Should Gibbons have been called for a false start on the winning-kick?

Submitted by Bobby Digital on

Turns out I don't care... GO BLUE, bitches!

MGoBoard

Lampuki22

January 4th, 2012 at 12:26 AM ^

He was a back in motion.  In HS I doubled as the kicker and a back and I used to linke up for a FG or Extra Point go in motion and the holder would stand up and pitch me the ball.  At least, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. 

 

 

Joined: 09/16/2009

MGoPoints: 7298

MFanWM

January 4th, 2012 at 12:44 AM ^

All that will be remembered going into next year is a win for Michigan!!!  Now time to start working on getting Garnett and any other road grading beast we can in recruiting and have them eating their Wheaties before next fall in Dallas.  Molk being hurt tonight just didnt leave me feeling all warm and fuzzy thinking about Alabama's D line.

Hopefully Borges' statements on QBs improving in the 2nd yr holds as true, if Robinson can start to really make defenses pay in the passing game, that will loosen up getting 9 men in the box and really open things up for the team.  

Joined: 09/19/2010

MGoPoints: 5216

snarling wolverine

January 4th, 2012 at 1:01 AM ^

All year we heard about how Gibbons was supposed to be iffy, but what did he finish, like 14-18 on the season?  The guy was actually very good.  Don't forget his clutch make at the end of the Ohio game, too.

Joined: 12/14/2011

MGoPoints: 98328

alwaystrueblue

January 4th, 2012 at 2:23 AM ^

that his movement towards the line could have/should have been called.

That being said....that was a very poorly officiated game.

 

And Beamer's decision to go for it was turrible too.

 

Also....is VT really that good on defense?  Borges...Hoke...Denard looked totally lost.

Joined: 08/09/2010

MGoPoints: 80