Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 2 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 3 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1,011 views
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 7 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    26 replies
  • New Jersey DE Aeneas Dicosmo: Prospect we should all want at UM
    35 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    85 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    14 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    72 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    85 replies
  • LaMarr Woodley Opening K-8 School in Saginaw
    41 replies
  • SIAP: Jay Feely prom "controversy"
    36 replies
  • Pep and Partridge Pressers
    10 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    77 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    11 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    128 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    55 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    66 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    19 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Rick Pitino Rumored to be Candidate for Detroit Mercy Job
    26 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    128 replies
  • New Jersey DE Aeneas Dicosmo: Prospect we should all want at UM
    35 replies
  • In-state recruiting rankings update
    85 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    77 replies
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    72 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    14 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    85 replies
  • LaMarr Woodley Opening K-8 School in Saginaw
    41 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    55 replies
  • Pep and Partridge Pressers
    10 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    19 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    66 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    11 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    128 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

SIAP: Pryor Admits that Sarniak gave him money after he enrolled at OSU

41 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
August 16th, 2011 at 5:37 PM
#1
WilliSC48
Joined: 10/20/2009
MGoPoints: 2706
SIAP: Pryor Admits that Sarniak gave him money after he enrolled at OSU

I didn't see anything on the front page about this. I don't think I've seen anything in the media about this even though he apparently admitted to it in May. 

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/6862197/terrelle-pryor-eligible-nfl-supplemental-draft

Pryor had met confidentially in May with the NCAA and provided financial records in response to follow-up requests from those investigators. Pryor had acknowledged that confidant Ted Sarniak had provided him and his mother with cash after he enrolled at Ohio State over and beyond the memorabilia scandal that created the five-game suspension. These violations all took place before Jan. 15, the deadline for underclassmen to declare for the April draft, not after.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 16th, 2011 at 5:49 PM
(Reply to #2) #2
elaydin
elaydin's picture
Joined: 04/17/2010
MGoPoints: 2325
It's a little more

It's a little more complicated.  The NCAA eventually ruled that Sarniak was not a booster at the time of Pryor's recruitment, however, OSU did inform Sarniak that he could no longer provide Pryor with any money.  I think that's all the NCAA really cares about, in terms of FTM or LOIC.  OSU was monitoring the Sarniak situation.  If Pryor still took money from him, that's on Pryor, not OSU.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:01 PM
(Reply to #3) #3
ILwolverine
Joined: 02/24/2011
MGoPoints: 1397
posted from iPhone

Well if they are monitoring him and he still gives money to Pryor doesn't that make it worse. This is a shady figure that they are watching yet he still provides illegal benefits.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:19 PM
(Reply to #5) #4
elaydin
elaydin's picture
Joined: 04/17/2010
MGoPoints: 2325
I think you're taking

I think you're taking "monitoring" a little too literally.

The university can tell the booster to back off.  They can tell the player to stop.  What else do you expect a university to do (change OSU to some other random school in your head)?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:35 PM
(Reply to #7) #5
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 16278
It's pretty obvious.

It's pretty obvious.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:51 PM
(Reply to #7) #6
Magnum P.I.
Magnum P.I.'s picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11281
Uh, suspend/dismiss the

Uh, suspend/dismiss the player they know to be taking money.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:51 PM
(Reply to #7) #7
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
Monitor the player they have suspicions about

Keep track of money coming the Player's way, and if there's any hint of wrong-doing AGAIN, make him come clean and/or dump him.



Remember CRex's story about all the paperwork just to get a car repair done? Don't tell me when you're actually watching a player who got in trouble you can track what's going on in his life. Unless your Mitch Albom Fab Five head in the sand level of denial.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 7:15 PM
(Reply to #7) #8
jblaze
jblaze's picture
Joined: 08/29/2008
MGoPoints: 14171
I expect that the head coach not

email TP's handler and give him the heads up.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:55 PM
(Reply to #3) #9
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
Furthermore

The idea that Sarniak isn't a booster just makes the NCAA even more incoherently laughable.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 10:38 PM
(Reply to #2) #10
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3440
Sarniak violations not covered by first NOA

The NCAA issued the current NOA in March or April (can't remember the exact date), which is before Pryor is supposed to have met with the NCAA and disclosed the Sarniak violations. The NCAA and OSU have been very clear that the letter OSU received from the NCAA a couple of months ago stating that no LOIC/FTM had been found and the recent hearing only cover matters in the current NOA. The NCAA has no doubt been investigating whatever Pryor disclosed to them in May and will, eventually, issue a second NOA covering those violations.

