SEC Drops its Ban on Satellite Camps - Let the Games Begin!

Submitted by EastCoast Esq. on

So the SEC has seen the writing on the wall and has voted to get rid of its 50-mile rule. In other words, it's open season on nation-wide recruiting:

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2015/05/sec_eliminates_its_ban_of_sate.html

I ventured over to Roll Bama Roll to see what they are saying about the satellite camp debate, and here's what I found:

http://www.rollbamaroll.com/2015/5/28/8677067/coming-soon-university-of-alabama-chesapeake-bay

They basically think that the B1G is going to come to regret the decision to push the issue because the SEC recruiting juggernaut will pilfer the Midwest.

In response I say....are you nuts? The best recruits in the country right now are coming from the West Coast and the Southeast. If you think we are afraid to trade facetime with Rust Belt recruits for Bible Belt recruits, you are greatly mistaken.

If they do take top recruits from the Midwest, great for them. However, to say that we have locked down the Midwest (which the author says) misses a very crucial fact...the most fertile recruiting grounds are in THEIR backyard.

 

As Michael Buffer used to say: Let's Get Ready to Rumble!

EDIT: A poster below noted that the policy change IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL 2016, and will only occur IF the NCAA does not ban the practice before then. Given that the SEC doesn't have the votes to ban the practice, though, this just means that the SEC will wait until 2016 to hold camps.

615Wolverine

May 28th, 2015 at 1:12 PM ^

This is hilarious lol
The sec contradict themselves so much.
Let the games begin, you are more then welcome to camp in Saginaw, Michigan, just don't forget to bring your heavy duty the north face coat with you, you scumbags.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

trueblueintexas

May 28th, 2015 at 1:17 PM ^

Does this mean the NCAA will rescind their recent rule change about being able to attend satellite camps but the college can not promote them using digital media? (which, BTW, in true NCAA form is stupid). 

LSAClassOf2000

May 28th, 2015 at 1:20 PM ^

But, by relaxing the restrictions and allowing its members to exploit the same loophole that Big Ten members so gleefully do, the SEC has signaled that it is more than willing to level the playing field for its guys.

I have this image of Mike Slive shaking his fist in a generally northerly direction and shouting, "YOU WILL RUE THE DAY YOU MADE MY PEOPLE AWFULLY JEALOUS!"

Like someone said above though, I think what happens more often than not at this point is that the SEC - still having every reason to focus a lot of personnel on its own talent-rich region - start invading the traditional recruiting grounds of their own conference opponents first. I tend to believe they are far more afraid of each other than of us or Ohio State or anyone else.

Brady Elliott

May 28th, 2015 at 1:37 PM ^

I have to believe that even if the top tire of sec schools don't come north, that the second tier schools will. I bet that Missouri, TN, and Kentucky would love to get some Ohio/Midwest talent. Kentucky already recruits Ohio hard. Let's say there are four recruits a year from Ohio goes to an sec school that would have gone to OSU otherwise, that could cause OSU to lose out on some blue chip Ohio talent as they battle it out. Of course the big 10 has more to gain in all of this but I would wager that of the big 10 schools that would be hurt the most by this, it would be OSU and msu (who recruits Ohio pretty hard).

Hoke-ish

May 28th, 2015 at 1:24 PM ^

Interesting to see what Saban's reaction will be, as he was quite outspoken against satellite camps and seemed to have ethical complaints more than thinking it would negatively impact recruiting. Will he stand behind his initial position? I think not...

Zok

May 28th, 2015 at 1:28 PM ^

ESPN saying SEC will drop camps in 2016 IF an outright ban nationally is not approved by NCAA before then.

They will still try and ban camps for now so Harbaugh is not out of the woods yet. I think by admitting this it hurts there chances on getting a national rule banning the practice in place though.

 

 

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12964883/sec-allow-satellite-camps-other-conferences-continue-to

MaximusBlue

May 28th, 2015 at 1:39 PM ^

Rather funny that they claim they stand firm in their position and yet do the exact opposite of what they say. If they truly believed they were bad for college football they wouldn't do them. Oh well. Game on.

Ronnie Kaye

May 28th, 2015 at 1:49 PM ^

People are really bored in the offseason, aren't they? Still can't believe how many find this story captivating. We don't even know if it will produce a single commitment yet.

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

May 28th, 2015 at 1:49 PM ^

coaches to immediately embrace the change. They double or triple their D1 contacts by meeting the traveling coaches so they can call those coaches about a kid the SEC might not pursue. The HS coaches might also be invited to help or attend new camps, like ExposureU.

alum96

May 28th, 2015 at 2:05 PM ^

I thought this would happen eventually (if not the camps being banned by the NCAA first) and leads me to believe there is a short window of opportunity either way.   If most major programs begin to offer these it really is going to lead to massive saturation - wherever they are.  There are already a # of "non affiliated" camps outside of satellites and most kids are not going to go to a camp for Alabama, UM, LSU, Florida, Georgia, PSU, etc etc.  There becomes a fatigue factor with it all, especially for the high end kid who is already doing any number of 7 v 7 camps / circuits or whatever.  

