Schools dropping/suing Adidas
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:25 AM ^
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:39 AM ^
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:59 AM ^
I wore Nike cleats for both track and football and they suited me just fine... Sure some preferred Asics, New Balance, Saucony, Adidas, etc... but I never had a single complaint about the Nike product... I also find that the quality of Nike's compression gear is far superior to Under Armour or Adidas. Just my 2 cents.
January 3rd, 2013 at 11:24 AM ^
January 3rd, 2013 at 11:26 AM ^
January 3rd, 2013 at 12:04 PM ^
I find that the compression gear is good for sweat and cooling down... cotton feels better, but once the sweat comes the compression gear is much better... I was hesitant to use it at first, but when I got used to it, I never looked back.
January 3rd, 2013 at 12:09 PM ^
Reebok, CCM, Taylor Made Golf, Ashworth, and Adams Golf are also owned by adidas!
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:45 AM ^
They have held up admirably well. I wonder if the quality has gone down in more recent production years.
January 3rd, 2013 at 11:55 AM ^
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:21 PM ^
That's not on Adidas, thats on our equipment guys. Adidas makes cleats of different lengths/traction levels. If our equipment guys chose not to use them then thats their fault, not Adidas.
January 3rd, 2013 at 12:47 PM ^
What would you say to Under Armour?
A buddy of mine works for them and says they'll be making a big-time push for the next contract
January 3rd, 2013 at 12:49 PM ^
I'd take Under Armour over Nike. Just the UA logo will make the stuff popular with kids and their stuff really is made well...but no UniformZ
January 3rd, 2013 at 1:00 PM ^
I just want the parade of alternate jerseys to end where it is. Walking around the concourse of Raymond James before the Outback Bowl I counted Michigan fans wearing 6 different jerseys. So much for brand consistency.
January 3rd, 2013 at 1:09 PM ^
Just so we are clear, Dave Brandon does not choose which jerseys we wear. Per the AD announcement back in August (too lazy to go find the link), there can be three jerseys/year:
1) Special in-season jersey for one game 2) Regular jerseys for the rest of the games 3) Bowl game jersey, if the coaches choose
The key here is the coaches choose whether or not to do it, not Dave Brandon. The AD believes that the coaches are best in tune with our players and recruits and thus will decide what jerseys, when, etc. So instead of focusing all of your anger at DB, direct it at the coaches or Adidas or Mary Sue Coleman. The AD decided we can have 3 jerseys/year, the coaches decide which of those to wear. They dont have to choose any.
That being said I hate the jerseys we just wore, I am not a fan of Adidas and I would like for all this nonsense to stop. I believe that the ultimate authority on this subject is DB, but the actual choices are made by the coaches.
January 3rd, 2013 at 1:13 PM ^
Side note, there cleats are way better then Nikes cleats w ever be. Adidas makes some of the most if not the best durable athletic gear out there. Nikes shoes suck, there only meant to stay durable for a short period (but try and get the wow factor) so u w go out and buy more. There apparel always fades or rips easily. I say stay w Adidas but knock off the uniform changing!!!
January 3rd, 2013 at 3:07 PM ^
Is anybody else bothered that a situation which involves thousands of workers being screwed by a company turned into a discussion about uniform quality and choice? These are people who are possibly having their lives destroyed and we are talking about how we can avoid wearing two different kinds of uniforms, sometimes sports discussions should take a back seat.
January 3rd, 2013 at 3:15 PM ^
No. This is Michigan Football