The NCAA is almost certainly still investigating many of the reports of additional violations surrounding Pryor that surfaced late this spring and early this summer, including all of the automobiles Pryor drove during his time as a student at OSU and the Dennis Talbott relationship. Those investigations likely explain the delay in issuing a second NOA covering whatever violations Pryor disclosed to the NCAA in May. But, regardless of whether the NCAA can ever prove any violations related to the automobiles or Dennis Talbott, the fact that Pryor has admitted to additional violations involving Sarniak guarantees that the NCAA eventually will issue a second NOA at some point. The NCAA is not just going to let those violations pass because Pryor is now gone from OSU.

Second NOA = BOOM!!!

[Note: The above assumes that Chris Mortensen's ESPN story is true insofar as it states that Pryor met with the NCAA in May and admitted to additional violations involving Sarniak. This is the first I have heard anything of the sort, but I assume Chris Mortenson and ESPN have a firm basis for what they've reported.]

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:00 PM
#11
samber2009
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 2212
I haven't seen this either

Man this kid will do anything to get into the NFL.  Does this mean he was ineligible form the start?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:10 PM
#12
MichiganPoloShirt
Joined: 08/11/2011
MGoPoints: 500
All that telling and you

All that telling and you still ain't eligible for the draft

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:33 PM
#13
bklein09
bklein09's picture
Joined: 08/24/2009
MGoPoints: 7209
Wait, so technically isn't

Wait, so technically isn't Pryor ineligible as of the first moment he received illegal benefits?

Meaning that nearly all of Pryor's career would need to be vacated, similar to what USC had to do with Bush?

I know vacated wins don't mean much in the grand scheme of things, but it would have to sting buckeye fans to have to pretend like the last 3 seasons never happened. 

Is it possible that the NCAA will require OSU to vacate those wins when the verdict finally comes down?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 8:37 PM
(Reply to #8) #14
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 81381
Worst Case Scenario...

Somebody could slip Pryor a Benefiber smoothie and he could symbolically vacate his football career, along with almost all of his innerds....

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 9:36 PM
(Reply to #8) #15
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 4643
Based on the NCAA's findings

Based on the NCAA's findings they submitted to OSU in July, I suspect that they were already going to force OSU to vacate the 2009 season.

On page 4, about half way down the page there is a bullet point that states that six OSU players who had received impermissible benefits from Rife's tattoo parlor participated in football games in the Fall of 2009.

http://www.osu.edu/news/ncaadocs/pdf/case_summary.pdf

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:38 PM
#16
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
Many unanswered questions

Since you cannot prove a negative--like a faiure to monitor--it seems to me that OSU has the burden of proving that they were adequately monitoring the situation---especially given the fact that Tressel's previous AD told him he did not adequately report NCAA violations.

 

So where is the proof that Smith was adequately monitoring Tressel?  Did Smith talk to TP and Sarniak regularly? 

DId Smith ask Tressel about his communications with Sarniak?   If so, he should have known at an early stage that Tressel was continuing to spend hours phoning and text messaging Sarniak--even after the NCAA indicated that Sarniak's relationship with TP and the university needed to change.  Smith could claim that Tressel lied to him, but where is the proof that Smith even asked? 

Smith kept no written records of the JT evaluations.

Finally, given the frequency of Tressel's comuniations with Sarniak, isn't it also likely also that Tressel knew all too well about the continuing improper relationship between Sarniak and TP?  Why didn't both Tressel and Smith cut off ties with Sarniak?  Why did Sarniak continue to get free tickets from players?  Or were those tickets not really free but paid to players who sought improper benefits?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:40 PM
(Reply to #10) #17
smwilliams
smwilliams's picture
Joined: 08/20/2010
MGoPoints: 6160
This

This is really the important part. It's not so much that Pryor was getting paid, but that the Head Coach was corresponding with the guy who paid him.