This will probably be a positive for the diamond in the rough guys who might have gone to the Sun Belt or MAC otherwise and maybe get discovered by a P5 type team but for the high performers I see them choosing 2-3 camps and be done with it.    Since this is not an invite only type of camp I also wonder what the high end kids really will get out of it other than a meet and greet.  Going out and doing drills vs a guy who might be DIII or headed to Akron is not really going to improve one technically - so after they see that a few times and word gets out over the cycle of camps I think most will use these camps simply to visit with people they might already be interested in, especially if there are say 15 schools offering camps in the future.

Anyhow it is fascinating to see Harbaugh blow the lid off this thing in a short time however.  It also in a perverse way could hurt Ohio at the margin as that is the 1 Midwest state I'd bother with if I was a SEC schoool. 

LDNfan

May 28th, 2015 at 5:00 PM ^

Now that the inevitable has happened..here's the thing, which SEC (or other Coaching staff) is going to have the cajones and do anything remotely close to 9 stops in 9 days....

Its one thing to show up at ONE school (ala Meyer) its a completely different deal to do a multi-stop, cross-country road tour.

ppudge

May 28th, 2015 at 2:12 PM ^

Harbaugh wants to work. Every day. And some of those SEC guys don't. Hell Richt said he wants his coaches to be able to actually spend time with their families (the nerve).

So it's a matter of, who wants to work more. Some may not - they're content to sit back and let their bag men do the work. We have Harbaugh and no one will outwork him. Because, let's face it, working these camps does take a lot of time and energy.

HimJarbaugh

May 28th, 2015 at 2:24 PM ^

I don't think this matters much with midwest kids. The risk is the other states UM has been drawing talent from like NJ, Virginia, and MD. If anything, I think this hurts Maryland, Rutgers, Syracuse, UVA, and UNC more than anybody.

WeaponXXX

May 28th, 2015 at 2:45 PM ^

He's so fired up to spend more time recruiting that he got Nick Saban to start talking about work-life balance and the entire SEC to start whining about competitive balance. What's next? Partner up with the engineering school in order to invent a new form of communication that he can use to contact recruits as often as he likes before the NCAA can regulate it? They can name it HarChat.

Avon Barksdale

May 28th, 2015 at 2:54 PM ^

The SEC was already getting some of the Midwest's best simply because they were winning. Winning cures all things. U-M will get whoever they want when they start to put championships on the board again.

Harbaugh is working on a national reputation again, but it has been badly damaged since 2007. Put up 9 wins in 2015, 10 wins in 2016, and 11+ in 2017 and beyond and suddenly the recruiting juggernaut of 110,000 on every Saturday, #1 public university, and perennial Big Ten Champions returns.

WestQuad

May 28th, 2015 at 3:45 PM ^

Everyone always says that the SEC has more talent than the B1G.  I believe it may be true, but how is that possible with Michigan, Ohio, Penn, (New Jersey), etc. having such large populations in comparrison?   Is it that the population up North is all old people?   Is it that kids down South aren't cooped up all winter (spring ball?)  Seems like if we had more kids regression to the mean would take over and we would have more/better talent (on average.)

The Mad Hatter

May 28th, 2015 at 3:58 PM ^

play football up here than down south.  When you grow up in asscrack Alabama there isn't much else to do.  Also, more educated parents are more likely to be concerned about CTE and other injuries, thus preventing their kids from playing.

seabass1974

May 28th, 2015 at 4:19 PM ^

I can't post a thread yet so I'll post it here. Has anyone heard of the talk of increasing scholarships in football due to the addition of the playoffs? I thought I heard some rumblings about bumping it to 90 or 95.

GoBluePhil

May 28th, 2015 at 6:15 PM ^

Themselves. Allowing satellite camps will now avoid the topic of oversigning. They can continue doing just what they have been doing. But they will have to work harder now that camps will be going on all over the country.

Hill Street Blue

May 28th, 2015 at 7:28 PM ^

the B1G and PAC pilfering of SEC-land recruits will be a path to the end of SEC over-signing, since there will no longer be such a surplus of southern recruits.  HARBAUGH!

UMgradMSUdad

May 29th, 2015 at 9:45 AM ^

I see this as more of a bluff than anything else in hopes it scares enough other schools to vote for a ban on these camps.  I can see a majority of the Big 12 and PAC 12 joining the SEC in the ban to keep schools like Alabama and LSU from setting up camps in Texas and California.