Snake Oil Roundup
according to rivals (http://michigan.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1032721) we are going to be able to take 29 in this class. right now we have 28 commitments (3 silent commitments - grimes, murphy, parker). that leaves us with 1 scholarship to give, but there are still 4 positions we are hitting hard. SOMETHING is up!?
#1) NT. It sounds like Johnathon Hankins might be leaning towards ohio state. It sounds like Jatushan Beachum might be leaning towards arkansas. That sucks, but I wouldn't count us out on either at this point. It sounds like Mike Thornton and Todd Chandler are both sort of wild-cards at this point, but who knows there, SNAKE OIL. If none of these options work out, then it sounds like we might take Roney Lozano of Florida.
#2) OL. It sounds like we're still in the game for Torrian Wilson and a mystery recruit - probably either James Hurst or Andrew Donnal. So, clearly, we want to add a second olineman in this class. The way we are going after nose-tackles AND olinemen leads me to believe that our coaching staff thinks at least one commitment won't qualify (drake!?).
#3) DE. It sounds like Jibreel Black is going to come in for a visit. I've still got a sneaking suspicion that we can get Derrick Bryant (the ucla commitment from ohio). Then there's that David Mackall kid we're still going after. I wonder if signing one of these guys means not signing Murphy, Kinard or Paskorz!? I mean, we have 4 DE/Q players signed already. Doesn't make sense to sign 5 with so many other guys on the table.
#4) ILB. Rich Rod has offered two inside backers offers in the last month - Quayshawn Nealy and Darrin Kitchens. Both are sort of wild-cards at this point in the game. But again, who knows, SNAKE OIL. If these options don't work out, and we have room to add an inside backer, I'd expect to see us go with Steve Mehrer from ohio. If two commitments don't qualify...or we get some unexpected de-commits, I think that we are reserving our last spot for one of these inside backers. It's pretty clear that we want one...but it's also pretty clear that we're not pushing THAT hard for any of them.
December 28th, 2009 at 3:58 PM ^
That's the first I have heard of that. And for the love of God how many threads do we have to keep starting with more or less the same info.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:02 PM ^
"first I have heard of that"
"the same info"
...let's try thinking before we speak.
:)
December 28th, 2009 at 4:23 PM ^
I think you meant to say, "let's try thinking before we type."
December 28th, 2009 at 5:14 PM ^
So you are suggesting that you are the first one to break the news that Parker is a silent commit?
December 28th, 2009 at 6:05 PM ^
He obviously is pointing out that there have been about 2 of these threads per day (not an exact number). I think you did a good job at breaking it down and I'm perfectly fine with your post, but he has a point. Both of those quotes are obviously not meant to be referring to the same thing. You, sir, are the idiot. No need to be harsh towards a guy for throwing out two things that are true.
December 28th, 2009 at 6:22 PM ^
How many threads must you start per day? If you are not careful you will become the next em0 unless that is who you are? I have no problem with this post, though the same question has been asked multiple times, just the frequency.
December 28th, 2009 at 6:33 PM ^
Pretty obvious it's Emo. Check out almost the same thread from 10 days ago...
http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/how-does-everyone-predict-class-will-end
December 28th, 2009 at 6:36 PM ^
crossed my mind a while back but I was hoping I was wrong. What a shame...
December 28th, 2009 at 9:46 PM ^
And had you posted information about anything factual it may have made sense but Parker is NOT a silent commit nor is he "in the bag" as a commitment at all. We may have a good chance but the race isn't over. The rest of your post was a summary of every other recruiting thread on the board.....gee thanks for the informative information.
December 28th, 2009 at 3:58 PM ^
out of the three guys we already have that are DE's/Q. hurst would be a huge get. the scouts think he could be another jake long. for some reason, i think that taylor, the MLB from georgia, could be another wild card here. and you're right about bryant, even though i haven't heard much since his commitment. we were looking good in the early stages. also, i didn't know parker was a silent commitment.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:01 PM ^
Parker isn't.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:03 PM ^
i guess you know more than the rivals mods then.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:18 PM ^
Why is he getting negged for offering justification to his reasoning? Assuming the mods did say this, I would say it's one of the better corroborations.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:23 PM ^
and that article doesn't say it. They are feeling confident but they have go nowhere near saying he's a silent commit.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:31 PM ^
they actually said it in the chat last night...genius.
December 28th, 2009 at 6:29 PM ^
to act like a real dick. Understand that not everything you say or hear is FACT. Believe in what you say but don't act like there is no possible way you could be slightly misinformed.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:34 PM ^
they neg everything i say bc a) they're idiots, b) they have nothing better to do, and c) someone having a 'breakdown' on this board is usually the highlight of their pathetic month.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:09 PM ^
I didn't neg you, but I think it has more to do with the way you say(type) your point than it does what your saying(typing).
December 28th, 2009 at 6:08 PM ^
Neither did I, but yeah I agree with what you gave as everybody's reasoning to neg. There should not be negging on all of his posts, though. Most of them are perfectly fine, IMHE.
December 28th, 2009 at 6:24 PM ^
Emo has very little political capital around here considering his previous meltdowns. People have been more than patient allowing Emo to work himself back into good graces even when it was obvious it was him.
