jrt336

May 5th, 2010 at 5:39 PM ^

Sweet. Hopefully he plays as well against first team defenses, because, let's face it, our 2nd team D will be like playing Mass/BG.

PhillipFulmersPants

May 5th, 2010 at 5:51 PM ^

context of Denard going up against the 2s and Tate facing starters for the most part is missing in that adulation.  Still, I saw enough of Denard to want the ball in his hands a lot in the next three years. Top end speed is great, but the burst of quickness past the first level on several plays in the spring scrimmage really impressed me. I don't think there are many teams that will be able to shut that down consistently.

blueblueblue

May 5th, 2010 at 5:53 PM ^

From Rittenberg:

Best quote II: "My name's Tucker, not sucker, so we're not going to have him get hit this spring." -- Iowa head coach Kirk Ferentz, on holding running back Jewel Hampton out of contact.

If by "Best quote" he means corniest quote, then I agree. Quite cringeworthy for Iowa fans. 

Beavis

May 5th, 2010 at 8:12 PM ^

Yes... Shocker ahead; SPOILER ALERT:

2010 Offense will be better than last year's Offense (which was pretty good); 2010 Defense will be....... who knows?  Defense to determine type of bowl game for Michigan.

Chadillac Grillz

May 6th, 2010 at 2:21 AM ^

Woolfolk is better than Donovan Warren...as J.T. Floyd is better than Cissoko...Graham was our best defender, but we won't have too many problems up front. I'm serious BTW about Woolfolk being better than Warren based on watching them play last year. Warren gave up alot of big plays and didn't play as physical. Whether or not Warren has more physical tools idk but Woolfolk outplayed him. Also, 4.65 40 for Warren vs. 7.00 60 meter for Woolfolk. In case you were wondering why I said that.

exmtroj

May 5th, 2010 at 8:10 PM ^

This is kind of random, but remember Shavodrick Beaver?  Whatever happened to that guy once he went to Tulsa?  It feels like forever since we were all getting excited about him...

Chadillac Grillz

May 6th, 2010 at 2:29 AM ^

I believe QB play and turnover margin will determine whether or not this team goes forward in 2010. The defense may improve but won't be very good. The main thing with the defense is avoiding giving up cheap plays like a QB draw on 3rd and 15 by a guy who isn't that fast. So yeah...1) QB play...score more points and 2) don't turn it over. If Michigan does these two things they'll win at least 7 games.  They'll need a very good defense to win more than 8 games and they'll probably not have near that. I expect a defense that has better faundamentals but QB play and offense to be more consistent.