The Snowflake Thread: Offense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

This will be your snowflake thread for the offense and offensive playcalling. Ugh. 

UMFoster

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:42 PM ^

So if Morris gets hurt you go to Bellomy, a walk on, or a true freshman who hasn't proved anything? Did everyone forget about the Nebraska game last year? Gardner has regressed but you can't move him to receiver. Also Morris hasn't taken a meaningful snap all year. Why does everyone think he is going to be a god already?

goblue16

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:28 PM ^

So what I'm sick of this shit everyone plays young players!! And news flash it's game 11 there not freshman and sophomores any more dammit! There has been zero offensive development and that's on the coaching staff

switch26

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:25 PM ^

How in the fuck is it possible to go from scoring almost 50 a game the first half of the season to barely getting 150 yards in a full game.. completely and utterly shocked that this is even possible..

 

It's like after the MSU game, the coordinators swapped playbooks or brains.. what a joke

snowcrash

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:33 PM ^

1. In the 2nd half of the season, we went up against actual defenses.

2. Opponents also took advantage of game film that ND didn't have, and figured out how to stop us.

3. Indiana sucks. Any offensive stats compiled against them should not count.

IBleedMaize_Blue

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:25 PM ^

I know our O- line is abysmal but I can't watch DG regress anymore. Running backward 10 yards on inevitable sacks, fumbles, bad decisions. Time for some sugar Shane. And no I don't think he will light it up but he can't be any worse than how DG is playing right now.

denardogasm

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:25 PM ^

I'm finally over Gardner. Morris better really suck in order to not be the starter next year. The problem is we can't start him for the first time next week because it would be a mess, but we know Gardner will be ineffective...

1329 S. University

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:25 PM ^

That's an improvement!

Okay, can't be positive anymore. That was abysmal. Keep in mind also that the D scored the first 7 points and the other two TDs were short yardage. There is no reason Borges should be calling plays any longer starting 7 days from now.

Perkis-Size Me

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:26 PM ^

I believe John McKay was once asked about his team's execution when he was down in Tampa. He simply uttered "I'm all for it."

That's probably how most of us feel about this offense right now.

MGJS SuperKick Party

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:26 PM ^

Can it be named the raincloud thread when we lose? Every post is doom and gloom.

I didnt watch the second half but on ESPN gamecast when I was paying attention, I noticed we seemed to abandon the run. Is this the case?

BluePants

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:26 PM ^

Why did this thought cross Borges' mind? "Well, Green seems effective, probably time to get Fitz in there. Don't want those numbers to be too gaudy." I know fitz had a decent run or two but Green was able to get between tackles, not dance for a loss.

stephenrjking

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:26 PM ^

The offense stinks.
It's not really the playcalling; occasionally that leaves something to be desired, but quite frequently reasonable playcalls were made that failed.
The problem is that the staff is not good at producing a philosophy and a gameplan that they can teach their players to run consistently and effectively every week.
And the results are obvious.

MichiganStudent

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:31 PM ^

Its the player development, playcalling, scheme, mistakes by players, etc. but it really comes down to the overall master plan. Its fucking terrible.

Al is being compensated far above the product he has produced in 3 years at the helm. If you perform far below your compensation level you should be fired. He has had 3 years to show improvement and its been a regression since day 1.

True Blue Grit

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:26 PM ^

it certainly wasn't the only problem.  Gardner is just never going to be a highly successful QB.  As extremely talented as he is physically, he just can't manage the pressure and make the plays he needs to - despite the dropped passes, lack of blocking, and questionable play calling.  He had more time in this game to throw than he's had most of the season.  Result?  Too many missed throws and the disastrous fumble near the end.  I'll cut him some slack though because of the dropped passes.  Is it fair to put the lion's share of the blame on Gardner?  No, definitely not.  But, as the QB of this team, he just needs to make more plays happen. 

stephenrjking

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:44 PM ^

I think Gardner suffers from poor QB coaching and a complicated, new-plays-every-week scheme that makes it hard to get proficient at staple stuff. He has shown growth in many areas this year, yet he always has more to learn as the gameplan is torn up and re-invented every week and he is pounded by the rampaging defenses that his OL can't block.

BayWolves

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:48 PM ^

Gardner would be very productive if he had better coaching.  Morris would get absolutely killed out there so switching is not a good solution.

The coaching is absolutely horrendous and we are not getting any potential out of the offense.  I'll bet Gardner would be up for heisman if he was in a better coached offense.

HAHAHAHA

MichiganStudent

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:27 PM ^

I hate Al Borges so much its giving me stomach pain. I'm too young and poor to be a big donor to the AD, but I hope some of those guys are calling Dave Brandon right now.

somewittyname

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:27 PM ^

Playcalling seemed okay, certainly not great, but at least decent by Borges standards. But blocking still horrible, Gardner is a mess, WRs dropped a number of big passes. It's just a clownshow. So it doesn't really matter to me whether it's the playcalling or not. Either way the offense is a disaster and Borges simply needs to go.

ndscott50

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:28 PM ^

Three options

1) enters next year as presumed started
2) enters next year competing for the job in an open competition
3) we move on and don't offer a fifth year

I would vote for number 2 but his performance lately even when he has had time to throw makes me consider option 3. Option 1 seems crazy to me at this point

UMFoster

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:33 PM ^

They are clearly going to offer him another year. We have no proven quarterbacks on the roster and he is a great athlete. They aren't going to cut someone loose when they have no experienced players at that position on the depth chart

snowcrash

November 23rd, 2013 at 3:37 PM ^

But I would say the same thing for every single returning player on the offense. Not a single one of them played well enough this year to be a presumptive starter next year. That includes Funchess, who dropped a ridiculous number of passes today.