December 29th, 2009 at 9:38 AM ^
What's wrong with his saying?
December 28th, 2009 at 4:05 PM ^
If you type SNAKE OIL in caps does it make it more "snakey"?
December 28th, 2009 at 4:10 PM ^
all CAPS ENHANCE meassage no SUGARCOAT!
December 28th, 2009 at 4:16 PM ^
If you type it in all caps it makes it more potent... and possibly more snakey! Hopefully more effective too.
December 28th, 2009 at 10:00 PM ^
...more slithery. I think that may capture the feeling better.
True "snake oiling" is really nasty business, the kind we need more of :)
December 28th, 2009 at 4:17 PM ^
annoys me.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:39 PM ^
BlueAdams Mission Statement:
December 28th, 2009 at 8:39 PM ^
Cool hwip
December 28th, 2009 at 4:12 PM ^
We should tell the people who write this blog they're not needed for their weekly Recruiting Roundup (although I've sworn I've read everything from the OP in their RRs, every week, for the past month or so). BlueAdams produces one every day based on his hunches from reading MGo, Rivals and Scout.
And if there's one reason to hate Joe Tiller, it's the god forsaken use of the term Snake Oil.
December 28th, 2009 at 4:18 PM ^
if Tiller never said the snake oil comment, we would never have the picture of RR with the wizard hat and the bottle of snake oil, which makes me chuckle every time I see it. In addition, the thought of Joe Tiller throwing a tantrum about it still make me feel warm and fuzzy. So, you have to take the good with the bad, I guess...
December 28th, 2009 at 4:56 PM ^
I like "snake oil" as a way of describing Rich Rodriguez magic recruiting powers. It leaves me feeling like we always have a chance to get anybody right down until the final moment of signing day. We should probably thank purdue for adding this phrase to our collective vocabulary.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:04 PM ^
I agree that when used in moderation, it is funny and sometimes chuckle worthy.
However, it's on the front board here twice, and it gets used for EVERY RECRUIT Rich Rod secures, whether committed elsewhere or not. Courtney Avery, the Talbotts, Devin Gardner, Cullen Christian, Richard Ash, Sean Parker, everyone else still on the board.
I like judicious and appropriate use of the term. Perhaps there need to be proper parameters for use of the term? Like, perhaps limited to actual Signing Day or near S-Day situations like Q, Je'Ron and Tree that are legitimately recruiting breakthroughs that justify the term?
December 28th, 2009 at 5:50 PM ^
Maybe it wouldn't be as annoying if you didn't spend every waking minute of your day amassing 6134 pts.
December 28th, 2009 at 6:37 PM ^
but wasn't Courtney Avery a verbal to Stanford? Maybe not the best example...
December 28th, 2009 at 7:36 PM ^
But I agree. Snakeoil was funny for about 3 days. Now it's just an annoying populist ploy for points.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:17 PM ^
...the snake oil thing was funny but of course is now wildly overused for every recruit with the remotest possibility of switching, even if that possibility exists solely in the OP's mind.
Also, not to gripe too much but links to things behind paywalls are not particularly useful to the average reader.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:23 PM ^
...within 60 seconds.
December 28th, 2009 at 7:44 PM ^
Tiller's use of snake oil, iirc, was used of Roundtree decommitting from Purdue and then committing almost immed. to Michigan. If correct, this means that to use the term, you really need someone highly rated to decommit and then almost immed. commit to Michigan, pref. within a day or two of signing day. So if a 4 or 5 star who is committed to ND, OSU, USC, UF, etc., decommits on signing day and signs later that day with UM, you have clear snake oil, that really screws someone else over.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:11 PM ^
If this isn't K06em I will be shocked. This post is identical to all his old ones. But the true giveaway is when someone questions his thread he immediately starts with the wise cracks/sarcasm, which in turn gets him negged into oblivion. Keep it up k06 only 181 negbangs till you get to make a new username. AGAIN.
I agree with everyone else about Parker. We are one of three finalists for his services, not sure how you make him out to be a silent commit? Until Tom VH or Brain says otherwise we should all just sit tight and wait to see what happens.
EDIT: In the time it took me to type this you have been negged 13 more times. You are well on your way my friend. Tone it down a little bit brah, dang.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:21 PM ^
go fuck yourself.
December 28th, 2009 at 9:03 PM ^
Let's pump the breaks, buddy
December 28th, 2009 at 10:54 PM ^
This video was actually shot at the University of Western Ontario where I went to graduate school. It seems oddly applicable to Mr. Blue Adams.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:22 PM ^
It definetly is em0, the email he is using for his account is k06em01@*********.
December 28th, 2009 at 9:47 PM ^
Banned?
December 28th, 2009 at 10:42 PM ^
correct
December 28th, 2009 at 11:02 PM ^
to a banhammer? If so, that's pretty funny.
December 28th, 2009 at 11:09 PM ^
I've done it for all his accounts
December 28th, 2009 at 5:25 PM ^
He negged me because I found out his Alias. haha.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:26 PM ^
I am going to guess he has negged every post that isn't his own. Very mature.
December 28th, 2009 at 5:32 PM ^
If a snake gets squashed in the woods, and nobody is there to see or hear it, does it still make an oil?