Snake Oil Roundup

Submitted by blueadams on
according to rivals (http://michigan.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1032721) we are going to be able to take 29 in this class. right now we have 28 commitments (3 silent commitments - grimes, murphy, parker). that leaves us with 1 scholarship to give, but there are still 4 positions we are hitting hard. SOMETHING is up!? #1) NT. It sounds like Johnathon Hankins might be leaning towards ohio state. It sounds like Jatushan Beachum might be leaning towards arkansas. That sucks, but I wouldn't count us out on either at this point. It sounds like Mike Thornton and Todd Chandler are both sort of wild-cards at this point, but who knows there, SNAKE OIL. If none of these options work out, then it sounds like we might take Roney Lozano of Florida. #2) OL. It sounds like we're still in the game for Torrian Wilson and a mystery recruit - probably either James Hurst or Andrew Donnal. So, clearly, we want to add a second olineman in this class. The way we are going after nose-tackles AND olinemen leads me to believe that our coaching staff thinks at least one commitment won't qualify (drake!?). #3) DE. It sounds like Jibreel Black is going to come in for a visit. I've still got a sneaking suspicion that we can get Derrick Bryant (the ucla commitment from ohio). Then there's that David Mackall kid we're still going after. I wonder if signing one of these guys means not signing Murphy, Kinard or Paskorz!? I mean, we have 4 DE/Q players signed already. Doesn't make sense to sign 5 with so many other guys on the table. #4) ILB. Rich Rod has offered two inside backers offers in the last month - Quayshawn Nealy and Darrin Kitchens. Both are sort of wild-cards at this point in the game. But again, who knows, SNAKE OIL. If these options don't work out, and we have room to add an inside backer, I'd expect to see us go with Steve Mehrer from ohio. If two commitments don't qualify...or we get some unexpected de-commits, I think that we are reserving our last spot for one of these inside backers. It's pretty clear that we want one...but it's also pretty clear that we're not pushing THAT hard for any of them.

MGrad

December 28th, 2009 at 5:41 PM ^

You know, even though the threaded neg-a-thon is reaching biblical proportions, the OP had a few decent comments in the OP, and probably only overreached on the Parker pseudo-commit note. To me, the interesting thing that I think many of us are wondering is how this pile of interested names will all add up to 29, then 25? That's a lot of late-breaking activity, which hints at the coaches knowing a few things about current verbals that are not yet public. It's going to be a wild ride for the next month on the recruiting front.

Birdman

December 28th, 2009 at 6:41 PM ^

Its been harsh reality on this board for a while now. Hopefully there will be a pos point stimulus package coming soon to break this down turn. My 3 digit point total causes me concern that I have spent to much time here and submit myself for a neg bang party!

J. Lichty

December 28th, 2009 at 5:49 PM ^

I have no problem with the appropriate use of the "snake oil" term, however it must be used narrowly and correctly. It only applies to someone who is publicly committed elsewhere, and not to undecided recruits regardless of how close to signing day they remain publicly undecided. Torrian Wilson has decommitted from the Fighting Harbaughs - not snake oiled. Thus the title of the thread is not really apt to the scope of the discussion. It is really talking about how the class will close.

trueblue1997

December 28th, 2009 at 6:33 PM ^

sorry but i just joined. if someone could tell me how emo came to be "blueadams" it would be greatly appreciated.

MGoVa

December 28th, 2009 at 9:29 PM ^

Emo refers to the name of a dude who posted like nuts during the season, and as some posters suggest, had meltdowns whenever people questioned his thinking, but that didn't stop him from posting forum topics daily. As a matter of fact, he's probably gonna neg me for this post.

UMMAN83

December 28th, 2009 at 6:35 PM ^

we went in the ditch. Are you all UM posters or want-to-bes? The fact we went in the ditch assumes the latter. Do you know what that means bucky?

aaamichfan

December 28th, 2009 at 9:36 PM ^

I think it would be a better idea to just settle with what we currently have rather than offer a couple of extreme "reach" players. Save a scholarship for next year, and hopefully we will have a good enough season where the top defensive talent begins to look at Michigan.