The Snowflake Thread: Offensive Line (Specific OL Issues)

Submitted by Gulogulo37 on

"There are several teams across the country who are operating with extremely young O-linemen. And they all seem to be able to run the ball."

Comments like these have been quite common in response to those posters who think there isn't anything the coaches can do given our line. However, I've yet to see anyone actually name one of these supposed teams. So, honestly, which teams have 3 (or more) starters on their O-line that are as young and inexperienced as ours but actually field good offenses? I honestly want to know if these teams actually exist.

MOD EDIT: The original title was "Which teams have competent O-lines that are young and inexperienced?", but as this might become a center point of discussion, this will be repurposed as a separate Snowflake Thread. Hopefully, the OP does not mind - LSA

OP EDIT: I specifically made this thread about other team's young O-lines because just making a thread about OL issues would likely lead to complaints about Borges or the players or whatever has been said a million times already, although those complaints are rife here as well unsurprisingly. However, I don't mind because it doesn't seem like anyone has an answer except UCLA, and theirs doesn't appear to be better than ours.

Reader71

November 3rd, 2013 at 3:50 AM ^

That's it! That's all I've ever said! You are the best! Fire EVERYONE, just don't expect good results behind this line. The fact that we have a decent offense at all is, in my opinion, a point in Borges's favor. Why can't there be multiple issues? Why can't Funk and Borges and the line suck? What's wrong with peoples' brains that this never seems to be an option?

JHendo

November 2nd, 2013 at 9:49 PM ^

Talent is one thing, execution another. Even now, I look at this OL and still see talent. They just can't execute. Is that because the scheme is flawed, the scheme doesn't fit their skills or their skills aren't being developed properly off the game field? That I don't know, but IMO, the talent is there, the coaching is not.

UMgradMSUdad

November 2nd, 2013 at 9:51 PM ^

As far as the Oline issues go, with the youth and inexperience, it seems a lot of people are forgetting about the lack of experience at the TE position as well. 

Gulogulo37

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:34 PM ^

Yes, good point, especially in Borges' offense. Someone mentioned Auburn having a good rushing offense, but I'm guessing they don't use their TEs like Michigan does. Now, part of that is on Borges, but it's unfair to say he should just install a full spread. That's not the offense he has learned. People talk about putting square pegs in round holes in terms of players, but the same goes for coaches. That's why I'm not on the Fire Borges train yet.

TXmaizeNblue

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:13 PM ^

A&M starts a freshman and a sophomore. No not 3, but they are not playing against the B1G, are they? This has not seemed to hinder them from moving the ball this year. Yeah, Johnny got roughed up by Auburn, but they have consistently moved the ball for big yards against Alabama and other SEC teams. Quit looking for excuses.

MGoStrength

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:13 PM ^

UCLA is top 40ish in most offensive catagories and is ranked.  Their losses are to Stanford and Oregon and they beat Nebraska.  They are playing one Jr, one RS So, a true So, and two true Fr.

Dilithium Wings

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:20 PM ^

Is it just me or does it look like on run plays it takes a long time for the QB to hand it off? When watching other teams it seems like the QB/RB exchange is quick and the RB is running full steam. But while watching Michigan seems like Fitz or any other RB is jogging by the time they get it.

hailgary

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:20 PM ^

we should fire Hoke. He is terrible. We will propably lose Peppers and Hand will sign with Alabama for sure. But I'm tired of being out coached every week.

GVSUofM

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:27 PM ^

At least stop dressing like an ass. Put some clothes on when it's cold and rainy. You look like an idiot. No you are not Billy B in New England. You are not tough and neither is your toilet paper strong team. Drives me crazy. No headset. No hat. No jacket. He just looks like a 3rd grader with parents who don't care how he dresses when he goes to school. Absolutely does not project 'toughness' when his teams get manhandled *weak in and *weak out. *yes, weak.

In reply to by GVSUofM

jmblue

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:36 PM ^

OK, if the coach's clothing is "driving you crazy," you need to take a step back from the ledge.  That's moving beyond normal coaching criticism into "I hate everything about the guy now" ranting, like you'd hear from a scorned ex-girlfriend.

(Besides, Dantonio didn't exactly glam it up with his scruffy gray sweatshirt, either.)  

Hoke actually did wear a headset at times today, incidentally.  It did not result in any miraculous improvement from our team, though.

 

FreeKarl

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:58 PM ^

If your avatar pic is of yourself you need to stop dressing like an ass. Drives me crazy. No headset. You look like an idiot. You look like a 3rd grader whose parents bought him clothing a size to big because they didn't care about how it looked and he would someday grow into them. Also, I don't know why you 'quoted' toughness and your puns are week.* 

*no. 

GVSUofM

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:22 PM ^

"FSU's 19 year old lineman is like a veteran on this O-line, compared to the other guys". They seem pretty okay, decent, somewhat good this year. Oh, and with a mobile QB a la DG.

BlueinLansing

November 2nd, 2013 at 10:23 PM ^

of the most disappointing 5 star oline recruits I can remember.  For a guy that whined about wanting to play last year he's been nothing but awful for most of the season.  Really tired of seeing Gardner go down on the ground with Kalis standing there looking at his man make the tackle.

Think its bad now wait till next when the only two current olinemen with any competency move on to the NFL.

