Semi OT: AP Reports that Schools Lower Admission Standards for Athletes

Submitted by Seth9 on
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4781264 While this is perhaps the least surprising thing I've ever read, I did find the distinction between regular and special admissions to be interesting. Also, I found the idea that Steve Spurrier singlehandedly managed to reduce South Carolina's admissions requirements to be amusing.

icefins26

December 30th, 2009 at 12:23 PM ^

Spurrier is an idiot. I remind my wife and her family (USC grads) about it every single time I see them. The thing is, they agree. Most people in Columbia praise Spurrier.

Hemlock Philosopher

December 30th, 2009 at 12:37 PM ^

I wonder if similar academic standards breaks are offered to art and music students (my guess is "yes"). My feeling on this is that student athletes offer a special talent beyond academic prowess and they should be afforded breaks that allow them to develop this talent. Gifted athletes, musicians and artists add tremendous value to the university - think of our experiences at Rackham and the Big House. Howeverm, I also feel that they should be forced to make academic progress in areas where they are weak (hell, I had to take German at Michigan and I hated that, but I understood the LS&A language requirement) because that's a strength in a university education.

Simi Maquoketa

December 30th, 2009 at 1:13 PM ^

Artists and musicians are usually smart people. I have three kids who are both, and also my anecdotal evidence from dealing with their friends and the kids and families they take music, dance, and art lessons with is that these kids also usually seem to have one other thing: the money to get into college. Families that can support artistic endeavors by their children usually aren't hurting. Music and arts support intellectual development as well. Music is a "language" kids learn to speak as they progress through their, er, music. If they are the types of kids who do well with their, er, music (and arts)--well, generally they pretty smart in other areas and work harder in those other areas as well. Also, never discount the socio-economic factors of many athletes. If you doubt the impact of their environment on many of them, take a look at some Jonathan Kozol books. I support the standards for athletes. Are they too low? How about a gradual raising over time--but do they have the support network and will their schools improve along with expectations of performance? Interesting topic, as always. I always take a sideways view of these types of things. My viewpoint is that if so many people really care--we'd see more Harvard, Yale and Princeton games on ABC and ESPN every Saturday.

WolvinLA2

December 30th, 2009 at 1:39 PM ^

Not sure where this comes from. Being a fantastic musician or artist, IMO, makes you smart, but it doesn't mean you are able to solve for x, write term papers or perform well on standardized tests, the bulk of what a college looks at during admissions. Very few people have intellegence in all disciplines, for example the kid who can breeze through a calc class usually won't breeze through an English class, and vice versa. UM has a very good School of Music, you need to be a top talent to get accepted. HOWEVA, if you are one of the best Musical Theater performers in the country (and M's school for this is top notch) you do not need the same grades as a kid applying to LSA. You need to have good grades, but no Musical Theater program at a top University would be able to stay tops in the country if the Musical Theater applicants were held to the same standards as a common LSA or Engin applicant.