How that doesn't deserve further investigation is beyond me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 7:48 PM
(Reply to #12) #18
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
I don't see how they can ignore this either

Although the "investigation" of OSU by the NCAA has so far been terrible--guided only by media revelations-- there is only so much they can push under the rug.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 8:08 PM
(Reply to #10) #19
Idzerd
Idzerd's picture
Joined: 10/01/2009
MGoPoints: 193
Actually, you CAN prove a

Actually, you CAN prove a negative.  The belief that you cannot is a misnomer. 

Right now, you can prove that I am:

-NOT dead

-NOT a female

-NOT carrying a gun

-NOT the moon

All those are "negatives".

The first result from googling "can you prove a negative?"

http://goosetheantithesis.blogspot.com/2006/01/you-cant-prove-negative.html

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 8:19 PM
(Reply to #23) #20
SysMark
SysMark's picture
Joined: 11/15/2008
MGoPoints: 13934
and just how do you intend to

and just how do you intend to prove these things?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 8:33 PM
(Reply to #24) #21
marmot
marmot's picture
Joined: 09/08/2009
MGoPoints: 323
He doesn't have to prove

He doesn't have to prove anything, and that's his point.

The point he was attempting to make was that YOU can prove those things. Of course, there are stipulations, such as being in the physical vicinity of him.. corroborated photographs, etc.

I could have ben all reading comprehension derp derp, but I hate that. No big deal here, but I do like his point.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 19th, 2011 at 12:49 PM
(Reply to #25) #22
Idzerd
Idzerd's picture
Joined: 10/01/2009
MGoPoints: 193
The stipulation of being in

The stipulation of being in my presence, of couse, would go a long way in proving any of those negatives I posted. 

If SysMark were to be in my presence today in order to prove those 4 negatives, I would allow him to prove that

a)  I am NOT dead

and

b)  I am NOT the moon

However, with respect to proving I am NOT a female and that I am NOT carrying a gun -that was yesterday.  Today, I just might be carrying my gun.  So, proving that I am NOT a female will occur only over my dead body.

Nevertheless, it is still logically possible to do.

;)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 8:48 PM
(Reply to #24) #23
Enginerd
Joined: 09/03/2009
MGoPoints: 56
  Why axiomatically of

 

Why axiomatically of course.
 
First off, that's axiomatically wrong, because the best pudding is chocolate.
 
Secondly, the organic structure of tapioca makes it a jiggling bowl of potential death. Tapioca is extracted from the root of the plant Manihot Esculenta. Due to a high concentration of cyanide, it is poisonous in its raw form and lethal if prepared improperly! [takes a drink of water]
 
So if we assume Euclid to be correct in his fifth postulate we can conclude:
 
I am NOT dead
I am NOT a female
I am NOT carrying a gun
I am NOT the moon
 
 
 
 
 
Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 10:11 PM
(Reply to #28) #24
marmot
marmot's picture
Joined: 09/08/2009
MGoPoints: 323
Alright, I laughed.

Alright, I laughed.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 8:39 PM
(Reply to #23) #25
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 81381
Disappointing

I wanted so much to believe the Moon was posting on MGoBlog. Imagine our only natural satellite being a Michigan fan....

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 10:44 PM
(Reply to #27) #26
Yostbound and Down
Yostbound and Down's picture
Joined: 07/27/2011
MGoPoints: -86515
SPACE, BITCHES!!! SPACE!!!

SPACE, BITCHES!!! SPACE!!!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 9:19 PM
(Reply to #23) #27
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
I said a negative--like a failure to monitor

That is, how do you prove that an event , such as the monitoring of athletes, did not happen?  You would, in theory, need to have sampled the behavior of all the personnel at OSU at all the intervals of time between now and some time in the past.

