October 7th, 2012 at 3:29 PM |
If Purdue actually put up a
If Purdue actually put up a
If Purdue actually put up a consistent offensive attack, this might be a legitimate question. Personally I'm pretty happy if a wideout or running back doesn't make it far enough downfield for the safeties to have to make a tackle. Means the front seven is doing its job.
Brady Hoke: Kicking Ass And Signing Names On The Recruiting Trail
October 7th, 2012 at 3:31 PM |
This is funny.
This is funny.
"...the TV announcers observed he was injured without specifying the extent of his injury."
I'm not convinced that Hoke tells Brandon the specifics of an injury. What are the chances of him letting a BTN announcer in on the details?
May you have a strong foundation
When the winds of changes shift
October 7th, 2012 at 5:48 PM |
There are no injuries with Hoke
There are no injuries with Hoke
Only boo-boos.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:52 PM |
I'm not going to be losing any sleep over it
I'm not going to be losing any sleep over it
but I'm curious about the nature and extent of the knee thing myself. He played hurt last year, so it might be nothing serious.
October 7th, 2012 at 3:53 PM |
I don’t know. Are you trying
I don’t know. Are you trying
I don’t know. Are you trying to help the gamblers?
"I recently heard from fans and friends that Michigan will be great again one day. In my opinion, Michigan never stopped being great." --Zac Ciullo
October 7th, 2012 at 4:05 PM |
Just a boo boo
Just a boo boo
Kovacs just has a boo boo on his lower body. He's fine.
If I say a duck can pull a truck, shut up and hook the sucka up!
October 7th, 2012 at 4:50 PM |
FWIW they are reporting that
FWIW they are reporting that
FWIW they are reporting that Kovacs is playing through a knee sprain over on Fox Sports Next(I hate the new design over there!!). So, perhaps he was a little slow during the game but was well enough to play and didn't have to tax himself too much.
Forget about the curveball Ricky. Give him the heater...
October 7th, 2012 at 5:07 PM |
LOL
LOL
If we're complaining about Kovacs making one tackle on Saturday, we've clearly forgotten what it was like to watch Obi Ezeh for three straight years at linebacker.
October 7th, 2012 at 5:11 PM |
If Kovacs getting only 1
If Kovacs getting only 1
If Kovacs getting only 1 tackle results in defensive performances where we give up less than 250 yds of offense and win the turnover battle, I will most certainly take it!
Forget about the curveball Ricky. Give him the heater...
October 7th, 2012 at 5:51 PM |
Why So Snarky?
Why So Snarky?
Frustrating that there is so much snark on a relatively innocent question. It's not like the OP asked about Kovacs' favorite Care Bear or something irrelevant.
Agreed that it is great that not many plays got into the secondary. But for as many people spend post after post complaining about stupid or pointless topics, there's just as many people that had stupid or pointless responses to the OP. After about the 3rd comment detailing that the lack of safety tackles is a good thing, I think we have it covered.
There is a legitimate outstanding question about Kovacs' condition. The board, with many posters that might have insight they can share seems like an appropriate place for the topic.
October 7th, 2012 at 8:14 PM |
wasn't being snarky. I was
wasn't being snarky. I was
wasn't being snarky. I was just pointing out that with his apparent lack of production we had a pretty good defensive performance. I'd prefer to not have to rely on him to make a ton of tackles every game. that's all.
Forget about the curveball Ricky. Give him the heater...
Well he was healthy enough to play. And you're complaining because our safety didn't get a ton of tackles? I would love if our safeties never had to make tackles.