AMazinBlue

November 2nd, 2013 at 11:44 PM ^

Our kids don't seem to learn from their mistakes (they keep making the same ones) and they can't stop anyone or push anyone off the ball.  I see Lewan getting beat all the time, putting him and Scofield on the same side does nothing.  They don't open any holes either.  I think it comes down to coaching and strength and conditioning.  Our guys are weaker, slower and out of position way too often.

Funk, Weller and their cohorts need to go.

realfootballfan

November 3rd, 2013 at 12:06 AM ^

Someone(for the 1000th time)said that today was RR's fault due to poor line recruiting. They said that youth and inexperience are the reason why the O-line has been terrible. I'm not doubting for a second that's one of the main reasons. But there ARE teams(UCLA, Auburn, A&M,etc) who have inexperienced linemen but seem to be able to run the football and pass protect. Not being able to run against MSU is one thing. Not being able to run against Akron and UCONN is an entirely different monster. I wasn't saying that EVERY team in America runs the ball better than UM. I was just stating that it goes deeper than youth. Outside of the IU game, Michigan hasn't been able to generate a consistent running game at all this season outside of Devin.

realfootballfan

November 3rd, 2013 at 12:16 AM ^

I'm not an RR supporter or hater. I supported him while he was the coach and moved on once he was fired. But the man hasn't coached Michigan for three years now. To keep blaming him for how the O-line has performed is ridiculous. We were set back by line recruiting but at this point we should be able to field five guys who can put up 100 yards against Akron and UCONN.

Sten Carlson

November 3rd, 2013 at 12:55 AM ^

This comment shows you don't quite get it. There are only 2 of them, that is a HUGE part of the problem. Worse still is the fact that there are ZERO RS Sr OLinemen next year. Meaning, RR plumb forgot to recruit OLinemen in '10. If there were 2 OLinemen from the '09 class, and 2-3 from the '10 class, putting one from the '11 class wouldn't be so bad. But the numbers just aren't there.

Sten Carlson

November 3rd, 2013 at 12:22 AM ^

When you try to compare personnel between teams in an effort to say, "see, they're starting underclass men and they are a functional OL," you're never going to be successful. Firstly, as many have aptly pointed out, Michigan's OL is not only inexperienced, but there are walk-ons and lower rated guys. Meaning, are the talent leveled comparable? I think many Michigan fans just assume that the talent is there. Moreover, one can discount the impact of bad recruiting from '08 - '11 but that is basically all one needs to look at. The pipeline is everything. Saying, "it's been three years now..." shows your ignorance of what makes a successful OL and program. Those upperclassmen are NOT on the roster, and there is no way to mask or scheme around that fact. It's HUGE, but fortunately, improving ...but it takes time.

realfootballfan

November 3rd, 2013 at 12:32 AM ^

The line recruiting wasn't good from '08 to '11. But the line didn't generate any rushing from anyone not named Denard las year either. Michigan has tried everything from mixing up the lineup to putting our two best linemen next to each other and nothing has worked.

Reader71

November 3rd, 2013 at 4:07 AM ^

They did. There were a few RPS minuses due to the defense having a good call against a certain protection, but bad protections weren't as big a problem as plumb bad blocking. We didn't block guys, we missed guys, all sorts of problems from all sorts of protections and plays. Nine sacks, countless hurries, a few scrambles that actually went for a gain, a few throwaways. Even our completions were rushed. But Brian said we're OK at pass protection, so it must be play calls.

PburgGoBlue

November 3rd, 2013 at 8:20 AM ^

I love that play where our QB and RB run sideways 5 yards behind the LOS and wait for the Defense to come get them, then the QB hands off to the RB when they get close. That play was perfect yesterday.

 

/s

 

Serious, wtf was that?  They throw the ball to get all the way down the field, then pull out these dumb ass run plays? You have to run quick run plays that go north and south. This east west crap just doesn't work.

mgobleu

November 3rd, 2013 at 8:22 AM ^

overly simplistic, and granted, they fill books with what I don't know about football, but have we considered moving our guards to the D line and their counterparts vice-versa? It seems to me that our O line has no trouble shedding blocks and losing their man, while the D line seem to be specialists at holding blocks and preventing penetration. Thoughts?

Yeoman

November 3rd, 2013 at 12:41 PM ^

Well, that's true of course, but I think the bigger point is that they DON"T HAVE A SINGLE GUY STARTING that's in less than his third year in the program, and yet they're trotted out as a comparable to a Michigan team whose interior is entirely made up of first and second-year players.

People are just throwing shit out there on the assumption that no one will bother to fact check.

Yeoman

November 3rd, 2013 at 10:59 AM ^

  • LT: Jake Matthews, SR
  • LG: Jarvis Harrison, RS JR
  • C: Mike Matthews, SO
  • RG: Germain Ifedi, RS FR
  • RT: Cedric Ogbuehi, RS JR

They have scholarship upperclassmen at C and RG who were beaten out for jobs.

What's going on this year at Michigan and UCLA is pretty unique. Barring a total catastrophe like the Tulane hurricane or the SMU death penalty, nobody goes multiple years with 0-1 OL recruits and nobody has multiple positions on their line without a single third-year-and-up scholarship player. Maybe you find a young guy that's better but the older guys exist on your roster.

MGoBlue24

November 3rd, 2013 at 11:31 AM ^

regarding recruiting and coaching (at every level from position coach through head coach). I have nothing new to add. I just know I have multiple memories of television and radio games in the Schembechler/Moeller/Carr eras where the announcers made a point of saying "Michigan's line is really taking control of this game." Enough times that it felt like a constant. Sigh.