Statistically, I suppose that the lack of a finding of monitoring could, in theory, establish the "lack of monitoring" if your study had sufficient power (ie using a suffiient number of intervals).  But someone at OSU could still claim you neglected to observe the periods of time or the people who did the monitoring.   Also, statistical arguments usually are insufficient in the type of legal reasoning used by the NCAA.

I hope that helps and does not unnecessarily complicate my argument.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:40 PM
#28
BrewCityBlue
BrewCityBlue's picture
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 2126
Isn't there something

with how long the alleged "booster" has known the individual? Something similar to the Ed Martin thing - how Jalen and Chris and some other players were able to get "smaller" amounts of money because he had been a long time acquantaince. (of course, when he gave cwebb and others large amounts of money that flew out the door, but, Jalen admitted to getting small spending cash and no harm was done to him)

Of course, i want all this to go as terribly as possible for Ohio, just playing devil's advocate i guess. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 6:59 PM
#29
vegasjeff
vegasjeff's picture
Joined: 06/13/2010
MGoPoints: 569
Sarniak

He was considered by Pryor -- and maybe by OSU and the NCAA -- to be a longtime benefactor of Pryor's, almost a parental figure. Or a generous "uncle." If he's not an OSU booster and is considered a family friend then he is allowed to give Pryor gifts.

The NCAA knew about the gifts and, to allay any concerns, OSU apparently asked Sarniak not to continue giving Pryor money.

This seems like a non-issue to me. The signature-selling, if it took place -- was way more serious.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 7:09 PM
(Reply to #16) #30
WilliSC48
Joined: 10/20/2009
MGoPoints: 2706
It's a very slippery slope

It's a very slippery slope though. Would Sarniak cared about Pryor at all if Pryor wasn't a highly-recruited player coming out of high school? If it's okay for Sarniak to give money to Pryor, why wouldn't it be okay for some wealthy person to become an "uncle" to some other highly touted recruit?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 10:28 PM
(Reply to #16) #31
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 23708
Doesn't matter

If he's not a booster but is acting as an agent of the program, it's a problem. If it weren't then Ed Martin could've qualified with minor changes of fact. And we all know that'd be horseshit

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 7:11 PM
#32
asquared
asquared's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 981
Am I mixing up my scandals or

Am I mixing up my scandals or was there a rumor that "real" OSU boosters were sending Sarniak "business" for placing Pryor at OSU. If Sarniak was in turn paying Pryor and they say he isn't a booster, I guess he's just a money launderer

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 7:32 PM
#33
Yooper
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 6900
Did the article confirm how much money

was passed to Pryor? If Pryor is the only source of information, multiply by 10.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 7:54 PM
#34
michelin
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 2199
The NCAA is investigating

to see if there was anyone in Ohio or Pennsylvania who DID NOT pay Pryor.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 9:31 PM
#35
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 30564
Cronyism

Mark Emmert is not going to punish his mentor, Gordon Gee, any more severely than he is forced to.  He really needs to be removed from the process for a conflict of interest.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 9:46 PM
#36
lilpenny1316
lilpenny1316's picture
Joined: 11/19/2009
MGoPoints: 28722
Any editors in the house?

Pryor had acknowledged that confidant Ted Sarniak had provided him and his mother with cash after he enrolled at Ohio State over and beyond the memorabilia scandal that created the five-game suspension.

Apparently my Sports Mgmt & Comm degree does not allow me to decipher this long ass sentence.  Does that sentence means that he received cash that amounted to more money than the memorabilia for tats scandal?  Or did they mean he talked about Sarniak and the memorabilia for tats?  Online editing is an epic place in tons of places so I'm often left confused.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 10:26 PM
(Reply to #33) #37
Geaux_Blue
Geaux_Blue's picture
Joined: 01/26/2009
MGoPoints: 23708
Makes sense to me

Sentence says he received benefits over and beyond those in the tattoo/memorabilia spotlight

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
August 16th, 2011 at 10:09 PM
#38
BlueinLansing
BlueinLansing's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 16425
Maybe the NCAA knows

it will be able to nail OSU twice, thus allowing them to impose stiffer penalties.

 

They nailed USC on much weaker evidenc and slowplayed them to bigger penalties.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.